Re: Problems with the Asus P8h61 -m pro motherboard

2011-07-20 Thread Matevž Markovič
I did check the whole dmesg output, but nothing. I also tried to recompile
the kernel, but I found no acceptable non-included nic drivers, so I just
backed off. Now I have Ubuntu installed, but that does not mean that I am
too happy about it...

The manufacturer of the nic is realtek, by the way...

Matevž
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: How to fix bad superblock on UFS2?

2011-07-20 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Try to use tools/tools/find-sb to locate superblocks.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Problems with the Asus P8h61 -m pro motherboard

2011-07-20 Thread Thomas D. Dean
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 08:24 +0200, Matevž Markovič wrote:
 Asus P8h61 -m pro motherboard

Did you try the re driver?

The chipset is Realtek 8111e.  This is supported by 8-stable, I think.

Did you look at:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-June/062886.html

tomdean

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: high performance open source DHCP solution?

2011-07-20 Thread Anton Yuzhaninov
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 23:26:55 -0300, Rogelio wrote:
R The free DHCP solution, ISC, seems to be having scaling issues (i.e.
R handling only about 200 DHCPDISCOVER and 20 DHCPRENEW requests), and I
R was wondering if anyone had any open source suggestions of solutions
R that could scale much better?

1. May be it is possible to decrease load of DHCP server by increasing
lease time.
If address pool is the limit, adaptive-lease-time-threshold option in ISC dhcpd 
may be
useful.

2. Which dhcpd version is used? According to changelog 4.2 has some
performance improvements.

-- 
 Anton Yuzhaninov

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: How to fix bad superblock on UFS2?

2011-07-20 Thread DA Forsyth
On 20 Jul 2011 , Maxim Konovalov entreated about
 Re: How to fix bad superblock on UFS2?:

 Try to use tools/tools/find-sb to locate superblocks.

Thankyou Maxim
I may yet need to use that on another partition, but last night I 
achieved some success by hacking fsck_ffs to display what it is 
doing.  By doing this I found that it considers the 'first alternate' 
superblock to be the one in the LAST cylinder group.

So, by using dd to copy a working superblock to block 128 and to the 
last one listed by 'newfs -N', fsck_ffs could then actually recover 
some files.  Since I probably broke more things on this partition 
than were broken by the 'disk smoke event', I was not surprised when 
only about half the drives files showed up in lost+found and the 
primary folder is now empty (the whole drive is a Samba share with 
quotas, so I create a folder to share so that users cannot mess with 
the quota.* files).   Not a problem for this partition as I have a 
full level 0 dump.

I now have 2 more partitions to resurrect
both report 'Cannot find file system superblock' though 'newfs -N' 
shows a sensible list of them, so I have hope.

But, further thanks to you for pointing out find-sb, because in 
googling for that I found various other very useful things, including
http://www.chakraborty.ch/tag/raid-filesystem-partition-recovery-ufs-
freebsd/
which at the least, points out things to avoid doing (-:

thanks

--
   DA Fo rsythNetwork Supervisor
Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research
http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/


___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25

2011-07-20 Thread ssgriffonuser

On 07/19/11 09:31, Robert Bonomi wrote:

Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 00:03:58 -0700
From: ssgriffonuserssgriffonu...@gmail.com
Subject: Sendmail not accepting connections on port 25

Hi all,

I'm having difficulty getting sendmail set up on my server.  I can send
and receive to localhost and I can send to external networks but I can
not receive from external networks (I receive a 550: Address rejected).

What does the sendmail LOG FILE show?


Netstat says sendmail is listening on port 25 but I cannot telnet to it.

Netstat just says something has port 25 open on 'any' address -- this may,
or may *not* be the sendmail instance you think is running.  It probably
*IS*, but you need to be sure.


When I do a port scan of the server, nmap does not show anything on port
25 but does show smtp on 587.

May I recommend 'lsof'?

The command-line  lsof -n -P |grep IPv  will show exactly what processes
have have what ports, on what addresses, open.


As far as configuration goes, I added my hostname to
/etc/mail/local-host-names and created a /etc/host/virtusertable that
looks like:

ad...@host.comshane
sh...@host.comshane

then I ran 'make all install restart' .

*Unless* you modified the .mc  file, I believe 'virtusertable' should be in
/etc/mail, not /etc/host.

what does 'grep Kvirtuser /etc/mail/sendmail.cf' show?

Lastly, you need to run 'makemap hash virtusertable' in the directory where
the virtusertable file lives.


First of all, thanks everybody for the help and suggestions.  Let me 
just clarify that the problem is: I cannot submit mail to my sendmail 
server (i.e sending mail from gmail to my server).  Answers to the 
questions that were presented are below.


*sendmail_enable and sendmail_submit_enable are set to YES in my rc.conf.

*ISP is not blocking port 25.

*The sendmail log file doesn't show anything useful which makes me 
believe that the connections are not getting to sendmail.


*lsof shows that sendmail is listening on port 25.

*The virtusertable file is in /etc/mail and not /etc/host. That was a typo.

*'grep Kvirtuser /etc/mail/sendmail.cf': Kvirtuser hash -o 
/etc/mail/virtusertable


*The correct files (i.e access.db, virtusertable.db, aliases.db and 
sendmail.cf) are being generated before sendmail is started.


*I noticed the following line in /etc/defaults/rc.conf:
sendmail_submit_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m 
-ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=localhost # Flags for localhost-only MTA


That line seems to describe the problem I am having, however when I move 
that line to /etc/rc.conf and change the address from localhost to 
gatanova.com I still can't telnet in from an external network.  Some 
relevant files are shown below:


/etc/rc.conf:

hostname=gatanova.com
ifconfig_re0=DHCP
apache22_enable=YES
apache22_http_accept_enable=YES
mysql_enable=YES
sendmail_enable=YES
sendmail_submit_enable=YES
sendmail_submit_flags=-L sm-mta -bd -q30m 
-ODaemonPortOptions=Addr=gatanova.com


/etc/hosts:

::1 localhost localhost.gatanova.com
127.0.0.1   localhost localhost.gatanova.com
10.12.32.90 rootbsdinternal


/etc/mail/local-host-names:

gatanova.com
gatanova


/etc/mail/virtusertable:

ad...@gatanova.com  shane
sh...@gatanova.com  shane
@gatanova.com   shane

/etc/mail/access:

#Empty, everything is commented out



Sorry for the long winded email, I wanted to make sure that enough 
information was available.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: printer - broadband router

2011-07-20 Thread Franci Nabalanci
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.


