process:
USERPID %CPU %MEMVSZ RSS TT STAT STARTEDTIME
COMMAND
root 11 152.9 0.0 032 ?? RL8:19AM 2:14.50 [idle]
root 0 0.0 0.1 0 2672 ?? DLs 8:19AM 0:00.36
[kernel]
root 1 0.0 0.0 6276 416 ?? SLs 8:19AM 0
Hello,
Do we have something in FreeBSD or its ports to measure the actual CPU
clock rate? Thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X
On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:13:08 +0200
Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote:
Hello,
Do we have something in FreeBSD or its ports to measure the actual CPU
clock rate? Thanks
matthias
Just check sysctl,
%sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq
From ports I use conky, that shows that info and a lot
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 461, Issue 6, Message: 1
(sorry about the threading)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:12:17 +0200 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:10:59 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
See how the entire ioctl() interface for these device types is completely
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013 05:23:31 +1100 (EST), Ian Smith wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 461, Issue 6, Message: 1
(sorry about the threading)
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:12:17 +0200 Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:10:59 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
It doesn't
On 04/02/13 20:55, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
In message 515aae16.9030...@qeng-ho.org, you wrote:
On 04/02/13 04:02, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
[Overheating CPU war story snipped.]
...
I've had a fan jam that way. Cable ties are your friends.
Yes.
P.P.S. I have a (relatively) monster
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 19:10:59 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
See how the entire ioctl() interface for these device types is completely
documented IN THE MAN PAGE? That's the way it should be... None of this
rooting around in the sources for something that should have been documented
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:35:49 +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
I'm not sure even the music industry's
paranoid lawyers would worry about something that sounds that bad, and
any half way sane judge would throw it out as de minimis.
They care about the crappy glaring sound of 8 bit, 11 kHz,
mono,
Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:55:20 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
No, that does not work. Read the manpage to recognize clearly
_what_ kind of input the /dev/speaker device accepts. It does
not understand WAV files.
However, try this example (cw.sh):
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:51:21 -0700, Carl Johnson wrote:
Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes:
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:55:20 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
No, that does not work. Read the manpage to recognize clearly
_what_ kind of input the /dev/speaker device accepts. It does
not
You might want to confirm that your processor model requires a thermal pad
and not grease. Then hunt some down and use it instead of thermal grease. I
seem to recall they were somewhat difficult to locate a place from which to
purchase.
It's not that bad these days, search amazon or something
anyway, I decided that this would be a good time to
pull out that *^%$#@ bleedin' new USB 3.0 PCIe card I had recently
installed... just in case that was causing the problem.
As I reached in to begin extracting the PCIe card, the tip of one of
my fingers accidentally brushed up against my CPU heatsink
On 04/02/13 04:02, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
[Overheating CPU war story snipped.]
I don't know what to make of this, except to suspect that some loose
wires inside my case got in the way of the CPU fan turning. (I am
not neat like some folks. The inside of myu case _is_ really rather
sloppy
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:02:02 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I've now installed mbmon and xmbmon and will be watching the CPU temp
closely for awhile.
I have xmbmon running on the lower left of my screen, together
with xcpufreq and xload. Just for my information. :-)
I really wish
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 20:02:02 -0700
Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com wrote:
I really wish that one or the other of those tools allowed setting a
threshold CPU temp, beyond which the tool would emit an ear piercing
alarm via the motherboard speaker... you know.. in case the regular
In message 515aae16.9030...@qeng-ho.org, you wrote:
On 04/02/13 04:02, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
[Overheating CPU war story snipped.]
...
I've had a fan jam that way. Cable ties are your friends.
Yes.
P.P.S. I have a (relatively) monster sized heatsink in this system, and
it sits atop
On Tue, 02 Apr 2013 12:55:20 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Is there any specific advantage to using that, relative to using mbmon?
As far as I understand, it's utilizing a different infrastructure
to obtain data. You can see man amdtemp in comparison to the
reporting mechanisms mbmon uses.
In message 20130402231522.71cb7352.free...@edvax.de,
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
First order question: Why is it that in FreeBSD there are so many man
pages like this one, _purporting_ to describe some low level interface
to some sort of hardware, and the man page _doesn't_ include a
On 02/04/2013 13:32, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I've now installed mbmon and xmbmon and will be watching the CPU temp
closely for awhile.
