when performing a binary upgrade from 9.0-RC1 to 9.0-RC2 by following
the instructions found here:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2011-November/029373.html
i've had this error:
Applying patches... done.
Fetching 5612 files... gunzip: (stdin): unexpected end of file
137c71ff9
I running 8.2-RELEASE-p4.
I have just run freebsd-update and it dave done something I dont't understand:
# freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 8.2-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Fetching metadata index...
Sorry,all.
I will email same message.
I am not familiar with this webmail.
Thank you very much for the understandable explanations.
I appreciate it very much.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
---
Inexperienced FreeBSD user: Level 1
pow 1, spd 1, vit 1,int 1,luck 1
--- On Fri, 4/11/11, Alexandre wrote:
> From: Alexandre
> Subject: Re: freebsd-update (custom kernel)
> To: "Jason Helfman" , "Michael Sierchio"
> , "masayoshi"
> Cc: fre
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:42:12AM -0700, Michael Sierchio thus spake:
This is simply not the case. freebsd-update works on the basis of
cryptographic hashes on the binaries. It is, after all, a binary
update program. If it detects a custom kernel, it will not update the
kernel, but updates
id non-custom updates to your custom kernel when the kernel or os
> patches
> are distributed by the update servers.
>
Hi,
The freebsd-update tool works fine with GENERIC and CUSTOM kernels. In
fact, GENERIC kernel is upgraded during the upgrade step. With a custom
kernel, you just h
This is simply not the case. freebsd-update works on the basis of
cryptographic hashes on the binaries. It is, after all, a binary
update program. If it detects a custom kernel, it will not update the
kernel, but updates userland programs. It doesn't *care* what your
kernel config name i
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 09:19:29AM -0700, Michael Sierchio thus spake:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
I does work fine with a custom kernel, as long as you are running and
maintaining the actual update server that distributes.
I don't think that's relevant. It works fi
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 08:49:16AM -0700, masayoshi thus spake:
I would like to know about freebsd-update command.
It is rumoured that freebsd-update command does not work well with custom
kernel.
First question is the following :
su -
#freebsd-update fetch
#freebsd-update install
Does this
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Jason Helfman wrote:
> I does work fine with a custom kernel, as long as you are running and
> maintaining the actual update server that distributes.
I don't think that's relevant. It works fine with the public servers.
___
It will work fine - it won't attempt to update the kernel.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 8:49 AM, masayoshi wrote:
> I would like to know about freebsd-update command.
> It is rumoured that freebsd-update command does not work well with custom
> kernel.
> First question is the fo
I would like to know about freebsd-update command.
It is rumoured that freebsd-update command does not work well with custom
kernel.
First question is the following :
> su -
#freebsd-update fetch
#freebsd-update install
Does this command work well?
The answer is .
[A].Always work,
On 23/08/2011 16:26, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> Thanks for the pointers on how to set up my own build servers for
> freebsd-update but I'm not really interested in building locally, I
> just want to mirror the releases and patches that we're interested in
> locally and poin
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to fetch files needed for freebsd-update once and put
them on a local fileserver to update many machines?
Thanks for the pointers on how to set up my own build
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 04:10:30PM +0200, Paul Schenkeveld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to fetch files needed for freebsd-update once and put
> them on a local fileserver to update many machines?
Thanks for the pointers on how to set up my own build servers for
freebsd-update
>I had an opportunity to upgrade a server from freebsd 8.1 to 8.2 since
>it had to be restarted any way. I upgraded it with freebsd-update and
>compiled a custom kernel with no problem. However I haven't been able to
>find a procedure for updating jails when they've been set
rade a server from freebsd 8.1 to 8.2 since
> it had to be restarted any way. I upgraded it with freebsd-update and
> compiled a custom kernel with no problem. However I haven't been able to
> find a procedure for updating jails when they've been setup with ezjail.
> I did &#x
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011, Rocky Borg spaketh thusly:
-}I had an opportunity to upgrade a server from freebsd 8.1 to 8.2 since it had
-}to be restarted any way. I upgraded it with freebsd-update and compiled a
-}custom kernel with no problem. However I haven't been able to find a procedure
I had an opportunity to upgrade a server from freebsd 8.1 to 8.2 since
it had to be restarted any way. I upgraded it with freebsd-update and
compiled a custom kernel with no problem. However I haven't been able to
find a procedure for updating jails when they've been setup with ezja
>Hi,
>Is it possible to fetch files needed for freebsd-update once and put
>them on a local fileserver to update many machines?
