On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:43:03 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> Interesting. My only observation was that sysctl is supposed to be the
> 'system' database where all queries relate to. It is supposed to display
> everything about the system; therefore any of these data bits should be
> fixed here first. An
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 08:43:59 +1000
Da Rock wrote:
> On 04/25/13 06:31, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500
> > "Mark Felder" wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since
On 04/25/13 13:32, Mike. wrote:
On 4/25/2013 at 4:47 AM Polytropon wrote:
|On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:32:17 -0400, Mike. wrote:
|> If uname -r [-a] does not give the proper version of the OS, then it
is
|> either a bug, or the documentation for uname should be changed.
|> Currently, the man page for
On 4/25/2013 at 4:47 AM Polytropon wrote:
|On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:32:17 -0400, Mike. wrote:
|> If uname -r [-a] does not give the proper version of the OS, then it
is
|> either a bug, or the documentation for uname should be changed.
|> Currently, the man page for uname gives the following option:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 22:32:17 -0400, Mike. wrote:
> If uname -r [-a] does not give the proper version of the OS, then it is
> either a bug, or the documentation for uname should be changed.
> Currently, the man page for uname gives the following option:
>
> -r Write the current release level o
On 4/24/2013 at 5:07 PM Mike Brown wrote:
|Da Rock wrote:
|> sysctl kern.version
|
|For me, that's the same info as in uname -a.
|
|Try this:
|
|grep -v # /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | head -4
=
If uname -r [-a] does not give the proper version of the OS, then it is
either a bug, o
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:13:56 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> The point is that the uname and sysctl output is inaccurate. If the
> latest release is -p6 and the kernel hasn't been touched since -p4, both
> uname and the sysctl only show -p4. It's impossible to tell otherwise
> that the system is really
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 20:41, Da Rock wrote:
> On 04/25/13 09:07, Mike Brown wrote:
> > Da Rock wrote:
> >> sysctl kern.version
> > For me, that's the same info as in uname -a.
> >
> > Try this:
> >
> > grep -v # /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | head -4
> That shows even less. But the point of the
Well I managed to find the answer!!
Scanning through /etc/defaults/rc.conf I noticed this:
dhclient_program="/sbin/dhclient" # Path to dhcp client program.
dhclient_flags="" # Extra flags to pass to dhcp client.
Then I went back to check my DHCP server's log files and i
Hi,
I'm experiencing a weird problem and I have no idea where to begin with
this one!
Basically what's happening is that I did a host scan from my NetBSD box
running Cacti in order to 'Auto Discover' machines on my network; a php
script on the Cacti server added an IP address xxx.xxx.1.52.
Seei
On 04/25/13 09:07, Mike Brown wrote:
Da Rock wrote:
sysctl kern.version
For me, that's the same info as in uname -a.
Try this:
grep -v # /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | head -4
That shows even less. But the point of the OP was having a file in etc
with the info on version, which I fell could
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Martin McCormick wrote:
Is there a filter that one can run in procmail in which
base64 encoded data go in and text comes out so one can allow
procmailrc to do its work?
I use bogofilter to filter spam and it does a very good
job after one builds a core of sp
Hi--
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I am my own CA and can
> generate certs that no one else has the private keys to.
So can someone who does not run their own CA...?
> The problem with buying certs from a provider is the go
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013, at 18:07, Mike Brown wrote:
> Da Rock wrote:
> > sysctl kern.version
>
> For me, that's the same info as in uname -a.
>
> Try this:
>
> grep -v # /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | head -4
>
Not useful if you don't have src on your servers, but that's good to
know.
___
Polytropon wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:07:35 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> > Is there a filter that one can run in procmail in which
> > base64 encoded data go in and text comes out so one can allow
> > procmailrc to do its work?
Good question, I havent tried that yet, (but should),
but
Is there a recommended set of settings on LSI 2008 chips burned IT for
ZFS?
Looking at the "Global Settings" in the configuration utility there is a
field labeled "status" whose value can be enabled/disable/error. I don't
know what to put there or whether it matters.
There are other config
Da Rock wrote:
> sysctl kern.version
For me, that's the same info as in uname -a.
Try this:
grep -v # /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | head -4
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To u
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> [snip]
> >>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many
> >>> think it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true;
> >>> it just takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as
On 04/25/13 06:31, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500
"Mark Felder" wrote:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
wrote:
You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no
kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message ha
On 04/25/13 01:53, Joe wrote:
When I do a ifconfig bridge create or ifconfig epair create commands I
get some high intensity messages on the hosts F1 session master console.
I would like to suppress these messages.
Is there any way to do that?
You'd have to adjust your syslog.conf I'd imagine-
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:07:35 -0500, Martin McCormick wrote:
> Is there a filter that one can run in procmail in which
> base64 encoded data go in and text comes out so one can allow
> procmailrc to do its work?
> [...]
> Is there anything which will take a raw email message
> and spit o
Forgot to cc the list.
On 04/24/2013 04:47 PM, Ryan Frederick wrote:
I believe mimencode is in ports as converters/mmencode. It is also
included as part of mail/metamail.
Ryan
On 04/24/2013 04:07 PM, Martin McCormick wrote:
Is there a filter that one can run in procmail in which
base64 en
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Michael Powell wrote:
> Alejandro Imass wrote:
>
> [snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 h
Is there a filter that one can run in procmail in which
base64 encoded data go in and text comes out so one can allow
procmailrc to do its work?
I use bogofilter to filter spam and it does a very good
job after one builds a core of spammishness, but legitimate
messages are often-ti
Michael Powell wrote:
> [snip]
>>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply
>>> referring to weak keys?
