Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font
The fastest solution is probably to install x11/gtk-theme-switch2 and use switch2 to change the theme and/or font. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'
On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? Not my spam. If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help you. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too
Hey all! I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like user: u...@site1.domain.com user2: us...@site1.domain.com user3: us...@site2.domain.com When someone from Internet send email to u...@domain.com with cc: to us...@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they recieve their mail. But I need some additional behavior: user receive that mail with to: u...@site1.domain.com cc: us...@domain.com I want that cc would be us...@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. Because I got problems replying to all (with us...@domain.com included, but it must be us...@site2.domain.com). How this can be achieved? In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to aliases file contents. I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that moment. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: What is loading my server so much?
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 19:30:08 -0600 Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote: Could there be a ulimit issue as well? I think shared memory is unaffected by ulimits ... at least, I've never had trouble with ulimit preventing PostgreSQL from allocating gigs and gigs of shared memory, and I don't recall every having to bump ulimits. - Original Message - From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org To: Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com Cc: questi...@freebsd.org questi...@freebsd.org; daniel...@gmail.com daniel...@gmail.com Sent: Thu Dec 09 18:55:26 2010 Subject: Re: What is loading my server so much? On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:15:14 +0100 Laszlo Nagy gand...@shopzeus.com wrote: First off, you have 24G of RAM available and PostgreSQL only seems to have access to 400M of it. Bump shared_buffers up to 2 or 3 G at least, and bump up work_mem to at least a few hundred meg, and maintenance_work_mem up to at 1/2G or so. All right. Here is what I did. I setup a new shmmax value this way: sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=8589934592 It is 8G. (By the way I also have kern.ipc.shm_use_phys: 1 ) Then I have changed shared_mem to 1024MB in postgresql.conf. Then I tried to start postgresql I got this message in the log: Dec 9 17:53:59 shopzeus postgres[27247]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-1] FATAL: could not create shared memory segment: Cannot allocate memory Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-2] DETAIL: Failed system call was shmget(key=5432001, size=1105051648, 03600). Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-3] HINT: This error usually means that PostgreSQL's request for a shared memory segment exceeded available memory or swap space. To reduce the request size (currently 1105051648 bytes), reduce PostgreSQL's shared_buffers parameter (currently 131072) and/or its max_connections parameter (currently 203). Dec 9 17:55:52 shopzeus postgres[27328]: [1-4] The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about shared memory configuration. I do not understand. Doc says these: max_connections cost ~ 400 bytes of shared memory slot, plus lock space (see max_locks_per_transaction). Even if I had max_connections = 5000, total shared memory required would be way below shmmax=8G. What am I missing here? Did you bump kern.ipc.shmall? The one you bumped is the maximum size of a single shared memory request, shmall is the maximum amount of shared memory for the entire system. They both have to be increased. To make it more confusing, shmall is in pages, not bytes, so you have to divide by pagesize (sysctl hw.pagesize). -Bill ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org font size=1 div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in' /div This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system. /font ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)']
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 11, Message: 27 On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 00:54:37 -0500 On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote: No, he didn't. These mails are FORGED as being from freebsd-questions participants, and on first glance may appear to be list postings. They used to get posted to the list itself also, but postmaster@ blocked the nuisance source back in August. However that doesn't stop them from targetting individual list participants, like you. If you examine the full mail headers, it's likely to have originated from the following IP address. If so, you just need to block that address at your mailserver. But if they've moved, we need to know .. Quoting from a message to postmaster@ in August: As Roland pointed out, the phishing/virus/whatever referral has switched from downwind.com.au to xpbargains.net, and possibly some others. Here's the business: % dig +short -x 64.38.11.26 allmail.0b2.net. % dig +short allmail.0b2.net. 64.38.11.26 % dig +short dusk.parklogic.com 64.38.11.26 If you can discard by Message-ID then every one of these, including the privately mailed ones, has @dusk.parklogic.com there. If you can block by IP, then that's the one. Or by hostname, every one so far has been relayed by allmail.0b2.net (that's a zero). So if the full headers reveal coming from that hostname or that IP or any other IP in 64.38.11.26/29, just block that and move on. If it's a different address range now, please provide the full headers for the message you received, with a copy to postmas...@freebsd.org Thanks, Ian (please cc me on any reply, I take this list as a digest) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ultradns issues?
