and/or
recursive dns-server there, and point it whereever?
As far as I can tell, that'd solve everything, add caching, and let it all be
controlled from the config of the DNS-server?
Terje
Hi,
I guess this is the way that'll end.
Laurent SALIN
You'll need to setup your bind.conf;
zone fqdn
Hi,
for the list archive, here's how I solved my problem.
Some on the thread tell me to run BIND on the 1rst VPS, as DNS
autoritative server and as caching resolver who let only hosts from my
network send him queries.
Well I'm quite happy my setup with NSD as DNS autoritative and UNBOUND
. All you need to do(!) is change this to a value
of your choice and recompile libc
Sorry, but this is startin to look a lot like a complicated solution to a
problem that isn't really there...
Why not just point from resolv.conf to localhost, run a caching and/or
recursive dns-server
Le 27.09.2013 23:31, jb a écrit :
Well, I hope I understand you.
You use DNS Proxy server, like BIND or DNSMASQ.
hi,
actually I use two daemons,
one to serve as a autoritative DNS server : nsd
the other one to serve as a recursive DNS resolver with caching : unbound
I can't set them both
Le 28.09.2013 01:11, Frank Leonhardt a écrit :
It was more of an explanation as to /why/ it's not easy to do what asked
in the original reasonable-sounding question.
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation of how it works from the behind.
I don't think I'll compile and maintain my own libc just for DNS
there...
It was more of an explanation as to /why/ it's not easy to do what asked in
the original reasonable-sounding question.
Beg to differ. The question isn't reasonable. There's no point in
having a dns recursive resolver listening on a port other than the one
that clients will contact
On 28. sep. 2013, at 15:50, Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
Given that BIND can happily listen on ports other than 53 and OpenBSD allows
a port to be specified against each nameserver in resolv.conf, it does not
seem an unreasonable question to me.
Just to avoid any
Le 28.09.2013 18:32, Terje Elde a écrit :
Not sure if I misunderstood what you're trying to do, but the way I recall
it, you have two boxes, one running with one recursive and one authoritative
nameserver, and you wanted a second box to quey the recursive nameserver on
the first box, which
On 9/28/2013 at 7:16 PM Laurent SALIN wrote:
|Le 28.09.2013 18:32, Terje Elde a écrit :
| Not sure if I misunderstood what you're trying to do, but the way
I
|recall it, you have two boxes, one running with one recursive and
one
|authoritative nameserver, and you wanted a second box to quey the
Le 28.09.2013 21:28, Mike. a écrit :
The way I solved this problem on my setup, I assigned another IP
address to the network interface via ifconfig alias.
I put the authoritative namesever on one IP address, and the
recursive nameserver on the other IP address.
They both are still
On Sep 28, 2013, at 2:24 PM, Laurent SALIN salin.laur...@laposte.net wrote:
Le 28.09.2013 21:28, Mike. a écrit :
The way I solved this problem on my setup, I assigned another IP
address to the network interface via ifconfig alias.
I put the authoritative namesever on one IP address, and the
Hello,
I wondering how i can send queries to a dns resolver listening on a
different port than the normaly 53 tcp/udp ?
The situation:
I've got a vps who running NSD as a autoritative nameserver, listening
on tcp/udp 53 and unbound as personnal resolver, listening on a
different tcp/udp port
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013, at 13:20, Laurent SALIN wrote:
Hello,
I wondering how i can send queries to a dns resolver listening on a
different port than the normaly 53 tcp/udp ?
The situation:
I've got a vps who running NSD as a autoritative nameserver, listening
on tcp/udp 53 and unbound
On 27. sep. 2013, at 20:20, Laurent SALIN salin.laur...@laposte.net wrote:
I've got a bad solution, use unbound on the second VPS and maybe tell
him to ask the 1rst VPS on the unusual tcp/udp port
Why is that a bad solution?
You'd cache locally, which is often considered a good thing?
Is there any way to use multiple IPs?
hi,
no I can't. Each VPS got only one IPv4 and I'm really not aware yet
about how IPv6 works.
Laurent SALIN
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Le 27/09/2013 22:28, Terje Elde a écrit :
Why is that a bad solution?
You'd cache locally, which is often considered a good thing?
Granted, it's a bit of a weird setup, but still.
I hope it could be esay as put the ip of my resolver VPS in the
/etc/resolv.conf and let PF translate the
Laurent SALIN salin.laurent at laposte.net writes:
Hello,
I wondering how i can send queries to a dns resolver listening on a
different port than the normaly 53 tcp/udp ?
