Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-18 Thread Paul Kraus
On Jul 12, 2013, at 2:57 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote: I thought MacOS X's rsync did handle resource forks if you gave it the proper option. The resource fork is reported by rsync in the usual convention of having ._ prefixed to the filename. My understanding was that the files named ._foo were

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-14 Thread David Brodbeck
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.comwrote: Thank you for the detailed description of what resource forks are. One more clue in this mystery is that appending .mov extension to it fixes the problem. That makes some sense, since without the resource fork some

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-12 Thread Chris Maness
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of the file checksums while this is running? MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums, so you should be able to

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-12 Thread Doug Hardie
On 12 July 2013, at 10:49, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of the file checksums while this is running? MacOS X comes with a

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-12 Thread Chris Maness
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org wrote: Dropping the list … On Jul 12, 2013, at 1:49 PM, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: Checksums are the same. All other files still work however the HUGE rendered Final Cut Pro output, so I guess it is something

Re: SV: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 07/06/13 19:51, Leslie Jensen wrote: Smb is slow by design compared to nfs. Sure. As I said, I was expecting lower performance; not *this* lower, however. bye Thanks av. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-08 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 07/07/13 00:52, Adam Vande More wrote: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-January/038903.html Thanks Adam. However: I'm using UFS, not ZFS, so the first part is not applicable. I have an nfe card, not an em; so again, the second part does not apply. The only tunable

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-06 Thread Andrea Venturoli
On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote: On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Is this normal in your experience? Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first? If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major

SV: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-06 Thread Leslie Jensen
Smb is slow by design compared to nfs.  /Leslie Skickat från min Samsung Mobil Originalmeddelande Från: Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it Datum: Till: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Rubrik: Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-06 Thread Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez
On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:55:31 Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote: On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Is this normal in your experience? Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first? If the slow was

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-06 Thread Damien Fleuriot
On 6 Jul 2013, at 21:34, Martin Alejandro Paredes Sanchez mapsw...@prodigy.net.mx wrote: On Saturday 06 July 2013 01:55:31 Andrea Venturoli wrote: On 07/05/13 20:42, Terje Elde wrote: On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Is this normal in your experience?

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-06 Thread Adam Vande More
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Hello. Sorry to ask here: maybe it's not the best place, but it might be a start (the client and server are both FreeBSD). The server exports the same directory via NFS and via SMB. I'd expect some performance

Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-05 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hello. Sorry to ask here: maybe it's not the best place, but it might be a start (the client and server are both FreeBSD). The server exports the same directory via NFS and via SMB. I'd expect some performance penalty when using SMB, but: find /nfs_mounted_dir /dev/null takes more or less 1

Re: Possibly OT: NFS vs SMB performance

2013-07-05 Thread Terje Elde
On 5. juli 2013, at 18:18, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote: Is this normal in your experience? Did you do them in that order, or did you do the smb (slow) one first? If the slow was first, I'm thinking caching on the server could be a major factor. Terje

OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-02 Thread Chris Maness
I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails on large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up entire Final Cut Pro projects this way with no issues. However, I recently synced a drive to

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy fails on large files, I can pick up where I left off. I have backed up entire Final

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-02 Thread Chris Maness
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote: On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until today. I generally use it instead of the copy command because if the copy

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-02 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 14:48:03 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.grwrote: On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 13:35:00 -0700, Chris Maness ch...@chrismaness.com wrote: I have been using rsync with Mac OSX with no issues until

Re: OT: rsync on Mac OSX

2013-07-02 Thread Chris Maness
Since you are going to wait anyway, why don't you try peeking at some of the file checksums while this is running? MacOS X comes with a shasum utility which implements SHA-256 checksums, so you should be able to look at a few random samples of these files, e.g. by running on the source disk:

[OT] What's the http://localhost/phpmyadmin mail about?

2013-05-28 Thread Arthur Chance
Many apologies for the off topic post, but my curiosity has got the better of me. Every once in a while we get a post with a subject of http://localhost/phpmyadmin; and no body. What is the point of this - borked mailer, existentialist spam, hacking attempt by a wannabe script kiddie even

Re: OT, i think...

