As you need max syntax checking from OCR, throw it at as many
different basic interpreters/ compilers as you can, inspect where
each bleats, some error messages may be more less usefull for
different errors.
A friend of mine wrote a basic decades back, its in /usr/ports/lang/pbasic/
PS
On 06/17/13 20:40, Greg Larkin wrote:
Hi Chris,
I prepared a new patch that incorporates my fixes, yours and
Michael's. I found the coredump - multiple missing right parens on
line 1170. Then I ran into another problem on line 430 and made an
educated guess with the fix.
The new patch is
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:31 AM, Paul Wootton
paul-free...@fletchermoorland.co.uk wrote:
On 06/17/13 20:40, Greg Larkin wrote:
Hi Chris,
I prepared a new patch that incorporates my fixes, yours and
Michael's. I found the coredump - multiple missing right parens on
line 1170. Then I ran
the various diffs and I think I have them all
covered.
I full file is at http://www.caspersworld.co.uk/FreeBSD/basic-moon.bas
Paul
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
I am having trouble getting this old USNO basic program running in bwBASIC.
The error output is not clear to me where the problem is. Here is the
code, if someone wouldn't mind running it and suggesting edits:
10 DEF FNARCOS(ARG)=1.570796-ATN(ARG/SQR(1.-ARG*ARG))
20 DEF FNARCSIN(ARG)=ATN(ARG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/13 1:16 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am having trouble getting this old USNO basic program running in
bwBASIC. The error output is not clear to me where the problem is.
Here is the code, if someone wouldn't mind running it and
suggesting
I'm no BASIC Guru,
but this one line caught my eye while scrolling through your mail:
2010 IF ABS(H1. THEN GOTO 2040
Missing parenthesis?
Regards,
Michael
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
at 10:52 AM, Greg Larkin glar...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/13 1:16 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
I am having trouble getting this old USNO basic program running in
bwBASIC. The error output is not clear to me where the problem is.
Here is the code
Oops, here is another patch that includes a correction for the missing
parenthesis that Michael Ross pointed out:
--- sun.bas.orig 2013-06-17 11:51:00.0 -0700
+++ sun.bas 2013-06-17 11:57:55.0 -0700
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@
1020 ON N GOTO 1030, 1090
1030 IS=133775.*M/SK
1040 PRINT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/17/13 3:03 PM, Chris Maness wrote:
Oops, here is another patch that includes a correction for the
missing parenthesis that Michael Ross pointed out:
--- sun.bas.orig2013-06-17 11:51:00.0 -0700 +++
sun.bas2013-06-17
On closer inspection it looks like the moons in the right spot, but the Sun
is in the wrong spot. I will take a look and see if there is no error in
the lines that deal with the Sun's Az/El. I have the original code that
was scanned from a USNO document. The OCR was rather sloppy. I will post
Here is a link to the USNO article that the BASIC program originated from:
USNO171s.pdf http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/USNO171s.pdf
Thanks,
Chris Maness
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Hi, Reference:
From: Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:52:47 -0700
Chris Maness wrote:
Here is a link to the USNO article that the BASIC program originated from:
USNO171s.pdf http://www.chrismaness.com/backend/USNO171s.pdf
Thanks,
Chris Maness
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:57:51 -0400, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:19:08 +0300
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr articulated:
You can always install bash with pkg_add. The default package is
not built as a static binary, but you can compile a static
On Jun 06 2010 22:00, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I was a tcsh user before switching to zsh. But I was raised on the
Bourne Shell, and used Korn shell a lot in the 90s. The C-shell versions
of control flow commands always tripped me
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:06:07 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:06:28AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
I cannot say about the tcsh features.
That's kind of a shame, since tcsh is what I prefer these days, having
long since given up on bash (pretty much
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:26:04PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:06:07 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I've never really tried using vi-mode editing in any shell, despite the
fact I'm a constant vi user (even a vi gangsta, one might say). Maybe I
should
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 09:31:05AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I'd also like to publicly thank you on this list for encouraging me to
try FreeBSD. I absolutely love it.
