14:53:01.837672 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown), length 46
it seems that bridging just can be done by two interfaces:(
i use ifconfig bridge0 create and ifconfig addm igb1 addm igb2 for
bridging two interfaces. i test by putting the below commands in rc.conf
file
:00.821098 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown), length 46
14:53:01.837654 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.4.157 tell 192.168.4.155,
length 46
14:53:01.837672 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown), length 46
it seems that bridging just can be done
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what is expected. you know i want to have a freebsd
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what
addm gbeth1 up
what is wrong here? it's so necessary for me to doing this:(
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
:
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what
if_bridge(4) says:
The if_bridge driver currently supports only Ethernet and Ethernet-like
(e.g., 802.11) network devices, with exactly the same interface MTU size
as the bridge device.
Am I correct to assume then that I can bridge a gigabit interface and
a fast ethernet interface and that one
I'm trying to use Dummynet+IPFW and bridging to make a packet shaper
that runs across multiple VLANs. So my intended set up is:
[users]-[Aggregate Switch]=[FreeBSD]=[Upstream Switch (with IP
interfaces for each vlan)]-The World
where - is a single VLAN, and = is a tagged dot1q trunk. The aim
Howard Jones wrote:
I'm trying to use Dummynet+IPFW and bridging to make a packet shaper
that runs across multiple VLANs. So my intended set up is:
[users]-[Aggregate Switch]=[FreeBSD]=[Upstream Switch (with IP
interfaces for each vlan)]-The World
where - is a single VLAN
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure but as per some internet guide, I have configured the bridge on
Freebsd(7) Machine with two LAN cards on it
I have compiled my KERNEL with (device if_bridge)
and then added code to rc.conf
cloned_interfaces=bridge0
Hi,
I connected two linux PCs with these two interfaces (sk0 and sk1)
and tried to ping between them but didnt get any
success.configuration seems to be ok, but still no traffice is being
passed. Can any one give any sugestion ?
Stupid question, but if you connect the 2 Linux boxes directly
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:28:10 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
To: faiz...@hotmail.com
CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
fb...@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Hi,
I connected two linux
Hi,
Are you using properly crossed cables?
Isnt it enough check for the that two linux can ping each other..
Yes and no. You must used crossed Ethernet cable between your FreeBSD
bridge and each of your Linux boxes.
As someone suggested, what is ifconfig saying on the FreeBSD box? You
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
To: faiz...@hotmail.com
CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
fb...@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Hi,
Are you using
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
To: faiz...@hotmail.com
CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
fb...@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Hi
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
From
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:28:01 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
From: amvandem...@gmail.com
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
i noted that, following information is missing
member: sk0 flags=143LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP
ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 200
member: sk1 flags=143LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP
ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost
Hi,
I am not sure but as per some internet guide, I have configured the bridge on
Freebsd(7) Machine with two LAN cards on it
I have compiled my KERNEL with (device if_bridge)
and then added code to rc.conf
cloned_interfaces=bridge0
ifconfig_bridge0=addm sk0 addm sk1 up
Michael Neumann wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to run Qemu on FreeBSD 7.0 and be able to connect from the Qemu
instance to the internet. For this to work, I'd like to use a tap device
and bridge it with a wireless (wpi) device. But it seems like both lagg
and if_bridge doesn't yet support WPA
Hi,
I'd like to run Qemu on FreeBSD 7.0 and be able to connect from the Qemu
instance to the internet. For this to work, I'd like to use a tap device
and bridge it with a wireless (wpi) device. But it seems like both lagg
and if_bridge doesn't yet support WPA security (or wireless clients).
On Thursday 25 October 2007 00:11:39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oct 24 12:33:35 nightmare ppp[859]: tun0: Debug: deflink: PPPoE:ed1:
Cannot determine bandwidth
I presume this is a result of the lost LQR packets.
No, bandwidth isn't known to ppp. You can ignore this warning.
There is no
multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
I am assuming there should be no need for my ISP to be notified that I
am trying to use bridging in the modem, since it should be transparent
on their end
:)
The modem is set to use VC-based multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
I am assuming there should be no need for my ISP to be notified that I
am trying to use bridging in the modem, since
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
You said you had wrong encapsulation type. Did you make any progress?
Yes.
Changing the encapsulation type brought the line up,
and things hobbled along...
However, the line is dropped after a few minutes,
apparently a result of not being able to determine line
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it as up, rfc
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 05:31:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 17:50:15 -0600
Gary Aitken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least
.
This is a zyxel 642r modem; I can't try my other modem, a cisco 678,
because it doesn't support a vci 63.
The modem is set to use VC-based multiplexing, vpi=0, vci=100
These are the parameters used for PPPoE, and I presume are still
required as part of the ATM layer when bridging.
