On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 05:35:27PM -0300, cdsinf wrote:
Is device npx not needed on a kernel built for FreeBSD 6 AMD64?
That is correct. It's an i386 thing.
Kris
pgpemQyHRusB1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 12/22/05, Georg Auernhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
i have an amd64 with Sata 80Gig Hardisk and extra RAID:
[...]
newfs and mounting ar0 works.
but as sonn as i am trying to write data on the RAID, the system
freezes.
i had some problems writing the label to ar0s1d
but after
i have an amd64 with Sata 80Gig Hardisk and extra RAID:
[...]
newfs and mounting ar0 works.
but as sonn as i am trying to write data on the RAID, the system
freezes.
i had some problems writing the label to ar0s1d
but after some reboots he managed to write the label on ar0.
only
On 12/23/05, Georg Auernhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But it shouldnt freeze.
Its a RAID 10, or do you think there are more than 1 disks broken?
I know it shouldn't freeze, but in my case I had a bad drive and as
far as the Promise controller was concerned, the drive was good.
Through trial and
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've been encountering some difficulty between
OpenLDAP/nss/pam/FreeBSD/samba over the past few months and really since
inception. After countless recompiles of samba, working with samba and
openldap code, we've traced it to being an issue
Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
clients sharing data via samba from UFS file systems... a drop-in
replacement
On 10/12/05, Nathan Vidican [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I did not realize that there was an RC1 out for 6.0 already. Any
ideas how far off 6.0-RELEASE may be? Realistically the O/S has become
the least important issue on these servers; they're basically ldap/nss
clients sharing data via
Eric Murphy wrote:
[...]
however if i run make buildkernel kernconf=GREED
it runs but uses the GENERIC kernel
This sets the variable ${kernconf}, which is ignored, because make looks
for ${KERNCONF}.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:05:47 -0400 (EDT)
From: Eric Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Eric Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AMD64 question
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hey guys im having trouble complieing a custem kernel for this version of BSD
I mkae a copy of the GENERIC
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005 19:46:48 -0500
Joseph Sniderman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64)
based computer?
Yes!
Best of luck,
Andrew Gould
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Joseph Sniderman wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64) based computer?
Yes, but what what libs and programs you may install that are i386
based as opposed to 64-bit. You can seriously 'screw' up your system by
having several programs be unrunnable if
On Saturday 06 August 2005 21:37, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Joseph Sniderman wrote:
Can I install the i386 version of FreeBSD on an AMD64(athelon64) based
computer?
Yes, but what what libs and programs you may install that are i386
based as opposed to 64-bit. You can seriously 'screw' up
On Thursday 02 June 2005 03:36 pm, Miguel Miranda wrote:
Hi list, i have heard a lot of good things about opteron servers, im
going to upgrade several old production servers (thinking on hp dl145
or sun v20z, sugestions?), is the amd64 port stable enough to use it
on production?, what about
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:10:42AM -0500, Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and after I go fast
: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:23 AM
To: Edgar Martinez
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 01:10:42AM -0500, Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible
Its using the default bios settings and nothing is overclocked at all..
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post
New error before death
Panic: page fault
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez
, 2005 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
New error before death
Panic: page fault
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Sullivan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April
Message-
From: Alex Zbyslaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 9:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
OK, removed all misc cards, devices, recabled...attempting
--- Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I
have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept
throwing up a privilege
fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and
after I go fast enough
to get
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 2:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; questions
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
--- Edgar Martinez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I
have had
Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
fault kernel error randomly (7sed...4m.7m..etc), and after I go fast enough
to get lucky to an install complete..the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 08:20:23PM -0400, jason henson wrote:
snip
MSI K8T Neo
AMD64 3000 w/1MB
I was just reading the archives this week at freebsd.org and it leads me
to believe msi make crap boards. They can not handle tough loads or
lots of ram. I think it was in the amd64 list
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez wrote:
All,
I cant begin to tell you how horrible of a time I have had trying to get
this system installed and running. Sysinstall kept throwing up a privilege
fault
]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 (former i386 convert)+ FreeBSD various issues in 5.3, 5.4
(pre+post install)
Edgar Martinez
DTR stands for desktop replacement notebook. You have a cpu for a
powerful notebook, but I think it would still be a low powered desktop
cpu
:
From: Conrad J. Sabatier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
To: Bachelier Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:54:00 -0500
Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200, Bachelier Vincent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote:
Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ?
for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
Well, what do you think ?
could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ?
ok see ya
Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I
Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
On 04 Apr Bachelier Vincent wrote:
Does I compile with march=k8 under cflags ?
for example: CFLAGS=-O2 -march=k8 -pipe
CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
Well, what do you think ?
could I optimize more than CPUTYPE=k8 ?
Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:32 +0200, Bachelier Vincent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I have a AMD64 and use FreeBSD 5.4 i386.
Why aren't you using the amd64 version of FreeBSD?
I have set CPUTYPE=k8 to optimize a little for my computer.
I have seen they set march=athlon-mp when it compile
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I
think). Is it still advisable to have -O -pipe in /etc/make.conf?
I have a duron 800. Does the -O2 flag give more errors or is it
better than using the
--- Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 20:53
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386
-
From: Nick Pavlica [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boris Spirialitious [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 19:05:59 -0700
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386 on FreeBSD 5.4-pre
Hi Boris,
I haven't had an opportunity to work with any AMD64 hardware yet
of this propaganda. The cluelessness in the performance
list is a good indication.
-Original Message-
From: jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 00:57:58 -0500
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 20:53
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: AMD64 much slower than i386 on FreeBSD 5.4-pre
I think that warning people
Maybe you shouldn't prejudge. Its clear than no one with their
own addresses has any answers.
-Original Message-
From: Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 21:37:12 +0530
Subject: RE: AMD64 much slower than i386 on FreeBSD 5.4
I think the point of a list is so that someone can say oh yes, I had
problems with the
em driver in amd64 also; try card X. But instead you get a lot of
people with no real
idea trying to explain away the problem, as if there is no chance that
the amd64
implementant just plain sucks wind. If
--- jason henson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea
what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the
process.
I think you may be right. I try Broadcom gigE card
with same results. Very slow for amd64 build. With
same hardware, very good results with 4.9/i386,
not too bad with 5.4-pre/i386, and very, very
poor with 5.4-pre/amd64.
Boris
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the point of a list is so that
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon determined that 10,000 ints/second
was optimal. Of course if you're passing 10Kpps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon determined that 10,000 ints/second
was optimal. Of course
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon determined that 10,000 ints/second
was optimal. Of course if you're passing
Hi Boris,
I haven't had an opportunity to work with any AMD64 hardware yet,
but have had good results with 5.4.? on i686. I can relate to your
frustration, but can say that I was able to greatly improve 5.x
performance with some effort. For example I went from a maximum
sustained disk write of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The answer, Boris, is that the team has no idea what
they're doing. Check out some of the threads on
performance testing. They tune little pieces here
and there, and break 10 other things in the process.
Matt Dillon determined that 10,000 ints/second
was optimal.
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris Spirialitious:
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic
and we route through 5.3/i386 system. Load is
about 50%. With same settings, amd64 system run
with 85% load. How could be so slow?
-- Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris
Spirialitious:
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic
and we route through 5.3/i386 system. Load is
about 50%. With same settings, amd64
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 01:19 schrieb Boris Spirialitious:
-- Emanuel Strobl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 23. März 2005 00:38 schrieb Boris
Spirialitious:
I have opteron 246 system with 2 port intel em
card. We have test bed with about 200Kbs traffic
and we route through
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 12:50:55PM -0700, ann kok wrote:
I can't install cvsup-without-gui and said it doesn't
support amd64
http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/cvsup-without-gui-16.1h.tbz
a simple google query would have revealed that link
hth,
toni
--
Wer es einmal so weit gebracht hat, dass
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004, Remi wrote:
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz
on 5.2.1-R
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)
I have no idea how to fix this! Would upgrading to -CURRENT help at all?
First, you could start by not
Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at 800MHz
on 5.2.1-R
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ (800.03-MHz K8-class CPU)
I have no idea how
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 Woes
Just force the cpu speed to high in your bios setup.
On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:46:22 -0700, Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got a new AMD64 laptop(I8254) and it appears to be running at
800MHz
on 5.2.1-R
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64
Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for the
AMD64 architecture at this point?
what is gentoo?
is it some new OS or linux distro?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for the
AMD64 architecture at this point?
what is gentoo?
is it some new OS or linux distro?
It's a Linux distribution, so I assume the question was meant to be:
Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64
--- Björn_Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for
the
AMD64 architecture at this point?
what is gentoo?
is it some new OS or linux distro?
It's a Linux distribution, so I assume the question
was
Does Linux or FreeBSD for the AMD64 architecture at
this point?
It doesn't really matter...yes gentoo is a linux
distro. and its the only linux distro I would consider
with the AMD64 architecture. I was looking to see if
one moment. distribution is distribution, linux is a kernel. CPU
On Monday 26 July 2004 20:41, jam man wrote:
--- Björn_Lindström [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Gentoo or FreeBSD have better support for
the
AMD64 architecture at this point?
what is gentoo?
is it some new OS or linux distro?
