On 6/21/2011 7:47 PM, Chris Brennan wrote:
* Peter Tothfree...@snap.net.nz [2011-06-22 12:16:11 +1200]:
Did you set the bootfs property on your root pool? Example: zpool set
bootfs=tank/root tank
OK, I booted back to the livefs memostick, imported my zpool (tank) and
zpool promptly tells me
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Dick Hoogendijk d...@nagual.nl wrote:
OK, it works very well. Installing a ZFS FreeBSD system with an ufs /boot
is very very easy using the PC-BSD DVD.
However, I have one question:
I'd like to install FreeBSD (pcbsd) on a (zfs) mirror
In OpenSolaris you
On 23 June 2011 02:38, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 22 Jun 2011, at 22:22, krad kra...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 June 2011 21:23, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 21/06/2011 20:01, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
I'd like to install FreeBSD (pcbsd) on a (zfs)
On 06/22/11 12:47, Chris Brennan wrote:
* Peter Toth free...@snap.net.nz [2011-06-22 12:16:11 +1200]:
Did you set the bootfs property on your root pool? Example: zpool set
bootfs=tank/root tank
OK, I booted back to the livefs memostick, imported my zpool (tank) and
zpool promptly tells me
Is anyone else running zfs on root and running into very slow finds? The
/etc/periodic/daily/450.status-security can take over a noisy HD thrashing hour
to finish, the culprit being the find that crawls the filesystem.
I'm hoping there is some I'm not sure if there if some simple zfs tuning
I feel summer creepin' in and I'm tired of this town again, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/23 03:56:07 -0700 Andrew Moran amo...@forsythia.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
AM
AM Is anyone else running zfs on root and running into very slow finds? The
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes
me is how quick support was pulled
On 6/23/11 2:02 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 23 07:02:56 2011
From: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Mozilla retires Firefox 4 from security support
Jerry writes:
From URL:
On Jun 23, 2011, at 8:56 AM, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox
_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to update to
version 5 which is now in the ports system.
* Peter Toth free...@snap.net.nz [2011-06-23 22:54:59 +1200]:
Did you set the mount point properly for your ZFS root? My previous post
was intended as an example only, you need to tailor it to your setup.
Also, you can use mfsbsd for installation very easy and straightforward
Jerry writes:
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes
me is how quick support was pulled from version 4.
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a
year.
Correct!
On 6/23/11 3:10 PM, Robert Huff wrote:
Jerry writes:
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
update to version 5 which is now in the ports system. What amazes
me is how quick support was pulled from version 4.
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4
On Wed, June 22, 2011 9:26 pm, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
You will lose your main ZFS pool if you lose:
- more than 1 of your full ZFS pools
or
- your ZIL (need confirmation on that)
From my reading, on the ZIL: Under 8.2, true. If you have patched your
ZFS install, or are running -CURRENT,
Damien Fleuriot writes:
Although, I'll give you, I'm as confused as everyone regarding
this 4-5 bump, surely they could have done 4.1 or something...
It is my understanding there are (even more) substantial (than
usual) internal changes, particularly relating to HTML v5.
On 23/06/2011 13:02, Robert Huff wrote:
My morning-fogged mind says Version 4 was out less than a year.
Much less than a year. V4 came out in April.
I'm wondering what the big deal is that Mozilla felt they needed to bump
the major version number? There don't seem to have been many user
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Pls see output:
Can't locate Net/DNS.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.14.1/BSDPAN
Le 23/06/2011 14:30, Jerry a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
Jerry writes:
From URL:
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9217837/Mozilla_retires_Firefox_4_from_security_support.
Obviously users of version 4 will be more or less forced to
On 6/23/11 3:51 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
Pls see output:
Can't locate Net/DNS.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.14.0
I just updated to the new Firefox-5 browser. Unfortunately, the
1-ClickWeather for Firefox (Weather Channel) fails. I tried to remove
and re-install the add-on but the results were the same.
This is the error message:
[Exception... Component returned failure code: 0x80520012
1-Port directory update through portsnap
2-FreeBSD src update through CTM
3-Port updates through distfiles and/or packages
I think 1- and 2- are quite straightforward. To allow 1- I need to white
list the whole content of http://portsnap.freebsd.org/ . To allow 2- I need
to white list the
On 6/23/2011 8:08 AM, Admin Cyanide wrote:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a major
version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same constraints.
What is surprising is why it is not a 4.1
On Jun 23, 2011, at 10:33 AM, Joshua Isom wrote:
On 6/23/2011 8:08 AM, Admin Cyanide wrote:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a major
version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same
On 6/22/11 5:58 PM, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 22/06/2011 20:02, Osterweil, Eric wrote:
On 6/22/11 2:56 PM, Leon Meßner l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:17:23AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 20/06/2011 01:37, Leon
I have FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE running on an HP DL360 G5. I recently added
an (HP branded) LSI Logic single channel SCSI 320 card and attached an
HP Ultrium 920 LTO3 tape drive.
The system sees the SCSI controller as mpt0, and it seems to know
there's something at SCSI ID 4, but I get an
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:08:39 +0200
Admin Cyanide articulated:
The major difference is that when updating Microsoft's OS from a
major version to another you have to pay.
I'm not flaming, I just want to focus on the fact that this products
have not the same constraints.
We were, or at least I
Why not take this discussion to freebsd-chat?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Hi all,
Now the different versions of Firefox are :
- Release (version)
- Aurora (version +1)
- Nightly (version +2)
With this roadmap, you don't care with the version number of the release.
There will be only one, not like before with 3.6.x, 3.5.x ...
I think this is really more easy. You will
Quoth Jerry on Thursday, 23 June 2011:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 08:02:23 -0400
Robert Huff articulated:
snip
The best part is that many of my add-ons again no longer work. From
what I can see in the ports system, and I may be wrong, there is not an
option to use the version 4 either although
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:25:16 -0700
Chip Camden articulated:
Yes, Pentadactyl for one. Upgrading to its nightly build version
makes it work, sort of. Looks like text fields no longer scroll
properly. This is taking the Google-led trend of beta is the new
release to extremes.
Google and its,
First there is the xfig issue:
No matter what the setting is for I18N (WITH or WITHOUT) there is this:
cc -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/local/include/X11 -I. -I/usr/local/include
-DCSRG_BASED -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Joe in MPLS j...@gracenpeace.net wrote:
The system sees the SCSI controller as mpt0, and it seems to know there's
something at SCSI ID 4, but I get an AutoSense Failed for hba/id/lun 0:4:0
at boot and subsequent camcontrol rescans.
I checked the supported
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:35:10 -0500, Joe in MPLS wrote:
I have FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE running on an HP DL360 G5. I recently added
an (HP branded) LSI Logic single channel SCSI 320 card and attached an
HP Ultrium 920 LTO3 tape drive.
The system sees the SCSI controller as mpt0, and it seems
Adam Vande More wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Joe in MPLS j...@gracenpeace.net wrote:
The system sees the SCSI controller as mpt0, and it seems to know there's
something at SCSI ID 4, but I get an AutoSense Failed for hba/id/lun 0:4:0
at boot and subsequent camcontrol rescans.
Seems in theory that LTO 3 should work ok based on this forum post:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=8042
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
This mail got only send to Matthew because of bad time of day ;)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 22/06/2011 20:02, Osterweil, Eric wrote:
On 6/22/11 2:56 PM, Leon Meßner l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:17:23AM
On 6/23/11 2:23 PM, Leon Meßner l.mess...@physik.tu-berlin.de wrote:
This mail got only send to Matthew because of bad time of day ;)
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:58:00PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 22/06/2011 20:02, Osterweil, Eric wrote:
On 6/22/11 2:56 PM, Leon Meßner
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you upgrade perl from 5.10.x
or 5.12.x to 5.14.1. This is explained in UPDATING.
If you
From: Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, June 22, 2011 11:26:30 PM
Subject: Re: Any working SIP-phone on FreeBSD?
Hey guys.this thread is really starting to stink. Take it outside.
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at
On 23 Jun 2011, at 21:37, Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
wrote:
On 23/06/2011 14:55, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
I have updated my Perl version yesterday but now my Spamd doesn't work
anymore.
Can someone hint me how to solve this?
You need to reinstall all perl modules if you
Should we send in a send-pr to edit src/etc/motd ?
PR it. Sounds good.
Thanks. Done. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=158238
Now it'll need a commiter.
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below, not above;
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
As a rule of thumb and for a serious server, I would recommend 1 SSD as
dedicated cache and 2 SSD for a mirrored ZIL (you don't want to lose this
data).
However I think ppl posted about running intro trouble when using both
Ok
Ce message a été envoyé depuis un terminal BlackBerry de Bouygues Telecom
-Original Message-
From: William Bulley w...@umich.edu
Sender: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:39:17
To: freebsd-po...@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: can't
I have been fighting a losing battle trying to get video to display
with Firefox. I just updated to the latest version 5;however, it still
does not work. This is on a FreeBSD-8.2 system.
As an example, the following URL does not display the video or even the
portion where one would usually click
On Jun 23, 2011, at 4:51 PM, Carmel wrote:
I have been fighting a losing battle trying to get video to display
with Firefox. I just updated to the latest version 5;however, it still
does not work. This is on a FreeBSD-8.2 system.
As an example, the following URL does not display the video or
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 00:03:23 +0200
Julian H. Stacey j...@berklix.com wrote:
Hi questions@
Robert Simmons articulated:
There
seems to be a few email addresses that are subscribed to these lists
that keep spamming it periodically,
snip
I think we should:
make questions@
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Jerry je...@seibercom.net wrote:
It is my personal view that FreeBSD-Questions should be consolidated
into the chat forum. Chat forums are rarely moderated and tend to be
open to the general public.
Some of us have workflows that favor e-mail over those
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Carmel wrote:
I have been fighting a losing battle trying to get video to display
with Firefox. I just updated to the latest version 5;however, it still
does not work. This is on a FreeBSD-8.2 system.
As an example, the following URL does not display the video or even the
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 08:10:29 PM Randy Pratt wrote:
I don't think making a list writable only to subscribers solves
anything since it seems the spammers are already subscribed. This only
makes it difficult for others like myself who read the lists online and
only post occasionally.
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 22:14:55 -0400
Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, June 23, 2011 08:10:29 PM Randy Pratt wrote:
I don't think making a list writable only to subscribers solves
anything since it seems the spammers are already subscribed. This only
makes it difficult
I installed 8.2 from the DVD ISO. This install overwrote the MBR even though I
selected not to write a boot record. Using the repair disk and/or bootrec does
not work.
The answer is found in
http://www.sevenforums.com/tutorials/105541-startup-repair-run-3-separate-times.html.
Basically you
FreeBSD 8.2
amd64
Attempting to install X11 server.
Attempt to install package xf86-video-fbdev-0.4.2.tbz
gives conflict between perl-5.10.1_3 and perl-5.12.3
even when installing into clean directory tree.
# mkdir /tmp/test_pkg_install
# export PKG_DBDIR=/tmp/test_pkg_install/var/db/pkg
#
53 matches
Mail list logo
