On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 5:40 AM, Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
On an old 20gb hard drive I first installed winxp on the first half of the
HD. winxp booted fine. Then I installed 9.1-rc3 on the second half of the
HD. Now when I boot the HD I only get 9.1-rc3. Winxp created mbr and
Hi.
Sorry for my english.
I have a dual boot system, windows 7 64-bit (ada1) and FreeBSD 9.0 amd64
GEOM (ada0).
I did it by installing FreeBSD boot0 on Windows HDD:
boot0cfg -B ada1
then I choose Windows HDD as first boot drive in BIOS. Now at boot i
have boot0 menu:
F1 - Win
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:32:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be
contradictory. I am not
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:32:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be
contradictory. I am not sure which to
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 19:41:22 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Since each system is going to be on different physical drives, why don't
you make things easy for you and just use the BIOS boot menu to choose
which drive to boot from?
That surely seems the hard way.Why interrupt the boot and
On 05/23/12 14:49, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have a dual boot system, windows 7 (ad0) and FreeBSD 9-stable (ad1).
I moved back to BIOS boot after (I think) windows upgrade stabbed ad0.
I found the system with a blank screen in the AM. Using BIOS boot, The
first windows screen had an
I've always meant to submit it as a PR, but found the send-pr(1) too
daunting. (It is impossible/undesirable for me to have a working mail
sender on my system and I have not yet found a way for send-pr(1) to
work in offline mode for delayed sending by a different machine.)
Easy.
Just run
Gyrd Thane Lange gyrd...@thanelange.no wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:26 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
... The code in i386/boot2 and
lib/libstand is written to find the / (or /boot) FS on a
BSD partition of an fdisk primary partition (aka slice),
or in a GPT partition, and
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:56:51 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gyrd Thane Lange gyrd...@thanelange.no wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:26 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
... The code in i386/boot2 and
lib/libstand is written to find the / (or /boot) FS on a
BSD partition of
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:52:16 +0200
Gyrd Thane Lange gyrd...@thanelange.no wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:56:51 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Gyrd Thane Lange gyrd...@thanelange.no wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:26 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
... The code in
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:47:26 -0700
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
d...@safeport.com wrote:
If FreeBSD can be installed in an extended partition,
that would be a very useful howto.
_Installing_ it in an extended partition is easy enough.
geom(8) understands extended partitions (although
On 24 Jun 2011, at 06:24, d...@safeport.com wrote:
I installed 8.2 from the DVD ISO. This install overwrote the MBR even though
I selected not to write a boot record. Using the repair disk and/or bootrec
does not work.
The answer is found in
At 09:08 24/06/2011, you wrote:
On 24 Jun 2011, at 06:24, d...@safeport.com wrote:
I installed 8.2 from the DVD ISO. This install overwrote the MBR
even though I selected not to write a boot record. Using the repair
disk and/or bootrec does not work.
The answer is found in
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 09:08 24/06/2011, you wrote:
On 24 Jun 2011, at 06:24, d...@safeport.com wrote:
I installed 8.2 from the DVD ISO. This install overwrote the MBR even
though I selected not to write a boot record. Using the repair disk and/or
bootrec does not
At 16:36 24/06/2011, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Well for me it all worked well for all versions of FreeBSD until
Windows 7. My main purpose was to document the link given to me by a
friend who does user support for a local college. Before Vista the
boot process was pretty simple, the MBR was one
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 16:36 24/06/2011, d...@safeport.com wrote:
Well for me it all worked well for all versions of FreeBSD until Windows 7.
My main purpose was to document the link given to me by a friend who does
user support for a local college. Before Vista the
d...@safeport.com wrote:
If FreeBSD can be installed in an extended partition,
that would be a very useful howto.
_Installing_ it in an extended partition is easy enough.
geom(8) understands extended partitions (although sysinstall
does not, so you need to install using Fixit# as for other
Hi,
Did you tried BSD Boot Manager?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/boot-blocks.html
Laci
From: Saifi Khan saifi.k...@twincling.org
To: FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 2:14:11 PM
Subject: dual boot
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 7:42 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to setup a test server that will be able to boot either FreeBSD
to Windows Server 2003 R2. I have tried to use the BSD Boot manager and the
Windows Boot manager. In either case I have run into problems. When using
the
The issue is not setting up a dual boot system. The issue is FDISK
displaying an error relating to the new rules MS is using when setting up a
partition under Vista. Based on the research covered here (
http://www.multibooters.co.uk/partitions.html) if you use the Vista
installer to create the
On Thursday 04 October 2007 00:57:19 compunction wrote:
I am trying to install FreeBSD on the same drive as Vista in a dual boot
configuration. FDISK is reporting the normal geometry errors and it is
also stating that my Vista partition does not start on a sector boundary.
