On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 02:57:02AM -0500, Henry Olyer wrote:
When I put up any version of FBSD I usually try to install Maxima. Which
fails because the sub-install of gnuplot fails.
I go to through various work-arounds, different things.
But Saturday I will be installing 9.0 and would
.
I wonder what versions you've been trying to install, since I've rarely
had problems installing from ports when upgrading as described above.
Mike Squires
mikes at siralan.org
UN*X at home since 1986
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Roland Smith wrote:
The default build of gnuplot is quite heavy, pulling in wxwidgets and teTeX.
Personally, I would recommend the following settings: enable X11, GD, gridb ox,
thinsplines and cairo, and disable the rest; pdflib didn't work last time I
tried it. WXwidgets is overkill IMO, the
I've been using FBSD since 2000 and a Macsyma user since 1976.
And done my own FBSD installs since 5.1, I think, maybe a few before. For
those early years I was content to install a lisp and then do my own FTP's,
getting maxima and doing things manually. No problems.
But the installs have
When I boot the CD I get a different menu, ie., boot, shell, install.
Since the CD is in the CD-ROM drawer and I know how to use sysinstall (or
so I thought!,) I get a fresh shell and say sysinstall.
Okay?
Except I can't write the disk. Notice, I have not explicitly mounted it or
done anything
reason, other than it's always worked for me.
One workaround would be to install gnuplot from ports (compiling it) and
then installing maxima from packages. My wild guess is that there's
something either different between the package version of gnuplot and the
version created by a compile
On Jan 28, 2012, at 1:30 PM, Henry Olyer henry.ol...@gmail.com wrote:
When I boot the CD I get a different menu, ie., boot, shell, install.
Since the CD is in the CD-ROM drawer and I know how to use sysinstall (or
so I thought!,) I get a fresh shell and say sysinstall.
Okay?
Except I
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
Gnuplot is the prototypical example of a port which is badly managed. There
are far too many dependencies which are absolutely *non necessary* There is
absolutely no necessity of having TeX (in any form whatsoever) to run
Gnuplot.
Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
occur, a port maintainer should only include the *strict minimum*
dependencies necessary to make the port work, it is not his job to include
the whole kitchen sink of dependencies that could
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 01:30:37AM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
Agreed. That is why it is an _option_ now.
Yes but ON by default, which is the problem. It is even a bigger problem
when you realize you would like using other versions of TeX than the
standard one, for example you would
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:07:51PM -0600, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Roland Smith rsm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 08:09:34PM +0100, Michel Talon wrote:
occur, a port maintainer should only include the *strict minimum*
dependencies necessary to make the port work, it is not
Hi,
am currently trying to install FreeBSD 9 on my Lenovo X220 and noticed
that the link on this page in the FreeBSD Handbook is broken:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html
with link provided here:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
am currently trying to install FreeBSD 9 on my Lenovo X220 and noticed that
the link on this page in the FreeBSD Handbook is broken:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html
See the header at the top of that page
On 01/27/2012 04:16 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
am currently trying to install FreeBSD 9 on my Lenovo X220 and
noticed that the link on this page in the FreeBSD Handbook is broken:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 01/27/2012 04:16 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
am currently trying to install FreeBSD 9 on my Lenovo X220 and noticed
that the link on this page in the FreeBSD Handbook is broken:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc
On 01/27/2012 07:22 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 01/27/2012 04:16 PM, Warren Block wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
am currently trying to install FreeBSD 9 on my Lenovo X220 and
noticed that the link on this page in the FreeBSD Handbook
I've said this here before. And been attacked, pretty much by everyone.
But I was telling the truth.
When I put up any version of FBSD I usually try to install Maxima. Which
fails because the sub-install of gnuplot fails.
I go to through various work-arounds, different things.
But Saturday I
Jasper Valentijn wrote:
L.S.,
I'm not able to install FreeBSD on a Sony Vaio vgn-cr31s. The problem
seems to be related to PR kern/153440,
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153440cat=.
The FreeBSD-9.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick.img was used to try the
install and extraction
i386 memstick image and it does not see the drive.
I have tried the 9.0 i386 memstick image and it does not see the drive.
I have tried the 9.0 amd64 memstick image and it does not see the drive.
Didn't do an install of 8.1 and upgrade to 8.2 though. If needed I
could try that, but I'd prefer
have a bearing on your situation.
Generally you can install from ports:
If you haven't already installed ports (try cd /usr/ports), then as root
run portsnap fetch extract.
