Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread John Bleichert
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote: Subject: Re: lightweight wm On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram what do u recommend me to install

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-21 09:09:30 -0500: Blackbox is great, very clean. Also, the code is very clean and makes an excellent X/WM tutorial. Interesting. The Openbox developers have the opposite opinion. IANAC++C (I am not a C++ coder), co I can't comment on this. I switched

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread Gary Dunn
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, John Bleichert wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote: Subject: Re: lightweight wm On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im on a pI 233mhz mmx

re: lightweight wm

2003-02-20 Thread John Bleichert
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as suggested by somebody else is based on Blackbox I believe) - it's a great window

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-20 Thread Jud
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as