>
>The reason for asking is that all these machines are on secure
>networks and are not allowed to have Internet access but can all
>access a com
2011/8/19 Paul Schenkeveld :
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to fetch files needed for freebsd-update once and put
> them on a local fileserver to update many machines?
You can use
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/projects/freebsd-update-server/
> The reason for asking is that all
Hi,
Is it possible to fetch files needed for freebsd-update once and put
them on a local fileserver to update many machines?
The reason for asking is that all these machines are on secure
networks and are not allowed to have Internet access but can all
access a common fileserver (using FTP, HTTP
On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:21:13AM -0400, Brent Bloxam wrote:
>
> I'm going through the freebsd-update process to move from 7.0 to 7.4. I
> followed the handbook, rebooted to GENERIC and followed up with
> `freebsd-update install` and got the following output:
>
> &g
I'm going through the freebsd-update process to move from 7.0 to 7.4. I
followed the handbook, rebooted to GENERIC and followed up with
`freebsd-update install` and got the following output:
# freebsd-update install
Installing updates...rmdir: ///usr/share/man/ja: Directory not empty
did you rebuild the world?
Ran makeworld and installworld twice to be sure of the version number
staying the same :)
-Reko
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
did you rebuild the world?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/After-freebsd-update-tp4438777p4439202.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
You have applied the update successfully. You won't see any
difference
in the output from uname(1) because this update when applied via
freebsd-update(8) doesn't touch the kernel. It only affects
named(8).
This is the patched version in 8.2-STABLE:
% /usr/sbin/named -v
BIND 9
On 30/05/2011 09:49, Leslie Jensen wrote:
>
> My system still is shows #0
>
> 8.2-RELEASE #0
>
>
> Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind
>
> I did
>
> # freebsd-update fetch
> # freebsd-update install
>
> And a reboot,
My system still is shows #0
8.2-RELEASE #0
Following the latest FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-11:02.bind
I did
# freebsd-update fetch
# freebsd-update install
And a reboot, but my system doesn't indicate the update!
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
/L
Bas Smeelen wrote:
It would be nice if freebsd-update had the same command sequence (without
the build parts) as in a source upgrade. First fetch of course, then
freebsd-update installkernel with a message to reboot on succes or rollback
on failure, then after reboot freebsd-update installworld
dure:
>
> A) 1st freebsd-update install: The kernel and kernel modules will be
> patched
>
> B) reboot
>
> C) 2nd freebsd-update install: The state of the process has been saved and
> thus,freebsd-update will not start from the beginning, but will remove all
> old shared lib
ful mess and rollback didn't work. loads of really basic
programs, stuff that freebsd-update uses, were missing, like id(1).
oh well.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsub
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:24:30AM -0500, Tom Worster thus spake:
On 3/10/11 9:13 AM, "Bas Smeelen" wrote:
On 03/10/2011 03:03 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
at this stage, i have no remote access. even if i could gain access, i
wouldn't know what state it's in or how to proceed. it's probably best
n
i can't ssh then i need local help. i'll ask them to try rollback
before resorting to cd.
>It sounds more like kernel and userland are not in sync or something else.
>This shouldn't be a problem caused by freeb-update though.
the handbook describes a procedure:
A) 1st freebsd-u
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 02:37 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> BTW Yes I mean sysutils/screen
>
There is also TMUX http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/tmux/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.
e a problem caused by freeb-update though.
Maybe someone has a clue about this?
Is this on real hardware or hosted in a virtual machine setup?
I haven't have this happen with about 30 servers the last three years going
from 6 to 7 and to 8, the latter with freebsd-update, rebooting with GE
02:37 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
>> freebsd-update install
>> Installing updates...Bad system call (core dumped)
>But your server is running and other services are ok?
>
>Is your kernel still 7.1 ?
>I guess it should be. (uname -a)
>
>Looks like either a newer version of freebsd-
On 03/10/2011 02:37 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> freebsd-update install
> Installing updates...Bad system call (core dumped)
But your server is running and other services are ok?
Is your kernel still 7.1 ?
I guess it should be. (uname -a)
Looks like either a newer version of freebsd-update a
On 3/10/11 8:01 AM, "Bas Smeelen" wrote:
>On 03/10/2011 01:52 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
>>i was upgrading a remote machine from 7.1 to 8.1 with freebsd-update.
>>
>>the "freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade" phase was complete and i had
>>given:
>
On 03/10/2011 01:52 PM, Tom Worster wrote:
> i was upgrading a remote machine from 7.1 to 8.1 with freebsd-update.
