On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 12:04:47 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>
>kaffe won't be available for 7.x until it's officially released and
> someone makes the binary.
Why is this any more of a problem than any other port? That's how I
installed it.
Thanks!
--
David Benfell, LCP
[EMAIL PROTECTED
David Benfell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:32:21 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
On 2007-11-22 David Benfell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:09:02 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
However, keep in mind that ant is a build (make) tool for Java
applications. It is quite possible that th
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:32:21 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> On 2007-11-22 David Benfell wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:09:02 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> > > However, keep in mind that ant is a build (make) tool for Java
> > > applications. It is quite possible that there are no applicatio
On 2007-11-22 David Benfell wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:09:02 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> > On 2007-11-22 Robert Huff wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > David Benfell writes:
> > >
> > > > Also, in deinstalling jdk, I found that apache-ant relied upon
> > > > it, but I couldn't see what depended o
David Benfell schrieb:
Hello all,
I don't know what the story is, but Java is locking up my
system badly. Even if I knew how to get details, I wouldn't
be able to because the system is completely unresponsive.
As a workaround, I have gone into /usr/ports/distfiles and
renamed the jdk* files to
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 08:09:02 +0330, Bahman Movaqar wrote:
> On 2007-11-22 Robert Huff wrote:
>
> >
> > David Benfell writes:
> >
> > > Also, in deinstalling jdk, I found that apache-ant relied upon
> > > it, but I couldn't see what depended on apache-ant.
> >
> > "man pkg_info", paying at
On 2007-11-22 Robert Huff wrote:
>
> David Benfell writes:
>
> > Also, in deinstalling jdk, I found that apache-ant relied upon
> > it, but I couldn't see what depended on apache-ant.
>
> "man pkg_info", paying attention to the 'r' and 'R' options.
>
> > Is there a workaround for apac
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:16:21 -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
>
> David Benfell writes:
>
> > Also, in deinstalling jdk, I found that apache-ant relied upon
> > it, but I couldn't see what depended on apache-ant.
>
> "man pkg_info", paying attention to the 'r' and 'R' options.
>
> > Is there
David Benfell writes:
> Also, in deinstalling jdk, I found that apache-ant relied upon
> it, but I couldn't see what depended on apache-ant.
"man pkg_info", paying attention to the 'r' and 'R' options.
> Is there a workaround for apache-ant?
If it's a mandatory dependency -
Hello all,
I don't know what the story is, but Java is locking up my
system badly. Even if I knew how to get details, I wouldn't
be able to because the system is completely unresponsive.
As a workaround, I have gone into /usr/ports/distfiles and
renamed the jdk* files to names with DO-NOT-INSTAL
10 matches
Mail list logo
