port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Bernt Hansson
Hello list I want to build packages from ports on AMD64 for use on i386 since the i386 system is; pid 21629 (cc1plus), uid 0, was killed: out of swap space When building firefox. Added some swap as a file so it's building as I type. Thinking that the AMD system I can access is a wee more

Re: port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Edward M.
On 03/05/2012 12:42 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package. Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to? http://filipenf.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/cross-compiling-for-x86-in-freebsd-64-bit/ ___

Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?

2012-03-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them a private company. No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems.

on purpose or forgotten ? hardcoded compiler in basesystem-makefiles

2012-03-05 Thread Dr. A. Haakh
a quick search revealed following usages: FreeBSD abaton.Haakh.de 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 29 13:49:36 CET 2012 t...@abaton.haakh.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ABATON i386 ah@abaton:~$ find /usr/src/ -name Makefile\* -exec egrep '^[[:blank:]]+[gc+]{2,3}[[:blank:]]+..' {} \;

Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?

2012-03-05 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 + Matthew Seaman articulated: No, the company behind PC-BSD is called iXsystems. They do an awful lot in the FreeBSD sphere, and PC-BSD is one of their products. While PC-BSD is a community driven project, iXsystems employs the project founder and lead

Re: on purpose or forgotten ? hardcoded compiler in basesystem-makefiles

2012-03-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 05/03/2012 10:12, Dr. A. Haakh wrote: a quick search revealed following usages: Some of the instances you've found are legitimate, some are in upstream code in contributed software -- the FreeBSD build process may not even use the Makefiles concerned. But, yes on the whole, I think you're on

Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?

2012-03-05 Thread Da Rock
On 03/05/12 19:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them a private company. No, the

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread David Naylor
On 5 March 2012 13:41, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang

nsswitch and unavailable backends

2012-03-05 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. I'm trying to set up LDAP user authentication. I use bet/nss_ldap and security/pam_ldap ports to do this. I'm doing this following the article from the documentation set. Though it's not that complete and misses some very important stuff, I've actually set up the LDAP installations and my

Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?

2012-03-05 Thread Jerry
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 09:52:15 + Matthew Seaman articulated: On 04/03/2012 22:56, Da Rock wrote: That's also an obligation to test it. PC-BSD is a product, by a private company. The burden of proof is on them. PC-BSD is an organisation or group; I wouldn't go as far as calling them

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On 5 March 2012 13:41, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 2:16 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc6 have been

Re: PC-BSD on top of FreeBSD - does it matter ?

2012-03-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 05/03/2012 12:10, Jerry wrote: Matthew, is this the URL for iXsystems http://www.ixsystems.com/ that you are referring to? Yep. That's the company. I was examining their company page: http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/about/our-company and they seem quite impressive. Also, the support page

semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Robert Huff
With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff ___

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Dimitri Yioulos
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Julien Cigar
jcigar@dev ~ % ipcalc 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 deaggregate 10.0.0.32 - 10.0.0.63 10.0.0.32/27 (net-mgmt/ipcalc) On 03/05/2012 15:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by:

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Dimitri Yioulos
On Monday 05 March 2012 9:30:01 am Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Paul Macdonald
On 05/03/2012 14:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff i cheated a bit but looks good

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Chris Knipe
Yes. cknipe@amnesiac ~ $ ipcalc 10.0.0.32/27 Address: 10.0.0.321010...001 0 Netmask: 255.255.255.224 = 27 ...111 0 Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 ...000 1 = Network: 10.0.0.32/27

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Duane Hill
On Monday, March 05, 2012 at 14:30:01 UTC, roberth...@rcn.com confabulated: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? I use the online IP calculator all the

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Tim Kellers
On 03/05/12 09:30, Robert Huff wrote: With my brain still on EBADSLEEP, I cannot decide if: 10.0.0.32-10.0.0.63 is correctly described by: 10.0.0.32/27 Anyone? Please? Robert Huff

Re: port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Bernt Hansson
2012-03-05 10:20, Edward M. skrev: On 03/05/2012 12:42 AM, Bernt Hansson wrote: Build the port on amd64 and install it on i386 as a package. Is it possible? Pointers? Handholding? How-to? http://filipenf.wordpress.com/2011/10/18/cross-compiling-for-x86-in-freebsd-64-bit/ Thank you for