>
> the "freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade" phase was complete and i had
> given:
>
> # freebsd-update install
> Installing updates...
>
> wh
i was upgrading a remote machine from 7.1 to 8.1 with freebsd-update.
the "freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade" phase was complete and i had
given:
# freebsd-update install
Installing updates...
when the wifi on my local computer went away. eventually i restarted the
wifi interfa
ts updates (we're running only
RELEASE) i do:
1 - check the 1st 4 fields of the tag file in the freebsd-update working
dir.
Just because the 1st 4 fields are populated, doesn't necessarily imply it
is
running at that version. The tag is stating what it has recently "seen"
as
>
>>1 - check the 1st 4 fields of the tag file in the freebsd-update working
>>dir.
>
>Just because the 1st 4 fields are populated, doesn't necessarily imply it
>is
>running at that version. The tag is stating what it has recently "seen"
>as
>av
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:32:11AM -0500, Tom Worster thus spake:
to determine roughly where a server is in its updates (we're running only
RELEASE) i do:
1 - check the 1st 4 fields of the tag file in the freebsd-update working
dir.
Just because the 1st 4 fields are populated, do
to determine roughly where a server is in its updates (we're running only
RELEASE) i do:
1 - check the 1st 4 fields of the tag file in the freebsd-update working
dir.
2 - check the output of freebsd-update IDS.
is it the case that freebsd-update IDS checks base system status relative
to w
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:25:47AM +1100, andrew clarke thus spake:
On Fri 2011-02-25 17:26:52 UTC+, Neil Long (n...@cymru.com) wrote:
Just noticed how large /var/db/freebsd-update has grown on a box I
just upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 (but I can't recall when I started
using it).
Is th
On Fri 2011-02-25 17:26:52 UTC+, Neil Long (n...@cymru.com) wrote:
> Just noticed how large /var/db/freebsd-update has grown on a box I
> just upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 (but I can't recall when I started
> using it).
>
> Is there a recommended approach or just rm the dire
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apologies .. correcting myself here ..
> .. to update the binaries after a full update of the host system and
> something like ..
>
> #!/bin/sh
> for JAIL in {list-your-jails-here}
> do
> mv /usr/src /usr/local/jails/${JAIL}/usr
> JA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/27/11 08:48, Dan Naumov wrote:
> I've also discovered the "ezjail-admin install -h file://" option which
> installs a basejail using the host system as base, am I right in thinking I
> could also use this by first upgrading my host and then runni
I have a 8.0 host system with a few jails (using ezjail) that I am gearing
to update to 8.2. I have used freebsd-update a few times in the past to
upgrade a system between releases, but how I would I go about using it to
also upgrade a few jails made using ezjail? I would obviously need to point
Hi
Just noticed how large /var/db/freebsd-update has grown on a box I
just upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 (but I can't recall when I started using
it).
Is there a recommended approach or just rm the directory if I have no
need to roll it back?
Thanks
Neil
27.01.2011 15:19, Konstantin Vasilyev пишет:
> Ok.
> Things a not good :-(
> freebsd-update produce a lot of output like this
>> /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c has SHA256 hash
>> 893beadfcf15784f31553ea142867c2949422d6937cb61f11a0f42ae3d7727fc, but should
Ok.
Things a not good :-(
freebsd-update produce a lot of output like this
> /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c has SHA256 hash
> 893beadfcf15784f31553ea142867c2949422d6937cb61f11a0f42ae3d7727fc, but should
> have SHA256 hash
> ce374f0d9434d08ee35769f8cbad7ca074506b814394b30d19d2aebcf3b2
Konstantin Vasilyev wrote:
> I know about how freedsd-update work.
> I use for a long time.
> But I don't understand why is freebsd-update going to update
> > FreeBSD ota2.cellnetrix.com 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4
> to
> > The following files will be u
I know about how freedsd-update work.
I use for a long time.
But I don't understand why is freebsd-update going to update
> FreeBSD ota2.cellnetrix.com 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4
to
> The following files will be updated as part of updating to 7.3-RELEASE-p4:...
--
With b
Konstantin Vasilyev wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I have installed
> %uname -a
> FreeBSD ota2.cellnetrix.com 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 #3:
> Tue Jan 25 19:19:34 MSK 2011
> kvasi...@ota2.cellnetrix.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> I have
> @daily
Hi all!
I have installed
%uname -a
FreeBSD ota2.cellnetrix.com 7.3-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p4 #3:
Tue Jan 25 19:19:34 MSK 2011
kvasi...@ota2.cellnetrix.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
I have
@daily freebsd-update cron
in root's crontab.