If you have installed ports, then cd
/usr/ports/databases/mysql55-server, and then make make install
make clean
Hi,
I'm having a hard time trying to install FreeBSD9 (64bit) onto a HP
ProLiant BL465c G1 (Blade-System):
The boot process (booting from CD) runs up to the point where it says
usbus0: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus1: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus3: 12Mbps Full Speed USB v1.0
usbus3
to boot after install on Sun
On Tue, January 3, 2012 15:33, Miller, Leonard wrote:
Hi,
I have tried installing 8.2 Sparc on a Sun system multiple times, using
different options, and each time I do, it takes me back to the initial
options screen, where I have to exit the install, forcing it to halt
-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Miller, Leonard
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 9:40 AM
To: James Edwards; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: 8.2 fails to boot after install on Sun
Thanks for responding.
Auto-boot is set to true
Hi,
I have tried installing 8.2 Sparc on a Sun system multiple times, using
different options, and each time I do, it takes me back to the initial options
screen, where I have to exit the install, forcing it to halt. I am never
prompted to install a boot manager or anything else. I always get
On Tue, January 3, 2012 15:33, Miller, Leonard wrote:
Hi,
I have tried installing 8.2 Sparc on a Sun system multiple times, using
different options, and each time I do, it takes me back to the initial
options screen, where I have to exit the install, forcing it to halt. I
am never prompted
On 12/20/2011 2:53 AM, Da Rock wrote:
On 12/20/11 16:08, Allen wrote:
On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
*Snipping*
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
biggest failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of
Hi,
I would like to know if there is an official howto that could help me in the
process of installing zfs on root.
I will need a raid 1 configuration and plan to use the whole disks to be part
of the pool.
How far can we go with the installer ?
Do I have to use gpart ?
What is best way
В Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:11:36 +0100
bsd b...@todoo.biz пишет:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is an official howto that could help
me in the process of installing zfs on root.
I will need a raid 1 configuration and plan to use the whole disks to
be part of the pool.
How far can we
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:11 PM, bsd b...@todoo.biz wrote: I would
like to know if there is an official howto that could help me in the
process of installing zfs on root.
I have specifically used this documentation with great success:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot/Mirror
You can
Le 20 déc. 2011 à 18:42, Ivan Klymenko a écrit :
В Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:11:36 +0100
bsd b...@todoo.biz пишет:
Hi,
I would like to know if there is an official howto that could help
me in the process of installing zfs on root.
I will need a raid 1 configuration and plan to use the
On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
*Snipping*
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
biggest failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never
a problem with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't
On 12/20/11 16:08, Allen wrote:
On 12/13/2011 11:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
*Snipping*
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their
biggest failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never
a problem with bsd as logs will
On 12/13/2011 10:54 AM, Devin Teske wrote:
We're seeing in 8.1-RELEASE that nodev is an invalid option for NFS mounts
that causes your system to boot into single-user mode. Is this still the case
in
9.0-RC2/3 or has the option been re-added? nodev was a valid option in
4.11-RELEASE, not sure
--On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 09:54:38 AM +1000 Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Da Rock
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 3:55 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 9.0 install and journaling
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley
--On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 08:54:23 AM -0800 Devin Teske
devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote:
We're seeing in 8.1-RELEASE that nodev is an invalid option for NFS
mounts that causes your system to boot into single-user mode. Is this
still the case in 9.0-RC2/3 or has the option been
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
fsck.
But fsck needs to
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
filling up usr, etc. And root always stays protected! Its saved my life
a number
On 12/13/11 06:00, Eric S Pulley wrote:
As for one big / partition- linux may be using it: and its their biggest
failing! I've had a system lockup due to lack of space. Never a problem
with bsd as logs will only fill up var, a user won't break it with
filling up usr, etc. And root always stays
On 12/13/11 04:09, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 15:42:52 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with traditional
unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting users have unlimited
access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk Quotas work to limit the damage
On 12/12/11 12:05, Foo JH wrote:
On 11/12/2011 6:21 AM, Robison, Dave wrote:
I prefer having separate partitions because it's more in line with
traditional unix systems, and in particular, I don't like letting
users have unlimited access to /tmp.
Pardon the noob question: will using Disk
I bit the bullet and installed the rc3, after spending half the day
fighting to get atheros 9285 working on a new laptop. I have to do
another as well, so...
After recovering myself from the shock of the new bsdinstall (not bad. A
little confusing after using sysinstall for so long), I
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
I bit the bullet and installed the rc3, after spending half the day
fighting to get atheros 9285 working on a new laptop. I have to do
another as well, so...