On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:

 On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, ajtiM wrote:

  My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
 CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
 I have an old broadband router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my
 computer
 with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
 I got HP bussiness inkjet 5000 which was connected to the network (my
 work).
 And the last one: I never had printer on my computer with FreeBSD and
 looks
 like is not so easy to setup.

 I just run HP Device Manager and it didn't find anything but light where
 is
 printer connected blink.


 Setting up printers on FreeBSD generally isn't that hard.  Difficulties
 come from cheap printers that have oddball page description languages or
 host-based printers which expect bitmaps only, and in a specific format.
  Some of these printers require a firmware download before they can do
 anything.

 openprinting.org doesn't list a Business Inkjet 5000, so I can't tell what
 PDLs it understands.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread Michael W. Lucas
Hi,

I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel.  When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing. 

It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
that.

As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried disabling TSO. No
change.

Anyone else experiencing this, or have any suggestions? At the moment,
the boss is complaining that his Windows Home Server is doing better
than this machine, and that's a technological direction I really don't
want to go in.

Thanks,
==ml

-- 
Michael W. Lucas
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/
Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread Eduardo Morras

At 18:04 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:

Hi,

I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel.  When using FTP
or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
network, no errors showing.

It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
that.


Don't know about that, but perhaps the nic is not working at full gigabit.

Can you post the output of ifconfig?

#ifconfig em0

If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can force 
it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the cable.



As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried disabling TSO. No
change.

Anyone else experiencing this, or have any suggestions? At the moment,
the boss is complaining that his Windows Home Server is doing better
than this machine, and that's a technological direction I really don't
want to go in.

Thanks,
==ml



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x

Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution 
to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.

Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I have
successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including, IMP app
for an IMAP mail service.

The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may be
able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni (WU)
Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.

I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a couple
designated as admins.

If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
login as I assUme?

Thanks for any ideas

(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone

System Admin
Sage-american
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: How to add sio to 8.2 ?

2011-07-20 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com writes:

 I've come to the conclusion that I need sio to be able to use 8.x.

 Can it be as simple as just dropping the code from 7.x into the source
 for 8.x and adding a line to the kernel configuration?

 Or would this be fraught with all kinds of deep traps?

It might work, but it would certainly be bad for performance on
multiprocessor systems.  I think the Giant lock is still around, 
just not used.  If it's actually been excised from the code, then
you have no chance at all.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: printer - broadband router

2011-07-20 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:


I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.


That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript.  Make sure it has 
DNS.  Entries in /etc/hosts should be adequate.  Set it with a fixed IP 
address or through DHCP.


The rest is CUPS, which I don't use.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Why not add ZFS support on bsdinstaller? (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/RELEASE)

2011-07-20 Thread Alvaro Castillo
The question... or maybe I'm wrong and will be included.

Greets!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread David Jackson
I do not believe that these phones or tablets will replace desktop but there
is a lot of room for these two types of devices basically to communicate,
giving people access to their data and environment from both. The reason I
dont see the desktop going anywhere is that, basically people dont want to
work on a spreadsheet, play a game, write a letter or do many other things
on a 3 screen. Students wont want to use them to do their reports, etc.
Phones and tablets are handy when on the go due to the portability, but
their portability makes them impractical for use at home when a larger
screen is more desirable. The growth of tablets is due to there simply not
being the market there before and more people buying them for mobile use.
But desktops will remain popular for home and work use. Also users want
upgradeability, they dont want to be stuck with the same amount of hard disk
space and may want to add a new camera to the system, a capture device,
scanner, etc. Desktop systems provide much more upgrade flexibility. Linking
the desktop to the tablet will be an important thing so people can access
data and so on from their tablet.

Problems with Linux and BSD user share relate to the lack of useability.

One of the useability issues relates to hardware driver issues. I am
convinced the only way to make Linux or BSD user friendly is to acknowledge
that we need to make it so that 3rd party hardware provider drivers can be
used easily on these operating systems and there is backwards compatability,
allowing the drivers  for an older version of the kernel to be continued to
be used. Its not that I love the idea of 3rd party binary drivers, but that
by putting up with the necessary evil we can greatly increase usage of BSD
by greatly improving hardware compatability by getting hardware vendors to
write drivers for their hardware. This of course still means open source
drivers can be developed and then used instead of the hardware provider
drivers, however, the hardware provider drivers would be avialable for many
devices where open source drivers may not be available for months or years,
if ever. Increasing available of hardware drivers for FreeBSD will also mean
increasing numbers of FreeBSD/PCBSD users and that would mean more potential
sources of donations, which could be requested by a pop up after
installation.

It is clear that hardware companies can provide hardware drivers more
quickly and better tested and implemented for the hardware than kernel
developers can. For instance, they can port their Windows drivers.  People
do not want to wait years for their hardware to be supported or having to
not be able to use many kinds of hardware just so they can use BSD or LInux.
People want to use hardware, and also they do not want a huge hassle with
getting hardware to work. Basically users need to be able to plug in the
device, throw the CD in the drive, and the hardware driver  should install
itself and work. Users are not going to use an OS that wont support hardware
when Windows will. They are not going to wait months when hardware will work
on windows right away. They wont give up on being able to use some hardware
because it wont work on BSD, they will just use Windows.

Hardware companies are not going to always provide open source drivers, but
are willng to provide binary ones. And as well, Hardware companies need to
have a well documented API, so they dont have to spend months trying to
figure an undocumented API in the BSD kernel to figure out how to write a
driver,  and a stable ABI so they can release one copy of the driver and
have it continue to work with many different versions of the kernel well
into the future. The User may buy a printer that has a driver CD in it, this
may be sitting on a store shelf for months or a year, and as well, the user
may need to use this CD for years down the road to use their printer. The OS
needs to support that binary driver for years following.

We need hardware manufacturers to develop drivers and support their own
drivers. The case with drivers developed by BSD people is the drivers may
take months to appear, or for lesser known or more exotic software, might
not be available ever. By putting up with a few pieces of binary 3rd party
driver modules the deployment and popularity of BSD can be increased as it
will begin to be useable with far more hardware.