>>
>> I would also like to specifically if it's for weak keys or are all
>> WPA2 personal keys crackable by brute force. Also is WPA2 Enterprise
>> as weak also. Could a
Arthur Chance wrote:
[snip]
>> What I was pondering is some form of L2TP tunnel, or some other form of
>> IPSEC tunnel to form some kind of VPN like communication between the
>> client and the wifi. Just never have begun to find the time to get
>> anywhere with the idea. But basically it would res
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500
"Mark Felder" wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
> wrote:
>
> > You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no
> > kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message hasn't
> > changed.
> > This could
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
>>> Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
>>> it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
>>> takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
>>
>> Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be crack
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
> wrote:
>
>> You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no
>> kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message hasn't
>> changed.
>> This could very rea
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:35:01 +0200, Alexandre wrote:
> Freebsd-update tool apply binary patches to your -RELEASE system and
> GENERIC kernel.
> Furthermore, sources are synced too (/usr/src) by default.
> If you want to see the -p# increased, you have to recompile your GENERIC
> kernel.
> If you a
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
wrote:
You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no
kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message hasn't
changed.
This could very reasonably be regarded as bug in the update/version
reporting process
Hi,
I have two boxes exhibiting issues with (updates or rebuilds to)
gettext-0.18.1.1, (which obv affects lots of stuff)
i had originally thought this was a problem with the port on jails on
each box, but actually even each host won't rebuild this port.
Both are amd64 and have recently bee
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:00:47 + (UTC)
Walter Hurry wrote:
> When I issue 'freebsd-update fetch install I see this:
>
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
> Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org...
>
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:05:04 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > The kernel's version message will only change if the _kernel_ has been
> > receiving changes. So, for example, if you update from 9.1 to 9.1-p2,
> > and _no_ change has been written to t
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:05:04 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> The kernel's version message will only change if the _kernel_ has been
> receiving changes. So, for example, if you update from 9.1 to 9.1-p2,
> and _no_ change has been written to the kernel, it will still report
> 9.1, even though the updat
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:00:47 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> When I issue 'freebsd-update fetch install I see this:
>
> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
> Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org...
>
When I issue 'freebsd-update fetch install I see this:
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org...
done.
Fetching metadata index... done.
Inspecting system... done.
Prepar
When I do a ifconfig bridge create or ifconfig epair create commands I
get some high intensity messages on the hosts F1 session master console.
I would like to suppress these messages.
Is there any way to do that?
Thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd
2013-04-24 15:40, Lowell Gilbert skrev:
Arthur Chance writes:
On 04/24/13 14:07, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
No, that's from /etc/passwd which never shows any real password
information. The true password field is in /etc/master.passwd and I'm
not going to ask anyone to show that here. However, th
On 04/24/13 13:45, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-04-24 13:21, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 11:55, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can
log
in, but
2013-04-24 15:07, Lowell Gilbert skrev:
Bernt Hansson writes:
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv
Arthur Chance writes:
> On 04/24/13 14:07, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
>
> No, that's from /etc/passwd which never shows any real password
> information. The true password field is in /etc/master.passwd and I'm
> not going to ask anyone to show that here. However, the OP should
> check it's got a valid
On 04/24/13 14:07, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Bernt Hansson writes:
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resol
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:07-0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> Bernt Hansson writes:
>
> > 2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
> >> On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >>> Hello list!
> >>>
> >>> I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
> >>> in, but when I try
Bernt Hansson writes:
> 2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
>> On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
>>> Hello list!
>>>
>>> I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
>>> in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
>>> issue. I have t
2013-04-24 13:04, Ralf Mardorf skrev:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:52 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
su does not "work" it sayes sorry.
Is the user in a group that does fulfil special permissions? Regarding
to Google results, the group for FreeBSD is "wheel".
Yes the user is in the wheel group.
2013-04-24 13:21, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 11:55, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can
log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't wo
s m writes:
> i'm trying to restore DUMP file for partition /usr on tow hard disk
> parallel y. these two hard are connected to my system (i have freebsd8.2).
> i use restore command and it uses /tmp directory to restore dump. in
> restoring dump process, two hard disks try to use /tmp directory
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 12:55:08 +0200
Bernt Hansson wrote:
> 2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
> > On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> >> Hello list!
> >>
> >> I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
> >> in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work.
On 04/24/13 11:55, Bernt Hansson wrote:
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:52 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> su does not "work" it sayes sorry.
Is the user in a group that does fulfil special permissions? Regarding
to Google results, the group for FreeBSD is "wheel".
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 12:52 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> su does not "work" it sayes sorry.
polkit:*:562:root,$USER
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
2013-04-24 12:30, Arthur Chance skrev:
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried with and without password but the comput
2013-04-24 12:12, Steve O'Hara-Smith skrev:
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:18:59 +0200
Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried with and without
2013-04-24 10:36, Ralf Mardorf skrev:
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 10:18 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried with and without password but the com
On 04/24/13 09:18, Bernt Hansson wrote:
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried with and without password but the computer said no.
How did it say no? What do
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 10:18:59 +0200
Bernt Hansson wrote:
> Hello list!
>
> I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
> in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
> issue. I have tried with and without password but the computer said no.
On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 10:18 +0200, Bernt Hansson wrote:
> I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
> in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
> issue. I have tried with and without password but the computer said no.
Do you want to st
Hello list!
I have set up a diskless machine with 8.3-stable and i as a user can log
in, but when I try to log in as root it won't work. How to resolv that
issue. I have tried with and without password but the computer said no.
___
freebsd-questions@
59 matches
Mail list logo
