ke han wrote:
On Aug 28, 2006, at 4:03 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
32 vs 64 bits does not give you any raw performance boost for most
apps. The
yes it will. FreeBSD/amd64 works at least 10% faster than
FreeBSD/i386 on athlon64 machine, when i386 version were recompiled
for P4. With
I hope that I'm not starting some sort of holy war with this question,
but here I'll go.
I'm planning to set-up some e-mail / file servers running FreeBSD 6.1 in
the near future and I'm wondering if it will be worth the cost to use 64
but CPU's for this.
Also I would like to know which
Graham North wrote:
I just tried to ssh into freebsd server using Putty (pocketputty
actually).
I got a connection (sort of) but my Putty device put up the question
...unknown certificate.do you want to trust it... or words to
that effect. Due to finger problems on the touchscreen I
Martin Miedema wrote:
I'm looking for a way to access (read only is fine) a FreeBSD
partition on my Windows installation on a dual boot notebook (so Samba
won't do the trick)
I read a couple of things after some googling about CrossFS which
basically should be a UFS driver for windows
I'm looking for a way to access (read only is fine) a FreeBSD partition
on my Windows installation on a dual boot notebook (so Samba won't do
the trick)
I read a couple of things after some googling about CrossFS which
basically should be a UFS driver for windows. Unfortunately all these
or startx (which starts
X again normally.
The only way for me to shutdown X without facing the blank screen
appears to be by using CTRL-F1 and pressing CTRL+C
Please let me know if you need any configuration files or logs etc.
Thanks in advance,
Martin Miedema
Jim Stapleton wrote:
On 7/17/06, Martin Miedema [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed FreeBSD 6.1 on my Thinkpad T23 (one of my first times
using FreeBSD) and after wrestling my self through configuring X I'm
having the following problem:
X starts correctly and opens KDE but when I log