On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:40 AM, jw011235 wrote: It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by anonymous on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how poorly most mainstream technical news is reported. http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10421577-265.html Regards, Jason On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: is anyone seeing dns problems with ultradns.net, I'm seeing lookup problems for several big domains, plus as an impportant aside freebsd uses whois-servers.net cnames such as tld.whois-server.net to the correct whois server many many other companies use them obv too. Paul. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Nevermind. I should have read further down in my mail. I see there's another thread on the same issue. And sorry for top posting earlier. Regards, Jason ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too
Generally reading documentation helps. then google... http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ighl=enrlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294=q=sendmail+aliasesbtnG=Google+Searchaq=foq= first URL... http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html t Hey all! I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like user: u...@site1.domain.com user2: us...@site1.domain.com user3: us...@site2.domain.com When someone from Internet send email to u...@domain.com with cc: to us...@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they recieve their mail. But I need some additional behavior: user receive that mail with to: u...@site1.domain.com cc: us...@domain.com I want that cc would be us...@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. Because I got problems replying to all (with us...@domain.com included, but it must be us...@site2.domain.com). How this can be achieved? In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to aliases file contents. I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that moment. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- bEsT rEgArDs| Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem. -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo| In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different. -- Albert Einstein ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ultradns issues?
It's possible what you're seeing is related to DDOS attacks by anonymous on UltraDNS (and others) in connection with all the Wikileaks events this week. It's hard to say for certain given how poorly most mainstream technical news is reported. http://news.cnet.com/8301-30684_3-10421577-265.html Regards, Jason On Dec 9, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Paul Macdonald wrote: is anyone seeing dns problems with ultradns.net, I'm seeing lookup problems for several big domains, plus as an impportant aside freebsd uses whois-servers.net cnames such as tld.whois-server.net to the correct whois server many many other companies use them obv too. Paul. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too
2010/12/10 tomasz dereszynski toma...@paraklet.net: Generally reading documentation helps. then google... http://www.google.co.uk/search?source=ighl=enrlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUK294=q=sendmail+aliasesbtnG=Google+Searchaq=foq= first URL... http://www.feep.net/sendmail/tutorial/intro/aliases.html t Hey all! I've got /etc/mail/aliases file like user: u...@site1.domain.com user2: us...@site1.domain.com user3: us...@site2.domain.com When someone from Internet send email to u...@domain.com with cc: to us...@domain.com sendmail send mail to user and user3 normaly, they recieve their mail. But I need some additional behavior: user receive that mail with to: u...@site1.domain.com cc: us...@domain.com I want that cc would be us...@site2.domain.com, like in aliases file. Because I got problems replying to all (with us...@domain.com included, but it must be us...@site2.domain.com). How this can be achieved? In other words I need some kind of cc: field rewriting regarding to aliases file contents. I have not found such feature in sendmail. So I think this can be done with some milter may be... Anyone has ideas? Any tips, thinks, tricks and etc highly needed! I'm out of ideas at that moment. Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- bEsT rEgArDs | Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem. -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo | In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different. -- Albert Einstein I do use aliases file and I know what is it. But it looks like not this case. I want Cc: be rewritten like in aliases file defined in Cc: header, not only those one that comes in RCPT TO:. And sendmail does not do it with Cc: field. Yes, recipient that in Cc: field do receive this mail, all ok in this way, but I want in MY mail Cc: field been rewritten as it is in aliases. I want to see in my mail this email headers to: u...@domain.com cc: us...@site2.domain.com Not this one: to: u...@site1.domain.com cc: us...@domain.com Looked at postfix - same thing, no such feature saw there in documentation. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
ZFS over nfs
Hi I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using zfs nfsshare as it says in the documentation. Then the system use the file /etc/zfs/exports. But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares in the same place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this way? Anybody know? System is Freebsd 8.1. Best regards Sven-Åke Svensson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? Not my spam. If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help you. Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just noticed that a lot of mail last night had that message attached to it, even mail from me. By the time I realized that, I was too tired to care. But either way, I'm still curious, does this list generate that message? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
THE SPAM WE GET [stop fretting and read]
