FreeBSD box that I am connected to. I think it may be a Solaris 9 box.
Is there any way to get this to work in Solaris?
Maybe the solaris find command supports the -newer option. I think
-newer is more widely supported, and likely to be available on
Solaris.
If necessary,
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:23 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
If a machine with a gig of memory runs fine under DOS but actually has
a bad big of memory hardware near the 512 meg address range, it would
probably still run flawlessly for a very very long time...
This machine has
On Mar 29, 2005, at 11:25 AM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Duo writes:
Does it work on an Apple Friggin IIe?
?
Apple IIe? you've never heard of it?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
On 2005-03-29 15:25, Lord Raiden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a server that I just recently upgraded to the latest of
everything, but for some reason when you type man and then what you
want to look at the manual for I get this error:
man: unable to find the file /etc/manpath.config
On Mar 29, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Chris writes:
No - NOT the PC - the hardware that's in question. The Adaptec WITH
the
modified code. I'm willing to bet, it's not.
Should I check for restrictions on chipset temperature, relative
humidity, and atmospheric pressure as well?
Are
Bart Silverstrim writes:
From the way you were complaining, I had the impression that MS was
bending backwards to help in issues while the FreeBSD people were
immature children.
They do a much better job than the FreeBSD project does, no doubt about
that.
Is this evidence to the contrary,
Bart Silverstrim writes:
It's deduction.
It can't be. There's nothing to deduct from.
Tell me again what those messages said, exactly?
Really? I have a free program running on my NT machines, ntpdate I
believe is the name, that just hammers the registry with requests
constantly. I'd
On Mar 29, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt writes:
He is saying that the microcode was modified and that we speculate
that
the mods contain a bug proprietary to the HP implementation of that
controller.
What makes it a _bug_? Why would the modified firmware contain a
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 06:17:47 + (UTC)
From: Christopher Nehren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2005-03-27, David Armour scribbled these
chmod:
#permissions: No such file or directory
chmod:
are: No such file or directory
chmod:
set: No such file or directory
chmod:
properly: No such
Bart Silverstrim writes:
That's nice. I wasn't talking about NT there. I was talking about
DOS.
I'm not running anything named DOS.
Command line, popular before Windows but after CP/M...maybe
you've heard of it?
I used to run a few operating systems by that name.
They're trying to help
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Apple IIe? you've never heard of it?
I used to use one. I've never heard of the Friggin variant, though.
--
Anthony
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Bart Silverstrim writes:
If it doesn't say, the list is referring to the generic
off-the-f'ing-shelf version.
I _have_ the generic, off-the-shelf version of this PC.
Very good. And if you take one of them whining about a problem, they
point at the list and say, Tough Sh*t.
No, they don't.
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Bart Silverstrim wrote:
Are you really this obtuse or do you just play you are on the Internet?
You are dealing with someone who feels he is more right than anyone else
in the WHOLE ENTIRE WORLD.
He drops his so called credentials (ive been in the biz for (fill in the
Hi Lowell
Thanks for the help so far. At the moment I'm actually cvsuping to
RELENG_4 to see if I can install the port after a buildworld. It's not
that I'm giving up on RELENG_5 so much as I'm just interested to see
if this solves the problem, or if I still run into a dependency
On Mar 29, 2005, at 4:03 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
It's deduction.
It can't be. There's nothing to deduct from.
Your description of the problem.
Tell me again what those messages said, exactly?
Can't. I didn't tell you the first time.
Really? I have a free program
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Um...because it took an adapter that generically had worked, but after
modifying it didn't?
It was referenced by an OS that generically worked, but then did not
after the modification of the adapter.
Note that it has not been established that any particularity of the
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
If it doesn't say, the list is referring to the generic
off-the-f'ing-shelf version.
I _have_ the generic, off-the-shelf version of this PC.
Very good. And if you take one of them whining about a problem, they
point at the list and say,
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
If it doesn't say, the list is referring to the generic
off-the-f'ing-shelf version.
I _have_ the generic, off-the-shelf version of this PC.
Very good. And if you take one of them whining about a problem, they
point at the list and say,
I just installed 5.3 on a laptop and am able to ping it, but it cannot
ping anything else. When I enter the ping ipaddress command the curser
moves down a line then nothing. It doesn't even time out. Just nothing.
The box will reply to a ping from another box on the network though. Is
there
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Your description of the problem.
My description of the problem is very sparse, and even I did not reach
those conclusions.
It shouldn't be hammering the registry. It is. The system doesn't
seem to care, doesn't report any problem.
So why is it a problem?
I only
Can you guys please take this discussion off line.
Thanks!
--Nick
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chip,
You can reconfigure your network interface using the sysinstall
utility (/stand/sysinstall). If you are not using DHCP make sure
that you have a DNS server and GATEWAY configured.