I am assuming
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it as up, rfc
I'm attempting to change a DSL link from using PPPoE in the DSL modem
to doing PPPoE on 6.1, with the modem in bridging mode.
I've put the DSL modem in bridging mode, and it brings up the link
properly -- or at least it reports it as up (DSL led steady; modem status
report shows it as up, rfc
Hello,
I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
What I have are two interfaces
rl0 - 192.168.2.2
sis0 - 192.168.1.2
and a bridge I've set up following the pages in the handbook. However
frames don't seem to be routed from one interface to the other
configure 192.168.2.2 as
your default router and skip the static route configuration all
together.
Regardless, bridging isn't going to help unless the host and the default
router have the same subnet configurations.
--
Chris Cowart
Lead Systems Administrator
Network Infrastructure Services
to 192.168.1/24, the next-hop is 192.168.2.2.
This seems needlessly complex when you can just configure 192.168.2.2 as
your default router and skip the static route configuration all
together.
Regardless, bridging isn't going to help unless the host and the default
router have the same subnet configurations
0 0
rl0
192.168.2.255ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ffUHLWb 187
rl0
On 9/29/07, Christopher Cowart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD
6.2
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
Hello,
I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
What I have are two interfaces
rl0 - 192.168.2.2
sis0 - 192.168.1.2
and a bridge I've set up following the pages in the handbook. However
I've poked around on the web, but come up empty. And I find it hard
to believe there's not a simple way to do this, if it hasn't been done
before.
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches of ipfw rules. I'd like to add a 3rd NIC and have it mirror
the 2nd NIC
On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Brian McCann wrote:
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches of ipfw rules. I'd like to add a 3rd NIC and have it mirror
the 2nd NIC (so all traffic into and out of nic2 goes to nic3), so I
can run an IDS on another server. Yes, I
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Brian McCann wrote:
I've poked around on the web, but come up empty. And I find it hard
to believe there's not a simple way to do this, if it hasn't been done
before.
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches
friendly to casual bridging, so just
ifconfig bridge0 addm tap0 addm ath0 up seems to be out.
I was thinking of an ip tunnel (gif) from the desktop to a machine
that is using wired ethernet. Then bridge the gif interface on the
desktop with the tap interface from qemu and finally bridging the gif
Thanks for the reply,
I followed the instructions in the handbook for ethernet bridging. In
Freebsd 6.1 release you could compile the bridge and tap modules into the
kernel, then enable ethernet bridging and actually bridge two interfaces
using sysctl.conf. I found that this brought a tap
Pete Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface
in Freebsd 6.2. I have compiled the bridge option and the tap device
into the kernel, but the tap device has not appeared. I have tried
this on a virtual machine and a separate box
Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface in
Freebsd 6.2. I have compiled the bridge option and the tap device into the
kernel, but the tap device has not appeared. I have tried this on a virtual
machine and a separate box with the same results, yet it works
I'm trying to get my feet wet with an ethernet bridging setup
under OpenVPN.
I have two hosts on a 10.0.0.0/24 network that I want to
connect: dl360 is the server, and t30 is the client. These
hosts are resolvable by /etc/hosts. TLS seems to be working
from certs I created at cacert.org
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Kailas Ramasamy wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks a lot. This is what I was looking for.
-Kailas
On 1/17/07, Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kailas
Ramasamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Hi Mike,
I read through fork() and exec() man pages but I
on bridging the router, I'm looking for
clarification before
I start changing the current setup that bridging the router is what I
want, that
the router is transparent to the Internet, that is allowing all
traffic in and out.
thanks,
John.
--
-
John F Hoover
[EMAIL
lengths to improve the SMP performance. Would it be better to just
implement a more powerful single processor machine to do the bridging?
Dynamic rules do get generated (see ipfw rule set above) because FTP was
having issues when I started to not keep-state, etc. However I'm still not
overly sure
Hi there. I wonder if somebody could help me with an issue I'm experiencing.
I've put together a bridging firewall using FreeBSD 5.X. The traffic routes
through fine and presently I'm using IPFW, default policy is set to deny,
with certain rules/ports allowed to pass through. The three
served by HTTP, and sending a link.
I've put together a bridging firewall using FreeBSD 5.X. The traffic routes
through fine and presently I'm using IPFW, default policy is set to deny,
with certain rules/ports allowed to pass through. The three interfaces that
are being bridged are all gigabit
I've also had problems with the bridge running out of dynamic rules. I've
raised them to silly figures however I'm always wary that if a machine had a
Trojan or some other form of malware that attempted a DoS attack, the bridge
would probably fall over after exhausting its dynamic rule count
PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 January 2006 08:29 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk
Dave,
I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the
two switches. If I
Hi all,
I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two
switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on
port 2 on switch2.
If I break the link between the two switches,
on 6.0 for me. You haven't
mentioned what version your using, but I will assume you have if_bridge.
