Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how to deal with this
easily.
What
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how
like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
If you have ports that far out of date, the upgrade process is going to
be long. Ports where the system does not know the replacement will have
to be handled manually.
Actually
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Scott Ballantyne s...@ssr.com wrote:
I understand why portmaster quits that port.
Because it has no choice.
It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
So it should
that port. It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
Some of them. It could not update any ports that depend on missing
ports, which conflicts with the -a meaning all.
If you have ports that far out of date
Adam Vande More wrote:
It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
So it should continue on and potentially build 1000's of ports with broken
linking and dependencies? Portupgrade will do this if you
On Mon 14 Oct 2013 Warren Block wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
On Mon, 14 oct 2013, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Mon, 14 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
Actually, the last time I updated my ports was when I installed 9.0,
and I used
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Scott Ballantyne s...@ssr.com wrote:
Adam Vande More wrote:
It does seem like a bit
of over-kill to quit updating ALL ports because one is long
gone. Seems like it could do the others.
So it should continue on and potentially build 1000's
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how to deal with this
easily. If the ports aren't
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013, Scott Ballantyne wrote:
Hi,
I'm following the recipe at the end of man portmaster for deleting and
reinstalling all my ports, which I have done many times in the
past. This time, I am getting errors on the portmaster -Faf step
involving deleted ports, and I'm not sure how
I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to reduce
ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with
pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports installed
that aren't required anymore? Will pkg_delete also delete any dependencies
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote:
I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to
reduce
ports in use and simplify system updating (deleting postfix with
pkg_delete). Is it possible that deleting postfix will leave ports
installed
that aren't required
Cool, thanks Mark. Guess that's also a reason to learn new pkg tools.
.
On 2013-08-31, at 1:41 PM, Mark Felder f...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013, at 14:19, Dale Scott wrote:
I was using the postfix port, but decided to replace it with ssmtp to
reduce
ports in use and simplify
I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
/usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
doesn't
and it exists in
/usr/ports/distfiles, yet it keeps giving an error stating that the file
doesn't exist.
Please help.
*Harpreet Singh Chawla*
___
No idea about virtualbox port, but have you tried deleting the offending
file (rm -f /usr/ports/distfiles
at 7:32 PM, Harpreet Singh Chawla
preet10101...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to install virtualbox support for my FreeBSD 9.1. A
package named v4l_compat-1.0.20120501.tar.gz is causing problems in the
installation. The package was downloaded automatically and it exists in
/usr/ports
Hello
I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port
construction in their Makefiles.
But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected
because of the relative path.
Shouldn't they use ${PORTSDIR}/some/port instead?
Thanks for the replies.
Kozlov
On 27/08/2013 13:04, Koslov Sergey wrote:
Hello
I've noticed that many ports are using ${.CURDIR}/../../some/port
construction in their Makefiles.
But if you copy on of these ports elsewhere it won't work as expected
because of the relative path.
Shouldn't they use ${PORTSDIR}/some/port
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing I
forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is finding
vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on the system.
These may have been installed at one point and removed. Firefox is
one
On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote:
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing
I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is
finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed on
the system. These may have been installed at one
On 08/06/2013 11:58 am, Paul Macdonald wrote:
On 06/08/2013 17:25, dweimer wrote:
I have a system that I just recently setup port audit, after realizing
I forgot to install it on the machine. The problem is that it is
finding vulnerabilities in several ports that are not installed
On 06/08/2013 19:23, dweimer wrote:
Of course I have WITH_PKGNG=YES in the make.conf, and I believe that
has been there ever since the server was built. Is my best option to
get the correct list from pkg info use rm -r /var/db/pkg/* to clear
everything out and then reinstall all of the ports
everything out and then reinstall all of the ports?
If you've had WITH_PKGNG=YES ever since the server was built then you
shouldn't have any of the old-style pkg_tools entries in /var/db/pkg.
