Gustavo Millani wrote:
Hi,
Where can I schedule the test for certification?
I found the site of Prometric and Vue.
Have a look here:
http://www.bsdcertification.org/
--
Glen Barber
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi,
Where can I schedule the test for certification?
I found the site of Prometric and Vue.
Gustavo Millani
Brazil, Porto Alegre
Veja quais são os assuntos do momento no Yahoo! +Buscados
http://br.maisbuscados.yahoo.com
___
freebsd-questions
Hello,
I use PC5750 verizon air card in FreeBSD 6.3 with ugencom device driver.
It works fine but I only get 240Kbps upload and download speed even I got
EDVO connection. When I test it in Windows, I got 1.4Mbps for download and
750Kbps for upload speed. I try so many staff and search
gnome and all other packages from packages-7-stable/Lastest on the
website, and it gives me the error from the subject line, 'Could not lock
the file /var/tmp/gconf-test-locking-file-blah'. It says that it's an
NFS locking error, but I'm not using NFS.
Do you think that the packages from 7-stable
Hi, Dear admin
I want to submit a question to Mail list; I hope to get help in time. Thanks
BR
Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Alex Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to submit a question to Mail list; I hope to get help in time.
Thanks
Never, ever send test emails to freebsd-questions. From the Handbook:
If you wish to test your ability to send to FreeBSD lists, send a test
message to freebsd-test. Please do
is produced.
- # scanimage -L
says no scanners were identified.
I would like to test if it might work with sane-genesys
backend.
How can I do this?
I am running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE amd64 .
In the meantime I have played around a little bit:
I put vendor and product id's into
/usr/src/sys/dev/usb
Hi!
Seems that the CanoScan LiDe 90 is one of the scanners built by
Canon that are not supported well. That's a reason to avoid them. :-)
I had similar issues with a LiDE 45 (I think it was), and I did
soon replace it with a SCSI scanner that worked out of the box
without problems.
On Sun, 14
Hello!
Polytropon schrieb:
Hi!
On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:40:54 +0200, Peter Ulrich Kruppa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb:
I have purchased a scanner yet unsupported by sane
(CanoScan LiDe 90).
Mayve the SANE team will get this scanner to work later on.
But at this point
.
- # scanimage -L
says no scanners were identified.
I would like to test if it might work with sane-genesys
backend.
How can I do this?
I am running FreeBSD 7.1-PRERELEASE amd64 .
Thanks for your answers, comments, help, etc..
Greetings,
Uli.
___
freebsd
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Redd Vinylene wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Moises Castellanos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got this dedicated server which is
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Redd Vinylene wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Moises Castellanos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Redd
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 9:05 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Redd Vinylene wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Moises Castellanos
Redd Vinylene wrote:
Hello hello!
I got this dedicated server which is exposed to DDoS attacks quite
frequently. Say I need to host a website on it, is there any way of
telling how often it is actually online (to the rest of the world)?
Maybe make some sort of ping script from a remote server?
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Moises Castellanos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello hello!
I got this dedicated server which is exposed to DDoS attacks quite
frequently. Say I need to host a website on it, is there any
. With this information you can know
the uptime
of the web server.
I'd have to install Nagios on a different server then, right? I doubt
the actual server knows when its ISP's link drops (or just slows down)
due to an attack.
You can easily get nagios to test the web server sitting on the same
machine
. With this information you can know
the uptime
of the web server.
I'd have to install Nagios on a different server then, right? I doubt
the actual server knows when its ISP's link drops (or just slows down)
due to an attack.
You can easily get nagios to test the web server sitting on the same
machine
Redd Vinylene wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 2:22 AM, Moises Castellanos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Redd Vinylene [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I got this dedicated server which is exposed to DDoS attacks quite
frequently. Say I need to host a website on it, is
Hello hello!
I got this dedicated server which is exposed to DDoS attacks quite
frequently. Say I need to host a website on it, is there any way of
telling how often it is actually online (to the rest of the world)?