No, this list does not. As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that accepts emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I can post from 4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each address. Spoofing email addresses has happened for years, and with this list's archives being publicly available online it's been happening for a while and will continue to happen until the rules may or may not be changed. -- Ryan On Dec 10, 2010, at 8:41 AM, Chris Brennan wrote: On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Paul B Mahol one...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/10/10, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote: Umm... what's the dea w/ this? More spam? Not my spam. If you still think that I actually really send this to you I can not help you. Well no Paul, I wasn't blaming you directly, I I just noticed that a lot of mail last night had that message attached to it, even mail from me. By the time I realized that, I was too tired to care. But either way, I'm still curious, does this list generate that message? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ZFS over nfs
On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-Åke Svensson s...@mbg.se wrote: Hi I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares using zfs nfsshare as it says in the documentation. Then the system use the file /etc/zfs/exports. But I find out that I also can share this directories using the standard /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares in the same place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this way? Anybody know? System is Freebsd 8.1. Best regards Sven-Åke Svensson ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org if you put it in exports zfs cant manage it, therefore the zfs filesystem set command becomes redundent and inoperative, so it doesnt fit in with zfs standard way of doing things. Not really an issue but possibly a little confusing. I know its not necessary the case for bsd yet, but on solaris if you have made the jump to zfs, you have most likely gone for a pure zfs installation, therefore it all hangs together nicely. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: THE SPAM WE GET [stop fretting and read]
On 12/10/10 9:46 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: No, this list does not. As I mentioned yesterday, this is an unmonitored, unnannyed list that accepts emails from addresses without checking authenticity... meaning I can post from 4 emails (and I have) and not be subscribed on each address. Spoofing email addresses has happened for years, and with this list's archives being publicly available online it's been happening for a while and will continue to happen until the rules may or may not be changed. -- Ryan If this discussion is about the same wave of spam I've been getting examples of in the last couple of days, it should be noted that the mail isn't coming via the mailing list at all. Somebody is harvesting e-mail addresses and subject lines from a month or more ago and sending the spam directly. Folks, you have to read the headers if you want to have a sensible discussion about specific instances of spam. If you don't, you're simply sending yet more noise that's kinda sorta pretending to be signal. My personal rule of thumb with spam is to assume that absolutely everything involved is a lie, this leading to a more accurate overall assessment than the naive thought that any of it might possible be true just because of some social contract. After careful analysis, you *might* conclude that a few things actually are true, but that's different than assuming they are. So, Subject: that look like they're from the FreeBSD mailing list: lie. From: address that of somebody you discussed that topic with on the mailing list: lie. Date:: lie. All lies with one goal, to get you to click through on a URL that is *not* (another lie, get it?) in your self-interest to visit. -- --Jon Radel j...@radel.com
Re: What is loading my server so much?
Matthew Seaman wrote: On 09/12/2010 11:31, Laszlo Nagy wrote: Today something happened. Number of http processes went up to 200. As a result, number of connections to database also went up to 200, and the web server is now refusing clients with Cannot connect to database messages (coming from PHP). This is a classic scenario. Some burst of traffic causes your apache to spawn more child processes than will all fit in RAM at one time. Consequently, the system starts to swap. Swapping kills performance. This slows everything down so much that there are always requests waiting for apache to process, so apache will never find any idle children to kill off. Result misery. The answer is to limit the number of child processes apache will spawn. Decide how much of your available RAM you can devote to Apache. Look at top(1) to find the maximum size apache processes grow to. The ratio of those two sizes is the maximum number of apache processes your system can support. Limiting the total number of apache processes sounds counter-intuitive. What happens when you get sufficient traffic that apache maxes out? Web queries will generally be queued up until there's an apache child free to handle them. Generally that will take from a few 10s of milliseconds on up -- although if you're regularly getting into a state where your webserver takes seconds to answer, then it's time to get more beefy hardware. The quintessential first-try for this has historically been to set keepalives to Off. Not a solution, just an interim stop gap. If this makes any discernible improvement (however small) it confirms the situation. What I did was switch to the event mpm and FastCGI. Fewer processes, but each process spawns lots of threads . Each of the threads within a process can reuse the database connection previously established by a different thread. Saves connection create/build-up/tear-down cycles as well as RAM. Then throw libmemcached into the mix, if possible. To properly utilize memcached your PHP has to have some code inserted so it will talk. This sets aside a cached buffer pool of RAM for database connections , similar to the connection pool you would find in use by a Java servlet container such as Tomcat or Resin. If unable to refactor code, in lieu of this you can enable MySQL SQL data cache. Not as effective, but if you get a lot queries which are the same SQL it saves cycles. The amount of YMMV here would depend upon how many queries are repetitive. If each and every query is unique it won't do much. So some fictitious example would be like start with some small number of stand-by processess such as 8,16,32, etc. Each process might have a thousand threads. When this thousand threads is reached Apache opens another process with a thousand more. You would still want to set a max-child/max-thread count along the lines you previously described. However, this approach gets you more headroom at the PHP data access wall of hanging doom. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Make gtk widgets use a larger font
in message 20101209114208.c1...@qroenaqrq.6qbyyneqvnyhc.pbz, wrote
Lars Eighner thusly...