After recovering myself from the shock of the new bsdinstall (not bad. A
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:40:53 +
Frank Shute wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
possibly could, but it escaped me as to how. And before I do- I
looked up journaling on 9. I couldn't quite get to the bottom of
whether it is or isn't available/standard, or
On 12/10/11 22:20, RW wrote:
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:40:53 +
Frank Shute wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 07:51:50PM +1000, R Skinner wrote:
possibly could, but it escaped me as to how. And before I do- I
looked up journaling on 9. I couldn't quite get to the bottom of
whether it is or isn't
On 10.12.2011 15:44, Da Rock wrote:
So how does soft-update journaling compare to gjournal? I'm using gjournal now
and it runs a bit of a dog, but it is reliable (until another ufs filesystem
turns up at boot) and necessary in my environment. Can I dump it for this new
one?
Its used on a
On Sat, 10 Dec 2011, R Skinner wrote:
So I went to the handbook. I'm still a little confused though: can one still
setup the usr and var (and so forth)? It said you possibly could, but it
escaped me as to how.
Use the bsdinstall partition editor to manually create the partitions.
I
still create /usr and /var and all the other
legacy partitions if you so wish - and you may even use the full
journaling (gjournal) on them.
But the default for bsdinstall is to use gpart, install everything on a
big / and create UFS2 partitions with the new soft-updates journaling
system
to go now.
As Warren says, you can still create /usr and /var and all the other
legacy partitions if you so wish - and you may even use the full
journaling (gjournal) on them.
But the default for bsdinstall is to use gpart, install everything on
a big / and create UFS2 partitions with the new
be similar for GPT, which is really the way to go
now.
As Warren says, you can still create /usr and /var and all the other
legacy partitions if you so wish - and you may even use the full
journaling (gjournal) on them.
But the default for bsdinstall is to use gpart, install everything on
a big
is to use gpart, install everything
on a big / and create UFS2 partitions with the new soft-updates
journaling system (on by default). Compared to gjournal,
soft-updates journaling only journals metadata and not everything
like gjournal does. This will definitely make it faster although
probably
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
GPT is cool - no problems there. The main thing I want to know is if I need
to run fsck every time the system dies unexpectedly (which is a higher
occurrence on a laptop)? GJournal helps in that it takes care of that. The
growing size of drives is another
On 12/11/11 08:14, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Da Rock wrote:
GPT is cool - no problems there. The main thing I want to know is if
I need to run fsck every time the system dies unexpectedly (which is
a higher occurrence on a laptop)? GJournal helps in that it takes
care of that.
True. But as a new user it was the separate partitions that attracted
me, having been burned with linux's megaroot. And a new user would have
trouble setting up the partitions. Not to mention the break with
tradition (what is happening to this world)! :)
I prefer having separate partitions
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard fsck.
But fsck needs to be run manually- I have users that can't do that,
and the filesystem corrupts. Ergo
On 12/11/11 10:23, RW wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 08:17:41 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
SUJ speeds up the check a lot, seconds as opposed to minutes. If
something happens to the journal, it falls back to a standard fsck.
But fsck needs to be run manually- I have users that can't do that,
and the
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:50:06 +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
Hello Bruno,
On 05.12.2011 21:47, Bruno Gruel wrote:
Hello,
I just want to know if someone already try to install NUXEO on a
FreeBSD.
I try some month later without sucess. I will try to install it on
FreeBSD82 to day
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:50:06 +0100, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote:
I unzipped the thing in /usr/local and tried to execute the
./bin/nuxeoctl start
I do the same thing
command, which failed. Having a look at the first line of this file I
found
#!/bin/bash
Idem
But my bash is installed in
#
Hello,
I just want to know if someone already try to install NUXEO on a
FreeBSD.
I try some month later without sucess. I will try to install it on
FreeBSD82 to day.
I already ask the question on the nuxeo forum without reply..
Thank's.
Bruno
CD. After that
if you can still not boot the install program on the acer, you either
have the FreeBSD CD on a CD the acer can not read or the CDROM on the
acer is bad.
If there is still an OS on your laptop find what kind of CD it can read,
test that and burn a FreeBSD ISO image
Hi all,
I'm trying to install freebsd on a notebook for quite some time. It is an
Acer Aspire 9302AWMSi with a
AMD Turion 64 Mobile CPU.
I tried freebsd 8.2, pcbsd 8.2 and pcbsd 9.0 .
Unfortunately the installation routine gets trapped in some kind of endless
loop. Version 8.2 starts up
Em Seg, 2011-11-28 às 18:53 +1030, Andreas Junius escreveu:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install freebsd on a notebook for quite some time. It is an
Acer Aspire 9302AWMSi with a
AMD Turion 64 Mobile CPU.
