On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Surat Sodchuen wrote:
> thank for your kindness
> i tired that your suggestion but cannot resolve problem.
> for more information ...
> FreeBSD 9.1-Release on HP ProLiant DL380p Gen8 128GB of Ram
> every time when booting process it seem freezing a
Please include your question as email content, not subject.
http://serverfault.com/questions/361673/hp-nc107i-bcm5723-on-freebsd-9
Indicates
you may be able to set
hw.bge.allow_asf="0"
in /boot/loader.conf. Try this, and if the problem persists, please reply
with more information (FreeBSD versio
Surat Sodchuen
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 04/02/2013 19:44, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
> avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB)
>
>
>
> where did 1GB of memory go?
Used by the kernel.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpke
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> new dell server:
...
> real memory = 34359738368 (32768 MB)
> avail memory = 33167446016 (31630 MB)
>
> where did 1GB of memory go?
- new BIOS firmware available ?
- BIOS - preallocation - graphics card ?
- $ sysctl -a |grep -i mem
jb
___
new dell server:
Copyright (c) 1992-2013 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #2: Sat
Good news on clang front:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTE3NjI
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubs
Ian,
Thank you for wind of hope :)
2012/7/30 Ian Smith :
> On my Thinkpad T23, BIOS autostart (not autoresume) time setting also
> works only from a cold start. WoL also worked from 'off' but not from
> S3, but that was on 8.1-STABLE. What version are you running, and on
> what machine? Some r
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 425, Issue 13, Message: 13
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 21:37:48 +0200 Piotr Czachur wrote:
> Dear users,
>
> Does FreeBSD support waking system up from S3 (suspend to RAM) state
> at specified time? On Linux, it can be achieved using rtcwake command
>
Dear users,
Does FreeBSD support waking system up from S3 (suspend to RAM) state
at specified time? On Linux, it can be achieved using rtcwake command
that uses RTC support in kernel.
If it's not supported, maybe I can somehow enable waking from S3 using
BIOS autoresume option? It powers m
Thanks Matthew / Michael for your responses on this.
On 9/14/2011 2:51 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 14/09/2011 18:27, Michael Sierchio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
... In these days of plentiful RAM, the new rule of thumb is "if you're
swapping, t
>
> The old rule of thumb of swap = 2 x RAM dates back to the days when
> 128MB RAM was a big deal. Nowadays, you're likely to have that much
> in your phone, and systems with 128GB RAM are not unknown.
>
> In these days of plentiful RAM, the new rule of thumb is "
On 14/09/2011 18:27, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Matthew Seaman
> wrote:
>
>> > ... In these days of plentiful RAM, the new rule of thumb is "if you're
>> > swapping, then you're doing it wrong."
> I think your re
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Matthew Seaman
wrote:
> ... In these days of plentiful RAM, the new rule of thumb is "if you're
> swapping, then you're doing it wrong."
I think your response follows the excellent pedagogical principle: "a
little inaccuracy sa
Excellent response. Thank you so much.
On Sep 14, 2011 9:56 AM, "Matthew Seaman"
wrote:
>
> On 14/09/2011 13:34, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
> > Each operating system seems to have different documentation regarding
> > what a decent swap size is for systems with large a
On 14/09/2011 13:34, Jonathan Vomacka wrote:
> Each operating system seems to have different documentation regarding
> what a decent swap size is for systems with large amounts of RAM. My
> system only has 8GB of RAM. Some people have gone with the general idea
> that 2X the amou
Good morning all,
Each operating system seems to have different documentation regarding
what a decent swap size is for systems with large amounts of RAM. My
system only has 8GB of RAM. Some people have gone with the general idea
that 2X the amount of RAM is sufficient but for systems with
At 05:33 PM 9/4/2011, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Does sound sorta-like VM thrashing.
Could it be hardware based _bank-switching_ on memory?
This would cause an intterrupt every time successive memory accesses were in
differnt 'banks'.
Indeed. In fact, when you put in a 4GB module, the BIOS reports
>I'd like to experiment with having FreeBSD try to use less than the
>full 4 GB (e.g., to make it act as if memory ended at, say, 3 GB)
>but I'm not sure how to tell the kernel to do that.
In /boot/loader.conf set "hw.physmem" to whatever size you want it to use.