How do I make gtk widgets use larger fonts? I found an old linux
FAQ on this, but it appears to have nothing to do with the way
configuration works on FreeBSD.
In ~/.gtkrc-2.0, I have ...
style default
{
#font=-adobe-new century
schoolbook-medium-r-normal--14-*-*-*-*-*-iso8859-1
#font_name=New Century Schoolbook 12
font_name=Bitstream Vera Sans 10
}
style user-tooltip
{
font_name=Screen 15
}
# 'gtk-font-name' property is needed for damned Firefox 1.5 as
# 'font_name' property alone didn't work, but does for Gimp 2.2.
# Anti-aliased fonts are used though i would love to use
# non-anti-aliased font in order to get New Century Schoolbook 14
# font.
#gtk-font-name = Bitstream Vera Serif 12
#gtk-font-name = New Century Schoolbook 12
gtk-font-name = Bitstream Vera Sans 10
widget * style default
widget *tooltip* style user-tooltip
... and in ~/.gtkrc ...
style default
{
font=-adobe-new century schoolbook-medium-r-normal--18-*-*-*-p-*-iso8859-1
}
style user-tooltip
{
font=-sgi-screen-bold-r-normal--16-*-*-*-*-0-iso8859-1
}
widget * style default
widget *tooltip* style user-tooltip
- parv
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Want sendmail applying aliases to 'cc:' field too
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:12:17 +0300, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
I do use aliases file and I know what is it.
But it looks like not this case.
I want Cc: be rewritten like in aliases file defined in Cc: header,
not only those one that comes in RCPT TO:.
And sendmail does not do it with Cc: field.
Yes, recipient that in Cc: field do receive this mail, all ok in this
way, but I want in MY mail Cc: field been rewritten as it is in
aliases.
I want to see in my mail this email headers
to: u...@domain.com
cc: us...@site2.domain.com
Not this one:
to: u...@site1.domain.com
cc: us...@domain.com
Looked at postfix - same thing, no such feature saw there in documentation.
That's because aliases do not actually 'rewrite' anything. They merely
redirect the message. Have a look at:
FEATURE('masquerade_envelope')
FEATURE(`allmasquerade')
But pay careful attention to the warning about `allmasquerade' in the
docs at `/usr/share/sendmail/cf/README'.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Issues when running Heartbeat on FreeBSD 8.1 RELEASE
Hi folks,
I'm trying to build a failover solution using FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE and Heartbeat
from ports (v2.1.4-10).
I've already configured heartbeat in the two peers, but once I start the daemon
using the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/heartbeat script, either CRM and CIB fail to
start.
I've already found out that the issue is appearing with CIB: when the daemon
runs CIB it doesn't start, but if I run it using some flags, it starts, and
them I'm able to run CRM too.
IE:
heartbeat[12539]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/cib as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12539)
heartbeat[12540]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/attrd as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12540)
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/cib process 12539 exited with return code 2.
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/cib respawning too fast
heartbeat[12541]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 info: Starting
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/crmd as uid 275 gid 275 (pid 12541)
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/attrd process 12540 exited with return code 2.