The situation:
I've got a vps who running NSD as a autoritative nameserver, listening
on tcp/udp 53 and unbound
On 27/09/2013 19:20, Laurent SALIN wrote:
Hello,
I wondering how i can send queries to a dns resolver listening on a
different port than the normaly 53 tcp/udp ?
The situation:
I've got a vps who running NSD as a autoritative nameserver, listening
on tcp/udp 53 and unbound as personnal resolver
this to a value
of your choice and recompile libc
Sorry, but this is startin to look a lot like a complicated solution to a
problem that isn't really there...
Why not just point from resolv.conf to localhost, run a caching and/or
recursive dns-server there, and point it whereever?
As far as I can tell
On 27/09/2013 23:08, Terje Elde wrote:
On 28. sep. 2013, at 00:03, Frank Leonhardt fra...@fjl.co.uk wrote:
If I understand the way it works correctly, the resolver pulls a list of the NS
and hard-sets the port number for each to 53 (via a manifest constant) . See
libc/resolv/res_init.c. All
as to /why/ it's not easy to do what asked in
the original reasonable-sounding question.
Beg to differ. The question isn't reasonable. There's no point in
having a dns recursive resolver listening on a port other than the one
that clients will contact it on.
Far better to have the authoritative
Hi all,
I'm running FreeBSD 9.2 with squid for a friend who owns an ISP outside the
U.S and uses my FreeBSD squid proxy to access netflix. I've been told this
can be also accomplished via DNS Proxy. Is it true?
If yes which one do you recommend?
Thanks
On 3 June 2013, at 22:21, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 3 June 2013, at 20:39, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:57:07PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and often the
IP address has no reverse
On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:57:07 -0500, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and often
the IP address has no reverse DNS entries. As a result the program
hangs for several timeouts. The call is not being made directly in its
code
On Jun 3, 2013 10:22 PM, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
On 3 June 2013, at 20:39, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:57:07PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and
often the IP address has no reverse DNS
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:21 AM, Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org wrote:
Unfortunately truss does not show anything more than ktrace.
Normally most people use truss first, then fall back to ktrace ;)
Bind doesn't check the hosts files as far as I can tell.
System requests obey nsswitch.conf(5)
--
See if whois can tell you who owns the block the IP is in. That may give
you some insight into what is asking for the reverse.
E.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
On 4 June 2013, at 22:19, Enno Davids e...@metva.com wrote:
See if whois can tell you who owns the block the IP is in. That may give
you some insight into what is asking for the reverse.
Its ATT. Its probably at least a state's worth of DSL addresses. I am
physically at one of them for a
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and often the IP
address has no reverse DNS entries. As a result the program hangs for several
timeouts. The call is not being made directly in its code, but is occurring in
a system call. There are no specific calls to DNS, its
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:57:07PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and often the
IP address has no reverse DNS entries. As a result the program hangs for
several timeouts. The call is not being made directly in its code
On 3 June 2013, at 20:39, staticsafe m...@staticsafe.ca wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 07:57:07PM -0700, Doug Hardie wrote:
I have an unusual situation. A program is doing a DNS lookup and often the
IP address has no reverse DNS entries. As a result the program hangs for
several timeouts
Well I tried changing them to various numbers up to 180 from 1 and 5
respectively and that didn't help.
Anyone else get around all this DNS mess with timeouts? It's causing my mail
server to throw errors; host lookup did not complete and not deliver mail.
-Original Message-
From
Okay, what's your DNS setup? Are you running a recursive cache that
contacts the root servers directly? Using your ISP's servers? Etc.
As a mitigation step, I tried pointing my caches to 8.8.8.8 and
8.8.4.4. - but it turns out that Google is intentionally blocking
(returning NX responses
My DNS config is pretty generic. I did try putting in the options to stop
recursive lookups, but all that did was cause even more failures (permission
denied lookups, etc...), so I removed that.
Here's my basic config;
options {
directory /etc/namedb;
pid-file/var
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow udp from any
...@lizardhill.com wrote:
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down to
IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go away.
I have the basic rules like this for dns;
01160 allow
, and there aren't. I'm
not running NAT, it's a publically accessible IP address.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Sierchio [mailto:ku...@tenebras.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2013 8:58 PM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with IPFW causing failed DNS
Don O'Neil wrote:
Hi everyone. recently my server started having issues with DNS and FTP
sessions either not resolving or timing out. I've tracked the issue down
to IPFW. if I issue a 'sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.enable=0' then my issues go
away.
[snip]
I'm probably not smart enough to be able
: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with IPFW causing failed DNS and FTP sessions
It would be really helpful if you'd post the ruleset.