If you don't and you're gonna use this machine alot for bridging, I'd
recommend moving to 6.0.
So presumably, you have two interfaces, plugged into the trunk port on
each cisco. For arguements
on switch2.
I do this quite often, and it works very well
on 6.0 for me. You haven't
mentioned what version your using, but I will
assume you have if_bridge.
If you don't and you're gonna use this machine
alot for bridging, I'd
recommend moving to 6.0.
So presumably, you have two
here is the solution:
http://qemu.dad-answers.com/viewtopic.php?t=554
Jan ZACH wrote:
Hi,
I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between
the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and
vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine.
Hi,
I'm configuring qemu. Everything works fine except networking between
the bsd host and the qemu computer (I cannot ping from bsd to qemu and
vice versa). Networking with other computers works fine. Am I missing
anything in my configuration?
Thanks a lot
Jan
bge0:
Hi all,
I've done some research on bridging vlans and can't get it right
with FreeBSD bridge. What I want to do is bridge an undefined number of
vlans through a BSD machine. For example. Vlan 10 from em0 out em1.
Now I can't create each vlan and bridge those, because you can't have
Hi,
This what I would like to do ...
Switch -[sis0 bridge ngeth0.(mesh protocol).ath0] -wireless-
[ath0.(mesh proto).ngeth0 bridge sis0] - switch
The above configuration should allow me to have layer 2 access from
the switch to switch. It's either I'm doing
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing through
on dot1q trunks.
The bridge works. Packet counts work (so I assume the bridge at least
sees the packets
At 09:08 PM 8/11/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing through
on dot1q trunks.
The bridge works. Packet counts
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005, Glenn Dawson wrote:
At 09:08 PM 8/11/2005, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Okay, here's the situation. PLEASE let me know if there's a better place
to ask. (isp@, kernel@, something)
I'm setting up a bridging firewall where the packets are passing through on
dot1q
Sushubh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2
separate lan modems. I want the server to take these 2 lines and
combine the speeds to form a single line which can be used
their is a bridge software in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.com
On 20 Jul 2005 09:38:22 -0400, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sushubh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
Now, we have 2 lines of
:
their is a bridge software in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.net
That doesn't do what you described. That's just regular bridging, to
connect two links into a single subnet. FreeBSD can do that quite
well (there's a whole chapter titled bridging in the FreeBSD
Handbook
in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.net
That doesn't do what you described. That's just regular bridging, to
connect two links into a single subnet. FreeBSD can do that quite
well (there's a whole chapter titled bridging in the FreeBSD
Handbook), but it doesn't have anything
I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2 separate
lan modems. I want the server to take these 2 lines and combine the speeds
to form a single line which can be used by our lan to access the internet.
I'm not so sure about your case. But as for as I know, all coming
traffics
catch the first rule ( as you stated .. any MAC any) before the second
one
so only the counter of the first rule is increment. No more for the second
rule.
pjn
Yes and no. In any case, I have tried assigning
Hey guys, hope I posted this to the right list!
I recently installed version 5.4 on a computer that acts as a
gateway/firewall/bridge for a LAN.
There are 30 or so computers sitting behind interface rl1 which has no IP
address assigned.
rl1 is bridged to rl0 which is the external interface and
On 6/1/05, George Breahna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to properly
filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
$IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4
$IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC
:43 AM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
On 6/1/05, George Breahna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
$IPFW 10 add allow ip
On 6/1/05, George Breahna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
..
According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
$IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4 $IPFW
10 add allow ip from any to any MAC
Tried that one myself, but I tried it again. No impact whatsoever!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin House
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:27 PM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
Thank you for your answers ...
Ruben, just a question.
How could I check if my tap device works great or not?
I've already tryed unlucky with tcpdump: I see nothing, even if the
tap0 is in promiscue mode.
Could you help my troubleshooting?
Thanks for your support
Regards
Andrea
Andrea Riela wrote:
Hi folks,
I would test openvpn with bridging options, then I need a tap interface.
I've compiled my kernel with
devicetap
then 'kldload if_tap' via command line
These are mutually exclusive: either you compile your kernel with tap or
you load it as a module, not both
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli typed:
Andrea Riela wrote:
but I don't see a tap interface in /dev or with ifconfig ...
You won't see any network interface in /dev; just run ifconfig -a and
check: you won't find any of the listed devices in /dev.
That's right;
Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 12:18:55PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli typed:
Andrea Riela wrote:
but I don't see a tap interface in /dev or with ifconfig ...
You won't see any network interface in /dev; just run ifconfig -a and
check: you won't find any of the listed devices in /dev.
Hi folks,
I would test openvpn with bridging options, then I need a tap interface.
I've compiled my kernel with
device tap
then 'kldload if_tap' via command line, but I don't see a tap interface
in /dev or with ifconfig ...