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/attrd respawning too fast
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 WARN: Managed
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/crmd process 12541 exited with return code 2.
heartbeat[12482]: 2010/12/10_14:22:14 ERROR: Client
/usr/local/lib/heartbeat/crmd respawning too fast
but if I run it from command line
[r...@mrefns09 /usr/ports]# /usr/local/lib/heartbeat/cib -s -VVV
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: main: Retrieval of a per-action CIB:
disabled
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: retrieveCib: Reading cluster
configuration from: /var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml (digest:
/var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml.sig)
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: file2xml: Reading 3538 bytes
from file
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 WARN: validate_cib_digest: No on-disk digest
present
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: update_quorum: CCM quorum: old=(null),
new=false
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: update_counters: Counters updated by
readCibXmlFile
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 notice: readCibXmlFile: Enabling DTD validation
on the existing (sane) configuration
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: startCib: CIB Initialization completed
successfully
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Listening
on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_callback
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Listening
on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_ro
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Listening
on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Listening
on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_rw_syncronous
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 debug: debug3: init_server_ipc_comms: Listening
on: /var/run/heartbeat/crm/cib_ro_syncronous
cib[13338]: 2010/12/10_14:30:49 info: cib_init: Starting cib mainloop
[r...@mrefns09 /usr/local/lib/heartbeat]# /usr/local/lib/heartbeat/crmd -VVV
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug3: main: Enabling coredumps
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
digraph g {
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
size = 30,30
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
graph [
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontsize = 12
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontname = Times-Roman
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontcolor = black
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace: bb
= 0,0,398.922306,478.927856
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
color = black
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace: ]
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
node [
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontsize = 12
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontname = Times-Roman
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontcolor = black
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
shape = ellipse
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
color = black
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace: ]
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
edge [
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2: init_dotfile: actions:trace:
fontsize = 12
crmd[14877]: 2010/12/10_15:14:28 debug: debug2:
Updating 1 single port.
Hi all, I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) -G ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
Hi all, I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) portupgrade --OPTION PORT_NAME -- bEsT rEgArDs| Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem. -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo| In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different. -- Albert Einstein ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
Grant Peel wrote: Hi all, I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make make deinstall make reinstall. Most ports will not munge your config files by this process. Just in case, I always set aside a copy of the relevant .conf file as insurance. This is the manual do it yourself way. Portupgrade and others can accomplish the same. But this is quick and simple for just doing one port. Also don't forget to restart the daemon afterward. :-) -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: mountroot prompt in the middle of updating - can't get past it
On Thu, 9 Dec 2010 11:38:29 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:50, Boris Samorodov b...@ipt.ru wrote: On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 11:49:41 -0800 Kurt Buff wrote: All, I have a Lenovo T61 with a 100g HD that I dual boot with FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64 and Windows XP. How and to which version did you upgrade? FBSD is on ad0s2a, with ad0s2b as swap, and XP on ad0s1a. Yesterday I booted up FBSD, started xfce4, started a terminal session, su'ed to root and did the following - running a generic kernel: # cd /usr/src # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel Then I exited xfce4, did sudo shutdown -r now, and got a mountroot prompt that I now can't get past. I can get to the loader prompt, and lsdev shows the following: cd devices: disk devices: disk0: BIOS drive C: disk0s1: NTFS/HPFS disk0s2a: FFS disk02sb: swap Is it a typo? (seems should be disk0s2b: swap when I use '?' at the mountroot prompt I get: List of GEOM managed disk devices: acd0 Hm, ad0s2a should be listed here. Seems that the new kernel doesn't detect a disk adapter. Your kernel config and may be helpful. BTW, dmesg for both successful and unsuccessful boot may give us some tips too. Loader variables: vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/ad0s2a vfs.root.mountfrom.options=rw I've tried entering the following at the mountroot prompt, with no success: ufs:/dev/ad0s2a That is the right one. ufs:/ad0s2a ufs:ad0s2a ffs:/dev/ad0s2a and several other variations that I've found while googling, but no success anywhere. Does anyone have thoughts on how to remedy this? Just for the last question: Try to load an old kernel. (Type boot /boot/kernel.old at loader prompt.) That worked... I think I'll try the update process again. Anything else you can recommend? -- WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone Internet SP FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
On 10/12/2010 15:26, Grant Peel wrote: Proftpd 1.3.3c portupgrade proftpd 1.3.3c or delete the port from /usr/ports/distfiles, do a portsnap update, portsnap fetch index then make deinstall make install clean ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote: Grant Peel wrote: I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make make deinstall make reinstall. make clean deinstall install is a little safer. But the problem that many people run into is that they haven't updated other installed ports, including infrastructure like the autotools ports that were updated today. So when they try to update a single port, things it depends on are missing or outdated. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
Warren Block wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote: Grant Peel wrote: I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make make deinstall make reinstall. make clean deinstall install is a little safer. But the problem that many people run into is that they haven't updated other installed ports, including infrastructure like the autotools ports that were updated today. So when they try to update a single port, things it depends on are missing or outdated. Excellent point indeed! The autotools fun - a perfect case in point. While you may be able to get away with a simple update some of the time, that is certainly not true all of the time. -Mike ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Runaway ProFTP?