Unless, that is, you've been using pkg_add(1) directly. Don't do that.
You just end up with a complete mess
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 08:47:47AM -0400, Carmel wrote:
I am having a problem updating some ports since installing the
print/texlive-full port a few days ago. I have: TEX_DEFAULT=texlive
sans quotes at the top of my /etc/make.conf file.
[...]
I think you have the reason just above
I am having a problem updating some ports since installing the
print/texlive-full port a few days ago. I have: TEX_DEFAULT=texlive
sans quotes at the top of my /etc/make.conf file.
For instance, the en-freebsd-doc-42326,1, and in fact all of the
*-freebsd-doc ports are refusing to build
2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev:
When I run
portsnap fetch update
pkg version -vIL=
It returns
pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory
The directory is there and I can list the contents.
What's going on?
Thanks
/Leslie
On 13/07/2013 11:17, Leslie Jensen wrote:
2013-07-12 13:25, Leslie Jensen skrev:
When I run
portsnap fetch update
pkg version -vIL=
It returns
pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory
The directory is there and I can list the contents.
What's
When I run
portsnap fetch update
pkg version -vIL=
It returns
pkg: Unable to open ports directory /usr/ports: No such file or directory
The directory is there and I can list the contents.
What's going on?
Thanks
/Leslie
___
freebsd-questions
Is anyone else having problems installing pear with PHP 5.5? Or do I
just have a misconfiguration on my system that is causing the install
process to look at my /tmp directory. My ports tree is updated to svn
revision 322502, and the system is running FreeBSD 9.1p4, so everything
is up
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:29 PM, Waitman Gobble gobble...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, Shane Ambler free...@shaneware.biz wrote:
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
set it up how you want.
a simple
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Mark Felder f...@feld.me wrote:
On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:08:15 -0500, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am
On 05/06/2013 17:00, Waitman Gobble wrote:
If you must have a web based version, another option is DIY roll your
own ports index based on your own local ports tree. At least you can
set it up how you want.
a simple quick-together script running on my computer:
https://dx.burplex.com/FreeBSD
I can not get current version of the ports system.
The ports web page http://www.freebsd.org/ports/
is almost 2 years out of date. Says the port I am interested in is at
1.7 version when just 2 weeks ago it was at 2.2. Portsnap is also messed
up showing the 1.7 version
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:06:15 +0200
Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote:
Le 28/05/2013 ? 14:50:25+0700, Olivier Nicole a écrit
Hi,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or
easyinstall (python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or
easyinstall ? or both
Hi everybody,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
For exemple when you want install some software with lots of dependances
you can use (if the software use easy_install) just one
Hi,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
But I am using mostly Perl and CPAN is very well integrated in FreeBSD
ports.
Voila.
Olivier
[ConnectX-3]'
class = network
I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500
options=209bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC
Le 28/05/2013 ? 14:50:25+0700, Olivier Nicole a écrit
Hi,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
Me too. But what you do when you cannot
=0x00
vendor = 'Mellanox Technologies'
device = 'MT27500 Family [ConnectX-3]'
class = network
I want to create Bond on the two ports (ib0 and ib1) of this device:
[root@qa-h-vrt-030-006 ~]# ifconfig
em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu
Albert,
I would like to known how you manage your gem (ruby) or easyinstall
(python). Do you use ports ? or directly gems or easyinstall ? or both ?
As far as I can, I use ports, for consistency.
Me too. But what you do when you cannot ? (Like the ports don't exist) ?
I see three
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs as part of my
install. After that, I use subversion to (I thought) make sure everything
was up
On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:00:52 -0700
Ed Flecko wrote:
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date,
but pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs as part of my
install. After
On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs as part of my
install. After that, I use
, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1 and I've installed ports, src, and docs
?
Ed
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Matthew Seaman matt...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On 27/05/2013 19:00, Ed Flecko wrote:
Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.