I consider it a service to mankind to encourage more people using better,
and better-licensed, software. You're welcome, and
On Sat, 5 Jun 2010 22:35:09 +, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com
wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but
i found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
It isn't humanly
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:19:08 +0300
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr articulated:
You can always install bash with pkg_add. The default package is
not built as a static binary, but you can compile a static bash
binary from its port:
# cd /usr/ports/shells/bash
# make
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be copyfree rather than copyleft.
Do you use that as your interactive shell, for scripting, or both?
man zsh to
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be copyfree rather than copyleft.
Do you use that as your interactive
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good ideas
from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be
On Jun 06 2010 12:21, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:50:43AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
On Jun 06 2010 10:31, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of the good
ideas
in message 20100606182148.gb28...@guilt.hydra,
wrote Chad Perrin thusly...
...
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 04:17:15PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I like zsh, because it's sh-compatible, brings in a lot of
the good ideas from csh/tcsh, and the license appears to be
copyfree rather than
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:32:58AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I was a tcsh user before switching to zsh. But I was raised on the
Bourne Shell, and used Korn shell a lot in the 90s. The C-shell versions
of control flow commands always tripped me up, even though they're
arguably more sane --
On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 10:06:28AM -1000, p...@pair.com wrote:
I cannot say about the tcsh features.
That's kind of a shame, since tcsh is what I prefer these days, having
long since given up on bash (pretty much immediately after I started
using FreeBSD as my primary OS instead of bash, and
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
thanks in advance
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Jun 05 2010 22:35, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
thanks in advance
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences between them?(pros and cons)
Too broad a topic I suspect
On Sat 05 Jun 2010 at 16:24:36 PDT Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Giorgos Tsiapaliokas terie...@gmail.com wrote:
hello,
i am coming from the linux world where i was using the bash shell but i
found out that there are also much more.
can u tell me the basic differences
On Sat 2009-11-07 19:19:52 UTC-0800, Randi Harper (ra...@freebsd.org) wrote:
Don't bother with any of that. Just use portsnap. It's also part of
base, and was written by the same person that wrote freebsd-update.
It's lovely and much faster, although some people may argue with me on
that.
andrew clarke writes:
Don't bother with any of that. Just use portsnap. It's also part of
base, and was written by the same person that wrote freebsd-update.
It's lovely and much faster, although some people may argue with me on
that.
For your system, use freebsd-update.
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:57:54 -0600, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
wrote:
There are three basic branches, CURRENT STABLE RELEASE
You want release. You shouldn't run anything else unless you're willing and
able to help with testing, debugging, and development.
That's a quite generic
Hello all,
I have another concept that I'm confused about, the source distribution.
Some ports, like lsof require the existence of /usr/src.
What I don't understand is which version to use to keep synchronized
with the production release.
When the installed was performed the release was 7.2 but
that need the sources present so now would be a good time to
find out which one
I should use.
Thank you for your time and patience,
There are three basic branches, CURRENT STABLE RELEASE
You want release. You shouldn't run anything else unless you're willing and
able to help with testing
Roger wrote:
Hello all,
I have another concept that I'm confused about, the source distribution.
Some ports, like lsof require the existence of /usr/src.
What I don't understand is which version to use to keep synchronized
with the production release.
When the installed was performed the
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:39:41AM -0500, Roger wrote:
Hello all,
I have another concept that I'm confused about, the source distribution.
Some ports, like lsof require the existence of /usr/src.
What I don't understand is which version to use to keep synchronized
with the production
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk wrote:
You mentioned lsof but there is a utility in base which you probably
don't know about called fstat(1), which does a lot of what lsof does.
Thank you for the tip. I will definitely look into it.
IIRC, the sources for 7.2
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Roger rno...@gmail.com wrote:
My second concerned is the ports. In the file ports-supfile there is
one option, *default release=cvs tag=..
I believe this specifies which cvs tag to use when pulling files from
the ports. At one point I had *default release=cvs
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 21:09:07 Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 06:00:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
10 GOTO 10
On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:32:47 +0200, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it
wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language
want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a
best seller
FreeBSD isn't for beginners, it's for professionals.