2013-05-15 Thread Gary Kline
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 03:02:28PM -0500, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: SIMIoff topic. (I think) Sorry but I am envious that you have a chrome working. I am stuck with the === chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 has known vulnerabilities: chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 is vulnerable: chromium -- multiple

OT, i think...

2013-05-12 Thread Gary Kline
guys, if goog had their browser from BSD it would help big-time; I use one of the zillions of linux distros for my desktop. I dont have a bleeding edge cell. just something to call the cops or access [ small bus with wchair lift.] only have one hand, so cant easily hold cell and type blah *

Re: OT, i think...

2013-05-12 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
SIMIoff topic. (I think) Sorry but I am envious that you have a chrome working. I am stuck with the === chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 has known vulnerabilities: chromium-25.0.1364.172_1 is vulnerable: chromium -- multiple vulnerabilities WWW:

[slightly OT] Hi BSD -

2013-04-07 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 18:13 -0400, Rod Person wrote: On 04/07/13 15:34, Lynn Steven Killingsworth wrote: Hi BSD - I know on my websites that more worrisome than someone caught reading my poetry as their own is that they have told something is mine that is not. I was thinking about

OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Felder
Hi all, Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Quartz
I'd really like to have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells Define funky shell. Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'? or using any temporary files. Do you mean manually created temp files?

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 07:47:09 -0500, Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote: I'd really like to have this working cleanly on FreeBSD without requiring any funky shells Define funky shell. Does it have to be straight up plain sh? Can it use csh or tcsh syntax? Does bash count as 'funky'? Any

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Quartz
fail on an unwritable filesystem. ...By which I mean you can't create new files because your disk is completely full or you're booting from a ramdisk that's messed up, etc. __ it has a certain smooth-brained appeal

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 4/4/2013 3:32 μμ, Mark Felder wrote: Hi all, Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. This is from a BB/Hobbit/Xymon monitoring script for ZFS. I'd really like to have this working cleanly on FreeBSD

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Teske, Devin
On Apr 4, 2013, at 5:32 AM, Mark Felder wrote: Hi all, Hopefully someone here is much more clever than I am. I've run out of ideas on how to cleanly convert this chunk of ksh to posix sh. /me takes the challenge (and shame on some of the current responses; this is trivial in sh and

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years… #!/bin/sh printf line1\nline2\n | while read line do echo line=[$line] done You sort-of can, but it's not portable at all. As

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Teske, Devin
On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Wait, you can't? Then I've been doing something wrong all these years… #!/bin/sh printf line1\nline2\n | while read line do echo line=[$line] done

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Teske, Devin
Oh, and just to cover all bases… If you suspect you have sub-shells in the loop, use export to export the vars so that the sub-shells get the vars in the loop. -- Devin On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:04 AM, Teske, Devin wrote: On Apr 4, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Mark Felder wrote: On Thu, 04 Apr 2013

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Felder
Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't see you mention that it appeared to be working for you. On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: The only things I saw that needed changing to go from ksh to /bin/sh were:

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Teske, Devin
On Apr 4, 2013, at 8:11 AM, Mark Felder wrote: Sorry, my email client did something weird with collapsing and I didn't see you mention that it appeared to be working for you. On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 08:54:30 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: The only things I saw that

Re: OT: posix sh problem

2013-04-04 Thread Mark Felder
On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:16:11 -0500, Teske, Devin devin.te...@fisglobal.com wrote: Here's what I suggest (the following works for me -- lists all my pools and shows healthy): Fantastic! I'd have never considered wrapping the entire thing into STRING=$STRING$(). I can't tell you how much

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-04-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 03:13:07AM +0200, Sabine Baer escribió: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: [...] I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works.

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-04-01 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Monday, April 01, 2013 a las 08:13:12AM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works. The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings injected

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-31 Thread Sabine Baer
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:20:05PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: [...] I'm using since some years http://www.aioe.org/ which has no binary groups (i.e. no porn or warez) and a cache of 25 days. Just works. The remaining users of de.* often say they filter postings injected over this server

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-31 Thread Sabine Baer
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 02:12:06PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: [...] Back then you had to have brains to be on the net, now everyone is web 2.0, and they're satisfied with ridiculous web forums. Any brains today are all but forced to use them because the population is so slim anywhere else.