Why does freebsd-update mail m
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 01:26:56PM -0600, Steve Randall wrote:
> > > 2010/12/5 :
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
> > >> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GEN
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 19:09:53 +0100
jo...@jodocus.org wrote:
> > 2010/12/5 :
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
> >> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads
> >&g
> 2010/12/5 :
>> Hi
>>
>> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
>> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads
>> (I'm
>> using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loa
On 06.12.2010 3:11, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
>> GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slicer) and
>> utility that rolls up support for many partitioning formats
>> (MBR, BSD, GPT etc.) into a single code base.
>> ...
>> NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the kerne
On 06.12.2010 10:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Thanks, that's what I had hoped (but had noticed a few things lately
> that had me wondering whether they might perhaps not be working
> entirely _correctly_ -- I need to do some more experimentation).
>
> The next question then is, when _does_ t
"Andrey V. Elsukov" wrote:
> >> NOTE: Some old utilities like bsdlabel may not work if the
> >> kernel doesn't include GEOM_BSD and other old slicer classes.
> >> In other words, bsdlabel et al don't work with GEOM_PART.
> >
> > Does this mean that, in 8.1-RELEASE, bsdlabel/disklabel will
> > not
David DEMELIER wrote:
> Here : http://ivoras.sharanet.org/freebsd/freebsd8.html
>
> GEOM_PART becomes the default slicer
>
> Status: Committed to -CURRENT
> Will appear in 8.0: sure
> Author: Marcel Moolenaar & others
> Web: commit message
>
> GEOM_PART (gpart) is a new GEOM partition class (slic
2010/12/5 :
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
> freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm
> using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded
> manually)
> It then
Hi
I'm trying to upgrade a amd64 box from 7.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE with
freebsd-update. After the first reboot the 8.1R GENERIC kernel loads (I'm
using a custom kernel, so at this point the generic kernel is loaded
manually)
It then claims it can't mount /
One thing that's
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 22:25, Jason wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:45:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff thus spake:
>>
>> Weird little problem here...
>>
>> I've got a 7.1-RELEASE box I'm trying to get to 8.1-RELEASE. I was
>> able to do 'freebsd-update -
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:45:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff thus spake:
Weird little problem here...
I've got a 7.1-RELEASE box I'm trying to get to 8.1-RELEASE. I was
able to do 'freebsd-update -install' and get the security patches and
all, but 'freebsd-update -r 8.1-REL
Weird little problem here...
I've got a 7.1-RELEASE box I'm trying to get to 8.1-RELEASE. I was
able to do 'freebsd-update -install' and get the security patches and
all, but 'freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade' fails - see output
below. Can anyone point me i
/usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or
directory
This line appears hundred of times.
After that, freebsd-update claims that many files are non existent
in the
new version and ask to delete them :
/usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or
dire
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguía thus spake:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bastien Semene
wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I have
the following (non critical) errors :
/usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bastien Semene
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I have
> the following (non critical) errors :
> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory
> This line a
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I
have the following (non critical) errors :
/usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory
This line appears hundred of times.
After that, freebsd-update claims that many files ar
> Is not "p1" compiled in kernel during make buildkernel operation?
I'm sure it is, but freebsd-update is a binary distribution system, and
doesn't build anything on the client.
> If yes, /boot/kernel of 8.1 and /boot/kernel 8.1-p1 must be different.
> So binary diff
Is not "p1" compiled in kernel during make buildkernel operation?
If yes, /boot/kernel of 8.1 and /boot/kernel 8.1-p1 must be different.
So binary diff of /boot/kernel also must be installed during
freebsd-update. It's my opinion. Why not?
I think it's not reasonable to
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:01:38PM +0700, Phan Quoc Hien thus spake:
Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote:
Hello freebsd-questions!
I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
reboot
A
But freebsd-update should do it. Rebuilding kernel will prevent from
further freebsd-update patches to rebuilded GENERIC.
2010/9/27 Phan Quoc Hien :
> Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it!
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote:
>>
>> He
Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it!
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote:
> Hello freebsd-questions!
>
> I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made
> freebsd-update fetch
> freebsd-update install
> reboot
>
> And in uname -a I still see 8.1-R
Hello freebsd-questions!
I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made
freebsd-update fetch
freebsd-update install
reboot
And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1.
In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1
REVISION="8.1"
BRANCH="RELEASE-
Hi!