I tried freebsd 8.2, pcbsd 8.2 and pcbsd 9.0 .
Unfortunately the installation routine gets
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote:
Em Seg, 2011-11-28 ?s 18:53 +1030, Andreas Junius escreveu:
Hi all,
I'm trying to install freebsd on a notebook for quite some time. It is an
Acer Aspire 9302AWMSi with a
AMD Turion 64 Mobile CPU.
I tried freebsd 8.2, pcbsd 8.2 and pcbsd
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 15:10:10 -0500 (EST)
d...@safeport.com articulated:
I would be very surprised if you can not install FreeBSD 8.2. Xorg is
unfortunately another matter. If you can easily reinstall windows (I
assume you want to dual boot) you can try to install only FreeBSD and
see
On Sunday 20 November 2011 23:55:31 Yuri wrote:
When I do portupgrade, I get this message (kdenetwork fails to update
due to this):
=== linphone-base-3.2.1_1,1 conflicts with installed package(s): ^M
ortp-0.13.0_1^M
Fix committed: ortp dependency has been replaced by linphone-base.
On 11/23/2011 11:45, Alberto Villa wrote:
Fix committed: ortp dependency has been replaced by linphone-base.
Please, update (and check UPDATING).
I updated via cvsup (*default release=cvs tag=.) but I don't see the
relevant ports UPDATING record.
The only recent record there is 2023 and
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 21:34:55 Yuri wrote:
I updated via cvsup (*default release=cvs tag=.) but I don't see the
relevant ports UPDATING record.
The only recent record there is 2023 and it is related to
databases/redis.
On 11/23/2011 15:23, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Wednesday 23 November 2011 21:34:55 Yuri wrote:
I updated via cvsup (*default release=cvs tag=.) but I don't see the
relevant ports UPDATING record.
The only recent record there is 2023 and it is related to
databases/redis.
2011/11/20 Yuri y...@rawbw.com:
Hi,
When I do portupgrade, I get this message (kdenetwork fails to update due to
this):
=== linphone-base-3.2.1_1,1 conflicts with installed package(s): ^M
ortp-0.13.0_1^M
Hello,
Please look at ports/UPDATING (20111016).
^M
They install files
On 11/21/2011 01:43, Olivier Smedts wrote:
Hello,
Please look at ports/UPDATING (20111016).
I did that, and wrote about this in my message (see below), but command
'portmaster -o net/linphone-base ortp' fails.
When I follow instruction in UPDATING and run this command 'portmaster -o
the same caveat during kde install and pkg_deleted ortp so I did
not have a problem with portmaster. Maybe you can pkg_delete -f
ortp-\* before upgrading kde with portmaster ?
When I follow instruction in UPDATING and run this command 'portmaster
-o
net/linphone-base ortp', I get
Hi,
When I do portupgrade, I get this message (kdenetwork fails to update
due to this):
=== linphone-base-3.2.1_1,1 conflicts with installed package(s): ^M
ortp-0.13.0_1^M
^M
They install files into the same place.^M
You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C.^M
While I am installing FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE, when I finish with disklabel, and
then says Last chance, then to accept I get the following message:
Unable to find device node for / dev/ad4s1b in / dev!
The creation of filesystem Will be aborted.
___
On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, masayoshi wrote:
--- On Sun, 6/11/11, Zantgo zan...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Zantgo zan...@gmail.com
Subject: Problem in install
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: Sunday, 6 November, 2011, 4:06 AM
While I am installing FreeBSD
8.2
.
swell:root 17:12:28 /usr/ports/databases/php5-dba # make install
=== Patching for php5-dba-5.3.8
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for php5-dba-5.3.8
=== php5-dba-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found
=== php5-dba-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.68 - found
Original Message
Subject:i386/162270: I need to install freebsd 7.4 manual
Resent-Date:Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:50:05 GMT
Resent-From:freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:47:53 GMT
From
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/11/11 00:22, Rares Aioanei wrote:
Original Message
Subject: i386/162270: I need to install freebsd 7.4 manual
Resent-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:50:05 GMT
Resent-From: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org (GNATS
On 11/3/11 2:22 PM, Rares Aioanei wrote:
Original Message
Subject: i386/162270: I need to install freebsd 7.4 manual
Resent-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 12:50:05 GMT
Resent-From: freebsd-gnats-sub...@freebsd.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-i...@freebsd.org
How I can install Gnome3?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:42:46 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
How I can install Gnome3?
Try this:
http://forums.pcbsd.org/showthread.php?t=14811
When Gnome 3 is officially in the ports tree, I think
it will be noted on the FreeBSD GNOME Project page:
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/
If you
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Mon Oct 31 20:44:18 2011
From: Zantgo zan...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:42:46 -0300
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Install gnome 3
How I can install Gnome3?