Obviously:
tcpdump -i tap0
tcpdump: BIOCSETIF: tap0: Device
just be a quick hack and I don't even know if it would work.
Dummynet works on the IP level, so it wouldn't solve my problem. Else
I'd jump all over it. =(
On 2/13/2005, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm bridging the devices so that the wired
On 2/13/2005, Lowell Gilbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a quick look, I think you might be on the right track. The
bridging code seems in a number of spots to be built specifically for
Ethernet. I have always maintained that bridging unlike media was a
hack bound for problems...
You might
Reid Linnemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm bridging the devices so that the wired and wireless nets will appear
to be on the same physical network to eachother.
Well, yes, that's what bridging means. Why do you want that? [Is it
a Microsoft thing?]
I think I was really tired when I wrote
, and I don't think you'll get any performance benefit from
bridging in this case.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. 802.11 really is a different protocol than
802.1, and I don't think you'll get any performance benefit from
bridging in this case.
I'm bridging the devices so that the wired and wireless nets will appear
to be on the same physical network to eachother.
I think I was really tired when I wrote my
I have a question that is more of a networking question than a BSD
question, but I am hoping someone out there has faced this same dilemma
before and has some advice:
I have a FreeBSD machine running -current that servers as a router for my
home LAN, using nat. I recently tossed in a DLink
RL I have a question that is more of a networking question than a BSD
RL question, but I am hoping someone out there has faced this same dilemma
RL before and has some advice:
RL I have a FreeBSD machine running -current that servers as a router for my
RL home LAN, using nat. I recently tossed
Hi,
I have a firewall in bridging mode, using ipf.
I upgraded to 4.10-p5 and now I have a bunch of error message:
bdg_forward drop MULTICAST PKT
/usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c line 609
Any clue what I am missing (sysctl or kernel)
Thank you,
Olivier
I have been trying to create an isolated virtual LAN with the following
configuration. A single FreeBSD v4.10 server with one physical NIC (fxp0)
is connected to two remote client Windows XP machines via OpenVPN tunnels.
OpenVPN v1.6 on the server and v2.0 on the clients. There are therefore
to connect
another part of the LAN on it, so I thought bridging would be good.
The machine hosting the bridge is my internet router, so every machine
on the
LAN has this machine as router. xl0 has an IP, xl1 has not (the
handbook says
better not to give an IP to the second NIC)
I've set up
I am not 100% sure of what I speak about. Bridge works in layer 2 i.e.
the data link layer. The virtual interface does not have a data link
layer so it is not possible to get the bridging done as the way you
are saying
Regards
S.
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:42:09 +0300, SharkTECH Maillists
[EMAIL
at the
backbone side.
The problem is although bonding seems to work fine as I can assign IPs at
fec0/ngeth0 and send/receive packet with both cards using the virtual
interface, I cannot get bridging to work at all between ngeth0/fec0(virtual)
and em2(switch). There are no errors in logs, it just doesn't seem
Maybe I should post this to the CURRENT mail list or
maybe STABLE(even though releng_5 isn't stable yet)
but I wanted to try here first.
I can't seem to get bridging working on a new install
of 5.3 beta. I set up the system correctly as far as I
can tell(see info below). I gave one nic(em0) an ip
Hello,
In using FreeBsd 5.2.1-Release I am running into some trouble. I have successfully
recompiled the kernel with support for atheros based wireless cards. I have also been
able to setup the card into access point Hostap mode correctly. I have tried the
bridging recommend in the FreeBSD
My box has 3 ethernet cards, fxp0, xl0 and another 4-port card.
Is it possible to bridge all the interfaces like this:
net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=xl0,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr0,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr1,fxp0
net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=vr2,fxp0
I am using this document
HYPERLINK
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/filtering-bridges/filte
ring-bridges-contributors.htmlhttp://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/ar
ticles/filtering-bridges/filtering-bridges-contributors.html
I find no reference to MAC rules showing
I find no reference to MAC rules showing up in 5.2.1. Any help or advice
would be appreciated.
That's because bridge(4) doesn't do Layer 2 filtering. Neither does ipfw (as
well it shouldn't). I don't know if there are any plans to add this
capability to FreeBSD's bridge, but I know that
I asked:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has
three ethernet interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster,
and one connected to the internet. The box acts as a bridge for the
two network segments, and as a router to the Internet (it's the
default
I originally wrote:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has
three ethernet interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster,
and one connected to the internet. The box acts as a bridge for the
two network segments, and as a router to the Internet (it's
PROBLEM SUMMARY:
I've got a bridge(4) issue on a BSD 5.2.1 box. The bridging box has three ethernet
interfaces, two bridged together in a single cluster, and one connected to the
internet. The box acts as a bridge for the two network segments, and as a router to
the Internet
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
