You could use pkg_add -r xorg to get it and all of its dependencies
installed. I usually use that, in combination with ccache to speed up
compiles called by portupgrade.
Brian
On Jul 25, 2012 8:38 AM, Mr U mru...@yahoo.com wrote:
hi
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
Humorous answer:
Yes - get a more powerful computer.
Robert Huff
real answer - get binary packages.
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
2 hours only??
Try lang/gcc46 or 47
or science/paraview
This will keep your electronic helper busy
for a day.
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:11:50PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
2 hours only??
Try lang/gcc46 or 47
or science/paraview
25.07.2012 18:16, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 July 2012 07:55, Владислав Продан univers...@ukr.net wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
2
# kldstat -v | grep
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
2 hours only??
Try lang/gcc46 or 47
or science/paraview
snort I beiieve the winner is OpenOffice and its kindred;
still compiling
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com writes:
Mr U writes:
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2 hours
Humorous answer:
Yes - get a more powerful computer.
or even just build on a more
65.1% 927+762k 25593+6358io 2506pf+0w
(No idea how I got _that_ time!)
# time make buildworld buildkernel KERNCONF=*
17272.243u 2294.595s 6:01:33.44 90.1% 24+204k 34888+6367io 2911pf+0w
18541.285u 2596.192s 6:19:33.55 92.8% 498+327k 31247+7302io 3034pf+0w
19725.009u 2882.355s 7:39:11.57 82.0
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping = 2
# kldstat -v | grep temp
319 cpu/coretemp
25, 2012 6:54 PM
To: Mr U
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd org
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 08:02:37 -0700 (PDT), Mr U wrote:
hi
is it possible to speed up port make ??
i want to install openbox and xorg on a Pentium 4 and 2gb ram,
compiling xorg takes about 2
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Got you beat. Compiled world on a 100MHz Pentium with 40 MB of RAM.
I think I can: FreeBSD 4 on a Pentium 1 with 64 MB EDO RAM.
The make buildworld took 24 hours. The kernel itself, if I
remember correctly, required 3-5 hours, of course
26.07.2012 1:55, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:55:00 +0300, Владислав Продан wrote:
CPU: AMD FX(tm)-8120 Eight-Core Processor(3110.49-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Origin = AuthenticAMD Id = 0x600f12 Family = 15 Model = 1 Stepping =
2
# kldstat -v | grep temp
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jul 25 16:34:22 2012
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 17:31:14 -0400
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: how to speed up port make??
Anton Shterenlikht writes:
i want to install openbox and xorg
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 08:41:15PM -0400, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 01:06:33AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jul 2012 18:59:56 -0400, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
Got you beat. Compiled world on a 100MHz Pentium with 40 MB of RAM.
I think I can: FreeBSD 4 on a
how we used to have to do our regexing. . . .
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
Hello Erich/Matthias,
Thanks for your responses.
I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
following output :
...
ugen0.2:Back-UPS ES 650Y-IN
Hi,
On Monday 23 July 2012 16:46:04 Manish Jain wrote:
On 21-Jul-12 19:06, Matthias Apitz wrote:
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
I am still stuck because I can't know the syntax to run usbdump. usbdump
man usbdump
usbconfig gives you the
Hello Erich/Matthias,
Thanks for your responses.
I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
following output :
ugen0.1: OHCI root HUB ATI at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
pwr=SAVE
ugen1.1: OHCI root HUB ATI at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps)
El día Saturday, July 21, 2012 a las 06:01:11PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
Hello Erich/Matthias,
Thanks for your responses.
I do not have the usbdump command on my system. usbconfig gives the
following output :
...
ugen0.2: Back-UPS ES 650Y-IN FW:853.m4.I USB FW:m4 American Power
Hello all,
I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS) who swapped
the Huawei EC1261-based USB modem with a Huawei EC1561-based USB modem.
El día Friday, July 20, 2012 a las 05:55:21PM +0530, Manish Jain escribió:
Hello all,
I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS) who
Hi,
On Friday 20 July 2012 19:25:21 Manish Jain wrote:
I earlier had a Huawei EC1261-based USB modem which used to connect
smoothly to the internet under FreeBSD 8.2 using the u3g module. For
some reasons, I have had to switch to another provider (MTS) who swapped
the Huawei EC1261-based
Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
Виталий Туровец core...@corebug.net a écrit :
Hello,
The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
get lost. Be aware that the latency for some patches could be
2012/7/19 Patrick Lamaiziere patf...@davenulle.org:
Le Wed, 18 Jul 2012 12:53:00 +0300,
Виталий Туровец core...@corebug.net a écrit :
Hello,
The general advice is mail the patch to -hackers for review. If you
don't get a reply or if people like it, submit a PR so it doesn't
get lost. Be
2012/7/18 Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com:
On 17 July 2012 02:16, Виталий Туровец core...@corebug.net wrote:
Hello, colleagues!