At first glance, your stateful rules seem rather wrong, unless there's a
check-state above. Also, in and out aren't discriminating enough
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm probably not smart enough to be able to help directly with your problem
but I'd like to add that there is a snowballing DNS Amplification ddos
attack against SpamHaus going on which is spilling over
Yes
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_short_lifetime ?
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime ?
You might want to increase these, given the current state of things...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
default HISADDR
enable dns
# a must, if DHCP server is enabled in adsl modem
# and if you don't wanna edit /etc/resolv.conf
# each time before connecting tp ISP's ppp server.
#Now you don't need to touch /etc/resolv.conf
-
My /etc
ppp using:
service ppp start
It shows tun0 is busy.
Which is correct.
## etc/resolv.conf
#Open DNS nameservers:
nameserver 208.67.222.222
nameserver 208.67.220.220
Those are OpenDNS resolvers. I've been using two provided by my
ISP, and also ran named myself later on.
## /etc
via PPP.
The original problem you quoted was with DNS and
that's explained by the DHCP on fxp0 overwriting resolv.conf with the
router/modem's own non-functional DNS proxy.
As regards ppp.conf mine was simply:
default:
set log Phase tun command
adsl:
set device PPPoE:vr0
set authname my
a lan).
You don't necessarily need DHCP with PPPoE because PPP can deliver the
IP address, DNS etc by itself. If the ISP requires you to use DHCP you
should probably have configured the tun0 interface instead of fxp0.
Exactly that's what I did describe in my message: Configuration
data is set
/resolv.conf
#Open DNS nameservers:
nameserver 208.67.222.222
nameserver 208.67.220.220
--
## /etc/ppp/ppp.conf
default:
set log Phase chat lcp ipcp ccp tun command lqm
set ifaddr
-out
into the router's LAN (PPPoE and IP can share a lan).
You don't necessarily need DHCP with PPPoE because PPP can deliver the
IP address, DNS etc by itself. If the ISP requires you to use DHCP you
should probably have configured the tun0 interface instead of fxp0
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Mark Blackman m...@exonetric.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack jacks.1...@gmail.com wrote:
I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
way to connect to
myusername
set authkey mypassword
set timeout 120
set redial 0 0
# set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0
# now this interface is set up at 2nd line in adsl profile
add default HISADDR
enable dns
nat enable
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack jacks.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
pppoe connection.
[snip]
fxp0 is the ethernet interface of my PC via which adsl modem is connected.
Any suggestions ...
Consider using the ports mpd5 daemon for a
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Mark Blackman m...@exonetric.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:08, Jack jacks.1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
pppoe connection.
[snip]
fxp0 is the ethernet interface of my PC via which adsl modem is
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack jacks.1...@gmail.com wrote:
I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
way to connect to internet is an adsl modem in bridge mode
(assuming the mode in modem, can't
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:49, Mark Blackman m...@exonetric.com wrote:
On 16 Oct 2012, at 16:38, Jack jacks.1...@gmail.com wrote:
I 'll try mpd5. Thanks.
Actually, I was concerned with userland ppp, becoz of the
scenarios where we have a FreeBSD machine and the only
way to connect to
'adsl' is the profile name, in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf.
I also tried
#ppp -auto adsl
but the error message was same.
...
I use a similar setup here except I use static IPs for both the ADSL modem
(in bridge mode) and the FreeBSD box connecting to it. The FreeBSD box
then runs a DHCP server (dns/dnsmasq
On Tue, 16 Oct 2012 20:38:47 +0530, Jack wrote:
I'm new as a FreeBSD user, and trying to configure my
pppoe connection.
I've been using PPPoE with a DSL modem for many years, using
FreeBSD 4, 5 and 7 with the system's PPPoE tools. The IP
was provided to the computer directly, so no DHCP in the
Hi
This morning at about 7 am, I noticed to commits to stable/9 that I wanted to
pull in and so did and then rebuilt from source.
Just now, I noticed this: svn commit: r240807 - in stable/9/contrib/bind9: .
lib/dns lib/dns/include/dns
I really can't be bother to requildworld again, can I
of them and one is configured to
point to SERVER A , and the other to SERVER B. Differenet places, same
configuration. Is there any preference over what is PRIMARY NAMESERVER or
SECONDARY NAMESERVER? I mean, Primary is the one used mainly?
actually when another DNS server resolve the name it may
Hello.
I am sorry if the following 2 questions could sound too stupid.
a) Normally any Domain name registered has to have 2 Nameservers.
Some registry like the one responsible for .ORG requires 2 at least
to propagate the domain. In teh case of .COM that is not a
requirement, one nameserver
is configured to point to SERVER
A , and the other to SERVER B. Differenet places, same configuration. Is
there any preference over what is PRIMARY NAMESERVER or SECONDARY NAMESERVER?
