On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:55:19PM -0600, Chuck Swiger wrote:
>
> The packet will contain the MAC address of the router.
>
> Your machine will lookup the MAC address by doing an ARPOP_REQUEST for the
> IP address mentioned in the routing table which matches the destination IP
> address of the pac
Danny MacMillan wrote:
[ ... ]
I'm pretty sure I understand subnet masks. The information I
was looking for was how my machine determines which MAC address
to put on the ethernet packet when sending to a machine off
my network.
The packet will contain the MAC address of the router.
Your machine wi
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:21:13PM -0600, epilogue wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0400
> epilogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600
> > Danny MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Is it the subnet mask that lets my computer know that for an IP
>
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0400
epilogue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600
> Danny MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> >
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 16:40:10 -0600
Danny MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> >
> > > > ifconfig_ed0="inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0"
> > > >
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 03:41:04AM -0600, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
>
> > > ifconfig_ed0="inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0"
> > > ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.0.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0"
> >
> > 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.0.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:32:46PM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:
> > ifconfig_ed0="inet 192.168.1.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0"
> > ifconfig_vr0="inet 192.168.0.0/24 netmask 255.255.0.0"
>
> 192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.0.0/24 are blocks of addresses in CIDR notation,
> not the actual addresse
> From: freebsder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I've changed the rc.conf as per you suggestion see
> below.
> Do I also need to change the
> natd_flags="redirect_port tcp 192.168.0.3:80 80"
> to
> natd_flags="redirect_port tcp 192.168.1.0:80 80"
> ??
See below. You need to correct
Hi,
I deleted freebsd-newbies, freebsd-net and freebsd-isp from the Cc: list.
Please do not cross-post to many lists. The -questions list is usually the
right place to ask when you are not sure that the topic fits the charter of
a more specialized list.
On 2004-07-12 16:47, freebsder <[EMAIL PR
[Note: cross-post removed. -questions is the appropriate place for this.]
As your rc.conf contents show, you have the same block of addresses assigned
to both interfaces. This is a broken configuration. You need to renumber
one of these networks into non-overlapping space. I would change the
D
I have a Freebsd 5.1 box connected to the internet.
It works. But I am now trying to network two other
Win XP machines as per the following network
hierarchy:
<><><>
Setup
<><><>
ISP-> DSL Modem -> FreeBSD box :
1) "vr0" 192.168.0.1 [Gateway machine address]
2) "ed0" 192.168.0.3 [Internal Netwo
"Dave Raven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I can solve the problem with the BIMAP - I'm just interested in
> finding out why it has to wait to resolve the host name when I'm telnetting
> directly to an ip address and I have no nameservers specified? Surely that
> can't be the way it has to
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
>
> Err -- no. The broadcast address is a function of the netmask.
> Specifically, looking at IPv4 addresses/masks as 32bit integers, the
> broadcast address has all ones where ever the net
PM
To: Dave Raven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Post your ipf rules and ipnat rules and /etc/resolv.conf
resolv.conf should have your isp's dns server names. If not then
post rc.conf also. Give interface name of Nic card connected to
public internet. Has this net
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:31:58PM -0700, Kevin Stevens wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
>
> > # ifconfig fxp1
> > fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> > inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
> > inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.1
> >
ether now?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Raven
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 5:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
I have made further progress - thanks for all your steady replies. I
know it
might look
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> The original ip 186.3 sets the broadcast - any aliases after that must
> have a /32 broadcast as they are aliases... That's correct isn't it
> (rest of list) ?
I don't believe so - it's the netmask which needs to be /32, which you did
correctly. See:
h
re the problem is
Thanks
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Stevens
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:32 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> # ifco
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Dave Raven wrote:
> # ifconfig fxp1
> fxp1: flags=8843 mtu 1500
> inet x.y.186.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast x.y.186.255
> inet x.y.186.1 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.1
> inet x.y.186.15 netmask 0x broadcast x.y.186.15
> inet x.
riginal Message-
From: JJB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:23 PM
To: Dave Raven; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Your symptoms are typical of DNS time outs.
Ping ip address does no DNS lookups.
Ping freebsd.org will not work either.
With out a l
, June 24, 2004 4:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
Hi all,
I really need some urgent help with this I'm completely
confused. I
have a FreeBSD 4.9 machine running ipfilter ipnat vrrp and a few
other
services, today is the first time I tried to access throug
result in an immediate negative response from the DNS
server, which should avoid the delay.
>
> Thanks again
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
> To: Dave Raven
> Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 n
estions on further tests?
Thanks again
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Gordon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 June 2004 11:09 PM
To: Dave Raven
Subject: Re: Urgent 4.9 networking problems
try ping -nR -c1 x.y.186.254
If you don't get the same "lag" then it is your D
Hi all,
I really need some urgent help with this I'm completely confused. I
have a FreeBSD 4.9 machine running ipfilter ipnat vrrp and a few other
services, today is the first time I tried to access through the specific
method but now every interface and every local address I try has the s
Hello all, I'm trying to use FreeBSD 5.2.1 in my computer behind a
domestic ADSL modem-router. At home, we have 2 computers, 1 is a server
and the router uses NAT with some port redirections; and the 2nd one is
my workstation, where I use NetBSD, Linux and FreeBSD 5.2.1.
The problem is t
On Monday, 1 December 2003 at 18:16:10 +1100, Darryl Barlow wrote:
> I am a Linux user trying Freebsd. I've installed 5.1 on two machines, one of
> shich is connected to a wireless network through a TI pci cardbus adapator
> and an Avaya Silver Wireless Network Card. The card is recognised, the
I am a Linux user trying Freebsd. I've installed 5.1 on two machines, one of
shich is connected to a wireless network through a TI pci cardbus adapator
and an Avaya Silver Wireless Network Card. The card is recognised, the
configuration settings appear to be correct but ifconfig -a shows that
Hi Everybody,
I'm having conceptual problems, I think :-)
My objective is to install a firewall with OpenBSD
which will be the gateway of my LAN.
Right now I have a unique server with the following
services:
Gateway to Internet
mail: qmail and serialmail, fetchmail
DataBase: MySQL
SAMBA,
DNS, et
28 matches
Mail list logo