:-)
I thought I was using svn to keep my ports, src and docs up to date, but
pkg_version seems to disagree.
I'm running 9.1
On Mon, 27 May 2013, Ed Flecko wrote:
Since I want to know the correct way (or one of I'm sure many correct
ways) of initially installing the OS and then getting it up to date (and
staying up to date), can you tell me what I did wrong and/or what I might
want to do differently?
A short
El día Wednesday, May 08, 2013 a las 02:58:18PM -0700, Waitman Gobble escribió:
Please be kind and give me some hints about best options I have:
- Do we have another Xserver in the ports to try?
- Should I post a bug report in our Gnats?
- Should I go to the lists.x.org?
- Any options
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió:
xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
I randomly face X11 crashes with the following symtoms:
- the display is filled with some colored pattern
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Tuesday, May 07, 2013 a las 02:45:39PM +0200, Matthias Apitz
escribió:
xorg-server-1.7.7_6,1 X.Org X server and related programs
all ports are from r315646 (1st of April);
I randomly face X11 crashes with the following symtoms
Hi,
I've seen that texlive has finally landed in the ports tree and as I
had a fresh and clean setup system ready I tried it out.
I tried to install texlive-full which started out okay but the last
line in my terminal is:
fmtutil: running `ptex -ini -jobname=ptex -progname=ptex ptex.ini
#ptex
Hello,
I am the maintainer of most of the Tryton ports. Tryton is a python
based application framework where you can easily build your own business
modules on top. It also provides some default modules for common uses.
Currently Tryton 2.4 series is in the ports. From upstream the successor
On 21/04/2013 10:24, Matthias Petermann wrote:
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond # portlint -AC
[...]
FATAL: Package conflicts with itself. You should remove trytond-* from
CONFLICTS.
1 fatal error and 4 warnings found.
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond #
So it looks like I need
wrote:
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond # portlint -AC
[...]
FATAL: Package conflicts with itself. You should remove trytond-* from
CONFLICTS.
1 fatal error and 4 warnings found.
root@compaq:/usr/ports/finance/trytond #
So it looks like I need to explicitly specify the conflicting versions,
e.g
Hello list,
In my daily vulnerability report, I'm seeing this:
Affected package: chromium-25.0.1364.160
Type of problem: chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities.
Reference:
http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/bdd48858-9656-11e2-a9a8-00262d5ed8ee.html
Latest ports
Latest ports update as of 1630 UTC - 315981
I try to update it. I get:
portupgrade chromium
--- Upgrading 'chromium-25.0.1364.160' to 'chromium-25.0.1364.172'
(www/chromium)
--- Building '/usr/ports/www
On 17/04/2013 19:27, Andrei Brezan wrote:
You can try:
portupgrade -m -DDISABLE_VULNERABILITIES chromium
From what I can see there is no update yet for the mentioned security
vulnerability.
Regards,
Andrei
Hi Andrei
It seems there is an update in the source but not in the ports. Source
John Levine wrote:
When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
^^
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that
originated from CVS!! Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 6: warning: The FreeBSD
project has switched from
Andre Goree an...@drenet.info writes:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I should
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:56:12 -0400, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Andre Goree an...@drenet.info writes:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion
On Fri, 29 Mar 2013 21:52:41 -0400, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better tool. Perhaps I should be running 'make
fetchindex' instead? I'm
On 29 March 2013 22:29, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
I seem to have to run 'make index' in /usr/ports after I've run 'svn up
/usr/ports' in order to see which ports need to be updated using
'portversion'. This doesn't seem correct...and if so portsnap would
seem like a much better
When I do portsnap update and try building stuff, I get errors like this:
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 5: warning: You are using a ports file that originated
from CVS!!
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 6: warning: The FreeBSD project has switched from CVS to
SubVersion.