Maybe make some sort of ping script from a remote server?
--
/access.log
2008/04/23 04:20:00| sendto FD 12: (1) Operation not permitted
2008/04/23 04:20:00| ipcCreate: CHILD: hello write test failed
Squid was running and accepting connections on port 3128, but they were
not carried out any longer.
I then killed squid (actually I needed kill -9 to bring
We Sell Worldwide
Rentals and Leasing Available
Renting or leasing test equipment is todays answer. Renting test equipment
allows you to acquire test equipment without the investment of ownership.
Renting test equipment is an ideal solution for companies that need additional
test equipment
Test
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jie Ouyang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Test
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for testing.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:52:17PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote:
test
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
Well, surprise, surprise! A glance at [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ rather than
--
Subject: test
Date: Thursday 24 January 2008
From: Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing, surprise, surprise.
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public Service Unix
http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org
.
please don't spam this list, use test@ instead :)
hm.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: test
Date: Thursday 24 January 2008
From: Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing, surprise, surprise.
--
Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public
tets
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, EaRSHoT wrote:
tets
Read The Friendly Handbook,
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL
begin quote
Note: If you wish to test your ability to send to FreeBSD lists, send a
test message to freebsd-test. Please do
Bill Moran wrote:
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
How long does it take for a test to be accepted or rejected on the
FreeBSD test mail box?
Is three minutes normal for a test to pop up?
I had some FreeBSD 7 config issues and this nearly caused me to think I
hadn't
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Aloha,
How long does it take for a test to be accepted or rejected on the
FreeBSD test mail box?
Is three minutes normal for a test to pop up?
I had some FreeBSD 7 config issues and this nearly caused me to think I
hadn't cleared
Bill Moran wrote:
I haven't noticed if the mail servers are doing greylisting, but it
wouldn't surprise me if they were.
They do.
--Alex
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On 2007-08-24 06:36, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to NetOpsCenter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How long does it take for a test to be accepted or rejected on the
FreeBSD test mail box? Is three minutes normal for a test to pop
up? I had some FreeBSD 7 config issues
I haven't noticed if the mail servers are doing greylisting, but it
wouldn't surprise me if they were.
They do.
That's quite the response.
Care to elaborate for purposes of archive accuracy?
Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Aloha,
How long does it take for a test to be accepted or rejected on the
FreeBSD test mail box?
Is three minutes normal for a test to pop up?
I had some FreeBSD 7 config issues and this nearly caused me to think I
hadn't cleared the problem because it took quite a while to pop up.
Mahalo
test
--
Jean-Pierre Trophardy
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In response to Jean-Pierre Trophardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you guest it was just for test message sending to THIS ONE.
Sorry
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Jean-Pierre Trophardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
to it and use it for test message sending.
As you
On 09/08/07, Jerry McAllister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 10:59:44AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Jean-Pierre Trophardy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Duane Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] works fine for sending test messages. Subscribe
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for testing purposes. That's the
reason it exists, and it avoids spamming 1000s of subscribers.
--
Bill Moran
http://www.potentialtech.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NP_Shutdown() invoke: Connection closed
###
### repeated test with video.google.com
###
(npviewer.bin:42682): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_resize: assertion `width 0'
failed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERROR: NPP_WriteReady() invoke: Connection closed
*** NSPlugin Wrapper
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:41:09 +1000
Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
###
### tried with youtube.com.
### Flash loaded ok, simple flash stuff like the 'videos being watched now'
worked fine.
### Clicking on the suggested videon on the top RHS started playing the video
+ sound,
Norberto Meijome writes:
So I decided to give this a try again, with some mixed results. I
double checked what I was doing with the steps shown in the URL
Gaye kindly provided, it all checked out as expected.
Ditto.
Downs: Flash videos, such as those in video.google, youtube
Please don't top post.
