On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:12, Chris Rees wrote:
Can
no-one can come up with a reply either quoting a mailing list or
giving the circumstances when:
a) Background fsck caused data CORRUPTION
_and_
b) A foreground fsck would not have done the same
?
2009/4/6 Doug Hardie bc...@lafn.org:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 02:34, Chris Rees wrote:
\
So, the answer is NO, it does NOT cause data CORRUPTION. A simple
reboot solved it? Really, you're advocating guaranteed extended
downtime every time there's a power outage, compared with a slight
chance of a slightly longer downtime while every
2009/4/6 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk:
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:40:52 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de:
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this
On Apr 6, 2009, at 11:12, Chris Rees wrote:
Can
no-one can come up with a reply either quoting a mailing list or
giving the circumstances when:
a) Background fsck caused data CORRUPTION
_and_
b) A foreground fsck would not have done the same
?
Yes. When background FSCK first became
2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de:
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Why?
Google background fsck damage.
I was bitten by it myself, and I also
2009/4/5 Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com:
2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de:
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Why?
Google background fsck damage.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2009 21:40:52 +0100
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de:
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of FreeBSD.
One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is to force an
fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On Linux, this was simply a
matter of editing /etc/rc.sysinit. Things seem a bit more complicated in
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:05:11 manish jain wrote:
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of FreeBSD.
One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is to force an
fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On Linux, this was simply a
matter of editing
manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of FreeBSD.
One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is to force an
fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On Linux, this was simply a
matter of editing /etc/rc.sysinit. Things seem a bit
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:35:11 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to force an fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On Linux, this
was
i don't know why you do want to FORCE it every boot. in FreeBSD it's not
needed.
but you may add
background_fsck=NO
to check filesystems at boot when needed, not delayed.
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
___
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:01:37 +0800, Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:35:11 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Why?
Chris
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Bruce Cran wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:35:11 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to force an fsck on all filesystems at system startup. On
2009/3/31 manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com:
BTW, a lot of people who posted replies thought I was not aware that a preen
is always executed at startup. When I said I wanted to force an fsck, I
meant 'fsck -fy'. As for background checks, they are - in my opinion - a
real nightmare. Even
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:05:11 manish jain wrote:
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I would to carry over from my Linux days is
to
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
As for the reason why I want to force fsck is that it has now
happened 3 timed that, after a clean and proper shutdown - with no
foreign filesystems mounted, FreeBSD has complained on system restart
(twice on a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Having bgfsck enabled is like
inviting a dragon to dinner when this happens.
2009/3/31 RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com:
If you've done a normal install, soft-updates aren't enabled on /,
so it will get foreground
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 04:04:53PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:00:18 +0530
manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Having bgfsck enabled is like
inviting a dragon to dinner when this happens.
2009/3/31 RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com:
If you've done a normal
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 14:24:11 RW wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 08:05:11 manish jain wrote:
I am migrating from Linux and am still learning the basics of
FreeBSD. One thing that I
Chris Rees utis...@googlemail.com wrote:
2009/3/31 Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl:
IMHO this background fsck isn't good idea at all
Why?
Google background fsck damage.
I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
background fsck off. If your disks are
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:57:21 +0200 (CEST), Oliver Fromme
o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
Google background fsck damage.
I was bitten by it myself, and I also recommend to turn
background fsck off. If your disks are large and you
can't afford the fsck time, consider using ZFS, which
has a
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:36:32 +0200
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009 14:24:11 RW wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:15:54 +0200
Mel Flynn mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net wrote:
somebody please point me in the right direction ?
24 matches
Mail list logo