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-29 Thread David Brodbeck
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Steve O'Hara-Smith st...@sohara.orgwrote: There are several free public USENET text servers (no binary groups), granted it's nothing like the days when every ISP ran one but there are still several about (eternal-september.com is one of the biggest).

OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Matthias Apitz
Hello, This is a bit OT, but maybe some of you FreeBSD folks are as well affected like me and/or have any answer or comments... In the past I've used a lot the so called newsgroups, even running my own inn news server for our company and nn as the newsreader. I liked to post there technical

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Quartz
Is USENET coming to its end? Yes, for better or worse. It's been a slow downward spiral since the late 90's. I can't speak for other countries, but in the US the majority of ISPs started dropping access as a cost cutting measure since your average layman didn't really understand or use it.

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 10:49:25 +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: Where have all the people gone? They're using wibbly wobbly web wonder services, unless they've been placed in a retirement castle. :-) Is USENET coming to its end? I think it's just changing audiences. A common means of USENET today

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Alejandro Imass
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Quartz qua...@sneakertech.com wrote: Younger generations In my experience, few people under the age of 30 have used usenet, and no one under the age of 20 has even heard of it. It's interesting to see all the re-inventions that occur all the time. It's

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Matthias Apitz g...@unixarea.de wrote: Hello, This is a bit OT, but maybe some of you FreeBSD folks are as well affected like me and/or have any answer or comments... In the past I've used a lot the so called newsgroups, even running my own inn news

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread staticsafe
On 3/27/2013 6:55, Quartz wrote: Younger generations In my experience, few people under the age of 30 have used usenet, and no one under the age of 20 has even heard of it. 19 year old usenet subscriber reporting in! I subscribe to ASR and c.p.t.ntp which are the only decent newsgroups

OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread grarpamp
Usenet was great. 'Was' because it really isn't there anymore. Servers used to be widespread, you could use your ISP, your school, your work, and failing that plenty of free ones even if for the asking, even some public/open ones. Now there are very few, if any, free servers and likely none are

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Walter Hurry
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote: Now there are very few, if any, free servers There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet, nevertheless I prefer the free one as it's faster and more reliable. ___

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Joshua Isom
On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote: Now there are very few, if any, free servers There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet, nevertheless I prefer the free one as it's faster and more reliable. The last ISP

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, March 27, 2013 a las 03:37:43PM -0500, Joshua Isom escribió: The last ISP I knew had usenet complained about the bandwidth and storage required. They had a dedicated satellite instead of using their backbone, and only cached a couple days. All the porn and warez has the

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread Walter Hurry
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 15:37:43 -0500, Joshua Isom wrote: On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote: Now there are very few, if any, free servers There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet, nevertheless I prefer the

Re: OT: The future of USENET?

2013-03-27 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote: On 3/27/2013 3:25 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2013 14:12:06 -0400, grarpamp wrote: Now there are very few, if any, free servers There are still free news servers available. My ISP bundles usenet,

Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

2013-03-19 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list, because people are not required to subscribe to post. That makes sense and does

OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

2013-03-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: Please Cc responses to the mailing list I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing lists nowadays it's common to reply to the list only. Most MUA nowadays provide an option to automatically

Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

2013-03-18 Thread Warren Block
On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: Please Cc responses to the mailing list Actually, I had written that in a reply. I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing lists nowadays it's

Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

2013-03-18 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 09:00 -0600, Warren Block wrote: On Mon, 18 Mar 2013, Ralf Mardorf wrote: Standard practice for this list is to Cc the responder and the list, because people are not required to subscribe to post. That makes sense and does explain why my last mail came through the list,

Re: OT: Installing 9.1 without re-partitioning hard drive

2013-03-18 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sun, 2013-03-17 at 15:37 -0700, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote: Please Cc responses to the mailing list I know that it's tolerated by the FreeBSD lists, but for most mailing lists nowadays it's common to reply to the

OT: Upgrade causes loss of all firefox settings (?)

2013-02-13 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 11:39 +0100, CeDeROM wrote: Agree, it contains more information than the second one which is picture-flash based and I cannot see ~80% of its content :-) And the biggest evil is, that those web pages hide important things and they don't add a site map. I can't find the

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 27/01/2013 02:57, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: On 01/26/13 15:52, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: Hello, On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: The pkg repo's are down. I'm not sure how you got it to work (if you did). It will not work on this end, thanks though. It seems to work from here.