I think the hardware support problem is really the stumbling block now.
Hardware support has to be avialable for hardware immediately. Users having
a BSD OS install process bomb because their hardware is not supported is not
acceptable, things have to work out of the box.

Here BSD has advantages over Linux. There is no legal question that binary
drivers can be used with BSD, there is no legal ambiguity here. BSD does
have a potential really to compete with Windows for hardware support.
provided, we make it easy for companies to develop drivers by providing for
good documentation and facilities for quick, rapid 

Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread Daniel Staal

On Wed, July 20, 2011 1:52 pm, David Jackson wrote:
 I do not believe that these phones or tablets will replace desktop but
 there
 is a lot of room for these two types of devices basically to communicate,
 giving people access to their data and environment from both. The reason I
 dont see the desktop going anywhere is that, basically people dont want to
 work on a spreadsheet, play a game, write a letter or do many other things
 on a 3 screen. Students wont want to use them to do their reports, etc.
 Phones and tablets are handy when on the go due to the portability, but
 their portability makes them impractical for use at home when a larger
 screen is more desirable. The growth of tablets is due to there simply not
 being the market there before and more people buying them for mobile use.
 But desktops will remain popular for home and work use. Also users want
 upgradeability, they dont want to be stuck with the same amount of hard
 disk
 space and may want to add a new camera to the system, a capture device,
 scanner, etc. Desktop systems provide much more upgrade flexibility.
 Linking
 the desktop to the tablet will be an important thing so people can access
 data and so on from their tablet.

I'll disagree, somewhat: I know several people who are using a tablet as a
desktop-replacement laptop.  They have a Bluetooth keyboard, and can use
the tablet as a full computer or not.

Most *consumers,* in my experience, also don't typically care about
upgradablity.  Either the machine works when they get it, or it doesn't
(which is a warranty issue), and after that if it breaks in few years,
well, time to get a new one.  A few will add RAM or a HD when they get it,
but that's about it.  Other additions, if any, are done as USB/Bluetooth,
etc, and can be done on a tablet just as easily as a desktop.

As for binary drivers...  They work ok *if* and *while* the company wants
to support the hardware/OS.  Once they decide they don't want to, that's
it.  This tends to cause problems down the road.  Also, they may do no
more than the minimum necessary to support a certain version of the OS,
unless that OS is a major source for their customers.  So while they *can*
make better drivers than the core team, they often *don't.*

Best is an open driver by the manufacturer.  Second is open docs, third is
binary blob.  My opinion.

Daniel T. Staal

---
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Tools to find unlegal files ( videos , music etc )

2011-07-20 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
 Obviously, it is _not_ unlawful to 'even open' a file that is 'labelled as
 private'.

 Herr Ghost subsequently clarified that he meant 'opened by a person' -- which,
 if _that_ is an accurate description of the law in question,  means that a
 purely mechanical process, such as a loop running file(1) on all files, and
 logging a filtered subset of that output would _not_ qualify as 'opening'
 under the law, either.

That's Frau Ghost, if you please.

Look, the problem isn't running some analyzer on the files,
it's the subsequent evaluation and interpretation of its
output by a human operator. That's the exact point in time
where the law applies (the law doesn't care about apparatus,
it cares about human behavior).

Over here, you can run as many filters on the files in an
automated fashion, but that won't do you any good when
you're not allowed to interpret the results (or even to merely
*look* at them), and *act* accordingly.

 To wit: If you're building on _my_ property, I _do_ have the right to demand
 proof that you are doing it 'legally'.

Please acknowledge that different jurisdictions also do
have different philosophies... and especially different
priorities w.r.t. the rights they are supposed to uphold.

If I understand what you're saying, it means that in your place,
private property rights rank higher than privacy protection
obligations. That's okay, and not something to criticize, but it's
not the case everywhere else in the world.

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: printer - broadband router

2011-07-20 Thread Polytropon
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
 On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
 
  I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
 
 That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript.  Make sure it has 
 DNS.  Entries in /etc/hosts should be adequate.  Set it with a fixed IP 
 address or through DHCP.
 
 The rest is CUPS, which I don't use.

You don't even have to use CUPS. PS is the default
output for printing of _any_ application. In worst
case, use gs as a simple filter that outputs PCL.
Entry in /etc/printcap  done. (But also CUPS can
generate PCL and direct it to a printer name that
refers to the IP of the printer.)


-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Duane Hill
Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 12:47:33 PM, Jack wrote:

 Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x

 Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
 google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution 
 to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.

 Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I have
 successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including, IMP app
 for an IMAP mail service.

 The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
 the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
 my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
 for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
 MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may be
 able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni (WU)
 Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.

 I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
 cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
 fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a couple
 designated as admins.

 If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
 would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
 login as I assUme?

 Thanks for any ideas

Installed fine via ports from /usr/ports/mail/horde4-webmail/
FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2, MySQL 5.1.58, Postfix v2.8.3

It took less than 15 minutes to have it configured and running.

-- 
Best regards,
 Duanemailto:du...@duanemail.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Tools to find unlegal files ( videos , music etc )

2011-07-20 Thread C. P. Ghost
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
  For example, if it is part of the _terms_of_emplyment_ -- which one
  *agreed* to, by going to work there --that you (the employeee) give
  permission for the company, or it's agents, to examine any file you
  store on the system.

 It depends on the jurisdiction. For example, in Germany, you as an
 employee CAN'T waive some basic rights by law, and every waiver you've
 signed with your employer is automatically null and void, at least the
 provisions that affect those specific rights.

 Do you mean to suggest that an employee _cannot_ give permission to *anyone*
 (whether it is the employer, or just a friend) to look at any file that is
 categorized as 'private' ??

 If they can give permission for 'someone' to look at a particular file,
 what prevents them from giving that someone permission to look at _every_
 such file?

We're getting to the point where only lawyers should give
binding advice, according to a particular jurisdiction, so I
obviously won't offer any such advice here.

The point though, is /roughly/ this: yes, an individual CAN give
permission for others to inspect his/her files (usually in his
presence). BUT a company CANNOT require or compel the
user to give this permission as a prerequisite for entering an
agreement. Or, in other words, a company couldn't simply state
in their TOS: user is giving permission to company to inspect
all files he stores in his private area. Such a language would
be null and void under most circumstance. That is at least the
situation here.