"man loader" for more info
R's
Have been doing more experimentation regarding this problem. It
doesn't occur with a 1 GB memory module in the machine, nor with a
2 GB module -- only a 4 GB module.
This makes me wonder if there's some sort of memory bank switching
or extended addressing mechanism here (like PAE). Perhaps it'
I've just seen something very peculiar. I have here a dual Atom
(D525) system which was running with 1 GB of RAM, and this morning
I put a 4 GB module into the system instead. Suddenly, the
systat(8) and top(8) commands were both reporting bursts of
interrupt overhead as high as 25% of
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some experiences that I&#
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
> question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some experiences that I've had.
Example #1:
At one tim
--As of May 26, 2011 7:46:10 PM -0400, Chris Hill is alleged to have said:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company.
My question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
Sent: 27 May 2011 02:16
To: Gary Gatten; Chuck Swiger
Cc: 'questi...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
On Thu, 26 May
Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amou
? Tweaked/minimal
kernel, etc.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my co
On May 26, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
> question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
How many DHCP leases and NAT clients?
ISC's DHCPd typically runs a few tens
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
not much else. I expect the amount of traffic (throu
--As of May 21, 2011 9:37:31 PM +0300, Vladislav V. Prodan is alleged to
have said:
Thanks for the recommendation, but I have all the workers of the amd64
and tests in the i386, with its restrictions did not see the point.
Now start the virtual machine to 150MB RAM, FreeBSD 8.2-CURRENT amd64
more of a priority than data integrity.
The other thing to keep in mind is i386 binaries use less RAM than their
amd64 counter parts. For this reason, I always make my VM's 32 bit to
achieve higher VM density. I have not had trouble with ZFS on i385 with
1GB+ of RAM when following the rec
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote:
> Tell choice OS (8.2, 8.2-CURRENT or 9.0-CURRENT, FS (UFS or ZFS) and the
> minimum amount of RAM for use in such schemes:
> 1) the interaction of multiple routers with established quagga (bgpv4,
> bgpv6, ospf)
> 2)
"Vladislav V. Prodan" writes:
> Tell choice OS (8.2, 8.2-CURRENT or 9.0-CURRENT, FS (UFS or ZFS) and
> the minimum amount of RAM for use in such schemes:
> 1) the interaction of multiple routers with established quagga (bgpv4,
> bgpv6, ospf)
> 2) the work of two
Tell choice OS (8.2, 8.2-CURRENT or 9.0-CURRENT, FS (UFS or ZFS) and the
minimum amount of RAM for use in such schemes:
1) the interaction of multiple routers with established quagga (bgpv4,
bgpv6, ospf)
2) the work of two different modes of MYSQL replication servers/clusters.
3) backup zfs
On 07/27/10 07:38, EforeZZ wrote:
Hi,
I was playing around with fwcontrol and its "-m" switch.
I connected my FreeBSD 7.2 notebook to Win7 PC Via firewire and
attempted to access Win7's RAM through the /dev/fwmem interface. I
failed.
The question is.. Should this always wo
Hi,
I was playing around with fwcontrol and its "-m" switch.
I connected my FreeBSD 7.2 notebook to Win7 PC Via firewire and
attempted to access Win7's RAM through the /dev/fwmem interface. I
failed.
5 r...@purevil:t
Thank you all for the consistent advice.
Iv
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
of
a .0 release. That said, I haven't heard of major issues with 8.0, so either
is likely to be fine.
> b) Is i386 or amd64 the right way?
For a machine with 4GB of RAM, amd64 is likely to be a better choice.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
___
freebsd-ques
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Iv Ray wrote:
>
>> We are getting a new web server -
>>
>> Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM
>>
>> It will have -
>>
>> 2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Iv Ray wrote:
> We are getting a new web server -
>
> Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM
>
> It will have -
>
> 2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1
>
> We will run -
>
> - Apache 2.x
> - PHP 5.x
> - PostgreSQL 8.x
We are getting a new web server -
Singe Dual Core Opteron 1212 w/ 4 GB RAM
It will have -
2 x 250 GB SATA gmirror RAID 1
We will run -
- Apache 2.x
- PHP 5.x
- PostgreSQL 8.x
- Postfix 2.x
We have a couple of questions-
If we are more interested in stability than in features and performance
revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
> > absolutely hammering the swap.
> >
> > I'm trying to set it up as a demo for some skeptics with no money, so
> > I need email, internet (with plugins), openoffice, acrobat, and wine.
[Rock, mate, you
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 09:21:06AM -0800, Charlie Kester wrote:
> On Wed 06 Jan 2010 at 04:25:31 PST Bill Moran wrote:
> >In response to Da Rock :
> >
> >>Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
> >>
> >>I have revived
n on those topics. I think we should simply point
interested readers in that direction and let them make up their own
minds.
[...]
I am currently using a PIV 2.4GHz with 480MB RAM with fluxbox!
Well, I'm currently using a P3 866MHz with 512MB RAM with musca!
And it works very well too. ;-
there's already a
> > voluminous discussion on those topics. I think we should simply point
> > interested readers in that direction and let them make up their own
> > minds.
> >
> [...]
>
> I am currently using a PIV 2.4GHz with 480MB RAM with fluxbox!
>
interested readers in that direction and let them make up their own
minds.
[...]
I am currently using a PIV 2.4GHz with 480MB RAM with fluxbox!
This works really well, I have firefox and opera browsers installed and
will look at getting my favorite Seamonkey installed too sometime but
isn'
Good point. Something anyone considering these Firefox alternatives
should investigate.
Same for OpenOffice. There are alternatives to each of the apps in the
OpenOffice suite that might not have all the same bells and whistles,
but will run in much less RAM.
gnumeric is nice for a sprea
bells and whistles,
but will run in much less RAM.
gnumeric is nice for a spreadsheet. May not be particularly
lightweight, but lighter than OO.
-Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
On Wed 06 Jan 2010 at 09:21:06 PST Charlie Kester wrote:
For some ideas on which apps to try, look at the apps bundled in some of
the Linux distros that target small machines.
http://bengross.com/smallunix.html has a good list of these distros.
Hmm, I probably should have checked that referenc
On Wed 06 Jan 2010 at 04:25:31 PST Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Da Rock :
Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
I have revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
absolutely hammering the swap.
I'm trying to set it up as a dem
On Tue, 05 Jan 2010 20:03:45 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
>
> I have revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
> absolutely hammering the swap.
>
> I'm trying to set it up as a de
In response to Da Rock :
> Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
>
> I have revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
> absolutely hammering the swap.
>
> I'm trying to set it up as a demo for some skeptics with
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 08:03:45PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
>
> I have revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
> absolutely hammering the swap.
>
> I'm trying to set it up as a de
Its been a while- work's has been keeping me very busy for months now.
I have revived an old laptop which has very little RAM, and it is
absolutely hammering the swap.
I'm trying to set it up as a demo for some skeptics with no money, so I
need email, internet (with plugins), openoffic
> need to enable PAE mode in the kernel
Not for amd64.
Mark,
What is the output of 'uname -a'?
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:32:46 +0200
> From: st...@mapper.nl
> To: freebsd-am...@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> CC:
> Subject: 8.0-BETA2 not getting my 4Gigs of ram
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm fully enjoying installing FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 amd64.
> H
Hello,
I'm fully enjoying installing FreeBSD 8.0-BETA2 amd64.
However, it does not seem to be able to use all my ram.
Strangely enough, it says the following:
[r...@carmen ~]# dmesg |grep memory
real memory = 2147483648 (2048 MB)
avail memory = 4112240640 (3921 MB)
and
[r...@carmen ~]# s
I need use more 128 000 kern.maxfilesperproc for the process how can i
calculate hardware for this purpose (RAM i think)? will use 7.1, 7.2
AMD64
Thanks for help
Regards
Valentin
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Monday, May 11, 2009, at 01:25PM, "Bill Moran"
wrote:
>In response to "Len Conrad" :
>
>> I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
>
>Really? This question has been asked a gazillion times ...
Agreeing with Bill Moran:
http://www
In response to "Len Conrad" :
> I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Really? This question has been asked a gazillion times ...
> Where's the 600 MB gone to?
i386 arch can only see 4G total, but much hardware reserves the
last 500M or so for special hardware addressing.
The
I'm sure this has been answered but I can't Google it.
Where's the 600 MB gone to?
Len
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubs
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 11:43:08 -0700 (PDT), Dino Vliet wrote:
DV> I have just installed 4 x 2gb kingston memory banks (Kingston HyperX 4GB
800mhz DDR2 Non-ECC CL5 (5-5-5-15) DIMM) onto my AMD 64 system with a X2 5200
CPU. The motherboard I have in this system is MSI K9AG Neo2-Digital.
DV>
DV> The s
d less reliable.