I mean, Primary is the one used mainly?
No, DNS round-robin used on most platforms will rotate fairly evenly
b) I am looking for good list like this one for people developing,
learning about Android Development. Any suggestion ?
I am trying to setup a Freebsd machine for developing for Android, if
possible.
Hmm. http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html suggests that maybe the
Linux
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 04/06/2012 14:47, Rada alive wrote:
[root@pladaks /usr/ports/dns/unbound]# make all-depends-list
/usr/ports/devel/gmake
/usr/ports/textproc/expat2
/usr/ports/dns/ldns
/usr/ports/devel/gettext
/usr/ports
On 04/06/2012 20:37, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/06/2012 14:47, Rada alive wrote:
[root@pladaks /usr/ports/dns/unbound]# make all-depends-list
/usr/ports/devel/gmake
/usr/ports/textproc/expat2
/usr/ports/dns/ldns
/usr/ports/devel/gettext
/usr/ports/devel/doxygen
/usr/ports/devel/libtool
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:58:39 -0500, Odhiambo Washington
odhia...@gmail.com wrote:
What does this linking look like?
Do you mean like symlinking zone files, so that domainA is exactly a
replica of domainB - as in conjoined?:)
precisely --
foo.com
foo.net - foo.com
foo.org - foo.com
I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache service to
replace BIND. A few hours into make install i decided to abort and have a
look at the dependencies.
Can someone tell me why a DNS server needs packages like graphics/jpeg
and x11/randrproto?
Is there a way to build unbound
Rada alive wrote:
I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache service to
replace BIND. A few hours into make install i decided to abort and have
a look at the dependencies.
Can someone tell me why a DNS server needs packages like graphics/jpeg
and x11/randrproto?
This I
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 15:47:29 +0200
Rada alive wrote:
I was hoping to test dns/unbound as a lighter-weight DNS cache
service to replace BIND. A few hours into make install i decided to
abort and have a look at the dependencies.
Can someone tell me why a DNS server needs packages like
graphics
On 04/06/2012 14:47, Rada alive wrote:
[root@pladaks /usr/ports/dns/unbound]# make all-depends-list
/usr/ports/devel/gmake
/usr/ports/textproc/expat2
/usr/ports/dns/ldns
/usr/ports/devel/gettext
/usr/ports/devel/doxygen
/usr/ports/devel/libtool
/usr/ports/converters/libiconv
/usr/ports
No -- you were not imagining things. The DNS for freebsd.org was
temporarily broken. It was that most impossible to remove of causes:
human error.
Thats good, as it means not sun spots aka EMP aka gammma :-)
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http
Julian H. Stacey writes:
No -- you were not imagining things. The DNS for freebsd.org was
temporarily broken. It was that most impossible to remove of causes:
human error.
Thats good, as it means not sun spots aka EMP aka gammma :-)
Hulk _not_ eat sushi near puny human
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:16:25 +0100
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
No -- you were not imagining things. The DNS for freebsd.org was
temporarily broken. It was that most impossible to remove of
causes: human error.
Thats good, as it means not sun spots aka EMP aka gammma
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 09:39:32 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:16:25 +0100
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
No -- you were not imagining things. The DNS for freebsd.org was
temporarily broken. It was that most impossible to remove
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:36:28 -0700
Robert travelin...@cox.net wrote:
Let's just blame it on Bush! Everybody else does.
Are you sure it wasn't the evildoers? You know, the terrists?
Maybe laying the groundwork for a nucular strike?
--
Conrad J. Sabatier
conr...@cox.net
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:36:28 -0700
Robert articulated:
Let's just blame it on Bush! Everybody else does.
Unless you are a right wing fascist; i.e. Limbaugh or Hannity, then you
blame Obama or Clinton.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not
anyone else notice this? Any word on what was causing it? I have
to admit, it was rather startling at first.
Do you have any further details? What are you using for DNS servers,
or are you doing lookups yourself?
Actually, around the same time others were reporting another site (not
fbsd, which I
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 at 01:14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
On 02/18/2012 03:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers
around the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't
notice if something
' that fall within those or are
they redundant?
They are not redundant, and yes, they are still beneficial.
Doug
--
It's always a long day; 86400 doesn't fit into a short.
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http
On 2/18/12 12:57 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
To clarify, almost universally the opposition to the idea centers around
the problems of users who enable this method, and then don't notice if
something changes/breaks, resulting in a stale zone (or zones, depending
on what you choose to slave). I
deeper
problems. :)
To be fair however, there are a lot of people who believe (rightly or
wrongly) that resolving DNS should be a fire and forget service. Those
of us who do this for a living know that this was never true, and DNSSEC
makes that even less true. However, if you happen to be one of those
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether people slave the root zone
or not, and why if not.
