hello everybody, I was trying to get working sharity-light, but until now
it's impossible.
I have added in /etc/hosts the IP and the name of the XP(fat32 or ntfs),
created a folder in order to mount.
foo# cd /
foo#mkdir share
foo#shlight //nightwalker/share /share -U foo -P bar
foo#Using port
Miguel Alcántara wrote:
hello everybody, I was trying to get working sharity-light, but until now
it's impossible.
I have added in /etc/hosts the IP and the name of the XP(fat32 or ntfs),
created a folder in order to mount.
foo# cd /
foo#mkdir share
foo#shlight //nightwalker/share /share -U foo
Hello, I found one other person who had the same below issue with
sharity-light however I did not find a resolution after some googling.
I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 Release and have just installed sharity-light
from the ports. When I execute: ./shlight //192.168.0.2/directory
/usr/ntmount -U
It kicks back the error `nfs mount /usr/ntmount: [2] No such file or
directory'
/usr/ntmount does exist with absolute certainty.
I'm using version sharity-light-1.2_1 which I believe is the latest.
Any ideas?
___
Sharity light didn't work too well
I've been using Sharity Light to access open shares on my Windoze machine
from FreeBSD.
But somewhere along the line I know this is now built-in to FreeBSD but I
can't remember or find what program to use to do this and I would prefer
not to rely on a port to make this happen.
Does anybody know
On Thursday 17 March 2005 08:51 am, Gerry Freymann wrote:
I've been using Sharity Light to access open shares on my Windoze
machine from FreeBSD.
But somewhere along the line I know this is now built-in to FreeBSD
but I can't remember or find what program to use to do this and I
would prefer
On 17 Mar 2005 09:53:03 -0500
Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know off hand what is now in the base system I can use?
mount_smbfs(8)
Beauties! Exactly what I was after. Got it mounted and working fine.
-gerry
___
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 02:21:53PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Lee wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE on a P166 and trying to copy very
..
dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem
0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at
device 20.0 on pci0
miibus0: MII bus on dc0
: Contrary to Sharity-Light docs, which say smbfs is faster,
A Win98 share as just described accepts data about three times faster
if mounted via shlight than if mounted via smbfs. I'm wondering if
anyone knows why. (For comparison, I believe ftp moves about two
times even faster than shlight.)
Please
Doug Lee wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE on a P166 and trying to copy very
..
dc0: ADMtek AN985 10/100BaseTX port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem
0xffbefc00-0xffbe irq 10 at
device 20.0 on pci0
miibus0: MII bus on dc0
ukphy0: Generic IEEE 802.3u media interface on miibus0
ukphy0: 10baseT,
to Sharity-Light docs, which say smbfs is faster,
A Win98 share as just described accepts data about three times faster
if mounted via shlight than if mounted via smbfs. I'm wondering if
anyone knows why. (For comparison, I believe ftp moves about two
times even faster than shlight.)
Please Cc me
hi all
i almost have sharity-light working well enough to be able to map a windows share to
my freebsd5.1 box.
the two machines are:
1. Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, DHCP but i'm using dyndns.org to map the address of
'machine1.gotdns.org' to this machine, ipfilter enabled
2. Windows Xp pro, DHCP
--- Redmond Militante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
hi all
i almost have sharity-light working well enough to
be able to map a windows share to my freebsd5.1 box.
the two machines are:
1. Freebsd 5.1-RELEASE, DHCP but i'm using
dyndns.org to map the address of
'machine1.gotdns.org
I can run awstats on the iis log
files, I can't read the current log file if iis is running. However, if I
run sharity light on the same share, I can then read the current file. At
first glance, there appears to be a lock in place that smbfs honors whereas
sharity light does not. I would prefer
I am trying to open a series of database files from FreeBSD that are
hosted by a Windows NT share. I only need read-only access at this
point.
For some reason though, if a file is opened by a Windows program,
FreeBSD can't get read access to it if I use smbfs, but other Windows
machines can and
15 matches
Mail list logo