One interesting point for desktop users is that Gentoo automatically compiles
X.org as a dependency of KDE rather then XFree86. And I must say, my TFT is
quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
can update their ports
quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto
switch from XFree to X.org
i'm of of topic in X.org and XFree - what's the difference?
any URL?
thanks
On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 11:28:02PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
quite sharper then it was with XFree86.
Since some days, -current defaults to X.org. Users of other FreeBSD version
can update their ports and have a look at /usr/ports/UPDATING howto
switch from XFree to X.org
i'm of
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
You can't run amd64 binaries when booted into an i386 OS, of course.
Quoting David O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 01:17:35AM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Me either. -current actually supports running i386 binaries in amd64 mode.
Thats one of the processor's features. :-)
You can't run amd64 binaries when
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 2004 6:29 AM
To: Kenneth Culver
Cc: Michal Pasternak; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
David O'Brien
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
So far my athlon 64 3200+ has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:58, Remi wrote:
toward the 1.7GHz Centrino, but I hear a lot of problems with FreeBSD
working right with Centrino, is this correct? What are the issues?
Works fine here (Dell Inspiron 8600).
- - Modem doesn't work (no
Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they
say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to
be changed) So now I come to a cross
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy. Im not sure how it works when switching 64 to i386, but they
say it's not supported in the BIOS(I assume this is where it is suppose to
be changed) So now I come to a cross
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 02:36:27PM +0200, Arne Schwabe wrote:
You can't change the cpu speed while running at the Moment, I don't
see any other iusses at the Moment with my Notebook (IBM T40).
I too have an IBM T40. It gives me much love, daily.
BMS
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:
It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
what the
laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64 to x86 after
already
booting an
: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 7:31 AM
To: Remi
Cc: 'Brooks Davis'; 'Michal Pasternak'; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'David O'Brien'
Subject: RE: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well I just got an email back from the manufacturer of the AMD64 laptop I
wanted to buy
Quoting Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004, Kenneth Culver wrote:
It runs OK, with some minor nits compared to x86 version. I'm not sure
what the
laptop maker is talking about... but if you boot the x86 version of FreeBSD,
it'll work. I think they meant you can't switch from amd64
Quoting Remi [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to clarify exactly what you mean. I can the x86 version of BSD with no
changes to the BIOS, jumpers or anything on an AMD64?
Sorry in advanced if this is a stupid question, Ive never dealt with
anything but x86
Yeah, no changes anywhere. I have my machine set
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT.
Which one would you
Quoting Michal Pasternak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]:
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
... but will it outperform it also
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 06:03:52PM -0400, Kenneth Culver wrote:
So far my athlon 64 3200+ has been one of the coolest running
processors I've ever owned... although I've never used it in a laptop,
my friend's p4 2.8 is running a lot hotter...
Yes, current AMD64 CPUs are fairly lower power
PROTECTED]
Cc: Remi; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AMD64 vs i386 for FreeBSD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one
would you guys recommend to run
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Remi wrote:
Im in the market for a new laptop. Right now I'm looking at HyperSonic
laptops.
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one would
you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be easier to
run,
David O'Brien [Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:00:26PM -0700]:
You do know you can run FreeBSD/i386 on the Athlon64 3200+ laptop,
right? :-) A 3200+ running 32-bit FreeBSD will out-perform the P4
2.8GHz running the same OS.
... but will it outperform it also by heat dissipation?
--
m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 08:30, David O'Brien wrote:
I have a choice between AMD64 3200+ and a P4 2.8GHz with HT. Which one
would you guys recommend to run FreeBSD. Obviously the i386 would be
easier to run, so I guess my question is what is the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I`m very close to byu a AMD64 system, but I`m not quite sure how it will work on
FreeBSD.
Is there something I should be aware about? Some mainboards maybe?
And how about S-ATA on these boards?
(I will probably run 5-CURRENT)
--
Med vennlig hilsen
Christer Solskogen
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 23:04:24 -0800 Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:
Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and
amd64 CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this?
Compare the build logs of the
On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:58:35AM +0100, Burkard Meyendriesch wrote:
Are there any differences in making ports between i386 STABLE and amd64
CURRENT? What is going wrong? What can I do to solve this?
Compare the build logs of the openldap port from i386 and amd64; it's
possible the build is
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:16:49PM -0500, Shah Amit wrote:
Hi all,
I have an AMD-64 bit processor on my emachines laptop that I got from
circuitcity. The model is emachines - 6805 - AMD64Bit, 15 WXGA ... It is a
relatively new laptop just released on like 19th Jan. I already inquired
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 04:18:31PM -0400, SKU wrote:
Greetings!
Can anyone using a Amd64 and FreeBSD comment on the performance times
during buildworlds? I currently buildworld 2-3 times a day and am looking
for a system that can complete these tasks much quicker.
Ask on the amd64 mailing
101 - 181 of 181 matches
Mail list logo