Everyone is a beginner sometime. So, FreeBSD is for beginners.
Otherwise there would be no FreeBSD --- or you
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:53:19 -0400, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote:
I know what he thinks he means. But, what he says is that
improvements are against the ethic of FreeBSD and that simply
is not true.
Never said such thing. In fact, there are many improvements
I'd like to see in
On Wed 2009-05-06 14:32:47 UTC+0200, giorgio novello (gio@vodafone.it)
wrote:
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
The OP is likely trolling, but reminded me of the Lazarus project.
It's loosely based on Borland Delphi and is apparently quite
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
Regards
Giorgio Novello
Vb developer
Italy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
2009/5/6 giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
Regards
Giorgio Novello
Vb developer
Italy
But VB only works on one platform!
Chris
--
A: Because it messes
comne on now, its not even april first.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:32 PM, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
Regards
Giorgio Novello
Vb developer
Italy
10 GOTO 10
On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:32:47 +0200, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it
wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
FreeBSD isn't for beginners, it's for professionals. There
wouldn't be Visual
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 06:00:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:32:47 +0200, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it
wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
FreeBSD isn't
, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
Regards
Giorgio Novello
Vb developer
Italy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 06:00:32PM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
10 GOTO 10
On Wed, 6 May 2009 14:32:47 +0200, giorgio novello gio@vodafone.it
wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will be a best
seller
FreeBSD
at it, let's re-write the shell in .NET...you
know...for
performance reasons.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM, giorgio novello
gio@vodafone.it wrote:
Do you want obtain new market share?
Develop e visual-basic like language, or asp vb and your OS will
be a best
seller
Regards
Giorgio
: Re: basic
That project already exist it is called linux...
-fred-
On May 6, 2009, at 9:08 AM, J Sisson wrote:
That's a great idea...let's take a wonderful open source project and
flood
it with Windows programmers who couldn't find the shell even if they
booted without a GUI.
And while
sometime like I am working on Windows.
-fred-
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
] On Behalf Of Fred C
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 1:52 PM
To: J Sisson
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: basic
that many people have no problem with those terms.
As for the suggestion that what FreeBSD needs is VB, there have already
been various ports of Basic over the years. None of them seem to have
had much success. BSD users seem to be content with traditional shell
scripting, perl, or newer scripting
of
doing things and not vice versa. The current userbase is large enough
to suggest that many people have no problem with those terms.
As for the suggestion that what FreeBSD needs is VB, there have already
been various ports of Basic over the years. None of them seem to have
had much success
!
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jerry McAllister
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 5:23 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: basic
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:59:41PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote
Hey all,
I was wondering if anyone could make mention of a decent basic sata card
(not raid). Disk is cheap but my old dell p4 (600sc) doesn't have an
onboard
controller. I see a list of supported chipsets here
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/6.4R/hardware-i386.html#DISK but I'm more
I just installed Tulip on my FreeBSD server. The server has X11
installed, but isn't running it. I asked the questions below to the
Tulip list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) earlier, but got no
reply, so I was hoping someone here was familiar w/ it and could help
me.
Does Tulip have a command-line mode?
--- Igor Robul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:51:54AM -0500, Peter
wrote:
Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 is working well for me.
This
card is a couple of years old now. I see many on
But pay attention, that nVidia drivers dont support
amd64 version of
FreeBSD.
Well I
Hans Nieser wrote:
Micah wrote:
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only slots on my Mobo are PCI
and PCI-EX. I use the i386 release of FreeBSD
500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD
Hi Don,
Thanks for the reply. But yes, APC is selling in India the
models it can't sell anywhere else. My 500 VA Back UPS
(purchased new last month) does not have any cuaa/usb
interface. It's not just APC alone, there's a whole lot of
companies that throw
the answer to the last question in the
thread pointed to above? Exactly which nvidia cards are/are not
'native' PCI-Express?