I really wish that one or the other of those tools allowed setting a
threshold CPU temp, beyond which the tool would emit an ear piercing
alarm via
out that *^%$#@ bleedin' new USB 3.0 PCIe card I had recently
installed... just in case that was causing the problem.
As I reached in to begin extracting the PCIe card, the tip of one of
my fingers accidentally brushed up against my CPU heatsink. I in-
stinctively yanked it away immediately. If I
decided that this would be a good time to
pull out that *^%$#@ bleedin' new USB 3.0 PCIe card I had recently
installed... just in case that was causing the problem.
As I reached in to begin extracting the PCIe card, the tip of one of
my fingers accidentally brushed up against my CPU heatsink. I
Hi,
is there a way to determine which core (virtual or real) belongs to which cpu?
Regards,
kaltheat
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 08:38:05 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Is there anything in 9.1 to Limit jail CPU memory resources?
https://wiki.freebsd.org/Hierarchical_Resource_Limits
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has
On Fri, 01 Mar 2013 09:52:41 -0600, fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
Read that all ready and left me with more question than answers.
Its experimental and has to be compiled into the kernel.
Need solutions that are provided as part of the base system.
Such as a loadable kernel module.
Can not be
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +0100, kaltheat wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to determine which core (virtual or real) belongs to which cpu?
Regards,
kaltheat
I read smp(8). There was a link to kern.sched.topology_spec which shows exactly
what I was searching
think about the new jail.conf parameter cpuset.id from jail(8)?
Seems to me it's a way to dedicate one or more CPUs to a single jail for
increased jail performance. Really the opposite of limiting cpu
resources to a jail.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hello!
We have a small server running FreeBSD 8.3 amd64 with Intel Pentium D
945 CPU. As the motherboard/CPU combo is getting rather old, we are
considering an upgrade to new motherboard with Xeon E3-1230 CPU. We
currently have these CPU settings
in /etc/make.conf:
CPUTYPE?=nocona
Cross-posting reply to amd64@ for relevance and to get answers from
those smart gents.
On 12/18/12 23:17, Toomas Aas wrote:
Hello!
We have a small server running FreeBSD 8.3 amd64 with Intel Pentium D
945 CPU. As the motherboard/CPU combo is getting rather old, we are
considering an upgrade
Hello,
FreeBSD 9.1 amd64, postgrey-1.34_4, perl-5.14.2_2
Here from time to time and since one or two months, postgrey starts to
eat 100% of CPU, it always occurs juste after it cleans its bases. Then
it does not accept any connection:
Dec 2 03:11:49 net-110 postgrey[2252]: cleaning up old logs
I think it's likely that it is a 64-bit installation.
Not sure about that. How could the amd64 OS be installed
and run on a i386 machine?
it cannot.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So
I tried both:
you've got into wrong directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
you've got into wrong directory
/usr/src/sys/i386/conf is right
/usr/src/sys/amd64/conf is wrong, unless you have 64-bit
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer.
*PRECISELY* why the OP is having problems. He _is_ trying to build amd64
kernel
...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit distribution on
your
nonsense. 64-bit distribution doesn't run on 32-bit computer
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may have installed the 64-bit
distribution on your
: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
To: Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org
Cc: RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why can't I set my cpu type in kernel config ?
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
Jason: It looks like you may
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an i686
CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu I686_CPU
(I also tried them both lowercase, like i686_cpu)
But all of these fail:
GENERIC
make LINT
vi LINT
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Jason Usher jushe...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's an
i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working. So I
tried both:
cpu I586_CPU
and:
cpu
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
an i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working.
So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
On Tue, 7 Aug 2012, RW wrote:
On Mon, 6 Aug 2012 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
Jason Usher wrote:
I am installing 8.3-RELEASE on an old 900mhz pentium laptop ... it's
an i686 CPU.
By default, GENERIC has HAMMER as the cpu, and that isn't working.
