Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use ULE for
performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I don't know whether
the release engineers plan to change that default, but I will check.
could you point to some URL/explain what's the actual difference.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Josh Carroll wrote:
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use
ULE for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I
don't know whether the release engineers plan to change that default,
but I will check.
could you point to some URL/explain what's
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Josh Carroll wrote:
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the
Karol Kwiatkowski wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use
ULE for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I
don't know whether the release engineers plan to change that default,
but I will check.
could you point to some
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for everything else. I wanted to ask if the new ULE scheduler will
benefit from having four cores on the CPU, meaning that if I have many
concurrent tasks, is it able to efficiently spread the load over all
available cores?
On 9/14/07, Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm about to purchase a new system for myself. It will dual-boot
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for everything else. I wanted to ask if
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On 9/14/07, Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm about to purchase a new system for myself. It will dual-boot
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for everything else. I
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Maxim Khitrov wrote:
On 9/14/07, Aryeh Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/14/07, Maxim Khitrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm about to purchase a new system for myself. It will dual-boot
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for
In general, if you are running a multi-process or multi-threaded
workload, FreeBSD 7 will be able to make good use of 8 CPU cores.
Over the past 2 years we have done extensive benchmarking and
optimizations that have resulted in *huge* performance improvements on
many common workloads on
Josh Carroll wrote:
In general, if you are running a multi-process or multi-threaded
workload, FreeBSD 7 will be able to make good use of 8 CPU cores.
Over the past 2 years we have done extensive benchmarking and
optimizations that have resulted in *huge* performance improvements on
many common
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use ULE
for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I don't
know whether the release engineers plan to change that default, but I
will check.
Great, thanks for the info. Good to know, I'll be sure to use ULE when
Josh Carroll wrote:
Yes, 4BSD is still the default, although you definitely want to use ULE
for performance reasons (NB: only on 7, dont use ULE on 6). I don't
know whether the release engineers plan to change that default, but I
will check.
Great, thanks for the info. Good to know, I'll be
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2
also (I'd heard that was the case
Josh Carroll wrote:
That's good to know. You should be using libthr for threaded
performance though :) That benchmark is probably almost all userland
though, so performance may not suffer much from libpthread.
Oh I wasn't sure if libthr was the preferred thread library for 6.2
also (I'd
Hello,
I'm about to purchase a new system for myself. It will dual-boot
Windows XP, which will be primarily used for gaming, and FreeBSD 7.0
for everything else. I wanted to ask if the new ULE scheduler will
benefit from having four cores on the CPU, meaning that if I have many
concurrent tasks,
16 matches
Mail list logo
