FreeBSD 5.4 NTFS Mount Bug?

2005-09-18 Thread John Do
Hi guys I mounted an NTFS drive and in one directory I noticed about 50% of the NTFS directories that existed were being shown. Does anyone know if this is an actual bug or is there a work around for it? In Linux I have never seen an issue like this with mounting NTFS (not to bash but just to

Re: FreeBSD 5.4 NTFS Mount Bug?

2005-09-18 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sep 18, 2005, at 5:12 PM, John Do wrote: Hi guys I mounted an NTFS drive and in one directory I noticed about 50% of the NTFS directories that existed were being shown. Does anyone know if this is an actual bug or is there a work around for it? In Linux I have never seen an issue like

Re: FreeBSD 5.4 NTFS Mount Bug?

2005-09-18 Thread John Do
Hi Garrett Thanks for your help again :) All the directories are in the same style/format and all standard English Since this is NTFS I don't think permissions are in effect here are they? For the NTFS user it is read, write execute though. --- Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread J. W. Ballantine
63; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 -- In Response to your message - Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:51:33 +0100 To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine wrote: Seems our friends

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread Mark Ovens
J. W. Ballantine wrote: The full fdisk output is: *** Working on device /dev/ad0 *** parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=4865 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) [snip] I take it that the partition sizees reported are correct? It a Dell, but given the

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote: J. W. Ballantine wrote: It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came pre-installed from the factory. I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS pre-installed. Not always. I am running FBSD 4.9 on a couple Dell 2650's

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread J. W. Ballantine
-- In Response to your message - Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 18:40:15 +0100 To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine wrote: The full fdisk output is: *** Working on device /dev/ad0

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread Mark Ovens
Mark Ovens wrote: Not come across Smart Boot Manager but I wonder if it creates a small partition to run from; the OS/2 Boot Manager, which was also shipped with older versions of Partition Magic, did but, like recovery partitions it didn't get a drive letter. Ah! I've just thought of

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread Mark Ovens
Bart Silverstrim wrote: On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote: J. W. Ballantine wrote: It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came pre-installed from the factory. I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS pre-installed. Not always. I am running FBSD

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread J. W. Ballantine
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount Mark Ovens wrote: Not come across Smart Boot Manager but I wonder if it creates a small partition to run from; the OS/2 Boot Manager, which was also shipped with older versions

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-07 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On May 7, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Mark Ovens wrote: Bart Silverstrim wrote: On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote: J. W. Ballantine wrote: It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came pre-installed from the factory. I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS

ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread J. W. Ballantine
Ok, either I'm missing something very basic or I'm trying to mount a w2k ntfs file system with: mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /C and I get back: mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s1: Invalid Argument I'm told this is an ntfs5 file system, could it be that FreeBSD doesn't grok this type of fs or am I missing

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread Mark Ovens
J. W. Ballantine wrote: Ok, either I'm missing something very basic or I'm trying to mount a w2k ntfs file system with: mount_ntfs /dev/ad0s1 /C and I get back: mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s1: Invalid Argument Is the filesystem you are trying to mount the first _primary_ partition on the first (i.e.

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread J. W. Ballantine
-- In Response to your message - Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:28:27 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine wrote: Ok, either I'm missing something very basic or I'm trying to mount

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread Mark Ovens
J. W. Ballantine wrote: yes, there is only one hard disk. What does the output from `fdisk ad0' show? Regards, Mark ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread Mark Ovens
PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine wrote: yes, there is only one hard disk. What does the output from `fdisk ad0' show? Regards, Mark ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread J. W. Ballantine
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine wrote: when I do a properties under w2k it says file system is ntfs, fdisk on bsd show partition 1 is sysid 45,(unknown) Hmm, should be sysid 7. I can't remember if the NTFS

Re: ntfs mount

2004-05-06 Thread Mark Ovens
? and both freebsd show 165. Which is correct. Regards, Mark Thanks Jim -- In Response to your message - Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:40:45 +0100 To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ntfs mount J. W. Ballantine