Mk/bsd.port.mk, line 7: warning: This CVS
On 26/03/2013 11:53, Shane Ambler wrote:
Either the man pages list is incorrect or heimdal installs a
duplicate copy of the openssl man pages - maybe this could be
disabled if openssl from ports is used.
For reference - heimdal includes source for libhcrypto which it uses if
openssl
On 26/03/2013 00:42, Jim Ballantine wrote:
Hi
I had removed the port, but it was reinstalled as a dependency of
other ports. I have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc/make.conf, and
after I do a pkg delete -f heimdal openssl installs fine, but when I
try to install heimdal from ports
On 22/03/2013 04:36, Jim Ballantine wrote:
But when I attempt to install the latest openssl for the
port system, it fails with a conflict (installs file in the same place)
with heimdal.
Take a close look at the message and what happens before. openssl only
gives a conflict message if the
The port is newer than the base version:
port is 1.0.1_8 and the base is 0.9.2
Both openssl and heimdal install fine from the base system src,
it's only when I try to install openssl from the ports, with heimdal
installed by the base system that I get the error.
When I run make install, what I
Hi,
I understand that heimdal and openssl are both port of the base system and
both install
fine with a system build/install. But when I attempt to install the latest
openssl for the
port system, it fails with a conflict (installs file in the same place)
with heimdal. I've search
the web for an
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:06:52 -0400
Jim Ballantine articulated:
Hi,
I understand that heimdal and openssl are both port of the base
system and both install
fine with a system build/install. But when I attempt to install the
latest openssl for the
port system, it fails with a conflict
I did something dumb I think with ports on my box. In the process of
upgrading Perl, for every package that depended on Perl, via pkgdb, I
somehow managed to delete the fact that the package depends on Perl
itself. So now I have a bunch of packages that no longer reference
Perl in it's upstream
Hi Chaps,
I typed make deinstall within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
default compiled languages.
How can I get back to the default FreeBSD default installed language
state (with Perl installed etc)?
Crossing my fingers
lang/ contains all languages and so on ruby, lua, python, perl.. Of course
you removed perl since you typed make deinstall in that parent port tree.
You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it again.
You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows here, you can
On 19/03/2013 07:54, Rob Navarro wrote:
Hi Chaps,
I typed make deinstall within the /usr/ports/lang directory of a
FreeBSD 9.0 and mistakenly lost Perl, Python, Ruby and a whole host of
default compiled languages.
How can I get back to the default FreeBSD default installed language
state
you typed make deinstall in that parent
port tree.
You can type make install in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.14 to install it
again. You don't need to reinstall FreeBSD, you're not on Windows
here, you can repair everything :)
Note: there is no perl installed by default, it's in the ports for few
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
is there a site or other location that lists *NEW* (not updated) ports
since a given date?
http://www.freshports.org/
has some limited options (24hrs, 48hrs, 7days, one month)...
but since the ports tree is now
is there a site or other location that lists *NEW* (not updated) ports
since a given date?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com writes:
Thank you, Damien, for the reply. AFAIK, STABLE gets updated every 2
weeks but not every day, and it seems to be that because of the
intrusion, it has not been updated for long. The versions of the ports
that come with the 9.1-RELEASE are even slightly
desktops, I keep ports and packages at
the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default
options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible to get the
ports snapshot that was used to compile the 9-STABLE packages? I think I
could use subversion but then I need
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the
RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need non-default
On 02/17/2013 13:13, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 16 Feb 2013, at 16:56, Jeff Tipton jef...@mail.com wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there are no
packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and packages at the RELEASE
versions, so I only
, the streaming mechanism of
PostgreSQL 9.X expects the slaves to be always online, to which the
replication.
I was said that Bucardo (http://bucardo.org/) would be the tool of
choice, but FreeBSD ports seem not not have this tool. SLONY also is a
way to complicated for my for just this task - or I'm
expects the slaves to be always online, to which the
replication.
