Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread Gary Dunn
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, John Bleichert wrote: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote: > > Subject: Re: lightweight wm > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread Roman Neuhauser
# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2003-02-21 09:09:30 -0500: > Blackbox is great, very clean. Also, the code is very > clean and makes an excellent X/WM tutorial. Interesting. The Openbox developers have the opposite opinion. IANAC++C (I am not a C++ coder), co I can't comment on this. I switche

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-21 Thread John Bleichert
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003, Jud wrote: > Subject: Re: lightweight wm > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> im on

Re: lightweight wm

2003-02-20 Thread Jud
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:38:28 -0500 (EST), John Bleichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as s

re: lightweight wm

2003-02-20 Thread John Bleichert
On Thu, 20 Feb 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > im on a pI 233mhz mmx with 64mb of ram > what do u recommend me to install GNOME or KDE > I use Blackbox on a 166 and it runs great (Fluxbox as suggested by somebody else is based on Blackbox I believe) - it's a great wind