Active poster
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 02:41:57PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
I've kinda hijacked the thread to ask whether
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/17/2012 05:41, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list, Jeremy, Doug,
We're currently having a discussion on the FRnOG mailing list regarding
the laughable announcement of an attack on the DNS root servers by
Anonymous.
Given their success
FreeBSD 8.2. system.
Gets is TCP/IP parameters (and DNS name-servers IPs) from a DHCP server,
with a fixed IP address
(the system always gets the same IP, based on its MAC address as specified
in the DHCP config file)
Now I wanted the system to have a different IP address.
Changed the DHCP server
On 1/19/12 3:32 PM, n dhert wrote:
FreeBSD 8.2. system.
Gets is TCP/IP parameters (and DNS name-servers IPs) from a DHCP server,
with a fixed IP address
(the system always gets the same IP, based on its MAC address as specified
in the DHCP config file)
Now I wanted the system to have
- with UseDNS no, I can login quickly again..
- I don't manage the DNS servers, can do anything there, but I do believe
they do not receive anything
since I now see, I can't even ping any of the three of tehm, specified in
my /etc/resolv,conf file
# ping 143.169.254.100
- the /etc
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
than DOMAIN whois) on http://www.internic.net/whois.html) and also for each
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 04:26:38PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
Yes, you can run BIND on the same FreeBSD machine as your web server.
You have to have your nameserver listed with internic (for .com and .net -
ie, your nameserver has to show up in the NAMESERVER whois (note: different
than
Now after refreshing my memory (it happened one year ago) I
could remember that I did register the nameservers. I found the
option in my registar to add to some domain i.e. mydomain.com
the entries ns1.mydomain.com, etc. I think that the problem I
had was related with the IPs. The VPS
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 11:06:39AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
Hello,
You /can/ have a nameserver with same IP as www. And you /can/ multihome
your NIC with multiple IP on same machine,
ie,
www.example.com 192.168.0.131 and 192.168.0.132 (if you want, optional
extra address for www)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Daniel Lewis innervisionnetw...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 6:50 PM
Subject: DNS
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my
domain www.innervisionnetworks.com??? Registar
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Lewis
innervisionnetw...@gmail.comwrote:
Im new to freebsd 8.2 and the unix world. How do i setup dns to support my
domain
Hi Daniel,
You probably want to use ISC bind in /usr/ports/dns
I recommend you read the O'Reilly book DNS and BIND.
Basic
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
was not able to automatically update in the system with my
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 05:54:59PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS was the only thing I
was not able to automatically update in the system with my
On Sun, Jan 01, 2012 at 03:24:59PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Time ago I made the attempt to setup my own DNS in the same
machine I had my web server running. DNS
the question, what is needed to run a DNS?
What I know:
Edit the zone files.
Run bind.
Register the names ns1.mysite.com, ns2..., (some trick here?)
Obviously adding them to the registrar of the domains served.
Walter
Yes, you can run BIND on the same FreeBSD machine as your web server.
You
Walter Alejandro Iglesias writes:
Perhaps you find stupid my question, but believe me, I am
lost :-).
Where you are now, so once were most of us. :-)
Sure, like you say, it is possible running BIND and Apache.
But, is it possible|convenient that the name server reside in
the
Hello,
I've been using FreeBSD as a local nameserver (with my own .local
domains!) for quite some time. FreeBSD comes with a name server already
installed; you don't need to get it from the ports, although I'm not
sure what difference it makes. The one that comes with FreeBSD can be
enabled with
Hi,
What is the required configuration in a FreeBSD 8.2 release host for it to
publish its name in a dynamic dns supported network?
LINUX: For a Linux host with name x.y.z.com I had to do the following:
=
# echo DHCP_HOSTNAME=x; /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
# echo PEERDNS
On 29/12/2011 20:11, akshay sreeramoju wrote:
What is the required configuration in a FreeBSD 8.2 release host for it to
publish its name in a dynamic dns supported network?
Something like this in /etc/dhclient.conf:
interface em0 {
send host-name foo.example.com;
}
See dhclient.conf
Thanks Matthew. It works.
Akshay
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Matthew Seaman
m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
On 29/12/2011 20:11, akshay sreeramoju wrote:
What is the required configuration in a FreeBSD 8.2 release host for it
to
publish its name in a dynamic dns supported
1 - 100 of 1415 matches
Mail list logo
