-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias F. Brandstetter
Sent: November 29, 2004 12:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hdd error
-- quoting LiQuiD --
I've installed 5.3 on the same machine
After trying what Chuck suggested, if you're using 5.3 and it still
doesn't work don't sweat it.
I've installed 5.3 on the same machine (an IBM Aptiva k6-2 450) but
using two different hard drives, both times giving me the same error.
In both cases, I was able to install 4.10-STABLE without any
Hi all,
I've noticed a few people mention this company, http://www.soekris.com
in the list now. Their website claims they can be used with a compact
flash card. I'm curious regarding their usage with a flash card as a
hard drive. Has anyone successfully been able to install FreeBSD on one
of
Please forgive me if there was an easy way to find this out and I'm
retarded, but uhm... how can I know if the issue brought forward in the
post last month by the person below applies to the 4.x or 5.x branch?
I have a FreeBSD system that was cvsup'd to -STABLE on jul. 24th and I'd
like to do so
Hi Hugo,
Look to NFS to do that for you. Here's a link to a page in the online
handbook. NFS can do exactly what you want
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-nfs.ht
ml
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm by no means an expert, and thus the reason for my crude and
unscientific solution that I'm proposing
Seeing as you now know what it'll turn into upon adding this RAID card
to your system, why don't you try the crude method of undoing
everything, booting successfully, and then editing
Hi all,
I have a machine running 4.10 stable that has a problem whenever I try
to run portsdb -Uu. The message the scrolls down the screen is as
follows:
/usr/ports/INDEX:11586:Port info line must consist of 10 fields.
That number changes... it basically goes from 0 to that (for all I know)
Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi, Liquid--
On Dec 6, 2003, at 3:06 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to have a static IP - say xx.xx.yy.zz - and a subnet as
follows:
xx.xx.xx.zz/28
Do you mean, I am switching from a single static IP to a 16-address
subnet, or are you
Hi all,
(My mailserver is currently offline and this address is not subscribed,
please cc me in all replies, thanks)
I'm waiting for my new internet connection to be setup here, and in the
meantime I'm starting to configure my network accordingly.
I'm going to have a static IP - say
Hi everyone,
Last night I was helping a guy out trying to install FreeBSD for the
first time. His cable connection is DHCP and I have very little
knowledge of how to set that up since it's been so long since I've had
to do so. The result is I went to /stand/sysinstall and pretended to
setup my
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ian Moore
Sent: October 10, 2003 9:59 AM
To: freebsd-questions
Subject: ADSL modem ip addresses
Hi,
I'm organising an ADSL connection and I'm a bit confused about our
options.
*snipped*
Actually quite a few of the SOHO DSL routers I've seen do include
simple
firewalling but often enough they are only configurable via a browser
and have a kind of all or nothing stance. For fine granular control
over
the firewall it is hard to beat FBSD and IPFilter / IPFW for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ajax Munroe
Sent: September 22, 2003 10:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD,Linux and any other os besides Microsoft.
Hello,
*snipped*
Your Friend;
AJAX
To be completely honest, I don't think it's good practise to use cvsup
to go from freebsd 4-series to freebsd 5.
I use cvsup all the time to stick to the latest -STABLE branch. Others
use the -CURRENT branch. If I were to setup a machine and then decide I
wanted to use the new 5.1 I'd probably
Also, anyone know of a workaround for BIND 8 at this time? If I
were to
simply install bind9 on my system from the ports, does it in fact
simply
overwrite the default installation included with FreeBSD?
No. It installs it under /usr/local.
Ok, Stupid question now. I'm just
It is turned on *IF* you say so during the install. What does or does
not run by default is actually determined by /etc/defaults/rc.conf.
/etc/rc.conf is an override file, if you will.
My guess here is that if you choose not to use the internet super
server during the installation, it alters the
LOL!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barbara Griffin
Sent: August 23, 2003 2:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Approved
You have a virus.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can always install portinstall from the ports. Then cvsup your
ports tree regularly and run ports db -Uu (or something similar, I can't
recall right now - it's in the portinstall man page) and simply type:
Portupgrade kde
And it'll go through the whole thing. Be warned, it can take a LONG
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darryl Hoar
Sent: August 8, 2003 2:38 PM
To: 'Mike Maltese'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ipfilter - port forward question
Well,
it does in fact use udp. Here is what I have
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David S. Jackson
Sent: July 29, 2003 6:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: named.conf et al and home network segments
Hi,
I'm trying to setup dns for my two home network segments,
You aren't running any sort of httpd.
What do you do to start it?
Try apachectl startssl.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daryl Hunt
Sent: July 29, 2003 11:55 PM
To: William Knechtel
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Sorry Alvaro, I forgot to send this to the list... oops.
-Original Message-
From: Liquid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 3, 2002 11:39 AM
To: 'Alvaro Gil'
Subject: RE: Is there any way to disable passive mode on ftpd?
I have a better question perhaps...
Is it possible
Now I don't know if that's a result of using a certain NAT setup vs
another, but I'm using ipnat + ipfilter, and I had ftp forwarded to a
windows box, and it worked fine for ftp, setting ports 10010-1030 for
passive mode. I then decided to play with ncftpd on a linux box a while
back, and it too
That 10.0.whatever crap is from your modem. When I had a box running on
cable, I'd see a horrific amount of that crap in my logs. It never
caused my firewall to stop working mind you. Mine, for instance was
10.0.80.31 - which, it appears, was my modem's IP address although I
do not recall
If you check out /var/db/pkg it lists what ports are installed
essentially. I don't know how to tell whether or not itÂ’s a dependency
though, so maybe someone else can answer that. I'd like to know that
too come to think of it.
-SM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry everyone, forgot to convert to txt before sending this, so I'll
resend
I'm having this huge problem: I have adsl, and I connect using that
PPPoE garbage. I also just changed ISP for a less expensive one, and
I'm beginning to realize why its less expensive. I'm running a machine
with
- which it has failed to do,
given the link is never down according to ifconfig anyway.
Thanks a lot Tim,
Sandro
-Original Message-
From: Timothy L. Robertson [mailto:timothyr;timothyr.com]
Sent: November 14, 2002 1:55 PM
To: Liquid; FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Your experiences
Hey everyone. A family member asked me to setup a gateway in his house
so that the internet can be shared between a couple of tenants. I
realize it can be very easily done using a router, but I have this
486dx2 50mhz at home with 8mb ram. It has a 300mb and 640mb hd in it
too. If I only wish
PROTECTED]]
Sent: October 1, 2002 9:53 PM
To: Liquid
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bare minimum requirements for FreeBSD installation
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Liquid wrote:
Hey everyone. A family member asked me to setup a gateway in his
house
so that the internet can be shared between a couple
29 matches
Mail list logo