I chose to ignore
I was able to install FreeBSD alongside Vista on my HP laptop. What I did was
I shrank down the windows partition using Partition Magic. Its not normal
NTFS according to Partition Magic. But after I shrank it down I just booted
from the FreeBSD install cd and installed it like normal, was
Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
How to make a dual boot with Stable and Current ? The FreeBSD loader
always uses the bsd partition 'a' to load the kernel. So i always boot
6.2.
My main boot loader is Gag.
Perhaps install the depeendant filesystems (/, /var, /usr) for the two
versions
On 7/13/07, CyberLeo Kitsana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Hello,
How to make a dual boot with Stable and Current ? The FreeBSD loader
always uses the bsd partition 'a' to load the kernel. So i always boot
6.2.
My main boot loader is Gag.
Perhaps install the
On 5/30/07, Paul Halliday [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed 6.2 on a 90GB drive. During the installation I
created the usual partitions and left 50GB untouched. I then rebooted
ran partition magic to put a DOS FS on the remainder then ghosted XP
pro onto it.
What is the process now to
Paul Halliday wrote:
I just installed 6.2 on a 90GB drive. During the installation I
created the usual partitions and left 50GB untouched. I then rebooted
ran partition magic to put a DOS FS on the remainder then ghosted XP
pro onto it.
Do I need to start over or can I fix this?
It's
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 07:17:01AM -0300, Paul Halliday wrote:
I just installed 6.2 on a 90GB drive. During the installation I
created the usual partitions and left 50GB untouched. I then rebooted
ran partition magic to put a DOS FS on the remainder then ghosted XP
pro onto it.
What is the
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 19:46:18 -0800
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RW wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub
Howdy,
Hello,
This weekend I purchased a laptop with a core2duo processor. The laptop
came with windows Vista premier. Due to some applications that I require,
removing Vista and installing FreeBSD is not an issue. (Please leave the
Vista/Microsoft flames at the door)
When I install
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 12:04:57PM -0500, Jeff Palmer wrote:
Do you really need to use Grub to replace the FreeBSD MBR?
I haven't had my hands on Vista yet - in no hurry either -
but I think it should boot Vista OK. I've use it for several
other MS versions from Win-95 - Win 2K - Xp-Pro
On 2/13/07, Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This weekend I purchased a laptop with a core2duo processor. The laptop
came with windows Vista premier. Due to some applications that I require,
removing Vista and installing FreeBSD is not an issue. (Please leave the
Vista/Microsoft
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
into why, but I'm confident there is a reason. Obviously, grub
becomes a non-option.
On 2/13/07, Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
This weekend I purchased a laptop with a core2duo processor. The laptop
came with windows Vista premier. Due to some applications that I
require,
removing Vista and installing FreeBSD is not an issue. (Please leave the
Vista/Microsoft
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
into why, but I'm confident there is a reason. Obviously, grub
becomes a non-option.
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
RW wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:52 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 20:44:03 -0500 (EST)
Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I try FreeBSD/amd64, grub won't compile (it's
architecture is forced to i386 only in the Makefile. I haven't dug
On 2006-06-10 22:44, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
much excised ---
Anyway, this all works just fine. The MBR and initial boot
record in the boot sector of each slice (or primary
partition if you must degrade to MS terminology) have just
enough standardization that
On Saturday 10 June 2006 11:55, Hunter Fuller wrote:
On 10 Jun 2006, at 11:45 AM, julien Chaffraix wrote:
Hello,
chainloader +1
Well, this is a different way to do it, usually this is used with
Microsuck products... but I suppose it'd work here too.
If you chainload you don't need UFS
On Sunday 11 June 2006 03:11, Jerry McAllister wrote:
In FreeBSd world, a slice is the primary division of the disk. It is
generally referred to as a primary partition in Microsloth land. But
that is the same.
IIRC It's actually more of an IBM PC term than a Microsoft term.
I'm being
On Sunday 11 June 2006 03:11, Jerry McAllister wrote:
In FreeBSd world, a slice is the primary division of the disk. It is
generally referred to as a primary partition in Microsloth land. But
that is the same.
IIRC It's actually more of an IBM PC term than a Microsoft term.