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Jimmy Olgeni
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: Failed to install the following 1 package(s): ftp://ftp1.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/lang/smlnj-110.0.7_3.tbz My fault - I didn't immediately connect pkg repo to pkgng :) I fired up a 9.1 VM and built an i386

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 05:20, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: Failed to install the following 1 package(s): ftp://ftp1.us.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.0-release/lang/smlnj-110.0.7_3.tbz My fault - I didn't immediately connect pkg repo to pkgng :) I

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Jimmy Olgeni
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3KB/s 285.9KB/s 00:09 Installing smlnj-110.0.7_3...pkg: wrong architecture: freebsd:9:x86:32 instead of

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:40:51 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: At this point I'm not sure what the problem is, though I do appreciate the help. root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3KB/s

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 16:44, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz 100% 2586KB 287.3KB/s 285.9KB/s 00:09 Installing smlnj-110.0.7_3...pkg: wrong

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:40:51 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: At this point I'm not sure what the problem is, though I do appreciate the help. root@alex-laptop:/root # pkg add http://people.freebsd.org/~olgeni/smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz smlnj-110.0.7_3.txz

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:53:05 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote: Did you have any success using the old-fashioned pkg_add method with the -f option, and using the FreeBSD 9-STABLE precompiled package (should work for 9.1-RELEASE too)? snip No, because I

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 16:59, Polytropon wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:53:05 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: On 01/27/13 16:49, Polytropon wrote: Did you have any success using the old-fashioned pkg_add method with the -f option, and using the FreeBSD 9-STABLE precompiled package (should work for

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 17:37, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: Possibly, I have the space (~18GB free on my /home partition, even more free on /). It's just a matter of me taking the time to work on setting either one up and I seem to be a perpetual corner case when it

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-27 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/27/13 17:37, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: On Sun, 27 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: Possibly, I have the space (~18GB free on my /home partition, even more free on /). It's just a matter of me taking the time to work on setting either one up and I seem to be a perpetual corner case when it

[OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-26 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of my machine if it would help. Thanks! -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr Whoever loves

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-26 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of my machine if it would help. 1.

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-26 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/26/13 13:44, Polytropon wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked ignore for whatever reason). I can send someone a 'pciconf -lv' of

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-26 Thread Polytropon
On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 14:50:34 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: On 01/26/13 13:44, Polytropon wrote: On Sat, 26 Jan 2013 12:23:42 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: I've got an amd64 machine (and no spare) and need help getting a binary for lang/sml-nj (it won't compile on amd64, it's marked

Re: [OT-ish] Need a Binary for lang/sml-nj

2013-01-26 Thread Joseph A. Nagy, Jr
On 01/26/13 15:52, Jimmy Olgeni wrote: Hello, On Sat, 26 Jan 2013, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote: The pkg repo's are down. I'm not sure how you got it to work (if you did). It will not work on this end, thanks though. It seems to work from here. Maybe with a mirror?

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Robert Bonomi
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jan 16 22:08:13 2013 Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 22:04:15 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk tun...@tundraware.com To: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ? This is not really a FreeBSD problem

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-17 Thread Tim Daneliuk
On Thu, January 17, 2013 6:49 am, Dan Nelson wrote: First, check /etc/nsswitch.conf and verify that dns is listed on the hosts: line. Next, try disabling nscd (svcadm disable name-service-cache) , and then running truss ping www.google.com (make sure to reenable nscd when you're done

A little OT: VNCviewer recent_hosts does not work

2013-01-16 Thread Leslie Jensen
I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4. I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to. I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to pick the one I need to connect to. From what I can read on-line the hosts should be saved to

Re: A little OT: VNCviewer recent_hosts does not work

2013-01-16 Thread Bas Smeelen
On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote: I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4. I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to. I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to pick the one I need to connect to. From what I can read

Re: A little OT: VNCviewer recent_hosts does not work

2013-01-16 Thread Leslie Jensen
2013-01-16 12:14, Bas Smeelen skrev: On 01/16/2013 12:08 PM, Leslie Jensen wrote: I'm using vnc-4.1.3_5 on FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with xfce4. I have about 10 different hosts that I usually connect to. I would like these hosts to be in a drop down menu so I just have to pick the one I need to

OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-16 Thread Tim Daneliuk
This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on a Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland interface came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have an insight into what's going on ... The machine in question does DNS lookups fine via dig or

Re: OT: What Might Break getbostbyname() ?