Re: port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 05/03/2012 16:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of; cd /usr/ports/random port make it for i386 even if we are building it on amd64, ooh by the way

Re: port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Polytropon
On Mon, 05 Mar 2012 17:42:58 +0100, Bernt Hansson wrote: Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. The problem here is that a specific build environment is required. I was thinking more along the line of; cd

Re: sysinstall

2012-03-05 Thread David Walker
Nikola Pavlović nzp at riseup.net OK, here goes: (in Nelson Muntz's voice) Haha, you clown, that's what you get for believing what documentation says. Use a magnetized needle and a steady hand you buffoon! There. I respect! :) Well played. It's a serious issue for me after 15 years of

Re: port to package amd64 to i386

2012-03-05 Thread Chris Whitehouse
On 05/03/2012 16:53, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 05/03/2012 16:42, Bernt Hansson wrote: Thank you for the pointer. I do find it a bit overkill to setup jails and such, just to build a few ports. I was thinking more along the line of; cd /usr/ports/random port make it for i386 even if we are

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread David Naylor
On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Please include the full error message, also could you please try running those apps in a clean wine prefix. # pwd /root/APPLY/PROGRAMS # wine x.exe

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: Please include the full error message, also could you please try running

Part-time Positions Available

2012-03-05 Thread Ben Rolland Fisheries Co Ltd
INTERNATIONAL COMPANY SEEKS FOR REPRESENTATIVE IN TAIWAN Part-time Positions Available. The job is based on administrative/customer service support. Immediate need for customer service representative seeking fun working environment, opportunity for advancement and hands on training

Re: sysinstall

2012-03-05 Thread Da Rock
On 03/06/12 05:23, David Walker wrote: Nikola Pavlović nzp at riseup.net OK, here goes: (in Nelson Muntz's voice) Haha, you clown, that's what you get for believing what documentation says. Use a magnetized needle and a steady hand you buffoon! There. I respect! :) Well played. It's a

Equine Vaccines offered by Santa Cruz

2012-03-05 Thread Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Are you having trouble viewing this e-mail? [1]Click here to view it from our website. To ensure that you continue receiving emails from us, please add [2]santacruzbiotechnol...@scbt.com to your e-mail address book. [3][USEMAP:email.jpg] Copyright ©

Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision (mic problem SOLVED)

2012-03-05 Thread sean
I just managed to get the mic working built into the camera. I followed the Sound steps below that are included in pkg-message and that did the trick. Hopefully these notes will help others having mic problems with the Logitech camera. NOTE: Just before I followed the below steps I did

Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision (mic problem SOLVED)

2012-03-05 Thread Da Rock
On 03/06/12 11:46, sean wrote: I just managed to get the mic working built into the camera. I followed the Sound steps below that are included in pkg-message and that did the trick. Hopefully these notes will help others having mic problems with the Logitech camera. NOTE: Just before I

Re: [spam] Equine Vaccines offered by Santa Cruz

2012-03-05 Thread Robert Bonomi
Anyone offended by this spam to the mailing-list is strongly encouraged to call the company to complain -- TOLL FREE numbers are: U.S.A. 1-800-457-3801 (headquarters) Europe +00800 4573 8000(Germany) Asia (010) 800.40402026 (Japan) Asia 00798.1.1.002.0297 (S.

Re: semi OT: correct CIDR block?

2012-03-05 Thread Michael Sierchio
ipsc, from packages or ports, is very useful. ipsc -gch 10.0.0.32/27 Network class:A Network mask: 255.0.0.0 Network mask (hex): FF00 Network address: 10.0.0.32 Subnet bits: 19 Max subnets: 524288 Full subnet mask:

Needs GSOC project idea guide.

2012-03-05 Thread Tiwari Punit
Hello, I, Punit Tiwari, pursing final year BE(IT) student. Final year project Game Engine: Project Description: Platform Java Application Framework Javafx 2.0 Database DB2 Game Type 2D RPG Game User Any (knows to use computer) Prsently, this game engine build 2d games

Re: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc6 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD)

2012-03-05 Thread David Naylor
On Tuesday, 6 March 2012 00:01:48 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 3:00 PM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote: On Monday, 5 March 2012 14:17:51 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 6:55 AM, David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.comwrote:

Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ?

2012-03-05 Thread Allen
On 2/28/2012 3:03 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE.