: When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary
: themselves.
:
: You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that.
Here is what I have/had in rc.conf
#sendmail_enable=no
#sendmail_submit_enable=no
#sendmail_outbound_enable=no
#sendmail_msp_queue_enable=no
And as
On Wed, 2004-05-26 at 14:27, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
: When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary
: themselves.
:
: You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that.
Here is what I have/had in rc.conf
#sendmail_enable=no
#sendmail_submit_enable=no
On Wed, 26 May 2004 13:27:07 +0100
Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: When local processes want to mail, they fork n exec a sendmail binary
: themselves.
:
: You shouldn't need a sendmail server running for that.
Here is what I have/had in rc.conf
#sendmail_enable=no
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:10:16PM -0400, JJB wrote:
: The log-in-vain feature is an good thing to keep. In your case it is
Okay, I'll put it back, then.
: The other post about firewall rules has nothing to do with your
: problem. The poster just did not recognize the messages as coming
: from
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 08:50:17AM -0400, JJB wrote:
: The messages you are getting are generated from the log-in-vain
: option you have turned on. Every night when the cron management
: reports run they post email from root to root using the 127.0.0.1
If I disable this 'feature' and adjust my
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:29:57PM +0100, Jonathon McKitrick wrote:
This is probably a simple question with a simple answer, but I wasn't sure
where to look.
I recently installed a deny-all firewall and everything is working fine.
However, I keep getting /kernel log messages about attempts
From: Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is probably a simple question with a simple answer, but I wasn't sure
where to look.
I recently installed a deny-all firewall and everything is working fine.
However, I keep getting /kernel log messages about attempts to connect to
port 25.
On 2004-05-24 08:49, Thomas T. Veldhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jonathon McKitrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is probably a simple question with a simple answer, but I
wasn't sure where to look.
[snip]
You should allow all traffic on your loopback device by default.
Much like this