Hello,
I have made the same configuration (Debian and FreeBSD). I used Grub and
it works very well, here is the entry in menu.lst:
title FreeBSD
root(hd0,0)
makeactive
chainloader +1
savedefault
boot
(It is strange that the entry is not the same as the previous answer
Hello;
If I want to set up a dual boot of either Linux or FreeBSD, what is the
best way to go about it?
Use Lilo, grub, or does FreeBSD have a boot loader that it likes better
and Linux won't object to?
Mabye you are using the term 'boot loader' for what I am used to seeing
called the
On 10 Jun 2006, at 11:45 AM, julien Chaffraix wrote:
Hello,
I have made the same configuration (Debian and FreeBSD). I used
Grub and it works very well, here is the entry in menu.lst:
I'll tell you which of these were different and why...
title FreeBSD
root(hd0,0)
On Jun 10, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hello;
If I want to set up a dual boot of either Linux or FreeBSD, what is
the
best way to go about it?
Use Lilo, grub, or does FreeBSD have a boot loader that it likes
better
and Linux won't object to?
Mabye you are
On Saturday 10 June 2006 18:11, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Jun 10, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hello;
If I want to set up a dual boot of either Linux or FreeBSD, what is
the
best way to go about it?
Use Lilo, grub, or does FreeBSD have a boot loader that it likes
much excised ---
Anyway, this all works just fine. The MBR and initial boot record in
the boot sector of each slice (or primary partition if you must degrade
to MS terminology) have just enough standardization that the FreeBSD MBR
or most any of the other more fancy ones, can
On Saturday 10 June 2006 18:44, Jerry McAllister wrote:
much excised ---
Anyway, this all works just fine. The MBR and initial boot record in
the boot sector of each slice (or primary partition if you must degrade
to MS terminology) have just enough standardization that the
Beech Rintoul wrote:
Maybe it can be a FAQ. How do they get there?
jerry
I'd ask that question on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list. I've never
submitted anything to any of the docs, so I have no clue what their procedure
is.
Beech
Probably something like this:
1. Chat it up on the
Grub does well for me. Set it up for Linux and then set it up for
BSD, making sure the UFS driver's in there. Here's my command-list
for booting FBSD.
root (hd0,0,a)
kernel /boot/loader
boot
I might have the spacing wrong, I'm doing it from memory, but the
data's all there.
On 10 Jun
On 10/6/05, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I installed 5.4 on a second drive and I realize now the boot manager I
installed is on the second drive and not loaded in the MBR of my Primary
drive.
Is there a way to load the FreeBSD boot manager onto my primary drive from
within windows?
I haven't done enough installations recently to answer. Are you
saying that if you leave the fdisk screen with no primary partition
marked active or with the MSFT one marked active, then it switches
it to the soon-to-be-FreeBSD one?
One of the installer's help files says:
If no slice is
K Wieland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone could add to this I would be interested.
I suppose that you say
Even if you choose not to alter the MBR.
because of the last install menu item below
{ { BootMgr, Install the FreeBSD Boot Manager,
{ Standard, Install a standard
On Sep 21, 2005, at 12:22 PM, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
K Wieland [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If anyone could add to this I would be interested.
I suppose that you say
Even if you choose not to alter the MBR.
because of the last install menu item below
{ { BootMgr,Install the
Petre Bandac wrote:
I have the following configuration
ad0s1 - win xp with ntfs
ad0s2 - freebsd
they were installed in the above order, so now I can use only freebsd
is there a way to configure freebsd's boot loader to be able to boot
from the win partition (I googled around and found
On 8/2/05, Petre Bandac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello
I have the following configuration
ad0s1 - win xp with ntfs
ad0s2 - freebsd
they were installed in the above order, so now I can use only freebsd
is there a way to configure freebsd's boot loader to be able to boot
from the win
Ultimate wrote:
Obviously, I am a newbi ... so further illustration
with the solution would be appreciated
1) Do as root sysctl kern.geom.debugflag=16
2) Start sysinstall
3) Go Configure-FDISK- OK - Q
4) It will ask if you wish boot manager
5) Select BootMgr
I got something from Igor which worked
1) Do as root sysctl kern.geom.debugflags=16
2) Start sysinstall
3) Go Configure-FDISK- OK - Q
4) It will ask if you wish boot manager
5) Select BootMgr
--- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ultimate wrote:
# fdisk -l
fdisk: illegal
--On Tuesday, May 17, 2005 01:14:35 PM -0500 Paul Schmehl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I select FreeBSD, the box boots to a prompt, flashing F1 and goes no
further, periodically beeping.