How would one propose some code to current branch?
I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX
Hello, colleagues!
How would one propose some code to current branch?
I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this
change to FreeBSD project.
Also i've created a PR with my patch describing what is done
Le Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:16:12 +0300,
Виталий Туровец core...@corebug.net a écrit :
Hello,
Hello, colleagues!
How would one propose some code to current branch?
I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest
On 17 July 2012 02:16, Виталий Туровец core...@corebug.net wrote:
Hello, colleagues!
How would one propose some code to current branch?
I've made a little change to ifconfig ( a switch to display IPv4
network masks in CIDR format instead of HEX) and want to suggest this
change to FreeBSD
I was getting
Tex capacity exceeded, sorry [main memory size 100]
error, so had to increase main_memory in
/usr/local/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf
main_memory = 700 % words of inimemory available; also applies to inimfmp
This works fine, but this file
will be overwritten if I
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a system
snapshot can be quickly restored
On 07/12/2012 05:47 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD
9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
last partition includes the block of gmirror metadata, that's an error.
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
i do this 2 ways:
method 1) i FIRST do gmirror on whole disk
no it doesn't
You appear to be agreeing with me, but saying that your method does not
produce that problem.
sorry - possibly i missed something.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels.
Yes, these are the same methods that can be used with MBR
the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
the two disks. And if one disk crashed or
disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
disk crashed or
disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
Does the FreeBSD support the disk mirror? How to implement it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Tnx!
Worked like a charm, with skipped init and other checks, just the
control point parts:
...
int optval=1;
setsockopt(root_socket, IPPROTO_IP, IP_RECVDSTADDR,
optval, sizeof(optval))
...
char t[200];
unsigned int sender_len;
1083 root 1 210 99444K 11544K select 0 1:28 0.00% Xorg
doesn't take much, only 11.5MB is resident
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On 4 July 2012 20:52, J B jb.1234a...@gmail.com wrote:
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
[10001 eitan@radar ~ ]%whereis xrestop
xrestop: /usr/ports/x11/xrestop
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Hi All,
The blow information can be found when we boot up the system, also can use
command uname -v
my question is how can I change this,
and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
[image: Inline image 1
in your e-mail.
my question is how can I change this,
and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
Well, the info that uname(1) prints out is generated from the source
code at compile time. Recompiling the kernel, or updating the kernel
via eg. freebsd-update(8
without pcap wrapper but
i'm not sure about how big pcap overhead is.
The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap
filter for specific port how big is impact of using pcap in such
situation? Is it possbile to estimate? Target traffic is about 1Mbit and
while testing
that with libpcap. It
coul be done with directly bpf api without pcap wrapper but i'm not sure
about how big pcap overhead is.
The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap filter
for specific port how big is impact of using pcap in such situation? Is it
possbile
with read/recvfrom so we'v made that with libpcap. It
coul be done with directly bpf api without pcap wrapper but i'm not sure about
how big pcap overhead is.
The questions is if we have about 1Gb incoming traffic and using pcap filter
for specific port how big is impact of using pcap
9716K 660K select 0 0:05 0.00% moused
...
Of course, opera is a big customer of RAM which i cannot decrease its memory
usage. then can i descrease the xorg's resident memory ?
Sincerely!
-
e^(π.i) + 1 = 0
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-can-i
good to put your image up on a pastebin site
and include the link in your e-mail.
my question is how can I change this,
and I cannot rebuild it ,because on my freebsd, I dont have src anymore .
Well, the info that uname(1) prints out is generated from the source
code at compile time
It is in ports:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/xrestop
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
*Sorry for my english*
Greetings
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 20:56:59 +0200, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi all,
How can i disable cups, docbook and other ports from compiling after
port update?
I have no printer and no use of cups or docbook.
If you don't mind the _time_ required for building those ports
(and taking into mind
that this is more likely just something inside his internal network.
Filtering by MAC is not secure, I agree. but at least secure enough for a
internal network.
And I am quite sure what I want to archive. I am really want to know how to
FILTER BY MAC .
Please stop even trying.
Well I don't think
On Sunday 10 June 2012 23:14:57 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Well, nevermind about that. I get the general idea, i.e. that dumping
at level N causes dumping of everything that has changed since the last
dump at level N-1.
A point to be aware of is that if you restore from a full backup
trying.
Well I don't think learning how to use ipfw properly at layer2 is a bad
idea in itself, and I wouldn't want to discourage anyone from that.