 Again, jurisdictions vary widely. We here in Europe are at the farthest
 spectrum in terms of privacy protection of workers (students etc..) in
 the workplace (school etc...).

 Educational institutions here _are_ subject to somewhat differnet rules
 than corporates.

True, most (i.e. all but a very few private Universities) are public
institutions
here. We're effectively and de jure part of the State infrastructure, and as
such subject to a different set of rules. However, privacy protection applies
just as much to corporations, if not even more so.

Or, to sum up this thread (if you please): original poster, and every other
sysadmin and IT head should check with their lawyer(s) before even
considering or attempting to invade their users' privacy for whatever reason.
The slippery when wet warning applies.

-cpghost.

-- 
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Why not add ZFS support on bsdinstaller? (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/RELEASE)

2011-07-20 Thread krad
use pcbsd installer or mfsbsd

On 20 July 2011 18:55, Alvaro Castillo gobl...@gmail.com wrote:

 The question... or maybe I'm wrong and will be included.

 Greets!
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Duane Hill
Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 1:45:57 PM, I wrote:

 Wednesday, July 20, 2011, 12:47:33 PM, Jack wrote:

 Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x

 Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
 google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution 
 to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.

 Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I have
 successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including, IMP app
 for an IMAP mail service.

 The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
 the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
 my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
 for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
 MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may be
 able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni (WU)
 Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.

 I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
 cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
 fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a couple
 designated as admins.

 If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
 would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
 login as I assUme?

 Thanks for any ideas

 Installed fine via ports from /usr/ports/mail/horde4-webmail/
 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2, MySQL 5.1.58, Postfix v2.8.3

 It took less than 15 minutes to have it configured and running.

Forgot to mention I am using Dovecot v2.0.13.

-- 
Best regards,
 Duanemailto:du...@duanemail.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Why not add ZFS support on bsdinstaller? (FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT/RELEASE)

2011-07-20 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Alvaro == Alvaro Castillo gobl...@gmail.com writes:

Alvaro The question... or maybe I'm wrong and will be included.

There *is* ZFS support in the PC-BSD 8.2 installer.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Tools to find unlegal files ( videos , music etc )

2011-07-20 Thread krad



 You cannot generate a hash without at a certain automated level opening the
 file.  If you can do that, couldn't you generate a hash of the first four
 bytes to match with hashes of known magic numbers? If you can look at the
 whole file, surely you can look at just the first four bytes.


not true these days. If you run zfs (or probably btrfs, yuk) you can just
pull the file hashes used by the fs (zdb). Therefore your not actually
reading the file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread Michael W. Lucas
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 07:12:27PM +0200, Eduardo Morras wrote:
 At 18:04 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel.  When using FTP
 or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
 network, no errors showing.
 
 It looks a lot like kern/152828, but it seems that nobody's looking at
 that.
 
 Don't know about that, but perhaps the nic is not working at full gigabit.
 
 Can you post the output of ifconfig?
 
 #ifconfig em0
 

It's at gigabit:

em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

options=219bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC
ether 00:15:17:31:c8:fe
inet xxx
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
status: active

Thanks, 
==ml


 If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can force 
 it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the cable.
 
 As per suggestions from the archives, I've tried disabling TSO. No
 change.
 
 Anyone else experiencing this, or have any suggestions? At the moment,
 the boss is complaining that his Windows Home Server is doing better
 than this machine, and that's a technological direction I really don't
 want to go in.
 
 Thanks,
 ==ml
 

-- 
Michael W. Lucas
http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/
Latest book: Network Flow Analysis http://www.networkflowanalysis.com/
mwlu...@blackhelicopters.org, Twitter @mwlauthor
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Wednesday 20 July 2011 09:47:33 Jack L. Stone wrote:
 Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x
 
 Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
 google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution
 to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.
 
 Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I have
 successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including, IMP app
 for an IMAP mail service.

All of the horde4 ports including webmail and groupware have been rewritten 
and comitted. AFAIK everything is working properly. You may be missing some 
libs or modules, so I would suggest a reinstall.

 
 The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
 the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
 my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
 for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
 MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may be
 able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni (WU)
 Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.
 
 I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
 cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
 fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a couple
 designated as admins.
 
 If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
 would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
 login as I assUme?

Not necessarily. It all depends on your auth backend configs for both horde 
and the apps. If you're using IMAP auth, you should be able to login to imp as 
any regular user on the mail account. It's common to use IMAP auth as your 
general auth backend, that way your users will end up in the right account. 
You also need either SASL auth or Dovecot auth setup along with your auth 
backend. IMAP SSL is required, imp will NOT work with IMAP plain login unless 
you hack the configs by hand (bad idea).

Finally, uncheck the disable horde test script box on the main horde configs 
under the general tab, save your configs and navigate to horde/test.php, there 
is a section near the bottom for testing your IMAP login. If that isn't 
successful, you're not going to get much further. If the option doesn't exist 
at all, you don't have all the modules you need. It will also give you an idea 
about the state of everything else.

Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction :-)

Beech


-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread Eduardo Morras

At 21:16 20/07/2011, Michael W. Lucas wrote:


It's at gigabit:

em0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500

options=219bRXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4,WOL_MAGIC
ether 00:15:17:31:c8:fe
inet xxx
media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex)
status: active


All seems to be ok, try a netstat -I em0 -d  (it's a capital 'i') to 
get statistics. If too much packets are dropped recheck cables.


Other options:

a) 30 MB/s looks very strange, do you have pf or similar with a filter rule?
b) Have you checked your disk i/o performance?
c) If you generate the data dinamically, may be your producer app is 
the problem.


About the em specific problem under 8.2 you cite, others can guide 
better than me.


HTH


Thanks,
==ml



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Wednesday 20 July 2011 11:22:44 Beech Rintoul wrote:
 On Wednesday 20 July 2011 09:47:33 Jack L. Stone wrote:
  Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x
  
  Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
  google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution
  to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.
  
  Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I
  have successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including,
  IMP app for an IMAP mail service.
 
 All of the horde4 ports including webmail and groupware have been rewritten
 and comitted. AFAIK everything is working properly. You may be missing some
 libs or modules, so I would suggest a reinstall.
 
  The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
  the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
  my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
  for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
  MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may
  be able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni
  (WU) Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.
  
  I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
  cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
  fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a
  couple designated as admins.
  