>
> ...
> pagesize 4096
> pagesizemask is 0xf000
> want 2400MB (2516582400 bytes)
> got 2400MB (2516582400 bytes), trying mlock ...failed for unknown reason
> Loop 1:
> .
>
> In my /etc/rc/conf file I had added these li
2400MB (2516582400 bytes), trying mlock ...failed for unknown reason
Loop 1:
.
In my /etc/rc/conf file I had added these lines in the past (when I had 4gb RAM
installed in it)
sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=1954311424
sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=238000
What is the case here? Why is memtest
Wojciech Puchar <> wrote:
> > I have finished the installation and yes, the entire amount is detected.
> >
> > Is this normal behaveour (why does it happen?)
>
> i'm not sure if install kernel is actually /i386 version.
It must be an amd64 kernel, otherwise it would not be
usable for "fixit
I have finished the installation and yes, the entire amount is detected.
Is this normal behaveour (why does it happen?)
i'm not sure if install kernel is actually /i386 version.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/
detected (with generic
> kernel) or 9?
>
>
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Matej Šerc wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> I am just trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 distro on the HP ML 150 G5
>> server and when booting, BIOS detects 9 GB of RAM, but when starting to
>> ins
just for sure - after installation is still 4GB detected (with generic
kernel) or 9?
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Matej Šerc wrote:
Hi all,
I am just trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 distro on the HP ML 150 G5
server and when booting, BIOS detects 9 GB of RAM, but when starting to
install the
Hi all,
I am just trying to install FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 distro on the HP ML 150 G5
server and when booting, BIOS detects 9 GB of RAM, but when starting to
install the system it is displayed that only 4 GBs are detected. Also the
default swap partition size is 4 GB ... What would be the needed steps
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:
>
>> I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
>>
> make -j
> generic kernel
why not make -j <4x # of CPUs> ???
that should
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 07:12:06 Artem Kuchin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
>
> Is there a suitable port for such task?
>
> I'd like to point out that i don't want to measure perfomance. I need to
>
I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
make -j
generic kernel
but it won't full load CPUs and RAM
copy GENERIC to 10 other files, do config, and then
make depend;make -j in every directory.
if any kernel won't build - machine is not OK.
while doing th
Vasadi I. Claudiu Florin wrote:
Hello!
I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
Is there a suitable port for such task?
I'd like to point out that i don't want to measure perfomance. I need
to really really
heavily load the server up to it's m
Hello!
I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
Is there a suitable port for such task?
I'd like to point out that i don't want to measure perfomance. I need to
really really
heavily load the server up to it's maximum.
well, not quite a port
Hello!
I need to really heavily test a box with 8 cores and 16GB FBDIM RAM.
Is there a suitable port for such task?
I'd like to point out that i don't want to measure perfomance. I need to
really really
heavily load the server up to it's max
achine isn't swapping, there's usually nothing to worry about.
For comparison's sake here is the top -P output from my Dell 2950 dual
quad core server; this one is has 8 GB or RAM installed
last pid: 94403; load averages: 0.02, 0.38, 0.63 up 11+21:13:56
12:12:47
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:14:10 -0500
David Scheidt wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 01:25:19AM +, RW wrote:
> > Although, looking at the output of top, most of the memory is in the
> > inactive state. As I understand it cache pages go from active to
> > cached, and the inactive queue contains
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 01:25:19AM +, RW wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:23:06 +0100 (CET)
> Wojciech Puchar wrote:
>
> > > When I boot this machine it usually shows (in top) about 11 G Free
> > > in the Mem: line
> > >
> > > The machine, in this snippet, has been up for 5 days 22 hours an
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:23:06 +0100 (CET)
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
> > When I boot this machine it usually shows (in top) about 11 G Free
> > in the Mem: line
> >
> > The machine, in this snippet, has been up for 5 days 22 hours and
> > change and it now shows 1436M free in the Mem: line
> > I've be
When I boot this machine it usually shows (in top) about 11 G Free in the
Mem: line
The machine, in this snippet, has been up for 5 days 22 hours and change and
it now shows 1436M free in the Mem: line
I've been watching the number and it has been slowly decreasing over the 5
days since its la
Thanks to all who responded. I am familiar with the FAQ and what it says
about memory handling. This is my first time with installed RAM over 8
Gig in an AMD environment so I was just making sure there wasn't
something going on that looked odd to anyone else.