Does anyone have any ideas? On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Dear list, Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my MBP it will connect in the CLI. It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they have to upload large numbers of photos. Thanks, Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Runaway ProFTP?
I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be because no one has tried again yet. Jerry On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Does anyone have any ideas? On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Dear list, Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my MBP it will connect in the CLI. It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they have to upload large numbers of photos. Thanks, Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Updating 1 single port.
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 13:07:00 -0700 (MST) Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Michael Powell wrote: Grant Peel wrote: I suspect I have an issue with Proftpd and need to update it quickly. At Christmas break we will be apdating all ports and src, but for now, I would like to get the latest version of Proftpd up. What is the best / quickest method of getting 1 single port updated? (Proftpd 1.3.3c) Since this is in the ports, refresh your ports tree. Then just cd to /usr/ports/ftp/proftpd and do make make deinstall make reinstall. make clean deinstall install is a little safer. And I would suggest running pkg_create -b, package-name in advance, just in case the install fail and you are left with a deinstalled port. Portupgrade does that automatically. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Runaway ProFTP?
On 11/12/2010 4:47, Jerry Bell wrote: I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be because no one has tried again yet. Jerry yeap, thats correct according to proftpd website news, I upgrade using latest port but still get attacking, I change to pure-ftpd then everything fine -- Thanks Regards, Thomas Wahyudi ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Runaway ProFTP?
- Original Message - From: Jerry Bell je...@nrdx.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be because no one has tried again yet. Jerry On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Does anyone have any ideas? On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Dear list, Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my MBP it will connect in the CLI. It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they have to upload large numbers of photos. Thanks, Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Indeed, this Proftpd 1.3.3a vulnerability is exactly what my post on upgrading a single port is all about. I can say for a fact that the botnets are trying to use the vulnerability and that you are quite correct that the CPU / ZOMBIE processes are exploit related. I just upgraded today and so far so good. \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single port: I must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade failed ... sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able to download the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. -Grant ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Runaway ProFTP?
I have not been able to get portsnap to work at all today. On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Grant Peel wrote: - Original Message - From: Jerry Bell je...@nrdx.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just be because no one has tried again yet. Jerry On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Does anyone have any ideas? On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: Dear list, Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my MBP it will connect in the CLI. It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when they have to upload large numbers of photos. Thanks, Ryan ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org Indeed, this Proftpd 1.3.3a vulnerability is exactly what my post on upgrading a single port is all about. I can say for a fact that the botnets are trying to use the vulnerability and that you are quite correct that the CPU / ZOMBIE processes are exploit related. I just upgraded today and so far so good. \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single port: I must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade failed ... sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able to download the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. -Grant ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
vi/vim questions
This may apply to other systems that can use a vi clone, not just the BSD's. I am looking for an easy way of turning on/off my list of homonyms that I am trying to set up for my :abbreviation list. So, is there a failsafe way of (1) including my ~150 :ab list in vim and turning it on and then (2) turning the vim list off so that, What I-Type-Is-what-I-See [?] In other words, dis-including my list of abbrevs. I tried this with ten or fifteen words last summer in nvi, and it worked very well with my ktts/festival suite. I was able, using my Thinkpad as a testbed, have the computer talk clearly for me. A day or two later I went into C mode for a day or three. After a few hours of enjoying my hacking, I had to stop, remove the :ab words from my ~/.nexrc and continue. For anyone who hasn't read my ideas about this, I am attempting to collect the 130+ most commonly used words and create natural or common sense abbreviations for each word. Obv'ly, this would be unnecessary for people who have no trouble typing accurately and rapidly. I have decided to use vim because is it widely used as the next step in a text editor based on vi, and because it may allow me to simply include a file in ~/vimrc; I'm not sure how far the improvements go. thanks, everybody, gary -- Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org The 7.97a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
umask .ape
1. In my system umask enter 022 I want to know why i do the commander umask -S it show Improper mask not u=rwx,g=. 2. anybody who know how to listen the music like .ape or flac thank you ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