2013-01-16 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 16), Tim Daneliuk said: This is not really a FreeBSD problem ... in fact, it's happening on a Solaris 10 machine. But because the TCP stack and its userland interface came from BSD, I am hoping some kind soul might have an insight into what's going on ... Solaris

Re: suggestions wanted.... {OT}

2013-01-12 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:41:43AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device to use on the once-every-75-years when I do get out. I am not looking for a cell phone. the one I

Re: suggestions wanted.... {OT}

2013-01-12 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:51:19PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: Hi, On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800 Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: note that this question is =OT=. sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very similar question a year or three

OT - Opera 12.12 crashes while uploading an image on Flickr

2013-01-11 Thread parv
Recently Opera -- Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12 -- has been crashing whenever I try to upload an image in JPEG format ... http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8364/8369048901_d47c385819_b_d.jpg ( opened raw file in ufraw 0.18_4; sent to gimp 2.6.12,2;

Re: OT - Opera 12.12 crashes while uploading an image on Flickr

2013-01-11 Thread ajtiM
On Friday 11 January 2013 03:06:32 p...@pair.com wrote: Recently Opera -- Opera/9.80 (X11; FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE i386) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12 -- has been crashing whenever I try to upload an image in JPEG format ... http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8364/8369048901_d47c385819_b_d.jpg

suggestions wanted.... {OT}

2013-01-11 Thread Gary Kline
note that this question is =OT=. sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very similar question a year or three ago; I'm just not sure where. I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device to use on the once-every-75

Re: suggestions wanted.... {OT}

2013-01-11 Thread Polytropon
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: I'm looking for a small and portable tablet [or whatever] device to use on the once-every-75-years when I do get out. I am not looking for a cell phone. the one I have works fine for auto- dialing whoever.

Re: suggestions wanted.... {OT}

2013-01-11 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi, On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:52:16 -0800 Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote: note that this question is =OT=. sorry if this is a re-request for clues. I =did= ask a very similar question a year or three ago; I'm just not sure where. Ah, I remember. Wans't it when

OT: Spam - Was: Re: HI

2013-01-08 Thread Ralf Mardorf
Please don't reply to spam, since this makes it harder to detect spam by software. Happy New Year! Ralf PS: I've broken the thread intendedly. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions

Re: somewhat OT ... in parts

2013-01-06 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: one question I have may solve the problem of vim

OT - turn off your cam and mike, now ...

2013-01-06 Thread jb
http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12 jb ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: OT - turn off your cam and mike, now ...

2013-01-06 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:21:50 + (UTC), jb wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12 http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/microsoft-patents-spying-on-yo.html http://hdguru.com/is-your-new-hdtv-watching-you/7643/ -- Polytropon Magdeburg,

Re: OT - turn off your cam and mike, now ...

2013-01-06 Thread jb
Polytropon freebsd at edvax.de writes: On Sun, 6 Jan 2013 21:21:50 + (UTC), jb wrote: http://www.businessinsider.com/verizon-dvr-will-know-what-your-doing-and-saying-2012-12 http://boingboing.net/2012/11/08/microsoft-patents-spying-on-yo.html

Re: somewhat OT ... in parts

2013-01-05 Thread Carl Johnson
Polytropon free...@edvax.de writes: On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: maybe I should just find keith bostic's newvi; see if they have it for linux; theyve got everything else... {grumble} I know there's nvi in ports. Maybe those will be helpful:

Re: somewhat OT ... in parts

2013-01-05 Thread Gary Kline
On Sat, Jan 05, 2013 at 08:43:18AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Fri, 4 Jan 2013 13:59:45 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: one question I have may solve the problem of vim

Re: somewhat OT ... in parts

2013-01-04 Thread Devin Teske
On Jan 3, 2013, at 11:03 PM, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't much

Re: somewhat OT ... in parts

2013-01-04 Thread Gary Kline
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 08:03:39AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:27:38 -0800, Gary Kline wrote: one question I have may solve the problem of vim displaying all the ^/search terms and displaying them in some color. the default brown is awful, but dark blue isn't

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >