On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Doug Poland wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've got a 7.2-RELEASE (i386) box that has recently experienced
> several panics when writing to a gjournaled partition. On this
> particular partition, the journal device is "mixed" in with the data
> provider. In both cases, I w
Hello,
I've got a 7.2-RELEASE (i386) box that has recently experienced
several panics when writing to a gjournaled partition. On this
particular partition, the journal device is "mixed" in with the data
provider. In both cases, I was trying to copy a 19GB file from an
external USB device (da1p16
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 23:20:22 +0200 (CEST), Alexander Best
wrote:
> thx. i thought since / gets mounted read-only and fsck is able to check it
> with write access this would apply to read-only mountpoints in general.
Because fsck resides in /sbin, it is required - in SUM - that /
is mounted and a
Polytropon schrieb am 2009-09-23:
> On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:02:24 +0200 (CEST), Alexander Best
> wrote:
> > however if i do `mount -r -o noatime /dev/label/usr /usr` and run
> > `fsck
> > /dev/label/usr` fsck isn't able to gain write access.
> The fsck program should - as far as I know - only be u
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:02:24 +0200 (CEST), Alexander Best
wrote:
> however if i do `mount -r -o noatime /dev/label/usr /usr` and run `fsck
> /dev/label/usr` fsck isn't able to gain write access.
The fsck program should - as far as I know - only be used on
unmounted (!) file systems. In order to
Hello,
I
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Hello,
I am trying to add a second firewall/NAT to my network for the purpose of
using NAT's address redirection to point to my webserver behind the firewall.
So far I have a fresh install of FreeBSD and have recompiled the kernel with
IPDIVERT and IPFIREWALL but NAT will not forward to my web
Am I doing something wrong here?
kldload if_tap if_bridge
sysctl net.link.tap.user_open=1
ifconfig tap0 create
ifconfig bridge create
ifconfig bridge0 addm tap0 addm em0
it# dhclient tap0
DHCPDISCOVER on tap0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 6
DHCPDISCOVER on tap0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 in
Le 23/09/2009 à 15:22:30+0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester a écrit
>
> According to
> http://linux-wless.passys.nl/query_part.php?brandname=TRENDware , there
> are two revisions of that device with totally different chipsets.
F**ck.20 bucks in trash
>
> Unfortunately, that is pretty
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:44:12AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> herbs wrote:
> > Hi Daemons,
> > I wonder whats wrong there:
> >
> > I need to change the permissions from
> > /dev/speaker 600 to /dev/speaker 666
> > --all works ok.
> >
> > Then I reboot the computer and the permissions of the f
hi there,
i've stumbled over some issues running 9-CURRENT i386 (r197427) and would like
to ask if these are in fact problems/bugs or the way things are meant to work.
isssue 1:
when booting into single user mode / (dev/label/rootfs) gets mounted
read-only. when doing `fsck /dev/label/rootfs` pro
Albert Shih wrote:
So I just buy a
Trendnet TEW-424UB
wifi usb adapter. I find this in the
man zyd
but when I plug my adapter (after add if_zyd_load="YES" in my loader.conf
and reboot) it's not working.
According to
http://linux-wless.passys.nl/query_part.php?brandname=
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:20:18 +0400, Arkady Tokaev wrote:
>
> Now I see new Error linking...
> How I can faind all dependenciesb e f o r kernel compyling ?
Traditionally from the documentation. Template and example files
such as GENERIC, NOTES and LINT do contain comments for the
various dr
Now I see new Error linking...
How I can faind all dependenciesb e f o r kernel compyling ?
Arkady Tokaev
From: tok...@hotmail.com
To: rfar...@predatorlabs.net
Subject: RE: Error linking MYKERNEL
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:40:39 +0400
Great!
Thank you for your prompt reply.
S
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 01:56:57PM +0200, Roy Stuivenberg typed:
> Hello,
>
> I get this error when I try to make buildkernel, with device snd_hda for
> my sound.
> When I load it as module in rc.conf it works fine, but I'd rather
> compile it in the kernel.
> [FreeBSD-7.2-stable]
>
> This is my
Hello,
I get this error when I try to make buildkernel, with device snd_hda for
my sound.
When I load it as module in rc.conf it works fine, but I'd rather
compile it in the kernel.
[FreeBSD-7.2-stable]
This is my error :
hdac.o(.data+0x2e8): In function `hdac_audio_undo_trace':
/usr/src/sys/dev
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Erik Norgaard wrote:
> >> This sounds like the correct solution, AFAIK it's the same concept
> >> as for NIS, first check local files, then ldap. You don't want
> >> your root credentials possibly be leaked ac
> > On a related note, why is slapd so damn fragile? It's a righteous pain
> > in the bum the way you have to run db_recover-X.Y /var/db/openldap-data
> > if slapd fails to start.
> Yes, this is a lot of pain. I have had issues the same way and never
> figured out what the reason was. /var/ is v
2009/9/23 ill...@gmail.com
> 2009/9/22 Anselm Strauss :
> > My next question is: Is it actually the plan to use ZFS as official root
> > filesystem in FreeBSD, eventually replacing UFS? Is ZFS actually designed
> > for that use?
>
> zfs works fine as root on opensolaris, though it
> took them a w
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Erik Norgaard wrote:
This sounds like the correct solution, AFAIK it's the same concept as
for NIS, first check local files, then ldap. You don't want your root
credentials possibly be leaked accross the network. On the other hand
you don't want or nee
2009/9/22 Anselm Strauss :
> My next question is: Is it actually the plan to use ZFS as official root
> filesystem in FreeBSD, eventually replacing UFS? Is ZFS actually designed
> for that use?
zfs works fine as root on opensolaris, though it
took them a while to get there. Functionally, it
shoul
2009/9/22 krad
>
>
> 2009/9/22 Anselm Strauss
>
> My next question is: Is it actually the plan to use ZFS as official root
>> filesystem in FreeBSD, eventually replacing UFS? Is ZFS actually designed
>> for that use?
>>
>> Anselm
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2009, at 22:25 , krad wrote:
>>
>> 2009/9/
Thanks Manolis,
works perfect now!
FreeBSD has the safest speaker access in the universe it seems. Even
the speaker-beeping user should be member of a group to do so..
Cheers
herb langhans
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 09:44:12AM +0300, Manolis Kiagias wrote:
> > herbs wrote:
> > > Hi Daemons,
> >
23 matches
Mail list logo