  If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
  would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
  login as I assUme?
 
 Not necessarily. It all depends on your auth backend configs for both horde
 and the apps. If you're using IMAP auth, you should be able to login to imp
 as any regular user on the mail account. It's common to use IMAP auth as
 your general auth backend, that way your users will end up in the right
 account. You also need either SASL auth or Dovecot auth setup along with
 your auth backend. IMAP SSL is required, imp will NOT work with IMAP plain
 login unless you hack the configs by hand (bad idea).
 
 Finally, uncheck the disable horde test script box on the main horde
 configs under the general tab, save your configs and navigate to
 horde/test.php, there is a section near the bottom for testing your IMAP
 login. If that isn't successful, you're not going to get much further. If
 the option doesn't exist at all, you don't have all the modules you need.
 It will also give you an idea about the state of everything else.
 
 Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction :-)
 
 Beech

I forgot to say use SASL or Dovecot auth if you also want to access and 
remotely use your sendmail system outside of your horde portal. Horde imp 
shouldn't have any problems out of the box if your IMAP is otherwise working 
properly.

Beech
-- 
---
Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - be...@freebsd.org
/\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  | FreeBSD Since 4.x
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech
/ \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/8.2R/announce.html
---



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Jack L. Stone
At 11:38 AM 7/20/2011 -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 20 July 2011 11:22:44 Beech Rintoul wrote:
 On Wednesday 20 July 2011 09:47:33 Jack L. Stone wrote:
  Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x
  
  Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
  google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution
  to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.
  
  Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I
  have successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including,
  IMP app for an IMAP mail service.
 
 All of the horde4 ports including webmail and groupware have been rewritten
 and comitted. AFAIK everything is working properly. You may be missing some
 libs or modules, so I would suggest a reinstall.
 
  The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
  the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
  my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
  for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
  MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may
  be able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni
  (WU) Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.
  
  I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
  cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
  fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a
  couple designated as admins.
  
  If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
  would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
  login as I assUme?
 
 Not necessarily. It all depends on your auth backend configs for both horde
 and the apps. If you're using IMAP auth, you should be able to login to imp
 as any regular user on the mail account. It's common to use IMAP auth as
 your general auth backend, that way your users will end up in the right
 account. You also need either SASL auth or Dovecot auth setup along with
 your auth backend. IMAP SSL is required, imp will NOT work with IMAP plain
 login unless you hack the configs by hand (bad idea).
 
 Finally, uncheck the disable horde test script box on the main horde
 configs under the general tab, save your configs and navigate to
 horde/test.php, there is a section near the bottom for testing your IMAP
 login. If that isn't successful, you're not going to get much further. If
 the option doesn't exist at all, you don't have all the modules you need.
 It will also give you an idea about the state of everything else.
 
 Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction :-)
 
 Beech

I forgot to say use SASL or Dovecot auth if you also want to access and 
remotely use your sendmail system outside of your horde portal. Horde imp 
shouldn't have any problems out of the box if your IMAP is otherwise working 
properly.

Beech
-- 

Good help!

Should I use Dovecot or Dovecot2 ??

Jack

(^_^)
Happy trails,
Jack L. Stone

System Admin
Sage-american
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore

2011-07-20 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:55:29AM -0400, Jerry wrote:
 On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:21:31 -0600
 Chad Perrin articulated:
 
  This is where we find a dividing line between users who want different
  things.  Yes, you turn on your Win7 laptop (or wake it up) in a coffee
  shop, and it connects automagically -- in fact, you probably don't
  even realize it has connected.  Hopefully it connected to the coffee
  shop's network, and not one of those occasional skimming networks that
  masquerade as coffe shop networks and exist to harvest login data and
  the like.  The dividing line between two schools of thought on the
  matter in this example should be obvious.
 
 You do realize that all of that is configurable; ie, auto connect,
 preferred network, etcetera. If you have not taken the time to read the
 documentation and properly configure the wireless app correctly then
 why bitch? I am not implying that it is perfect; however, given the
 grave limitations that FreeBSD places on wireless connections;
 specifically lack of drivers, and the inordinate amount of manual
 intervention to accomplish what Microsoft and other OSs, (does the name
 Ubuntu sound familiar) have achieved, it is readily apparent that the
 FreeBSD implementation is trailing the pack.

If you turn off the automation that connects you to networks you do not
want, you turn off the advantage you suggest FreeBSD needs.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpIjoR9Hoiqg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 7/20/2011 12:04 PM, Michael W. Lucas wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm running FreeNAS 8.0/amd64, with an 8.2-p1 kernel.  When using FTP
 or SCP, performance maxes out around 30MB/s. This is on a gigabit
 network, no errors showing. 

what does
sysctl -a dev.em

show ?

What kind of switch is the box plugged into ? Can you show the output of
the switch interface showing how its connected e.g. flow control,
duplex, interface counters etc.

---Mike

-- 
---
Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications, m...@sentex.net
Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore

2011-07-20 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 12:03:56PM -0600, Sam George wrote:
 
 Having come to BSD from Linux less than a month ago, I find it 
 interesting that the very thing, which Mr. Pottering is encouraging in 
 Linux development, is what has lead me to search for other options 
 besides Linux.  Of late Linux has been loosing the 'plays well with 
 others award'.  First they cut the .AppleDouble support from the 
 appletalk drivers, then they refused to let the ReiserFS code into the 
 kernel, and I suppose their lack of implementing ZFS is possibly same 
 motivation (given that they _do_ have the man power to port the code).

Actually, as I understand it, the reason the Linux community has had
trouble integrating ZFS is licensing.  That's a major downside of
copyleft licensing: most copyleft licenses (GPL, CDDL, et cetera) are
mutually incompatible.  Because the FreeBSD kernel is BSD licensed, and
the Linux kernel is GPLed, it is easier to get ZFS working legally with
the BSD kernel in a distributable form than with the Linux kernel.

I'm a little iffy on the details, though.  I have not looked into the
matter in any depth, and may have misstated myself a bit.


 
 If Kerningham and Richie were focused on staying 'professionally 
 relevant' UNIX would never have /existed/, and as its decedents, neither 
 would have BSD or Linux.  Is BSD relevant?  Looks like it's /essential/ 
 given the context of the question.