So I tried both:
That's the amd64 (64-bit) GENERIC
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:07:21 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar wrote:
acroread9 is awfully slow, or more accurately it was the PDF I was
editing for UK government tax return (**.) I recall reading it was
also awfully slow on MS. I never use it except when I have to (**)
true. braindamaged
hello, world\n
I'm wondering if it's just here or if other people also observe that
acroread9 makes the CPU spin at 100% (one load point), as if in a busy
loop. This happens for me on 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT alike (amd64), with
up-to-date ports tree. It has done this as long as I can remember
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 22:17:37 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
hello, world\n
I'm wondering if it's just here or if other people also observe that
acroread9 makes the CPU spin at 100% (one load point), as if in a busy
loop. This happens for me on 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT alike (amd64), with
up
I'm wondering if it's just here or if other people also observe that
acroread9 makes the CPU spin at 100% (one load point), as if in a busy
loop. This happens for me on 9-STABLE and 10-CURRENT alike (amd64), with
not me - i use xpdf. Free, open source, much faster
On 25 July 2012 07:55, Владислав Продан univers...@ukr.net wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping = 2
# kldstat -v | grep temp
319 cpu/coretemp
25.07.2012 18:16, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2012 07:55, Владислав Продан univers...@ukr.net wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
2
# kldstat -v | grep
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping = 2
# kldstat -v | grep temp
319 cpu/coretemp
26.07.2012 1:55, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
2
# kldstat -v | grep temp
How to look what re0 is doing?? And how to debug that?
last pid: 74164; load averages: 17.97, 13.81, 14.40
up 47+09:31:54 21:50:58
110 processes: 9 running, 87 sleeping, 14 waiting
CPU: 0.5% user, 0.0% nice, 1.6% system, 97.9% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 194M Active
averages: 17.97, 13.81, 14.40
up 47+09:31:54 21:50:58
110 processes: 9 running, 87 sleeping, 14 waiting
CPU: 0.5% user, 0.0% nice, 1.6% system, 97.9% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 194M Active, 449M Inact, 204M Wired, 20K Cache, 112M Buf, 1143M Free
Swap: 512M Total, 512M
I have a FreeBSD 8.2-REALEASE-p5 system that is running as a Squid
proxy server, after some complaints for internet performance I logged
into the system to take a look, and discovered the flowcleaner process
is consuming 100% on one CPU. I did some searching, and have discovered
Здравствуйте, Robert.
Вы писали 26 декабря 2011 г., 23:54:59:
RB [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines]
RB You've been told the following, *repeatedly*:
RB Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic
RB it is being subjected to.
RB Reaaltek cards and the 're' device
Also I notice next:
in case of overload 'ping localhost' or any IP this router has get
timeouts about 50-100ms, pinging any external host on LAN or Internet
get normal results: 5ms LAN, 40ms Internet.
I do not think this issue related to re0 interface or its driver.
This is related to kernel
, 251 sleeping, 16 waiting, 3 lock
CPU 0: 16.5% user, 0.0% nice, 12.2% system, 48.9% interrupt, 22.3% idle
CPU 1: 12.2% user, 0.0% nice, 13.7% system, 60.4% interrupt, 13.7% idle
CPU 2: 8.6% user, 0.0% nice, 8.6% system, 68.3% interrupt, 14.4% idle
CPU 3: 10.8% user, 0.0% nice, 4.3% system, 72.7
I get it!!
When one of netisr take 100% of CPU other netisr threads did not get
free CPU time.
http://piccy.info/view3/2444937/25e978a34d1da6b62e4e4602dee53d8b/
In this case network works without any problem
last pid: 23632; load averages: 5.53, 5.76, 5.72up
6+00:09:50
Dennis Glatting wrote on 31.12.2011 16:52:
Curios here.
My BIOS reports my CPU at 4,023 MHz but when FreeBSD boots it says
3973.35-MHz. How is this determined? Seems like an off-by-one error
somewhere.
MB: ASUS Crosshair V FORMULA, latest BIOS, overclocked.
dmesg output:
Tasha dmesg
Curios here.
My BIOS reports my CPU at 4,023 MHz but when FreeBSD boots it says
3973.35-MHz. How is this determined? Seems like an off-by-one error
somewhere.
MB: ASUS Crosshair V FORMULA, latest BIOS, overclocked.
dmesg output:
Tasha dmesg
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project
if this is interesting for anyone.
looks strange:
irq256 - WAIT and
ng_queue - sleep
are they wait each other?
last pid: 70764; load averages: 69.14, 48.87, 26.25
up 9+03:32:40 21:01:21
197 processes: 101 running, 82 sleeping, 14 waiting
CPU: 14.2% user, 0.0
RB [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines]
RB You've been told the following, *repeatedly*:
RB Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic
RB it is being subjected to.
RB Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems
with
RB heavy network
[2]: high load system do not take all CPU time
w
w
Здравствуйте, Daniel.
Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00:
DS --As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений
DS is alleged to have said:
How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces?
On this pictures
Staal dst...@usa.net
w Date: 18 December 2011, 19:47:40
w Subject: Re[2]: high load system do not take all CPU time
w
w
Здравствуйте, Daniel.
Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00:
DS --As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений
DS is alleged to have said:
How
[drivelectomy -- 200+ lines]
You've been told the following, *repeatedly*:
Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic
it is being subjected to.
Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems with
heavy network traffic. They're merely
Здравствуйте, wishmaster.
Вы писали 19 декабря 2011 г., 6:54:08:
w --- Original message ---
w From: Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru
w To: Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net
w Date: 18 December 2011, 19:47:40
w Subject: Re[2]: high load system do not take all CPU time
w
w
Здравствуйте
--- Original message ---
From: Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru
To: wishmaster artem...@ukr.net
Date: 25 December 2011, 18:10:22
Subject: Re[4]: high load system do not take all CPU time
Здравствуйте, wishmaster.
Вы писали 19 декабря 2011 г., 6:54:08:
w --- Original
Здравствуйте, Daniel.
Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00:
DS --As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений
DS is alleged to have said:
How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces?
On this pictures you can see that CPU can not exceed 400tics
http://piccy.info
--As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений
is alleged to have said:
How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces?
On this pictures you can see that CPU can not exceed 400tics
http://piccy.info/view3/2368839/c9022754d5fcd64aff04482dd360b5b2/
http://piccy.info/view3
Здравствуйте, Daniel.
Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00:
DS --As of December 17, 2011 10:29:42 AM +0200, Коньков Евгений
DS is alleged to have said:
How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces?
On this pictures you can see that CPU can not exceed 400tics
http://piccy.info
kes-...@yandex.ru wrote;
can I get interrupt limit or calculate it before that limit is
reached?
You can extrapolate from the current cpu time spent in interrupt handling
and the current interrupt rate to a situation where roughly 100% of the
cpu capacity is spent in interrupt handling
--- Original message ---
From: Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru
To: Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net
Date: 18 December 2011, 19:47:40
Subject: Re[2]: high load system do not take all CPU time
Здравствуйте, Daniel.
Вы писали 18 декабря 2011 г., 17:52:00:
DS --As of December 17
How to debug why system do not use free CPU resouces?
On this pictures you can see that CPU can not exceed 400tics
http://piccy.info/view3/2368839/c9022754d5fcd64aff04482dd360b5b2/
http://piccy.info/view3/2368837/a12aeed98681ed10f1a22f5b5edc5abc/
http://piccy.info/view3/2368836
On 11/14/11 17:23, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:16:49 -0800, Edward Martinez wrote:
Thanks!, Even though mbmon is about 10 degrees off from what the
BIOS is reporting. I'm still a happycamper.
I had a similar observation with my P4 system: CPU temp
would always flatline
On 11/12/11 18:02, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:19:57 -0800, Edward Martinez wrote:
Hi,
I have a Pentium 4 and i have been trying to get coretemp and
sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature to display my Cpu temperture ,
however i have not had any luck using them
On Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:16:49 -0800, Edward Martinez wrote:
Thanks!, Even though mbmon is about 10 degrees off from what the
BIOS is reporting. I'm still a happycamper.
I had a similar observation with my P4 system: CPU temp
would always flatline at 60 deg. C.
I have a question
On 11/12/2011 8:02 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:19:57 -0800, Edward Martinez wrote:
Hi,
I have a Pentium 4 and i have been trying to get coretemp and
sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature to display my Cpu temperture ,
however i have not had any luck using them
Hi,
I have a Pentium 4 and i have been trying to get coretemp and
sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature to display my Cpu temperture ,
however i have not had any luck using them
Are there any other apps perhaps from ports that reports CPU temp?
thanks
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 18:19:57 -0800, Edward Martinez wrote:
Hi,
I have a Pentium 4 and i have been trying to get coretemp and
sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature to display my Cpu temperture ,
however i have not had any luck using them
Are there any other apps perhaps from
system is still consuming 100% CPU whenever
it runs.
I googled around awhile trying to find the solution, and found a couple of
suggestions for fixing this, but none of them worked.
OK, so somebody please clue me in. What's the magic diddle I have to
apply to this system in order to get acroread
hi, Freebsd-questions.
last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23 20:29:07
218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping
CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 225M Active, 81M Inact, 115M Wired, 3936K Cache, 60M Buf, 64M Free
Swap: 2048M
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 20:38:49 +0300
From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= kes-...@yandex.ru
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: top: how to obtain which process take CPU time
[[.. sneck ..]]
