This question is going to make me sound pretty stupid, but I haven't
been able to figure it out.
I had mplayer (the console version) running in one urxvt, and I thought
I had a different urxvt focused when I typed a command (I think it was
'make install clean') -- but mplayer was actually focused
I experienced a similar situation under different circumstances. It
turned out that the sysctl
variable hw.snd.default_unit was refering to the wrong sound card. Not
sure if thats the
problem, but it might be worth checking if you have multiple sound cards.
-- WFV
wfvin...@gmail.com
On Mon, May
On May 24 2010 12:21, William Vining wrote:
I experienced a similar situation under different circumstances. It
turned out that the sysctl
variable hw.snd.default_unit was refering to the wrong sound card. Not
sure if thats the
problem, but it might be worth checking if you have multiple
On Monday 24 May 2010 22:02:44 Chip Camden wrote:
On May 24 2010 12:21, William Vining wrote:
I experienced a similar situation under different circumstances. It
turned out that the sysctl
variable hw.snd.default_unit was refering to the wrong sound card. Not
sure if thats the
problem,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2007, Adam J Richardson wrote:
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Robert Huff
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Robert Huff wrote:
Rakhesh Sasidharan writes:
Kind of related to this topic. Is there any way I can find installed
packages that are *not* required by any other packages?
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_cutleaves ?
Man, I love the ports system!!
Pollywog wrote:
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one etc.
It is perfectly safe to have all of them
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
autoconf-2.59_2needs updating (port has 2.59_3)
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 03:13:51PM -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs
On Saturday 28 July 2007 20:23:16 Erik Trulsson wrote:
Short answer: It is perfectly normal. Don't worry.
Longer answer:
The reason you have all of them installed is that some ports need one of
them, and others need another one etc.
It is perfectly safe to have all of them installed at
On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 15:13 -0500, Jonathan Horne wrote:
today, when i was auditing what needs to be updated, i came upon this:
autoconf-2.13.000227_5 needs updating (port has
2.13.000227_6)
autoconf-2.53_3needs updating (port has 2.53_4)
I recently added some aliases to my ipconfig and now I'm getting these
system messages? Should I be concerned? (FreeBSD 4.6)
Feb 3 02:24:23 freedom /kernel: arplookup XXX.XXX.XX.XX failed: host is
not on local
network
Feb 3 00:17:35 freedom sm-mta[94]: gethostbyaddr(XXX.XXX.XX.XX) failed:
1
mailing list said:
I recently added some aliases to my ipconfig and now I'm getting these
system messages? Should I be concerned? (FreeBSD 4.6)
snip
ifconfig_de0=inet XXX.168.0.219 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_tl0=inet XXX.82.15.219 netmask 255.255.255.240
snip
]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: arplookup messages? now what have I done?
mailing list said:
I recently added some aliases to my ipconfig and now I'm
getting these
system messages? Should I be concerned? (FreeBSD 4.6)
snip
ifconfig_de0=inet XXX.168.0.219 netmask
mailing list\ said:
Hi Michael,
My network topology skills are limited... does this mean the following:
- my default gateway is on a 255.255.255.240 subnet
- so is my devices real address
- there is another device listed there (de0), no problems (internal)
So, if I change the aliased
Hmmm, I'm confused
If you want to have your aliases attached to the tl0
interface, you need to use addresses in that range. So,
something like:
ifconfig_tl0_alias3=inet XXX.82.15.210 netmask 0x
That's what I have, and I'm getting those funny arplookup error
messages.
The
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 06:30:00 +0100, Cliff Sarginson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 05:38:26PM +1300, Richard Shea wrote:
Hi - For the first time ever I have tried to upgrade a FreeBSD by using
CVS. In fact I used CVSUPIT. I'm on 4.4-RELEASE and I just wanted to move
up to
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 08:50:36PM +1300, Richard Shea wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:01:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[...]
If you intend on just upgrading your system sources, you don't need
ports-all and doc-all. src-all is approx 298M and the ports-all is
about 162M.
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 21:14:49 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 08:50:36PM +1300, Richard Shea wrote:
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:01:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[...]
If you intend on just upgrading your system sources, you don't need
Hi - For the first time ever I have tried to upgrade a FreeBSD by using
CVS. In fact I used CVSUPIT. I'm on 4.4-RELEASE and I just wanted to move
up to 4.5,6 or 7.
Well I answered a few questions, pressed the button and the process
commenced 'checking out' hundreds of files. I thought this was a
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 05:38:26PM +1300, Richard Shea wrote:
[...]
Well I answered a few questions, pressed the button and the process
commenced 'checking out' hundreds of files. I thought this was a bit
suprising given I thought the whole point of CVS was to only pull those
files which had
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 06:30:00AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
RELENG_4_5_0_RELEASE
After that change this to RELENG_4_5 which should start to get you the
security updates when you again run cvsupit.
-And -ditto- to go up the release chain...
p.s. You can probably actually update
On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:01:20 +1300, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 05:38:26PM +1300, Richard Shea wrote:
Hi - Thanks for your reply ...
[...]
Well I answered a few questions, pressed the button and the process
commenced 'checking out' hundreds of files. I
25 matches
Mail list logo