I was said that Bucardo (http://bucardo.org/) would be the tool of
choice, but FreeBSD ports seem not not have this tool. SLONY also is a
way to complicated for my for just this task - or I'm to dumb to perform
a solution that fits
Hi,
I upgraded 9.0 - 9.1 on my netbook and only then found out that there
are no packages for 9.1-RELEASE. On my desktops, I keep ports and
packages at the RELEASE versions, so I only have to compile when I need
non-default options or when there are no packages. Would it be possible
to get
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went to bed and
left it to get on with it.
The next morning I discovered
On 9 February 2013 05:45, Mike Clarke jmc-freeb...@milibyte.co.uk wrote:
I started off portmaster on a massive update on Thursday evening. Everything
started off OK and I kept responding to all the make config screens until they
were all finished and the compilation was well underway then went
Hello,
I run rkhunter from time to time and have warnings about the diff between
sockstat and netstat like this:
[11:33:31] Warning: Differences found between sockstat and netstat output:
[11:33:31] Sockstat output (ports in use): 0 1124 22 25 514 587
[11:33:31] Netstat output
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I
saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which update KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on.
Does anyone knows when KDE 4.9.5 will be out in ports
Hi,
2013/2/3 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last time I
saw many update for KDE 4.8.4 which update KDE 4.9.5 ports and so on.
Does anyone
On Sunday 03 February 2013 23:40:46 Olivier Smedts wrote:
Hi,
2013/2/3 ajtiM lum...@gmail.com:
Hi!
I have installed KDE 4.9.5 and Calligra 2.5.5 from area51.
I am not sure how is working:
I use portsnap which update ports and KDE 4.9.5 ports are merged. Last
time I saw many update
to a wrong owner for
files from world.
It's still running.
I still have no idea how to check this for the files build from ports.
If I understand your problem correctly, it is of incorrect owner
group. If so, are there any problems with just running chown -R on
the parent directory (say /usr
IDS outfile_28Jan2013.ids
perhaps this will give some useful output, regarding to a wrong owner for
files from world.
It's still running.
I still have no idea how to check this for the files build from ports.
If I understand your problem correctly, it is of incorrect owner
group
.ids
perhaps this will give some useful output, regarding to a wrong owner for
files from world.
It's still running.
I still have no idea how to check this for the files build from ports.
If I understand your problem correctly, it is of incorrect owner
group. If so, are there any
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
when somebody makes a big mistake? Perhaps more people stay with Linux
than other *NIX,
El día Tuesday, January 29, 2013 a las 12:23:09PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf escribió:
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 10:08 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote:
This is a mayor damage and can only be repaired by a new installation.
Perhaps true, but if such a simple mistake can't be fixed, what happens
when
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:08:20 +0100
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
El día Monday, January 28, 2013 a las 10:28:06PM -1000, parv escribió:
In general, I find all this thread (wrong file owner) a bit boring.
I find it very interesting.
This is a mayor damage and can only be
world build from ports? if this should be ok for
the list, if not I can be quiet, no hard feelings. The thread could easily
be filtered by most MUAs.
Regards,
Ralf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
to
this issue anymore. I'll continue with this thread Re: How to fix a
broken owner for files from world build from ports? if this should
be ok for the list, if not I can be quiet, no hard feelings. The
thread could easily be filtered by most MUAs.
just continue.
erich
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 14:58:18 +0100, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
mtree
I was confused, since the existing files only provide directories. Ok, I
guess I understand, I can let mtree generate new files using the backup. I
anyway need to take care about files that are missing by the backup.
Thank
I'm surprised, there's no /bin/sh for the backup:
# ls -ld /bin/sh
-r-xr-xr-x 1 rocketmouse wheel 142952 Dec 23 18:38 /bin/sh
# ls -ld /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh
ls: /usr/TMP4DIFF/bin/sh: No such file or directory
This is an error in reasoning :D. I compared the original /bin, with a
restore
1 - 100 of 6354 matches
Mail list logo