It is unclear which process take CPU time. is there any other tool, which
help
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:38:49PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote:
hi, Freebsd-questions.
last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23
20:29:07
218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping
CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 225M
Здравствуйте, Frank.
Вы писали 1 октября 2011 г., 21:38:56:
FS On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 08:38:49PM +0300, ??? ??? wrote:
hi, Freebsd-questions.
last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23
20:29:07
218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping
CPU: 59.6% user
In the last episode (Oct 01), ??? ??? said:
hi, Freebsd-questions.
last pid: 92665; load averages: 2.40, 2.68, 4.75up 5+02:45:23
20:29:07
218 processes: 3 running, 215 sleeping
CPU: 59.6% user, 0.0% nice, 40.4% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0% idle
Mem: 225M Active, 81M
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:03 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
ssh) with SIGKILL
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg
begins to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get
sluggish. Quitting the browser brings situation back to normal.
[...]
Have you tried
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg
begins to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get sluggish. Quitting
the browser brings situation back to normal.
It looks amazing to me that both firefox
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote:
I saw this with firefox, now I see the same with chrome.
After a while when the browser is launched with ~10 tabs open, Xorg begins
to consume 100% CPU and all graphics apps get sluggish. Quitting the browser
brings situation back
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, C. P. Ghost wrote:
Running:
FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #0 r222832 amd64
with
xorg-server-1.7.7_1,1
xorg-drivers-7.5.1
and the radeonhd driver:
radeonhd is defunct. Everything it does should be done better by the
radeon driver from xf86-video-ati.
C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws wrote:
... when mplayer plays some (rare) video files.
Xorg then stays at 100% CPU, and it is impossible to kill it,
neither from the inside, nor from the outside (logged in via
ssh) with SIGKILL. Only a reboot helps here.
An unkillable process is almost
and
run smartctl on /dev/ad8s2 (the ffs slice). Is there any port for
monitoring system thermals, particularly CPU ?
Regards
Manish Jain
On 09-Jul-11 22:24, Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Jul 9, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Manish Jain wrote:
What do I make of it when the system runs flawlessly both on Win
dies, powering off in a flash. I suspect the continuous I/O is causing
is a CPU overheat which results in this behaviour. The strange thing
is when I ran a script to ktrace and kdump, there is no sign of any
unwarranted I/O. Can anyone suggest what possibly be wrong with my
system
not running), suddenly the whole system
dies, powering off in a flash. I suspect the continuous I/O is causing
is a CPU overheat which results in this behaviour.
While you probably do have flaky hardware causing problems, even under the
worst case situation, a modern hard drive doesn't use more than
booting, the disk keeps
continuously (meaning continuous I/O) and after a couple of hours (on
the console with the X server not running), suddenly the whole system
dies, powering off in a flash. I suspect the continuous I/O is causing
is a CPU overheat which results in this behaviour.
While you
On Jul 9, 2011, at 9:22 AM, Manish Jain wrote:
What do I make of it when the system runs flawlessly both on Win XP and
FreeBSD-8.0-amd64 ?
That's interesting but inconclusive. Can you run prime95 testing overnight
under WinXP without issues? Or memtest86?
BTW, 8.2 does NOT - for reasons
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:27 AM, manish jain invalid.poin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Dan,
It looks like ppp is doing a lot of read and write operations, which keeps
the disk spinning. How do I set this right ? Is there something wrong with
my ppp.conf (see below) ?
ppp.conf :
default:
set
In the last episode (Jul 05), manish jain said:
On 30 June 2011 10:26, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
In the last episode (Jun 30), Manish Jain said:
I have a strange problem with my 8.1 box. After booting, the hard
disk goes into a full-speed never-ending spin.
To
Hello Dan,
I was having multiple problems with my x86 installation, apart from
the disc spinning continuously. Despite tuning many sysctl parameters,
X clients would not open for non-root users (max number of clients
reached); for root, they would open, but after about 30 minutes
children) for 10 seconds, then run kdump -m64 | less to view the results.
Look for read or write calls.
'ps waux' always shows pid
11 as taking 400% CPU utilization :
/root # ps -up 11
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TT STAT STARTED TIME COMMAND
root11 400.0 0.0
1 - 100 of 1264 matches
Mail list logo