For some years I ran a filtering transparent bridge with ipfw + dummynet
for a small network of about 20 mostly W98, XP and Mac boxes sharing one
slow
On Monday 11 June 2012 00:03:59 Daniel Feenberg wrote:
It does occur to me that /etc is not a felicitous place to keep this
information, but given the desirability of dumping filesystems in read
only state, placing the dump dates in the filesystem itself isn't
feasible.
Dumping with the -L
Bill == Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com writes:
Bill I want to create a white list MAC address, Only the machine which it's
MAC
Bill in the white list will be allowed, all others will be blocked.
Bad idea. Since (a) every MAC address that *is* allowed is transmitted
in the clear and (b) it's
Hello.
2012/06/09 19:30:53 -0700 Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com = To
Arthur Chance :
RFG Thank you Arthur, and yes, trying to back up a partition that's currently
RFG mounted r/w using dd will almost certainly not produce the desired results.
You can make snapshot to back up
On Sunday 10 June 2012 03:30:53 Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
I don't care to take own my system to make backups... and don't believe
that I should have to do so, and thus, this is one of the reasons why I
would prefer to use something like cpio.
Also, I don't like backups taking longer than
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Sat Jun 9 21:33:57 2012
To: Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org
Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:30:53 -0700
From: Ronald F. Guilmette r...@tristatelogic.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Making a bootable backup (hard)disk... how
Hi,
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC Address 1 any
2 deny all from any to any
i want to only allow the mac address to go through the freebsd firewall,
but I found
with the current contents of my
actual /usr partition, what is the most proper way to do this? Should
I use rsync for that? Or should I use dumprestore again? If that latter,
then how exactly does that work? I mean if I do the pipeline from dump
to restore as you have shown in your examples in your
with the current contents of my
actual /usr partition, what is the most proper way to do this? Should
I use rsync for that? Or should I use dumprestore again? If that latter,
then how exactly does that work? I mean if I do the pipeline from dump
to restore as you have shown in your examples in your Copying
come on , someone help please,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC Address 1 any
2 deny all from
...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC Address 1 any
2 deny all from any to any
i want to only allow the mac address to go through
Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Bill Yuan wrote:
come on , someone help please,
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 418, Issue 18, Message: 1
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:43:39 +0800 Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC
mean if I do the pipeline from dump
to restore as you have shown in your examples in your Copying Filesystems
section, then what must I do in order prevent dump from dumping files that
haven't changed? (And likewise, how do I prevent restore from trying to
restore files under /mnt/usr that have
Warren? Just a couple more quick questions. You recommend:
dump -C16 -b64 -0uanL -h0 -f - /usr | (cd /mnt restore -ruf -)
I'm real curious about you suggestions for the -C and -b values.
I have what amounts to a personal workstation. Yea, OK, it is running
mail, web, and FTP servers
that. Yes, that clarifies things entirely.
... I mean if I do the pipeline from dump
to restore as you have shown in your examples in your Copying Filesystems
section, then what must I do in order prevent dump from dumping files that
haven't changed? (And likewise, how do I prevent restore from trying
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
What I don't understand (and what I wish someone would enlighten me about)
is just this: It would seem that in order to implement these dump levels,
dump must be keeping a record somewhere, for each file in the filesystem,
of the level at
in order prevent dump from dumping files that
haven't changed? (And likewise, how do I prevent restore from trying to
restore files under /mnt/usr that have not changed? Or is that answer to
that question that I simply have to do the first thing, i.e. force dump
not to dump any of the unchanged
Ronald F. Guilmette writes:
Warren? Just a couple more quick questions. You recommend:
dump -C16 -b64 -0uanL -h0 -f - /usr | (cd /mnt restore -ruf -)
I'm real curious about you suggestions for the -C and -b values.
I have what amounts to a personal workstation. Yea, OK,
is a little small because it's hard to tell how much memory someone
running the example will have. I usually use -C32 on machines with
plenty of memory. Remember that dump forks multiple times, so it's not
32M, but N*32M.
-b64 is the largest safe buffer size to use. People have experienced
problems
+0800 Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC Address 1 any
2 deny all from any to any
i want to only allow the mac address
question as mine,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 418, Issue 18, Message: 1
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:43:39 +0800 Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1
sent in 2008
while other place asked a same question as mine,
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Ian Smith smi...@nimnet.asn.au wrote:
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 418, Issue 18, Message: 1
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 17:43:39 +0800 Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com wrote:
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
:
how to allow by MAC in ipfw
currently i set the rule like below
1 allow ip from any to any MAC any to MAC Address 1
1 allow ip from any to any MAC MAC Address 1 any
2 deny all from any to any
i want to only allow the mac address to go through the freebsd
1 allow all from any to any MAC MAC ADDR1 any
#allow the .. destination mac is that machine
ipfw add 1 allow all from any to any MAC any MAC ADDR1
ipfw add 1 deny all from any to any
it is not working , all the traffic will be block by the deny !!! how come
?