In general, I think you make good points, and like this wrap-up of yours.
I just wanted to point out a little-recognized detail of the benefit of
BSD Unix systems over GPLed systems, once you (sorta inadvertently)
brought up one of the effects of that difference.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpEN2KjrKINz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread David Jackson
upgradability is not just about about ram and hard drives. But i would beg
to differ that people dont want to add hard drives considering how fast they
can be filled with movies, or they wouldnt want to use their old hard drives
on a newer system considering how much data is on the older hard drive.

but you also have scanners, cameras, joysticks, capture devices for video,
and so on that many common users love to use. A lot of people use computers
for writing, home and office business work, and gaming, and given the choice
between a 3 screen and a 20 screen, you want a 20 screen. Even facebook
is better on a 20 screen.

I stand by what i said, mobile is great for use on a subway, but when you
get home, you really want a nice 20 screen to work on, and the bigger hard
drive and faster CPU.

I do want FreeBSD on both my handheld and the desktop. Now, notice its very
difficult to near impossible to change the operating system on handhelds.
Thats one reason I dont like most handhelds made today. They are designed to
control you.

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:


 On Wed, July 20, 2011 1:52 pm, David Jackson wrote:
  I do not believe that these phones or tablets will replace desktop but
  there
  is a lot of room for these two types of devices basically to communicate,
  giving people access to their data and environment from both. The reason
 I
  dont see the desktop going anywhere is that, basically people dont want
 to
  work on a spreadsheet, play a game, write a letter or do many other
 things
  on a 3 screen. Students wont want to use them to do their reports, etc.
  Phones and tablets are handy when on the go due to the portability, but
  their portability makes them impractical for use at home when a larger
  screen is more desirable. The growth of tablets is due to there simply
 not
  being the market there before and more people buying them for mobile use.
  But desktops will remain popular for home and work use. Also users want
  upgradeability, they dont want to be stuck with the same amount of hard
  disk
  space and may want to add a new camera to the system, a capture device,
  scanner, etc. Desktop systems provide much more upgrade flexibility.
  Linking
  the desktop to the tablet will be an important thing so people can access
  data and so on from their tablet.

 I'll disagree, somewhat: I know several people who are using a tablet as a
 desktop-replacement laptop.  They have a Bluetooth keyboard, and can use
 the tablet as a full computer or not.

 Most *consumers,* in my experience, also don't typically care about
 upgradablity.  Either the machine works when they get it, or it doesn't
 (which is a warranty issue), and after that if it breaks in few years,
 well, time to get a new one.  A few will add RAM or a HD when they get it,
 but that's about it.  Other additions, if any, are done as USB/Bluetooth,
 etc, and can be done on a tablet just as easily as a desktop.

 As for binary drivers...  They work ok *if* and *while* the company wants
 to support the hardware/OS.  Once they decide they don't want to, that's
 it.  This tends to cause problems down the road.  Also, they may do no
 more than the minimum necessary to support a certain version of the OS,
 unless that OS is a major source for their customers.  So while they *can*
 make better drivers than the core team, they often *don't.*

 Best is an open driver by the manufacturer.  Second is open docs, third is
 binary blob.  My opinion.

 Daniel T. Staal

 ---
 This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
 are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
 the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
 expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
 whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
 local copyright law.
 ---

 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
 To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:45 PM, David Jackson djackson...@gmail.comwrote:

 I stand by what i said, mobile is great for use on a subway, but when you
 get home, you really want a nice 20 screen to work on, and the bigger hard
 drive and faster CPU.


While I agree with your points, can please stop top posting?  It's difficult
to follow and violates list convention.

Thanks,

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Lennart Poettering: BSD Isn't Relevant Anymore

2011-07-20 Thread Jerry
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:29:41 -0600
Chad Perrin articulated:

 If you turn off the automation that connects you to networks you do
 not want, you turn off the advantage you suggest FreeBSD needs.

Maybe its a language thing; however, I am not comprehending what you
are trying got say.

You would, or at least I would, limit the networks I want to
automatically connect to. That can be as few as one, or none if you
simply disable it entirely.

FreeBSD suffers from unneeded user intervention in order to configure
the device, assuming (and that is a large assumption) that a driver
is available for said device. In the case of N protocol devices, the
chances of one being available ate moot to none.

-- 
Jerry ✌
jerry+f...@seibercom.net

Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or ignored.
Do not CC this poster. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header.

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread Gary Gatten
snip

Regarding drivers / hardware support...

I'm not a huge fan of abstraction layers, in fact I hate them, BUT - does there 
exist or could an AL (HAL) be developed to hide the OS from the driver so 
hardware manufacturers can more easily write drivers?  For example, can a HAL 
be developed that runs on BSD that emulates Winblow$ such that any driver 
written for Winblow$ will work on *BSD?  Granted it may not be as efficient 
as a native driver but perhaps it would have these benefits:

1.) Would work good enough for most people in most circumstances.  Perhaps 
it's slightly slower (insert metric of choice) than a native driver, but all 
but the most demanding users (top 10%?) won't care.  The most demanding users 
will probably take the time / effort to acquire supported hardware and have the 
technical skills to accomplish what they need to.

2.) Would give BSD developers a starting place for reverse engineering / 
engineering a native driver.  Instead of making the hardware people write 
drivers for BSD, they write for Winblow$ - but provide the source?  The *BSD 
dudes (dudettes) can take that and tweak as necessary.  The hope is no one 
would have to do 100% of the work, especially reverse engineering without much 
doc / etc - that must suck!

Something in the back of my head says there was / is something along this line 
already available or in the works, but I can't recall for sure.

Anyway...  I think someone else mentioned dividing up the donations such that 
one could select which development area receives ones funds.  I think this 
would be a good idea...  If I'm more interested in ZFS than wireless NIC 
drivers - I can contribute to the filesystem/ZFS area.  Perhaps this would also 
yield more donations - if one feels there funds will be going to support their 
specific needs...

G










font size=1
div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'
/div
This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system.
/font

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread Subbsd
Hi

On 7/19/11, Konrad Heuer kheu...@gwdg.de wrote:
 To my mind we'll have to face a rapid
 change within the next years, and operating systems of the future might be
 Android or IOS or Windows Mobile or something similar which my base on
 Linux or BSD but are something different.

