On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, John Bleichert wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote:
> > Subject: Re: lightweight wm
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-21 09:09:30 -0500:
> Blackbox is great, very clean. Also, the code is very
> clean and makes an excellent X/WM tutorial.
Interesting. The Openbox developers have the opposite opinion.
IANAC++C (I am not a C++ coder), co I can't comment on this.
I switche
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote:
> Subject: Re: lightweight wm
> On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >> im on
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram
what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE
I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as s
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram
> what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE
>
I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as suggested by
somebody else is based on Blackbox I believe) - it's a great wind