I noticed one little difference how to update my system on freebsd.org
1st: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-freebsdupdate.html: it says
to do an portupgrade -af after I issued freebsd-update install
"# freebsd-update install
Note: Depending on whether any libraries ve
--- On Thu, 9/9/10, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> From: Murray S. Kucherawy
> Subject: freebsd-update question
> To: questi...@freebsd.org
> Date: Thursday, September 9, 2010, 1:40 PM
> Hi,
>
> I'm reading
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/book
ater is needed to do it via
> the freebsd-update(8) mechanism.
>
> Are there any references for using freebsd-update for a 6.2
> installation, or am I looking at doing the update from source as per
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html?
Yes. 6.
Hi,
I'm reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
in preparation for an update of a 6.2-RELEASE machine in a colocation
faciilty. However, that page says 6.3 or later is needed to do it via the
freebsd-update(8) mechanism.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:27:31 +0200
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400, Kyle Dippery
> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable
> > with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the s
On Tuesday 31 August 2010, Kyle Dippery wrote:
> I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable
> with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system,
> well, updated.
>
> First try, 'freebsd-update fetch' yielded a number of failure
&
On Tue 2010-08-31 09:56:19 UTC-0400, Kyle Dippery (k...@engr.uky.edu) wrote:
> hostname# freebsd-update fetch
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found.
> Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-STABLE from update4.FreeBSD.org... failed.
> Fetching metadata signature fo
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:56:19 -0400, Kyle Dippery wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable
> with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system,
> well, updated.
That won't work. The freebsd-update program
Hello,
I've just installed 8.1 from distribution CDs and updated stable
with cvsup. I want to enable freebsd-update to keep the system,
well, updated.
First try, 'freebsd-update fetch' yielded a number of failure
messages regarding the public key. Found a fetch address to get t
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 03:26:24PM +0200, Coert Waagmeester thus spake:
Hello all,
I am setting up my own freebsd-update-server.
Everything seems to be working so far, but how can I also get the
patches to build together with everything?
Here is the output of scripts/init.sh
# sh scripts
Hello all,
I am setting up my own freebsd-update-server.
Everything seems to be working so far, but how can I also get the
patches to build together with everything?
Here is the output of scripts/init.sh
# sh scripts/init.sh i386 8.1-RELEASE | tee init.log
Sat Aug 7 14:59:24 SAST 2010
If I run freebsd-update on the host updating to 8.0-RELEASE-p3 and then
run it again with the -b option pointing to the directory tree of the
jail, I get message saying no update needed to update system to
8.0-RELEASE-p3. I know the directory tree jail is at 8.0-RELEASE.
If I start a jail and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2010 12:44:10, bsd wrote:
> I wanted to know if I could safely update one of my production
> server from 7.2p8 to 7.3-RELEASE without having to recompile all userland
> apps installed… ?
>
> I am using portmaster and have a couple of hundred
Hello,
I wanted to know if I could safely update one of my production server from
7.2p8 to 7.3-RELEASE without having to recompile all userland apps installed… ?
I am using portmaster and have a couple of hundred ports installed…
Thanks for your advise
¯¯
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> You could use 'make package-recursive', or have a look at
> ports-mgmt/tinderbox, which does this by default.
>
Or as I do: rsync /usr/ports/packages :)
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma
Hi,
On 7/1/10 6:48 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
2010/7/1 Christer Solskogen
I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
use those binari
2010/7/1 Christer Solskogen
> I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
> different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
> the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
> use those binaries on the slow one, without mounting /usr/
I've got two FreeBSD machines on two different networks(and two
different locations). One of them is as fast machine (i7-920) while
the other one is a Intel Atom. How can I build on the fast machine and
use those binaries on the slow one, without mounting /usr/obj using
nfs? first I was thinking ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/06/2010 14:34:43, n dhert wrote:
> When doing a major version upgrade of FreeBSD, the last (mandatory) step is
> to rebuild and reinstall all third party software (ports)
> (# portupgrade -af )
>
> I have a system with 750+ ports, I guess the po
Clears out the old libs, sorry. Prediction playing up!
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
it!
On 15 Jun 2010 14:57, "Chris Rees" wrote:
You're generally ok until you run make delete-old, which clears out the old
kind and hoses any port linked to them.
So
You're generally ok until you run make delete-old, which clears out the old
kind and hoses any port linked to them.
Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote. There's a bug report on
it!
On 15 Jun 2010 14:35, "n dhert" wrote:
When doing a major version upgrade of FreeBSD, the last (mand
201 - 300 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
