Re: 3dnow, mmx, k6-2 optimizing?

2004-09-17 Thread Puna Tannehill
Interesting. I just tried the settings you suggested, and it seems that -mcpu is depreciated for -mtune. ALWAYS check the documentation first. :-) Here's the details: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.2/gcc/i386-and-x86_002d64-Options.html#i386-and-x86_002d64-Options Puna Puna Tannehill

kern.ipc.maxpipekva exceeded, error

2004-09-14 Thread Puna Tannehill
such an error on a 15min uptime, cold-booted machine and just doing a 'make clean'. And thoughts? Puna ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

3dnow, mmx, k6-2 optimizing?

2004-09-13 Thread Puna Tannehill
or configuring Xorg to use 3dnow or mmx, or even how to check to see if they are automatically detected and used. Any thoughts? Puna ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail

Re: 3dnow, mmx, k6-2 optimizing?

2004-09-13 Thread Puna Tannehill
Erik Trulsson wrote: On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:23:18PM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote: I've been looking for possible flags, optimizations, really anything that would help me setup my laptop to use mmx and 3dnow. I've updated /etc/make.conf to -march to the drum of a k6-2, but I'm not even sure

Re: 3dnow, mmx, k6-2 optimizing?

2004-09-13 Thread Puna Tannehill
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:23:18 -0500, Puna Tannehill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been looking for possible flags, optimizations, really anything that would help me setup my laptop to use mmx and 3dnow. I've updated /etc/make.conf to -march to the drum of a k6-2

Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release #

2004-07-29 Thread Puna Tannehill
the cvs tag= to something else to get up to date? I thought the #number indicated the number of times the server has been rebooted based upon the last time the kernel was recompiled. Being that it is #0, it was your first book. Reboot the machine and check the number again. Puna Thanks for your

Re: Updating 5.2.1 Release #

2004-07-29 Thread Puna Tannehill
Matthew Seaman wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:37:35AM -0500, Puna Tannehill wrote: Scott wrote: uname -a shows: FreeBSD 5.2.1-Release #0: I was expecting the release (version, revision# ?) number to be greater than #0. I think I've seen where the latest revision is #9 or so? Do I need

Re: Why BSD?

2004-01-23 Thread Puna
It's also about quality of the underlying work. On average, Linux base code runs 10% faster under FreeBSD. Linux works toward patches for what everyone wants because it competes for the Windows market share. FreeBSD works toward solutions because it competes with no one. Jonathan T. Sage