Bob
-- Original message --
From: Hangmn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You group of elitist fucks...the unsub link is FUCKING USELESS
On 4/14/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In response to Hangmn [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GET ME OFF THIS
On Apr 16, 2007, at 8:52 AM, Bob Middaugh wrote:
Please don't top post.
Maybe he can't read and that's why the unsub link is useless? That
would also explain the top posting to a degree.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
. Obviously, the guy who sent this test message, as well as others
who read it are most likely to be the people who can actually _do_ anything
about your problem.
And lastly, leaving out all the details of your problem is guaranteed to
expedite the fix of your problem. Obviously those details
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:28:29 +1200
Juha Saarinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/14/07, Hangmn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
No, no, this is the FreeBSD Questions list. The Fucking List is down
the hall, third door to your right. Just ignore the funny noises
there.
message instead of taking the time to
contact the right people is a fabulously effective method of getting
things
done. Obviously, the guy who sent this test message, as well as others
who read it are most likely to be the people who can actually _do_
anything
about your problem.
And lastly, leaving
is to SHOUT all
the time. I'm glad you've caught on to this fine point of netiquette.
Thirdly, replying to an arbitrary message instead of taking the time to
contact the right people is a fabulously effective method of getting
things
done. Obviously, the guy who sent this test message, as well
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 08:22:53AM -0400, Gerard Seibert wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:28:29 +1200
Juha Saarinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/14/07, Hangmn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
No, no, this is the FreeBSD Questions list. The Fucking List is down
on to this fine point
of netiquette.
Thirdly, replying to an arbitrary message instead of taking the
time to contact the right people is a fabulously effective method
of getting things
done. Obviously, the guy who sent this test message, as well as
others who read it are most likely
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
On 4/11/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for testing. It avoids
spamming 1000s of inboxes with test messages.
In response to Bill Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
Bill Hall
Manager, Occupant Protection Program
Hangmn wrote:
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
On 4/11/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for testing. It avoids
spamming 1000s of inboxes with test messages.
In response to Bill Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
Bill Hall
Manager
Chris wrote:
Hangmn wrote:
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
On 4/11/07, Bill Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for testing. It avoids
spamming 1000s of inboxes with test messages.
In response to Bill Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
Bill
On 4/14/07, Hangmn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GET ME OFF THIS FUCKING LIST
No, no, this is the FreeBSD Questions list. The Fucking List is down
the hall, third door to your right. Just ignore the funny noises
there.
If you don't want to receive mail from the FreeBSD list in question,
try this
--
Bill Hall
Manager, Occupant Protection Program
UNC Highway Safety Research Center
730 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite 300
CB# 3430
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
919-962-8721 (Voice)
800-672-4527 (toll-free in NC)
919-962-8710 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hsrc.unc.edu
--
Bill Hall
Manager, Occupant Protection Program
UNC Highway Safety Research Center
730 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite 300
CB# 3430
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
919-962-8721 (Voice)
800-672-4527 (toll-free in NC)
919-962-8710 (fax)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.hsrc.unc.edu
Please use the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list for testing. It avoids
spamming 1000s of inboxes with test messages.
In response to Bill Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
--
Bill Hall
Manager, Occupant Protection Program
UNC Highway Safety Research Center
730 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd., Suite
Hear, hear.
Chris, please remember NOT to do this again.
SC
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Chang wrote:
Hear, hear.
Chris, please remember NOT to do this again.
SC
Yanno - I was just gonna let this go but it seems a simple sorry isn't
good enough for some that simply don't feel as if life is complete
without some sorta bitchin'
Grow up, get a life, move on. It wont be
participating in. Remember, again, that's
less than 1% of the total list participants.
Yes, the test@ list exists to keep test messages off the other lists. Yes,
you should have posted there. Yes, _someone_ was right to point that out
to you so you know for next time. No, it's not a big deal
Yanno - I was just gonna let this go but it seems a simple sorry isn't
good enough for some that simply don't feel as if life is complete
without some sorta bitchin'
Grow up, get a life, move on. It wont be the first time someone does
this - and it certainly won't be the last - much less have
Sorry folks - just testing something.