--Nick
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:46:07 -0700, Chip Wiegand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just installed 5.3
Lo all,
From the ppp man page.
-background
Here, ppp attempts to establish a connection with the peer
imme-
diately. If it succeeds, ppp goes into the background and the
parent process returns an exit code of 0. If it fails, ppp
exits
with
On Monday 28 March 2005 04:08 am, you wrote:
--- Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 27 March 2005 07:23 pm, you wrote:
Mike: got an error running a portmanager -u.
Freebsd
4.11-stable, fresh cvsup ports.
here is the error:
-su-2.05b# portmanager -u
Hello,
I have two sound cards:
SiS 7012 (C-Media Electronics CMI9739 AC97 Codec) - 'snd_ich'
Genius Sound Maker Value 5.1 (CMedia CMI8738) - 'snd_cmi'
The first is integrated in the motherboard, and it is detected first and
used as the default output device (pcm0). The second it detected
On 29 Mar Bart Silverstrim wrote:
You should go out and reinstall Windows on that server and leave this
list in peace.
He won't do that. I told this weeks ago. He comes off on this shit he
writes. You won't win this game. Why? 'Cause all of you use arguments
and Anthony simply is /not/ He
On 29 Mar Bart Silverstrim wrote:
You should go out and reinstall Windows on that server and leave this
list in peace.
He won't do that. I told this weeks ago. He comes off on this shit he
writes. You won't win this game. Why? 'Cause all of you use arguments
and Anthony simply is
No, I think the biggest changes are that
1) Processor speed is rarely the key limiting factor
and
2) Memory efficiency is much less a concern.
In the old days if you weren't a very good programmer
you did something else. Today anyone can
crank out code that works (linux anyone?). And
processors
So, I've got a laptop with two network interfaces (a wired one, xl0, and
a wireless, wi0).
The network setup around here gives me a static IP for the wired
inteface, and DHCP for the wireless.
My question has (I think) to do with routing; when I have the config for
xl0 in /etc/rc.conf, and it
More supurb technical analysis from that wiz, Jerry. Nicely
done!
You know if you guys spent half the time debugging code
as you spend cutting down people who've found
stuff that doesn't work there might not be a reason
to complain. Too bad all of the real developers are
off scratching their heads
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/29/2005 01:56:48 PM:
Hi Chip,
You can reconfigure your network interface using the sysinstall
utility (/stand/sysinstall). If you are not using DHCP make sure
that you have a DNS server and GATEWAY configured.
--Nick
Yes, that is how I configured it to
On Mar 29, 2005, at 5:56 PM, Mac Mason wrote:
Specifically, much of the use of this machine is in unwired sorts of
places, where I want to use the wi0 interface and not the xl0
interface.
If I don't have xl0 in /etc/rc.conf, and then dhclient wi0, it works
fine.
If I do have xl0 in rc.conf, I
More supurb technical analysis from that wiz, Jerry. Nicely
done!
Glad you appreciated it.
jerry
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Quick question:
Repo copy means that a current port or piece of src is being renamed, probably
with other changes or a split-out of parts that become new ports or contribs.
Should be seen in the context of CVS.
Do I grasp this correctly?
Thanks,
Dan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The principles of modern controllers are surprisingly similar to those
of old controllers. The biggest change is that the PC world is only
now discovering what mainframe designers knew 40 years ago.
PC Designers knew it 20 years ago. When I designed the
And it's off to the list!
-Original Message-
From: David Armour [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 3:40 PM
To: Andrew Heyn
Subject: Re: dmesg -a lines' explanation? NEWBIE
hello,
thank you for your response.
Regarding grep, you got it half right.
that is just
I was trying to make buildworld the 5-STABLE tree (fetched as of about
an hour ago), and I got these error messages a bit of the way into it.
Any idea what was causing this? I'll get back to you right away if you
need more information or anything.
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/cc -O -march=pentium2
Joel Heikkila on 2005-03-29 18:51:15 -0500:
I was trying to make buildworld the 5-STABLE tree (fetched as of about
an hour ago), and I got these error messages a bit of the way into it.
Any idea what was causing this?
ccache has occassionally caused this sort of error for me with
kerberos.
/etc/devfs.conf:permxpt00666#permissions are set properly at
boot
... which is still largely un-intelligible to me, at the moment. and which
co-incides, oddly enough, with the moment at which i have to leave for
work! dang! so i'll have to take another google around, later
Duo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyway, I think we should all do ourselves a favor, and kill this
thread.
I know it will be hard, Anthony will try really hard to say something
even
stupider, in a vain attempt to make us want to reply...but, there are
a
plethora of other things we could
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:16 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Martin McCann writes:
And how do you write software that will be able to communicate with
hardware, irrelevent of what changes have been made to that hardware?