For 2020 year here is nice sugesstions make HTML5/JS based DE for
FreeBSD and Co:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=141286#post141286 ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Horde-4

2011-07-20 Thread Per olof Ljungmark

On 07/20/11 22:07, Jack L. Stone wrote:

At 11:38 AM 7/20/2011 -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:

On Wednesday 20 July 2011 11:22:44 Beech Rintoul wrote:

On Wednesday 20 July 2011 09:47:33 Jack L. Stone wrote:

Am running FBSD-7.x and IMAP WU + sendmail-8.4.x + MySQL-5.0.x

Sorry to bother the list with this but have searched and read everything
google  horde.org has to offer but I find no solution
to an important issue I'm having with the installation of horde4.

Although the port maintainer won't have the broken port for horde4, I
have successfully installed Horde4 plus several common apps including,
IMP app for an IMAP mail service.


All of the horde4 ports including webmail and groupware have been rewritten
and comitted. AFAIK everything is working properly. You may be missing some
libs or modules, so I would suggest a reinstall.


The problem is while I have a good install with the Horde4 base frame and
the apps, I can login to HORDE just fine, but when going to the IMAP app,
my login fails. From what I understand, the same Horde login should work
for the IMP. Reading the login scripts indicates that as well. I'm using
MySQL (SQL) as the backend for everything that needs a backend so I may
be able to handle a large number of users. I've installed Washington Uni
(WU) Imap server and it's listening on the expected port 143.

I've worked on this issue over days and weeks, including reinstalls but
cannot login to IMP for the mail services. In Horde, I can add users just
fine and they appear in the MySQL horde database properly. I have a
couple designated as admins.

If anyone on this list uses horde and maybe knows what I have missed I
would appreciate any possible tips to check on. Does IMP not use the same
login as I assUme?


Not necessarily. It all depends on your auth backend configs for both horde
and the apps. If you're using IMAP auth, you should be able to login to imp
as any regular user on the mail account. It's common to use IMAP auth as
your general auth backend, that way your users will end up in the right
account. You also need either SASL auth or Dovecot auth setup along with
your auth backend. IMAP SSL is required, imp will NOT work with IMAP plain
login unless you hack the configs by hand (bad idea).

Finally, uncheck the disable horde test script box on the main horde
configs under the general tab, save your configs and navigate to
horde/test.php, there is a section near the bottom for testing your IMAP
login. If that isn't successful, you're not going to get much further. If
the option doesn't exist at all, you don't have all the modules you need.
It will also give you an idea about the state of everything else.

Hope this gets you pointed in the right direction :-)

Beech


I forgot to say use SASL or Dovecot auth if you also want to access and
remotely use your sendmail system outside of your horde portal. Horde imp
shouldn't have any problems out of the box if your IMAP is otherwise working
properly.

Beech
--


Good help!

Should I use Dovecot or Dovecot2 ??



We're using Cyrus-IMAP so I cannot help you with that, but did you 
configure your imapserver in

/usr/local/www/horde4/imp/config/backends.php ?

Specifically the line
'hordeauth' =

This file itself has a lot of useful information on imap settings.
I assume you checked the imap server log files?

While on the Horde4 subject, we are running a test installation and find 
the perfermance of H4 to be considerably slower the its predecessor.


Did anyone here experience this?

Thanks,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread Daniel Staal
--As of July 20, 2011 5:45:49 PM -0400, David Jackson is alleged to have 
said:



but you also have scanners, cameras, joysticks, capture devices for video,
and so on that many common users love to use. A lot of people use
computers for writing, home and office business work, and gaming, and
given the choice between a 3 screen and a 20 screen, you want a 20
screen. Even facebook is better on a 20 screen.

I stand by what i said, mobile is great for use on a subway, but when you
get home, you really want a nice 20 screen to work on, and the bigger
hard drive and faster CPU.


--As for the rest, it is mine.

*All* of which can be connected to a tablet just as easily as a desktop. 
(Well, except for a faster CPU.)  I know people who do so.


Current tablets have USB, Bluetooth, and HDMI/Displayport.

Can you do everything on a tablet that you can on a dedicated desktop?  No. 
But you can do most of it, especially if the people writing the software 
and designing the add-ons know that's the market they have to work with.


I don't think everyone will go to tablets.  But I think it's going to be a 
larger market than you think, and I think they *will* displace some 
desktops and laptops.


The perfect computing device would fit in a pocket, have a screen the size 
of your wall, have a full (and full-sized) keyboard, and your choice of 
pointing devices.  It would be able to play any game you wanted to play, 
hold every movie and song ever recorded along with your entire lifetime's 
collection of documents, and be able to access the Internet from anywhere. 
It would only need to be recharged as often as you sleep.  (And would be 
able to recharge anywhere.)


Today, a tablet is closer to that then a desktop is.  It's short on CPU and 
storage, and it doesn't have the battery life.  It's also a little too big 
and not quite mobile enough.  Several of those constraints can be worked 
around with a docking station/case.  Smartphones have the mobility and 
Internet access, and nearly the charging/battery life, but are even more 
constrained on other issues.


Daniel T. Staal

---
This email copyright the author.  Unless otherwise noted, you
are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use
the contents for non-commercial purposes.  This copyright will
expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years,
whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of
local copyright law.
---
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


scrpt help neded...

2011-07-20 Thread Gary Kline

Y'all,

Not sure where it was the calendar or something else that suddenly
made my tying go South.  maybe both.  --oh, yes, i still need to
buy a new clicky kybd.   but that won't help with the script i
need.

back hen i worked from cray reseach in WI, a shell /bin/sh wizard cooked
up what i wanted in minutes.  i have lost in in the 20+ years so
maybe some shell or perl guru can help me.  

I'm looking for a script that takes on arg and lets   me vi/vim into
the r esults.  Let's say that I'm looking for the string 201107 in
a slew of files.  the script find it with grep---not grep -w, just
grep.  collect es the filenames and lines (grep -n) and saves  then
temporarily, then points vim or vi at each file+linenumbr and execs
it for me.   the fewer keystrokes, the better.

can anybody help me?

tia,

gary


-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
   Journey Toward the Dawn, E-Book: http://www.thought.org
  The 8.51a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: printer - broadband router

2011-07-20 Thread Warren Block

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Polytropon wrote:


On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:


I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.


That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript.  Make sure it has
DNS.  Entries in /etc/hosts should be adequate.  Set it with a fixed IP
address or through DHCP.