Tim
RW wrote:
On Fri, 1
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:35:33 -0500
Tim Kellers wrote:
> I've never noticed this (the slow decline of Free) before on any
> machine I've had. Maybe that just means it has happened and I
> haven't noticed it, but I don't know.
FreeBSD has worked like that for a long time, it doesn't free memory
Tim Kellers writes:
> My Machine: Dell 2850 PE w/ 12 GB of Ram
>
> www# uname -a
> FreeBSD www 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #2: Tue Jan 6 19:24:57 EST 2009
> r...@www:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELL64 amd64
>
> When I boot this machine it usually shows (in top) about 11
My Machine: Dell 2850 PE w/ 12 GB of Ram
www# uname -a
FreeBSD www 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #2: Tue Jan 6 19:24:57 EST 2009
r...@www:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DELL64 amd64
When I boot this machine it usually shows (in top) about 11 G Free in the Mem:
line
The machine, in this snippet
Hi guys,
Not sure if anyone would want them, but I have 2 x 512MB DDR667
working Dimms laying around unused that I'm more than happy to part
with. Please note that it is standard laptop ram (this is compatible
with some of the ultra small form factor machines though). So if
inter
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 13:14:35 -0400
Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never been 100% clear on the exact differences, but it basically
> has to do with where the data in RAM came from. Depending on whether
> it was a VM page, or a disk page will determine what b
On Friday 03 October 2008, RW wrote:
> The terms are a bit misleading, because the don't all relate to the use
> of the memory from the user's perspective, but how it's seen within
> FreeBSD's integrated cache/VM system.
Thanks to you and everyone else who wrote. I guess I'll go back to using it
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 09:58:54 -0500
Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
>
> usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
> avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
>
> However, most of it is just sitting there when it
active and the program need not be reloaded from disk.
I think non-program code can also be "inactive".
i am sure.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
> inactive, cache, and buffer are all different types of "buffer".
That is my understanding as well.
> I'm fairly sure that inactive is memory used by program code. When the
> program terminates, the memory is marked as inactive, which means the
> next time the program starts the code can simply
In response to Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 02 October 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
>
> > I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
> >
> > usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
> > avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
> &g
Mem: 482M Active, 1044M Inact, 363M Wired, 3792K Cache, 214M Buf, 4023M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 8192M Free
I can understand that on the other machine maybe inactive memory is more
beneficial than cache or buffers, but this system is just sitting there
with 4GB free (and the exact same amount of b
usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
However, most of it is just sitting there when it looks like it could be
used for buffers or cache:
Mem: 1186M Active, 3902M Inact, 468M Wired, 233M Cache, 214M Buf, 138M Free
Swap: 8192M Total, 900K Used, 8191M Fre
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
>
> usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
> avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
>
> However, most of it is just sitting there when it looks like it could be
> used
I have an AMD system with 6GB of RAM. From dmesg:
usable memory = 6428237824 (6130 MB)
avail memory = 6203797504 (5916 MB)
However, most of it is just sitting there when it looks like it could be
used for buffers or cache:
Mem: 1186M Active, 3902M Inact, 468M Wired, 233M Cache, 214M
Hi Sir,
Actually we are doing a project "Power management in RAM". For that, we
want to know whether Partial Array Self Refresh (PASR) is implemented in
software or not. We have read datasheets & we think that PASR is implemented at
hardware level. The bank(s) which
On Sep 26, 2008, at 6:51 AM, john seth wrote:
I want to know whether there is facility for mobile DDR RAM, so
that we can switch of a bank(s) without loosing the data in other
bank(s)..
Swapping RAM without taking down the system is feature or capability
of high-end hardware like Sun
Hi friends,
I want to know whether there is facility for mobile DDR RAM, so that we
can switch of a bank(s) without loosing the data in other bank(s)..
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 2008.07.24 17:49:56, Benjamin Adams wrote:
> Hello everyone. I'm running a website (http://www.FreeBSD-World.com/) When
> the RAM is used up and moves to inactive the pages stop loading 100%.
> Pages will stop halfway and sometimes I will get a display of what is in the
>
On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:01 AM, Robert Heron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use:
>
> FreeBSD 7.0-R on i386 server with motherboard S5000VSA and 6GB RAM onboard.
> BIOS version - 88 (the latest)
>
> Kernel includes: optionsMAXMEM=(6*1024*1024
1 - 100 of 542 matches
Mail list logo