Well, the performance isn't too horrible I think, especially if you're
just going to run some basic OpenGL apps. I think it was roughly 1/4 to
1/3 of what I would get
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only slots on my Mobo are PCI
and PCI-EX. I use the i386 release of FreeBSD currently, but would like
to have the
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:57, Micah wrote:
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only slots on my Mobo are PCI
and PCI-EX. I use the i386 release of
On Thursday 02 March 2006 21:37, Vayu wrote:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:57, Micah wrote:
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only slots on my Mobo
--- Vayu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 02 March 2006 15:57, Micah wrote:
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple
OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D
acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only
slots on my Mobo are PCI
On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:51:54AM -0500, Peter wrote:
Nvidia GeForce FX 5500 is working well for me. This
card is a couple of years old now. I see many on
But pay attention, that nVidia drivers dont support amd64 version of
FreeBSD.
___
Micah wrote:
I'm looking for a card to handle some simple OpenGL stuff for a class
I'm taking. I have an ATI X300 card, but 3D acceleration is not
supported on it in the current Xorg. The only slots on my Mobo are PCI
and PCI-EX. I use the i386 release of FreeBSD currently, but would like
in this country. Thankfully FreeBSD is
not one of them.
Regards
Manish Jain
Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
manish jain wrote:
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the
pro/smart one).
It does not have any
.
Regards
Manish Jain
Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
manish jain wrote:
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the
pro/smart one).
It does not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get apcupsd
-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Making APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not
the pro/smart one). It does not have any serial/usb interface.
Can I get apcupsd or any other daemon to work with it so that
the system automatically
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Donald J.
O'Neill
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 8:47 AM
To: Chuck Swiger
Cc: manish jain; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Making APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD
Then, thats got
APC 500 Back UPS (basic) work with FreeBSD
Then, thats got to be a really old, old one. I've been working
(playing with actually) with computers since the color computer. I
won't admit to anything further back than that. I've never seen one
that didn't have some means of communication
On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 03:07:21AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Fortunately, the used market is awash in UPSes that have burned out
batteries. Just find the local supplier of lead-acid gell cells and
make friends with him and your in like flyn. Any large city has at
least 1 of them.
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the pro/smart
one). It does not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get apcupsd or any other
daemon to work with it so that the system automatically shuts down before
backup supply runs out ?
If someone can attach
At 09:09 2006-02-21, manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the
basic model, not the pro/smart one). It does
not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get
apcupsd or any other daemon to work with it so
that the system automatically shuts down before backup supply runs
manish jain wrote:
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the pro/smart
one).
It does not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get apcupsd or any other
daemon
to work with it so that the system automatically shuts down before backup
supply
runs out ?
No. If your UPS
--- Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:09 2006-02-21, manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the
basic model, not the pro/smart one). It does
not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get
apcupsd or any other daemon to work with it so
that the system
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
manish jain wrote:
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the basic model, not the
pro/smart one).
It does not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get apcupsd or any
other daemon to work with it so that the system automatically shuts
At 10:32 2006-02-21, Peter wrote:
--- Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:09 2006-02-21, manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the
basic model, not the pro/smart one). It does
not have any serial/usb interface. Can I get
apcupsd or any other daemon
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
No. If your UPS isn't smart and does not have an external USB or
serial port, apcupsd has nothing to work with.
As best I can tell from the OP's description, and the APC website, they
all have a UPS
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 09:53, Ian Lord wrote:
At 10:32 2006-02-21, Peter wrote:
--- Ian Lord [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 09:09 2006-02-21, manish jain wrote:
Hi,
I just purchased an APC 500 Back UPS (the
basic model, not the pro/smart one). It does
not have any
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 10:08, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
No. If your UPS isn't smart and does not have an external USB or
serial port, apcupsd has nothing to work with.
As best I can tell from the
At 11:47 2006-02-21, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 10:08, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
No. If your UPS isn't smart and does not have an external USB or
serial port, apcupsd has
Back-UPS CS 350 is the lowest model
I got to work on *nix.