The hardware and software must agree on a minimum set of standards.
I'm not that interested in running Linux. Linux is for kids.
This pretty much sums up your attitute. Most people on this list use the
right tool for the right job, they are not interested in labeling a
piece of code for 'adults' or for 'children'. I am sure IBM, SUN, and
plently of other
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 22:20 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thats because you seem unable to grasp modern concepts.
None were under discussion.
As far as you can see, which shows the limit of your percption.
If you think that performance criteria
of modern
After updating everything to its latest version, did you remember to
mergemaster to update your /etc files?
Nope, didn't think to do it because I've never had to do it
before. This would be a first. But I did run it and it errored out when I
tried it and got this error. Any ideas?
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:00 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
From the way you were complaining, I had the impression that MS was
bending backwards to help in issues while the FreeBSD people were
immature children.
They do a much better job than the FreeBSD
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:03 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
It's deduction.
It can't be. There's nothing to deduct from.
Exactly, because you have time and time again refused to put any effort
into deducing anything. It, as you have said, is the fault of the
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:51:15 -0500, Joel Heikkila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was trying to make buildworld the 5-STABLE tree (fetched as of about
an hour ago), and I got these error messages a bit of the way into it.
Any idea what was causing this? I'll get back to you right away if you
Where is Sendmail 8.13.4? I cannot find it in the ports, and it isn't at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/sendmail/
Either.
Thanks,
- Mark
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:13 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
That's nice. I wasn't talking about NT there. I was talking about
DOS.
I'm not running anything named DOS.
Command line, popular before Windows but after CP/M...maybe
you've heard of it?
I
No, I was referring to the additional modularity and stability made
possible by the additional abstraction of a HAL.
Please explain this to me - I have had a lot of experience in OS design,
and would like you, who obviously from you remarks, have extensive OS
design knowledge, point out to
On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 23:25 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Bart Silverstrim writes:
Um...because it took an adapter that generically had worked, but after
modifying it didn't?
It was referenced by an OS that generically worked, but then did not
after the modification of the adapter.
This sounds as if you are missing the Makefile. Do you have a
Makefile in /usr/src? If not, this is your problem.
The Makefile should be installed by the base package within the
src distribution. To install this, you need to be root, then:
/stand/sysinstall
Go to Configure-Distributions-src
In a final effort to resolve this issue -
It is widely agreed that anthony's issue lies in a custom chipset for
his hardware.
It is widely agreed that anthony is not willing to put any effort into
trying to verify this.
If is widely belivied that the person who could answer these queries
My partner uses a winxp box on my local net (behind a FreeBSD box who acts as
gateway/firewall in front of out gbit switch).
Now, we were wanting to upgrade the gateway box with two gigabit NICs and we
did but the hard disk died (oh well it was 6 years old as is the box and
mobo). I made a new
Dear All,
I Just add 9 in front of the set phone, but i still cannot connect to
isp. Log say No Dialtone. But if i dial direct using telephone i
can dial out to isp and same result if i test with windows. Please
help me.
i use pabx and i have to dial 9 first to dial out.
Thanks for your
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:13:47 -0500, PS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello I use freeBSD 4.11 with pppoe.
I used almost default ppp.conf (as in freebsd handbook) for dynamic ip.
my config is here http://block111.servehttp.com/ppp.conf
Twice a day I restart ppp from cron with `killall -INT ppp` and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-29, David Armour scribbled these
curious markings:
[partially snipped for clarity]
#permissions: No such file or directory
are: No such file or directory
set: No such file or directory
properly: No such file or directory
at: No
Danny Pansters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quick question:
Repo copy means that a current port or piece of src is being renamed,
probably
with other changes or a split-out of parts that become new ports or contribs.
Should be seen in the context of CVS.
Do I grasp this correctly?
More
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 04:11, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Danny Pansters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Quick question:
Repo copy means that a current port or piece of src is being renamed,
probably with other changes or a split-out of parts that become new ports
or contribs. Should be seen in
Why does x server always use a avarage of 1% cpu time while i am doing
nothing ? Everything els is 0% except x and enlightenment ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe,
I can get yahoo fine with any browers but Internet
explore 6.0. I have the top update and can not get
web base to look right. But with Netscape firefox
it works fine. All my cookies history have been
deleted. whats going on???
Plase replay you ASAP at this addres or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sent the wrong email to the wrong address. sorry about
that. please disregard that last email.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 04:42, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Why does x server always use a avarage of 1% cpu time while i am doing
nothing ? Everything els is 0% except x and enlightenment ?
Probably the load of showing content or waiting for input, and the like. X is
big. It also uses a lot (if
set device /dev/cuaa0
This is not your real device name.