The rest is CUPS, which I don't use.


You don't even have to use CUPS.


Yes, but OP had already installed it.  If CUPS is not a requirement, 
lpr/lpd work very well:

http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Question about regular expressions

2011-07-20 Thread dave jones
Hi,

I have a config file below:

$user=   'root';   // This is the username

if $user is found, I want to display root.
Anyone knows how to programming in C or some other language? thank you.

Regards,
Dave.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread perryh
Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:

 The perfect computing device would fit in a pocket, have a screen
 the size of your wall, have a full (and full-sized) keyboard, and
 your choice of pointing devices.  It would be able to play any
 game you wanted to play, hold every movie and song ever recorded
 along with your entire lifetime's collection of documents, and be
 able to access the Internet from anywhere.  It would only need
 to be recharged as often as you sleep.  (And would be able to
 recharge anywhere.)

It would also be fully encrypted and keyed to your fingerprint or
retinal scan, so that no thief would be able to extract anything
from it, and the encrypted files would be backed up automatically
whenever it was recharged to guard against data loss in case of
loss, theft, damage, malfunction, etc.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: scrpt help neded...

2011-07-20 Thread perryh
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:

 I'm looking for a script that takes on arg and lets   me vi/vim
 into the r esults.  Let's say that I'm looking for the string
 201107 in a slew of files.  the script find it with grep---not
 grep -w, just grep.  collect es the filenames and lines (grep -n)
 and saves  then temporarily, then points vim or vi at each
 file+linenumbr and execs it for me.   the fewer keystrokes, the
 better.

To edit each file that contains 201107:

  $ vi ` grep -l 201107 {files to be searched} `

That won't pre-position within the files, but since it's a single
invocation of vi, with each subsequent file being loaded by :n, a
search pattern will persist (unless/until you replace it by entering
a different search pattern).  At the top of the first file, you enter

  /201107

to find the first instance, n to find the second, etc.  After :n
-- at the top of the second file -- n alone will find the first
instance.

OTOH if you want to bring up an xterm containing _the results of
the grep_ you can pipe it into the attached script.  There is no
manpage, but the comments and the (straightforward) parameter
decoding should provide a start.  (There are a few magic numbers,
which ideally should be tweaked for your X11 installation's font
dimensions, but nothing horrible will happen if they are slightly
off.)
#!/usr/local/bin/bash

# The maxl and maxw calculations involve magic numbers, which ideally
# ought to be extracted from xterm and window-manager settings rather
# than being hard-coded.  Good luck figuring out a way to do that.
#
#   The xterm font is 6w x 13h
#
#   visible title bar height incl top frame = 29 pixels
#   + xterm margin inside frame = 1 pixel
#   + bottom frame  margin = 8 pixels (same as frame widths below)
#   + window-manager shadow = 1 pixel
#   = height available for text = screen height - 39 pixels
#
maxl=`(xwininfo -root | sed -n -e 's/  Height: //p' ; echo 39 - 13 / p) | dc`
#
#   visible frame width = 7 pixels
#   + xterm margin inside frame = 1 pixel
#   * 2 sides = total width of side frames = 16 pixels
#   + window-manager shadow = 1 pixel
#   = width available for text = screen width - 17 pixels
#
maxw=`(xwininfo -root | sed -n -e 's/  Width: //p' ; echo 17 - 6 / p) | dc`

# maxw should be used in conjunction with the max line length found in the
# file to automatically set the width (as is already being done for the length).

# Set defaults
w=80
l=0
n=stdin
flags=
n_is_default=1
w_is_default=1

# Handle flag params
while [[ $1 == -?* ]] ; do
   case $1 in
  -w  )
shift
w=$1
w_is_default=0
;;
  -w* )
w=${1#-w}
w_is_default=0
;;
  -l  )
shift
l=$1
;;
  -l* )
l=${1#-l}
;;
  -n  )
shift
n=$1
n_is_default=0
;;
  -n* )
n=${1#-n}
n_is_default=0
;;
  *   )
flags=$flags $1
   esac
   shift
done

# Check for no params = stdin, or 1st param of - (explicit stdin), and
# if so copy stdin to a file since there seems no way to get it passed to
# the less which will be running in the xterm.  Note that - will not
# work as any but the first non-flag parameter.
if [ x$1 == x -o $1 == - ] ; then
   cat  /tmp/xless$$
   shift
   if [ $l == 0 ] ; then
  l=`(head -$maxl /tmp/xless$$ | fold -w$w | wc -l ; echo \1 + d [$maxl p 
q] sa $maxl a p q\) | dc`
   fi
   xterm -geometry ${w}x$l +sb -sl 0 -title $n - `pwd` -n $n $flags -e sh 
-c less /tmp/xless$$ $* ; rm /tmp/xless$$ 
else
   [ $n_is_default == 1 ]  n=`basename $1`
   if [[ $w_is_default == 1  $1 == *.w=* ]] ; then
  w=`echo $1 | sed -e 's/^.*\.w=//'`
  [ $n_is_default == 1 ]  n=`echo $n | sed -e 's/\.w=.*$//'`
   fi
   if [ $l == 0 ] ; then
  l=`(head -$maxl $1 | fold -w$w | wc -l ; echo \1 + d [$maxl p q] sa 
$maxl a p q\) | dc`
   fi
   xterm -geometry ${w}x$l +sb -sl 0 -title $1 - `pwd` -n $n $flags -e 
less $* 
fi
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: em0 NIC slow on 8.2-p1 amd64?

2011-07-20 Thread perryh
Eduardo Morras nec...@retena.com wrote:

 If it's not connected at 1 gigabit or not full duplex you can
 force it with ifconfig. If there are too much errors check the
 cable.

Last I heard, this does _not_ work with gigabit unless you can
force-configure both ends of the link.  The negotiation protocol is
such that force-configuring just one end _guarantees_ a mismatch.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: 2020: Will BSD and Linux be relevant anymore?

2011-07-20 Thread perryh
Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:

 ... can a HAL be developed that runs on BSD that emulates
 Winblow$ such that any driver written for Winblow$ will work
 on *BSD?
 ...
 Something in the back of my head says there was / is something
 along this line already available or in the works, but I can't
 recall for sure.

I _think_ we may already have something along these lines for
NDIS (network) drivers, but I don't know how well it works.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org