However, you have to ring / mail APC
and ask them to send you out a serial
lead.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 11:46, Ian Lord wrote:
Lol in my own opinion, if the user that asked the question can't
figure out there is a usb/serial port on the unit (I took the
assumption as true :) I can hardly see how he would manage to compile
and configure apcupsd :)
What can I say.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:35:40AM -0600, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
I think in this case, he was referring to extra sensory perception. But,
since this is evidently a model that just sits there and supplies
backup power until the battery is too depleted to AC power to the
computer at an
Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Tuesday 21 February 2006 08:26, Chuck Swiger wrote:
[ ... ]
No. If your UPS isn't smart and does not have an external USB or
serial port, apcupsd has nothing to work with.
As best I can tell from the OP's description,
Dan O'Connor wrote:
My config file:
UPSNAME APC_BACKUPS_650
UPSCABLE 940-0020B
UPSTYPE dumb
DEVICE /dev/cuaa0
LOCKFILE /var/spool/lock
ONBATTERYDELAY 10
BATTERYLEVEL 20
MINUTES 5
TIMEOUT 600
Nope. Same thing.
Well, first off, try setting UPSTYPE to apcsmart
My config file:
UPSNAME APC_BACKUPS_650
UPSCABLE 940-0020B
UPSTYPE dumb
DEVICE /dev/cuaa0
LOCKFILE /var/spool/lock
ONBATTERYDELAY 10
BATTERYLEVEL 20
MINUTES 5
TIMEOUT 600
Nope. Same thing.
Well, first off, try setting UPSTYPE to apcsmart
then just set UPSCABLE to
Hello. I have an APC BackUPS 650 and I want to have my FreeBSD 5.4 system
shutdown on power failure. I received a cable with the unit but there are
no identifying markings. When I run apcupsd it thinks there is a power
failure and proceeds to shut me down. Can anyone help?
My config file:
Peter wrote:
Hello. I have an APC BackUPS 650 and I want to have my FreeBSD 5.4 system
shutdown on power failure. I received a cable with the unit but there are
no identifying markings. When I run apcupsd it thinks there is a power
failure and proceeds to shut me down. Can anyone help?
--- Greg Maruszeczka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter wrote:
Hello. I have an APC BackUPS 650 and I want to have my FreeBSD 5.4
system
shutdown on power failure. I received a cable with the unit but there
are
no identifying markings. When I run apcupsd it thinks there is a
power
Hello ! ,
As a fresh Freebsd user[and fan] I am trying to set up my WM / X environment
and choose the apps I will use for basic stuff.
Text Editors , Image viewers , Mail apps , FileManagers.
So after I see some screenshots [it would be very nice and handy if some
screenshots could be added
On 10/31/05, George Katsanos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello ! ,
As a fresh Freebsd user[and fan] I am trying to set up my WM / X environment
and choose the apps I will use for basic stuff.
Text Editors , Image viewers , Mail apps , FileManagers.
So after I see some screenshots [it would
Monday 31 October 2005 10:00 skrev George Katsanos:
Hello ! ,
As a fresh Freebsd user[and fan] I am trying to set up my WM / X
environment and choose the apps I will use for basic stuff.
Text Editors , Image viewers , Mail apps , FileManagers.
So after I see some screenshots [it would
George Katsanos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a fresh Freebsd user[and fan] I am trying to set up my WM / X environment
and choose the apps I will use for basic stuff.
Text Editors , Image viewers , Mail apps , FileManagers.
So after I see some screenshots [it would be very nice and handy
G'day. I am quite new with supporting FreeBSD, although well
experienced with Unix and Linux in general, so I hope these questions
are not too silly.
My first question is about firewalls: I have read the FreeBSD handbook
and browsed the ports database, etc, to find out about firewalling.
It
On Thu, 20 Oct 2005, Daniel Pittman wrote:
It looks to me like either ipf or ipfilter are equally good, and have
about the same capabilities, as well as being provided as part of the
base system. Is there any good, technical reason why I should prefer
one to the other?
ipfilter is simpler
1 - 100 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