--
Best regards,
Chris
No running on pool deck.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chris wrote:
Sorry folks - just testing something.
Normally I would never reply to SPAM publicly, but it has to be
publicized, at least once in a WHILE, that there is a list established
for test messages, it's [EMAIL PROTECTED], and you should use that, NOT
THIS LIST, never again.
Believe
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 19:26:28 -0800 Bill Campbell wrote:
Test Messages
The lists freebsd-test, ..., ... have been created for test messages.
Please use only these test lists for test messages.
Do not send test messages to any of the normal lists.
If you do send test messages, at least put some
Hi Armin and folks,
I made further test as follow;
# cp /root/xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf
Hard reboot X = [Ctrl]+[Alt]+[Back Space]
exited to runlevel 3
Login : satimis
Password: xxx
$ startx
KDE started with color looking strangely and finally PC hung.
Hard reboot and removed
Lets see if the mailserver can find my hostname from 80.126.252.242
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 22:46:40 -, Justin Schlingmann wrote:
Lets see if the mailserver can find my hostname from 80.126.252.242
I think we're going to have to put this in the charter: please do
*not* send test messages to tens of thousands of people when you
just want to test your
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
On Friday, 23 February 2007 at 22:46:40 -, Justin Schlingmann wrote:
Lets see if the mailserver can find my hostname from 80.126.252.242
I think we're going to have to put this in the charter: please do
*not* send test messages to tens
*not* send test messages to tens of thousands of people when you
just want to test your own configuration. We have a mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] exactly for that purpose.
A notice on the web page here might help:
http://www.freebsd.org/community/mailinglists.html
With it between the Mailing
I need to checkout memory on a remote machine. I see there is memtest and
memtest86 out there. Which one is appropriate for my situation?: CPU is a
dual cpu, dual core SMP Intel Xeon. Can I run either program while the
machine is performing other tasks?**
--
Yudhvir Singh Sidhu
408 375 3134
-Original Message-
Subject: Memory test
I need to checkout memory on a remote machine. I see there is memtest
and
memtest86 out there. Which one is appropriate for my situation?: CPU
is a
dual cpu, dual core SMP Intel Xeon. Can I run either program while the
machine is performing
Sorry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried deleting the work subdirectory
and doing both a 'make' and 'make WITHOUT_PERL_64BITINT=yes'
but make test still fails the same way on both the pack and integer tests ..
is it possible that there is some misconfiguration in my system that is
confusing the
configure script w.r.t. 64bitness
Steven D. Yee wrote:
I'm seeing multiple errors from make test and I can't seem to
figure out how to get rid of them. As far as I can
tell it builds correctly.
[...]
../lib/integer..NOK 10
# Failed test 'left shift'
# in ../lib/integer.t at line 49
Steven D. Yee wrote:
I'm seeing multiple errors from make test and I can't seem to
figure out how to get rid of them. As far as I can
tell it builds correctly.
[...]
../lib/integer..NOK 10
# Failed test 'left shift'
# in ../lib/integer.t at line 49
I'm seeing multiple errors from make test and I can't seem to
figure out how to get rid of them. As far as I can
tell it builds correctly.
The errors look like:
...
t/op/pack.# Failed at op/pack.t line 631
# Failed at op/pack.t line 631
FAILED at test 514
Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a way for a shell script to test if 2 is the same as 1? I
want to put messages in both when they are connected to different files,
but would like to avoid duplicating the message when they are the same.
You could try using fstat(1) to print out the open file
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Robin Becker wrote:
Is there a way for a shell script to test if 2 is the same as 1? I
want to put messages in both when they are connected to different files,
but would like to avoid duplicating the message when they are the same.
You could try using fstat(1) to print
Is there a way for a shell script to test if 2 is the same as 1? I
want to put messages in both when they are connected to different files,
but would like to avoid duplicating the message when they are the same.
--
Robin Becker
___
freebsd-questions
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006, Josef Grosch wrote:
--
Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca.