I'm torn between two facitous answers, based on the degree
Just following up...I resolved the issue by copying /etc/* to /stand/
in the mfsroot.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Rick Miller vmil...@hostileadmin.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am Installing 8.2-RELEASE via PXE and receive an error stating that
sysinstall was unable to create new /etc/fstab.
Hi All,
I am Installing 8.2-RELEASE via PXE and receive an error stating that
sysinstall was unable to create new /etc/fstab. Everything appears to
function correctly, in that, the system TFTP's the pxeboot and mfsroot
files as needed. However, When I switch to the holographic shell and
poke
On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:
I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
x64 desktop without CD drives.
1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server
-- Eir Nym
On 24 October 2011 13:23, Eir Nym eir...@gmail.com wrote:
✪
On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:10, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:
I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
x64 desktop without CD
On 10/24/11 04:29, Eir Nym wrote:
-- Eir Nym
On 24 October 2011 13:23, Eir Nymeir...@gmail.com wrote:
✪
On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:10, Matthew Seamanm.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 24/10/2011 02:18, Eir Nym wrote:
I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only
Hi,
I want to install FreeBSD to my second box and I have only Windows 7
x64 desktop without CD drives.
1. I have access to remote FreeBSD server (via SSH) where I can make
custom FreeBSD installation in any format.
2. I know how to create TFTP/DHCPD/PXE server to boot loader and kernel.
So
Please check the following link:
http://www.daemonforums.org/showthread.php?t=6373
I am attempting to install FreeBSD from DVD
(FreeBSD-8.2-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso.xz)
Installing on a Dell PE-2950 with six 300Gb Hds installed via Perc5i Serial
Attached SCSI. The controller has mirrored
Hi all,
First time poster to the lists!
Using dwm, loving the minimalism and it's forcing me to learn stuff the hard
way which is all good. But I can't seem to figure out how to apply a patch
to it.
According to the instructions listed here: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/ I
figured I'm to use
Hello
I'm trying to install php5-ldap from ports and I'm facing
to a strange error :
ldap3# cd php5-ldap
ldap3# make config
=== No options to configure
ldap3# make
=== php5-ldap-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found
=== php5-ldap-5.3.8 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf
Hi all,
I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed
gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get
the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its
installed a fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't
need on this
On 04/09/2011 11:05, Richard Collyer wrote:
I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed
gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get
the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its
installed a fair number of packaged (mostly X11
On 04/09/2011 12:02, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/09/2011 11:05, Richard Collyer wrote:
I was trying to get CUPS working last night and installed
gutenprint-cups but the make failed half way through - managed to get
the printer working without it so no longer need it. As a result its
installed a
On 04/09/2011 12:09, Richard Collyer wrote:
Just incase anyone else reads this for a solution I think the cd
/usr/ports/packages line near the bottom was a typo and should have been
/var/db/pkg
Yes. Dammit. One of these days I'll perfect the art of writing down
exactly what I want to say.
Hi! I'm trying to upgrade my Amanda installation from a v2.6 to v3.2 via ports.
I had configured Amanda previously to be installed as the user `operator`. The
upgraded version wants to install as the user `amanda`; however this presents
all kinds of problems:
- the `amanda` user has
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 07:20:32PM +, Morse, Richard E.MGH thus spake:
Hi! I'm trying to upgrade my Amanda installation from a v2.6 to v3.2 via ports.
I had configured Amanda previously to be installed as the user `operator`. The
upgraded version wants to install as the user `amanda
Please CC me in replies, this was passed on to me by someone subscribed.
Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote:
Hi! I'm trying to upgrade my Amanda installation from a v2.6 to v3.2 via
ports. I had configured Amanda previously to be installed as the user
`operator`. The upgraded version wants to install
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote:
GID_FILES=/usr/ports/OP_GROUP UID_FILES=/usr/ports/OP_USER
AMANDA_USER=operator AMANDA_GROUP=operator make install
This runs along for a while, then dies with the note:
** /usr/ports/OP_GROUP doesn't
On 23 Aug 2011 21:42, Morse, Richard E.MGH remo...@partners.org wrote:
On Aug 23, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Chris Rees wrote:
Morse, Richard E.MGH wrote:
GID_FILES=/usr/ports/OP_GROUP UID_FILES=/usr/ports/OP_USER
AMANDA_USER=operator AMANDA_GROUP=operator make install
This runs along
301 - 400 of 5507 matches
Mail list logo