On Sat, Jun 9
add 1 allow all from any to any MAC any MAC ADDR1
ipfw add 1 deny all from any to any
it is not working , all the traffic will be block by the deny !!! how
come
?
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Bill Yuan byc
backups
in the past, but I'm sure that the way I have been doing that is
sub-optimal, so I'm here seeking knowledge of how to do this the
Right Way.)
The bottom line is this... I know how to use cpio, and would like
to use it to create a complete and _bootable_ backup of my main
system disk. (My main
In message 4fd38b9a.4010...@qeng-ho.org,
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org wrote:
There's a BFI (brute force and ignorance) way of doing it in the base
system - dd. Provided your system disk is quiescent (ideally when
running from a live CD or all partitions mounted read-only, otherwise
pray
On Sat, 9 Jun 2012, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Also, I don't like backups taking longer than absolutely necessary, and
this is why I am specifically _not_ attracted to either the dd solution
or to dump/restore, because as I understand it, with either of these methods
you end up copying perhaps
Hi All,
If this question is better suited for a different list please let me
know. Simply stated, my question is 'What is the best source for
identifying supported hardware?'. Having said that, allow me to pose
an example...
I've attempted to identify if various ethernet controllers are
On 08/06/2012 16:07, Rick Miller wrote:
If this question is better suited for a different list please let me
know. Simply stated, my question is 'What is the best source for
identifying supported hardware?'. Having said that, allow me to pose
an example...
I've attempted to identify if
this in /var/run/dmesg.boot:
pciN: unknown card (vendor=0x1106, dev=0x165f) at X.Y
NOTE: Insert random numbers for N, and X.Y
How you know that 8.3-R's bge(4) driver supports the BCM5720 is because this
source file:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?annotate
vendor/device IDs.
NOTE: Insert random numbers for N, and X.Y
How you know that 8.3-R's bge(4) driver supports the BCM5720 is because this
source file:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?annotate=1.83.2.35.2.1
NOTE: I specifically pointed you at CVS instead
vendor/device IDs.
NOTE: Insert random numbers for N, and X.Y
How you know that 8.3-R's bge(4) driver supports the BCM5720 is because this
source file:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bgereg.h?annotate=1.83.2.35.2.1
NOTE: I specifically pointed you at CVS instead
Hi Devin
There were some great tips in your last post.
Would be great if they couldfo in FreeBSD handbook somewhere.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, indent with .
Format:
Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com writes:
i am using freebsd 9.0 as a firewall and i want to filter the traffic by
the mac and the ip at the same time,
for example, i only allow my laptop MAC Address 1 can go throught the
firewalll when it's using IP IP Address 1
for how to config the firewall
been doing that is sub-optimal, so I'm here
seeking knowledge of how to do this the Right Way.)
The bottom line is this... I know how to use cpio, and would like to use
it to create a complete and _bootable_ backup of my main system disk.
(My main system disk has only one BIOS partition
that is
sub-optimal, so I'm here seeking knowledge of how to do this the
Right Way.)
The bottom line is this... I know how to use cpio, and would like
to use it to create a complete and _bootable_ backup of my main
system disk. (My main system disk has only one BIOS partition,
and that is sub
that the way I have been doing that is
sub-optimal, so I'm here seeking knowledge of how to do this the
Right Way.)
The bottom line is this... I know how to use cpio, and would like
to use it to create a complete and _bootable_ backup of my main
system disk. (My main system disk has only one BIOS
making my own ham-fisted disk-to-disk backups
in the past, but I'm sure that the way I have been doing that is
sub-optimal, so I'm here seeking knowledge of how to do this the
Right Way.)
The bottom line is this... I know how to use cpio, and would like
to use it to create a complete
, all the traffic will be block by the deny !!! how come
?
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Lowell Gilbert
freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
Bill Yuan byc...@gmail.com writes:
i am using freebsd 9.0 as a firewall and i want to filter the traffic by
the mac and the ip at the same
hi all,
i am using freebsd 9.0 as a firewall and i want to filter the traffic by
the mac and the ip at the same time,
for example, i only allow my laptop MAC Address 1 can go throught the
firewalll when it's using IP IP Address 1
for how to config the firewall rules?
I tried to configure
401 - 500 of 10614 matches
Mail list logo