# Ensure that set device statement references the correct serial
port
# for your modem. (External modem on com1 = cuaa0, com2 = cuaa1)
# PCI modem com5 = cuaa4
# Only needed for dial out device.
# This can be found in dmesg boot log
For
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 04:58:27 +0200, Danny Pansters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 30 March 2005 04:42, Gert Cuykens wrote:
Why does x server always use a avarage of 1% cpu time while i am doing
nothing ? Everything els is 0% except x and enlightenment ?
Probably the load of showing
Is there a simple way to compare the md5 checksum of a file, to a file
that contains possibly more than one md5 checksum entry in it? Kind
of like mdsum -c does?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Matt Kosht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a simple way to compare the md5 checksum of a file, to a file
that contains possibly more than one md5 checksum entry in it? Kind
of like mdsum -c does?
I've never heard of mdsum, but try mtree(8).
___
Can anyone offer any suggestions as to why I see the following on shutdown:
*** FINAL System shutdown message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
***
System going down
IMMEDIATELY
Martin McCann writes:
That is how standards work, and when a piece of hardware goes beyond
those standards either through design or mis-implementation, who is to
blame?
The hardware designer. But it has not been established that that is
happening here. Perhaps the hardware is not adhering
Martin McCann writes:
This pretty much sums up your attitute. Most people on this list use the
right tool for the right job, they are not interested in labeling a
piece of code for 'adults' or for 'children'.
The same is true for me. But there isn't anything I want or need to do
right now
Martin McCann writes:
then stop complaining to a list of 'kiddies', and use that.
MS doesn't support FreeBSD.
If you have never encountered the term FLOSS, you are not the open
source user you claim to be, it is a common term.
I've probably encountered it, I just didn't retain it. The IT
In the last episode (Mar 30), Mark said:
Where is Sendmail 8.13.4? I cannot find it in the ports, and it isn't
at:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/mail/sendmail/
I think it's probably because 8.13.4 was released on the 27th, and the
ports tree was frozen on the 21st for the
Martin McCann writes:
So, you start by demanding your individual problem is resoloved by a
list who has no responsibility to the upkeep of the software that has
given you issue?
I haven't demanded anything, I've simply asked.
You have repeated this time and time again. No-one is argueing
Martin McCann writes:
Please explain this to me - I have had a lot of experience in OS design,
and would like you, who obviously from you remarks, have extensive OS
design knowledge, point out to me how a HAL makes an OS inherintly more
stable than a system that writes its drivers for a
Martin McCann writes:
I doubt many people here would request a feature for MS, have it
granted, then forget what that feature was.
I have never considered it an especially significant event.
Well, you are showing many user traits, and not many sys admin traits.
I'm both a user and a
Martin McCann writes:
Therefore, in order to keep this list a sane and useful resource, I
would suggest that if anyone feels like answering anthonys queries, they
do it to his personal email address, so the rest of us might get on with
other issues ...
Why were your previous eight replies
Help! FreeBSDamsel in distress.
I'm just starting out with this OS and already running into a problem.
Initially I installed FreeBSD onto a seperate hdd but that died. I have
a 120gig drive, that i want to partition into two 10gig drives, one for
windows, one FreeBSD 1 gig for BSD swap and the
Am Mittwoch, 30. März 2005 07:24 schrieb Quinn Ellis:
Help! FreeBSDamsel in distress.
I'm just starting out with this OS and already running into a problem.
Initially I installed FreeBSD onto a seperate hdd but that died. I have
a 120gig drive, that i want to partition into two 10gig drives,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2005-03-30, Lowell Gilbert scribbled these
curious markings:
Matt Kosht [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a simple way to compare the md5 checksum of a file, to a file
that contains possibly more than one md5 checksum entry in it? Kind
of
I'm running 5.4 BETA1 on a soekris 4801 board. The unit emulates a
console on a serial port. I want to use the serial port for my GPS so I
want the console messages from BSD to go away - an in particular I want
BSD to ignore inbound data during the boot process.
So far:
I've used the regular
Hi,
I would like to combine the bandwidth of two network cards on FreeBSD (which
are connected to 2 different ADSL modems of the same ISP) in order to double
the bandwidth of the Internet connection of the LAN that is behind this box.
I have searched Google and FreeBSD question and people
However, these approaches require support from the other peer (the ISP),
which is not possible in my situation.
I would say that no solution exist that do not have the colaboration
of the other part.
You can do as much load balancing on your end, but that is your ISP
that will decide to send
* Lord Raiden [2005-03-29 19:55 -0500]
After updating everything to its latest version, did you remember to
mergemaster to update your /etc files?
Nope, didn't think to do it because I've never had to do it before.
This would be a first. But I did run it and it errored out
101 - 183 of 183 matches
Mail list logo
