On Saturday 17 April 2004 12:38, Stephen Liu wrote:
Where can I find simple and straight forward guide for Assembly for
beginner.
Hi, sorry for the late answer, I couldn't check my mail earlier.
I found the following site to be quite helpful:
On Saturday 17 April 2004 15:30, Dan MacMillan wrote:
From: Daniela
Sent: April 17, 2004 04:50
OO languages can be optimized differently than non-OO languages, and
when you translate one language into another, this advantage gets lost.
I challenge you to defend this claim with a specific
On Saturday 17 April 2004 18:10, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 16 April 2004 20:31, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What? C++ code is converted to C? Which compiler are you using, and
why the hell would a compiler do this?
On Saturday 17 April 2004 12:38, DoubleF wrote:
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:50:29AM +,
Daniela probably wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2004 21:52, Lucas Holt wrote:
Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway?
C++ is useful for programmers that believe in object oriented
From: Daniela
Sent: April 20, 2004 15:25
I don't really have a specific example, but it's quite the same with human
languages. The more often a text is translated, the more useless
information
gets added to it. And if the original text is beautifully written, it is
often total crap when you
On Friday 16 April 2004 21:52, Lucas Holt wrote:
Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway?
C++ is useful for programmers that believe in object oriented
methodologies. Some things are easier to do in C++ as well. It all
depends on the programmer.
You seem to favor assembly
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 10:50:29AM +,
Daniela probably wrote:
On Friday 16 April 2004 21:52, Lucas Holt wrote:
Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway?
C++ is useful for programmers that believe in object oriented
methodologies. Some things are easier to do in C++ as
From: Daniela
Sent: April 17, 2004 04:50
OO languages can be optimized differently than non-OO languages, and
when you translate one language into another, this advantage gets lost.
I challenge you to defend this claim with a specific example.
I would rather say, assembly is fast and can be
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Friday 16 April 2004 20:31, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What? C++ code is converted to C? Which compiler are you using, and
why the hell would a compiler do this?
In the old days, C++ was implemented by a program called
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway?
Why would one need C if it's converted to machine language anyway?
Why would one need machine language if it's converted to micro-ops
anyway?
Do you see my point?
Kai
On Thursday 15 April 2004 11:10, Lucas Holt wrote:
Many universities teach C++ exclusiveley now. Java and C++ share some
common ground on syntax and the fact that they both support Object oriented
programming. Aside from that, there are many differences. C++ is native
code and executes
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:20:36 +
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 15 April 2004 11:10, Lucas Holt wrote:
Many universities teach C++ exclusiveley now. Java and C++ share some
common ground on syntax and the fact that they both support Object oriented
programming. Aside from
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What? C++ code is converted to C? Which compiler are you using, and
why the hell would a compiler do this?
In the old days, C++ was implemented by a program called cfront, I
believe, and it did convert C++ to C.
If you can write a program that converts
On Friday 16 April 2004 19:13, Miles Lubin wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:20:36 +
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 15 April 2004 11:10, Lucas Holt wrote:
Many universities teach C++ exclusiveley now. Java and C++ share some
common ground on syntax and the fact that they
On Friday 16 April 2004 20:31, Kai Grossjohann wrote:
Daniela [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What? C++ code is converted to C? Which compiler are you using, and
why the hell would a compiler do this?
In the old days, C++ was implemented by a program called cfront, I
believe, and it did convert
Why would one need C++ if it's converted to C anyway?
C++ is useful for programmers that believe in object oriented
methodologies. Some things are easier to do in C++ as well. It all
depends on the programmer.
You seem to favor assembly languages. I've found that many people into
assembly
I would suggest C before C++. I took a C class after tring C++ on my own.
I tought C++ was newer and better. Actually I found it was only newer. It
has new features and such, just not better because it was an extension or
expansion to C. I don't use C++ so I am sure there are those that
Thanks,
I will strongly consider your advice.
Tomorrow I'm heading out to barns and noble to pick up
some reading. Any good beginner C books you may
recommend?
It wouldn't be thought a beginner book per se, but you should
have the KR C Programming Language as it is the definitive
Thanks,
I will strongly consider your advice.
Tomorrow I'm heading out to barns and noble to pick up
some reading. Any good beginner C books you may
recommend?
It wouldn't be thought a beginner book per se, but you should
have the KR C Programming Language as it is the
K R is a good book.
For C++, Absolute C++ was my textbook last semester and I found it to be
pretty good. Avoid the Deitel Deitel C++ book. It has a few good
reference chapters but covers material in a very choppy way. Practical C++
programming from O'Reilley is a good book on C++ basics.
Hi,
I've learn shell scripting and java on my freebsd box
since I migrated from winblows 98 a while back. now
i'm ready to move to a more sophisticated language. I
have decided to go with C++. Is there any bigginer
guides online that you may have run a cross that would
help me get started?
Joe
Me wrote:
Hi,
I've learn shell scripting and java on my freebsd box
since I migrated from winblows 98 a while back. now
i'm ready to move to a more sophisticated language. I
have decided to go with C++. Is there any bigginer
guides online that you may have run a cross that would
help me get
Me wrote:
Hi,
I've learn shell scripting and java on my freebsd box
since I migrated from winblows 98 a while back. now
i'm ready to move to a more sophisticated language. I
have decided to go with C++. Is there any bigginer
guides online that you may have run a cross that would
help me get
Me wrote:
Hi,
I've learn shell scripting and java on my freebsd box
since I migrated from winblows 98 a while back. now
i'm ready to move to a more sophisticated language. I
have decided to go with C++. Is there any bigginer
guides online that you may have run a cross that would
help me get
Thanks,
I will strongly consider your advice.
Tomorrow I'm heading out to barns and noble to pick up
some reading. Any good beginner C books you may
recommend?
thanks for your time every one!
Joe
--- jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me wrote:
Hi,
I've learn shell scripting and java on my
: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD
Thanks,
I will strongly consider your advice.
Tomorrow I'm heading out to barns and noble to pick up
some reading. Any good beginner C books you may
recommend?
thanks for your time every one!
Joe
--- jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Me wrote:
Hi,
I've learn shell
26 matches
Mail list logo
