Re: Obscure df -h output

2008-08-29 Thread Kris Kennaway
Marc Coyles wrote: Yes, they did something bizarre. Ask them why :) Kris ___ Mornin' Kris / list... Asked them why and they shrugged and said "we didn't"... So... I unmounted all the nullfs mounts that it'd allow me to unmount (tmp, dev, proc and b

RE: Obscure df -h output

2008-08-29 Thread Marc Coyles
> Yes, they did something bizarre. Ask them why :) > > Kris > ___ Mornin' Kris / list... Asked them why and they shrugged and said "we didn't"... So... I unmounted all the nullfs mounts that it'd allow me to unmount (tmp, dev, proc and bin were "busy

Re: Obscure df -h output

2008-08-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
Marc Coyles wrote: Looks like they did some strange things trying to get it back. Those look like nullfs mounts with the same source and destination, which makes no sense. What does mount -v show you? Hi Kris... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mount -v /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 71548

RE: Obscure df -h output

2008-08-28 Thread Marc Coyles
> Looks like they did some strange things trying to get it back. Those > look like nullfs mounts with the same source and destination, which > makes no sense. What does mount -v show you? > Hi Kris... [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mount -v /dev/ad0s1a on / (ufs, local, writes: sync 715484 async 362440,

Re: Obscure df -h output

2008-08-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
Marc Coyles wrote: One of my servers appears to be having a slightly dippy moment... Running FREEBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 i386 (I don't have the bottle to attempt freebsd-update to 7.0-REL, altho I really should... Still a relative newb tho, and not confident on a box I can only access by remote) runni

Obscure df -h output

2008-08-28 Thread Marc Coyles
One of my servers appears to be having a slightly dippy moment... Running FREEBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p5 i386 (I don't have the bottle to attempt freebsd-update to 7.0-REL, altho I really should... Still a relative newb tho, and not confident on a box I can only access by remote) running WHM 11.23.2 cPanel

Re[2]: df -h output

2005-06-07 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hi Svein, Wednesday, June 8, 2005, 12:06:05 AM, you wrote these comments: > * Daniel Gerzo [2005-06-07 23:09 +0200] >> Actually, this question is asked 2-3 times a month (if not more) ;-) > In fact, it is asked so often, that one might be inclined to make the > output of df imply this is some w

Re: df -h output

2005-06-07 Thread Svein Halvor Halvorsen
* Daniel Gerzo [2005-06-07 23:09 +0200] > Actually, this question is asked 2-3 times a month (if not more) ;-) In fact, it is asked so often, that one might be inclined to make the output of df imply this is some way or another, by means for a "reserved" column or something like that. But it w

Re: df -h output

2005-06-07 Thread Jerry McAllister
> > Hi all, > > Have a query re the above > > /dev/ad2s1 75G 68G1.5G98%/data-one > /dev/ad3s1 74G 66G2.3G97%/data-two > > As you can see, I have two data drives in this system, but I do not > understand and not really noticed before the sizes. > > 'Us

Re: df -h output

2005-06-07 Thread Daniel Gerzo
Hi Gray, Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 11:04:11 PM, you typed: > Hi all, > Have a query re the above > /dev/ad2s1 75G 68G1.5G98%/data-one > /dev/ad3s1 74G 66G2.3G97%/data-two > As you can see, I have two data drives in this system, but I do > not understand a

df -h output

2005-06-07 Thread Gray Lilley
Hi all, Have a query re the above /dev/ad2s1 75G 68G1.5G98%/data-one /dev/ad3s1 74G 66G2.3G97%/data-two As you can see, I have two data drives in this system, but I do not understand and not really noticed before the sizes. 'Used' states 66GB, with 2.3