Never mind. It was waiting for me to hit enter. Now all I have to do is
change the default boot to FreeBSD
-Original Message-
From: Maude User [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 3:40 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Dual-boot WinXP: FreeBSD slice within 8GB? Space for
EasyBoot?
Hello -
I'm going to install FreeBSD to make a dual-boot laptop
Hello -
I'm going to install FreeBSD to make a dual-boot laptop (keeping WinXP-Pro).
It has 60GB on a single hard drive, currently one big NTFS partition (C:)
- which I will shrink down to about 16GB with PartitionMagic, leaving a
new generic FAT or FAT32 slice which FreeBSD will
All of this is FreeBSD 5.2.1, if it matters.
I'm trying to do a scripted install / Jumpstart using PXE booting
and 'install.cfg'; all works fine when assigning the entire disk
to FreeBSD.
When I change to have 'install.cfg' select the free disk space left
after WinXP is installed in slice 1, it
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 06:44, Gary Kline wrote:
The first CD boots 5.3 ad brings up /stand/sysinstall.
Every options I have tries sees the NTFS as ad0s1.
Is there another choice to chose to divvy up the drive
to give me more than three slices? This is where the
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +, RW wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 06:44, Gary Kline wrote:
The first CD boots 5.3 ad brings up /stand/sysinstall.
Every options I have tries sees the NTFS as ad0s1.
Is there another choice to chose to divvy up the drive
to
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
If memory servers, the slices I created were
ad0s2 /
ad0s3 SWAP
ad0s4 /usr
People normally create a BSD partition table within an FDISK partition,
so / would be on ad0s2a, rather than using all of ad0s2 for a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 06:22:43PM +, RW wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 06:44, Gary Kline wrote:
The first CD boots 5.3 ad brings up /stand/sysinstall.
Every options I have tries sees the NTFS as ad0s1.
Is there another choice to chose to divvy up the drive
to give
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:08:19PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
If memory servers, the slices I created were
ad0s2 /
ad0s3 SWAP
ad0s4 /usr
People normally create a BSD partition table within an FDISK partition,
so /
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 19:28, Gary Kline wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:08:19PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
If memory servers, the slices I created were
ad0s2 /
ad0s3 SWAP
ad0s4 /usr
People normally create a
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 20:05, RW wrote:
Even
if you don't plan to use it you should do that to see what the default
looks like.
Don't forget to delete the three partitions and create a single large slice,
if you try to create a default set of partitions on a slice dimensioned to
take /
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:05:57PM +, RW wrote:
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 19:28, Gary Kline wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 02:08:19PM -0500, Charles Swiger wrote:
On Mar 23, 2005, at 1:59 PM, Gary Kline wrote:
If memory servers, the slices I created were
ad0s2 /
ad0s3
On Wednesday 23 March 2005 21:05, Gary Kline wrote:
ks like.
Yeah, I wound up trying the defaults because my custom creates
failed. With thr auto defaults newfs works, but I error out
on /usr. /usr is large.So the mount will fail, etc. (??)
Maybe a smaller /usr
Gary Kline wrote:
I'm having trouble installing 5.3 from my 4CD set. I have
a 10G Window partition; That leaves 3 slices available.
I have tried various sizes for /, SWAP, and /usr, but newfs
consistantly has trouble mounting /usr. I have no idea why.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 09:44:46PM -0500, jason henson wrote:
Gary Kline wrote:
I'm having trouble installing 5.3 from my 4CD set. I have
a 10G Window partition; That leaves 3 slices available.
I have tried various sizes for /, SWAP, and /usr, but newfs
Hi
I have a problem booting the second disk with fbsd's boot manager. I
installed a new disk as pri/master (ad0) and moved my old disk to
sec/master (ad2). Then devided ad0 (40GB) with fbsd's fdisk in 10G (ufs)
and 30G (fat) and installed FreeBSD 5.3 with a boot manager on the first
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi
I have a problem booting the second disk with fbsd's boot manager. I
installed a new disk as pri/master (ad0) and moved my old disk to
sec/master (ad2). Then devided ad0 (40GB) with fbsd's fdisk in 10G (ufs)
and 30G (fat) and installed FreeBSD 5.3 with a boot manager
Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi
I have a problem booting the second disk with fbsd's boot manager. I
installed a new disk as pri/master (ad0) and moved my old disk to
sec/master (ad2). Then devided ad0 (40GB) with fbsd's fdisk in 10G (ufs)
and 30G (fat) and installed FreeBSD 5.3 with a
I'm about to make the switch from 4.10 to 5.3. However, I don't want to
do it in one go, but rather first install 5.3 on a separate physical
disk and get all applications installed and configured correctly. Once
I've completed the process, the scenario is a RAID-1 setup (gmirror is
the
I'm going to by a laptop with wondoze XP pre installed soon.