Please use the test mailing list:
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-test
Regards,
Uli.
Peter Ulrich
--
Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 6.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Micro$oft free world | Berkeley, Ca.
pgpclfgwfCiFQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
testing newserver:
news.myown.framed.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I hope you don't mind my asking this here.
I'm working in an ISP right now. We are using mrtg for
each client connected to us. They can view their mrtg
statistics. Their way to the internet is to us. Say a
client connects to us via E1, they are guaranteed of
2.048Mbps because our uplink to the
Maybe this helps...
http://www.netperf.org/netperf/NetperfPage.html
Bob
On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 01:01 -0700, jay alvarez wrote:
I hope you don't mind my asking this here.
I'm working in an ISP right now. We are using mrtg for
each client connected to us. They can view their mrtg
Your client has major flaw in their test plan. Just because they
have large bandwidth to you does not mean the public websites that
want to test with also have that size bandwidth. So any time they
test loading up targeting some public website they will be limited
to some portion of the targeted
Dear list
Is there a memory test suite other them memtest86/memtest86+
TIA
zheyu
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++)
{
if ( *p == 0 )
*p = 1;
*p = 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
[end of code]
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, FreeBSD Daemon wrote:
|Dear list
|
|Is there a memory test suite other them memtest86/memtest86
FreeBSD Daemon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a memory test suite other them memtest86/memtest86+
There are others in the ports, but they aren't nearly as effective.
Of course, if you really want effective, there is no substitute
for a dedicated device
.
I want to test disk / raid card.
I tried below command 10 times while I 'm root
date dd if=/dev/zero of=deleteme.now bs=64k count=300 rm deleteme.now
date
1 - 19660800 bytes transferred in 3.420916 secs (5747232 bytes/sec)
2 - 19660800 bytes transferred in 3.318186 secs (5925165 bytes/sec)
3
that each about 70 Gbyte based RAID5. That is
Total capacity nearly 140 Gbyte.
I want to test disk /
cd /usr/ports ; make search info=performance
should give you some tools (bonnie, from memory)
raid card.
... other than setup raid, yank the cable in one/several of the
drives and see what
, but the first thing I noticed in your
test report is that you are only using a 1MB test file. You should run
a test that will also max out the on disk / controller buffers. I
think the Baracuda's have a 16MB buffers (16MBx4=64MB) so try a 128MB
test file. Also be nice to see more detailed hardware
result of amrd0 with 4 spindle Seagate Baracuda 300 Gb SATA II
(1 hotspare)
w/ Intel SRCS16 PCI-X
Is that fast or what ? :)
I'll have to take a closer look, but the first thing I noticed in your
test report is that you are only using a 1MB test file. You should run
a test that will also max out
Nikolas Britton wrote:
On 3/3/06, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Please can you be careful when you attribute your comments. You've sent
this email to me, and left only my name in the attributions as if I
were someone suggesting either dd or diskinfo as
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Please can you be careful when you attribute your comments. You've sent
this email to me, and left only my name in the attributions as if I
were someone suggesting either dd or diskinfo as accurate benchmarks,
when in fact my contribution was to suggest unixbench and
On 3/3/06, Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolas Britton wrote:
Please can you be careful when you attribute your comments. You've sent
this email to me, and left only my name in the attributions as if I
were someone suggesting either dd or diskinfo as accurate benchmarks,
when in
Your performance sucks because, to quote the manual, Input data is
read and written in 512-byte blocks.
Try a sensible blocksize. 16k would mimic a standard file system
block, but even that is likely to underestimate. If you were, say,
copying the disk to another you could easily use
Beastie wrote:
second tools is diskinfo, but i'm not quite happy with the result.
#diskinfo -t /dev/amrd0s1d
/dev/amrd0s1d
512 # sectorsize
96609024# mediasize in bytes (931G)
1953118377 # mediasize in sectors
121575 # Cylinders
101 - 200 of 431 matches
Mail list logo