The machine will have one IDE disk.
Am I right in thinking that I can install FreeBSD also without having
to re-install XP ?
Yup. The very best way.
The only funny thing is that the standard FreeBSD MBR will put ?? in
the
David Larkin wrote:
I'm going to by a laptop with wondoze XP pre installed soon.
The machine will have one IDE disk.
Am I right in thinking that I can install FreeBSD also without having to
re-install XP ?
Ive searched the mailing list and found info on how to achieve dual boot with
multiple
David Larkin wrote:
I'm going to by a laptop with wondoze XP pre installed soon.
The machine will have one IDE disk.
Am I right in thinking that I can install FreeBSD also without having
to re-install XP ?
Ive searched the mailing list and found info on how to achieve dual
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Greg Barniskis
thusly...
David Larkin wrote:
I'm going to by a laptop with wondoze XP pre installed soon.
The machine will have one IDE disk.
Am I right in thinking that I can install FreeBSD also without
having to re-install XP ?
Consider
On Tue, 1 Mar 2005, David Larkin wrote:
I'm going to by a laptop with wondoze XP pre installed soon.
The machine will have one IDE disk.
Am I right in thinking that I can install FreeBSD also without having to
re-install XP ?
Ive searched the mailing list and found info on how to
http://ipucu.enderunix.org/view.php?id=70lang=en
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:44:28 -0700, Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the
tethys ocean wrote:
http://ipucu.enderunix.org/view.php?id=70lang=en
Hey great info on this. One question, he has assumed that we are going
to put WinXP and FreeBSD on the same drive so in his setup config he
has:
#this is the name that will appear on the boot menu title FreeBSD
#this is
Jud wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:12:33 -0700, Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here is the link:
http://www.crtech.com/sinda.html
I don't see anything in ports. Googling turned up some FEA stuff with
what appeared to be fairly nice CAD backends that work on Linux and
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 04:44:28PM -0700, Tom Connolly wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the FreeBSD
boot
Yes go ahead and install the BSD boot loader on the XP drive.
It will work fine. BTW I haven't come across many Sorry does not
work under FreeBSD messages.
Could you tell us something about that thermal monitor? I think there
must be some compatible port.
Yes the program is called SIMBA.
Jud wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:44:28 -0700, Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have
it dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can
I just simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the
Jud wrote:
A bit of Googling found that SIMBA is based on Matlab and Simulink
from Mathworks. Here's an email re getting those programs to work on
FreeBSD
Terribly sorry Jud. The program is actually called SINDA not SIMBA.
SINDA/Fluint to be exact. Sorry for the typo.
Any ideas on this?
And here is the link:
http://www.crtech.com/sinda.html
Thanks,
Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Tom Connolly wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the FreeBSD
boot manager/loader on the XP drive? I
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:12:33 -0700, Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And here is the link:
http://www.crtech.com/sinda.html
I don't see anything in ports. Googling turned up some FEA stuff with
what appeared to be fairly nice CAD backends that work on Linux and
(occasionally) Unix, a
Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have
it dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can
I just simply go through the FreeBSD install and
On Monday 27 December 2004 06:44 pm, Tom Connolly wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the FreeBSD
boot manager/loader on
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:44:28 -0700, Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the FreeBSD
boot
Tom Connolly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and have it
dual boot with the existing Windows XP system (separate HD). Can I just
simply go through the FreeBSD install and have it install the FreeBSD
boot manager/loader on the XP drive? I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Connolly
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:14
To: FreeBSD_Questions
Subject: Dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD 5.3
Hello list. I wish to put FreeBSD 5.3 on a new hard drive and
Giuliano Cardozo Medalha wrote:
My first IDE drive is (on IDE 0 - master) with windows XP
controlling it MBR.
My second IDE drive (on IDE 0 - slave) is with FreeBSD 5.3
controlling it MBR.
How can I do to configure the boot loader and the scripts: loader.rc
and loader.conf to
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 03:10:38 -0800
Loren M. Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to dual boot FreeBSD 4.9 and 5.2.1 on one system, each
using a different / partition, but sharing the same /usr partition for
example? I'd really like to try out some of the features of 5.x, but be
able
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
