possible to run X server without HAL, even the newest one.
-best regards,
Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Xorg---how-can-I-configure-this-thing---tp24417470p24428745.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
swap at all (stripped KDE3/7.2-STABLE).
I'm runnig opera-devel, firefox35 (fresh ports tree). If memory serves me
right,
PIII 750/1000Mhz wasn't that bad either. Also, with 512MB it was swapping a
little
only when compiling something heavy. OO.o could be not usable tho.
-best regards,
Jakub Lach
- launch dhclient manually
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761835.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
- FreeBSD 9 has latest wpa_supplicant.
- Try upgrading router's firmware.
- Try detailing wpa_supplicant.conf more.
eg. proto=
pairwise=
group=
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/wlan-setup-tp4748233p4761824.html
Sent from
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#Why
Sorry, it's looks roughly applicable here.
I'm guilty too, but I don't want/use binary upgrades.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/A-quality-operating-system-tp4717703p4765099.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions
See man snd_hda, you probably need to set device.hints.
For example, I with T400 have something like this in
device hints:
hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid22.config=as=1 seq=15
hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid24.config=as=3
hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid26.config=as=1
hint.hdac.0.cad0.nid29.config=as=2
best regards,
Jakub
pinout expert either :)
On a lighter note, once correct pinout
will be set, you shouldn't have any
more problems with CX20561, it's
common and well supported chip.
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad-audio-question
I would love to investigate it properly further,
however I'm critically low on time, so I can only
offer pinout dump with my device.hints at this
time, sorry
http://pastebin.com/ig54CwT9
good luck,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Thinkpad
, as
possibilities of default wrong pin associations are
endless.
If you think otherwise you are free to submit PR
as well :)
best regards,
- Jakub Lach
PS. I suspected that If by chance my device.hints
will just work, the pedantic engineer in
you would be silenced somehow :P
--
View this message
Strange thing is, that cdcontrol works
for me, disc is spinning but no sound
out of speakers.
Sound system is working, and this is
laptop.
I usually rip to hdd, and play those
files, but it was annoying last time
I tried to play audio cd.
Before CAM it was the same, if
I recall
Correct, cd entry from mixer is
missing.
However, then it didn't stop other tools
from working (I think that at one point I
also used mplayer for CD playback).
best regards and thanks,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-access-a-music
/etc/make.conf :
.if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports/*)
set clang as you like
.endif
clang for ports, YMMV as always.
http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang
libreoffice 3.5.x builds and run sucessfully
with clang 3.0 and (upcoming) 3.1 - @bapt
So wait for libreoffice 3.5 for clang support.
--
youtibe_dl is just python script, nothing related.
20120531:
AFFECTS: users of graphics/png
AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org
The PNG library has been updated to version 1.5.10. Please rebuild all
ports that depend on it.
If you use portmaster:
portmaster -r png-
If you use
That's interesting discussion.
I hit some cases where clang produced binaries were
clearly faster than those made with latest gcc. But it's far
from rule.
Where you have found statements that clang is always
faster than gcc?
From my perspective, it's almost as good OR better
than gcc, with
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).
Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.
--
View this message in context:
I am more concerned about an aspect of the language the clang tools are
written in, namely the use of object-oriented paradigm of c++ (it is a
phony
paradigm, one that does not exist in nature or reality, which explains
the failure rate of C++ OO projects historically and current usage
In the next episode:
Modern home video with Betamax and LaserDisc ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Omega-Zip-Drives-on-FreeBSD-8-tp5721532p5721678.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If you really want/need clang 3.1 you should be tracking 9-STABLE,
source branch not RELEASE.
Port system is separate from base system, and installs things
only in /usr/local/*.
--
View this message in context:
It has been done, it's just rally not recommended.
Sorry, don't know what was exact procedure/
if it works currently.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/32-bit-to-64-bit-tp5722481p5722485.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
At least he should have used one or
at very least identical systems, not 3
different, albeit similar.
And I do not care If it would change
results or not, comparing different
systems invalidates benchmarks period.
--
View this message in context:
=== Starting check for runtime dependencies
=== Gathering dependency list for archivers/unzip from ports
=== No dependencies for archivers/unzip
=== Installing package
=== Installation of archivers/unzip (unzip-6.0_1) succeeded
=== Delete unzip60.tar.gz? y/n [n]
What option do I need to
Try with:
WITHOUT_MODULES= usb/ulpt
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723880.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
and consider using MODULES_OVERRIDE if you will
precisely know your needs.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/WITHOUT-MODULES-in-etc-make-conf-doesn-t-work-tp5723832p5723883.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Excellent, I knew I was missing something simple.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723916.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Now I see that I even used -d in my own portupdating
wrapper, but forgot about it and it's meaning, embarrassing.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/portmaster-embarrassingly-simple-question-y-option-tp5723878p5723918.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions
Sort of a dirty trick that you have to use usb/ulpt as
opposed to ulpt, and a deficiency in the documentation.
No, I'm just borderline sure that WITHOUT_MODULES works
the same way as MODULES_OVERRIDE, that is it looks in
top directory in /usr/src/sys/modules/ and ulpt is in
If remember correctly, accessing single user mode here
requires root password, but will it use login.conf?
Killing init is not solution (I think I lack privileges as
user anyway, remember I can't su account) because
I'm running KMS patches and will not see anything
(lacking visible system
Initially dropped to single user mode, but when
I saw ED(1) I reconsidered and dusted off trusty
LiveCD :)
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727712.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list
Or vi in place.
Really, it always surprises me there's
no vi available in single user mode.
vi 352k, ed 54k.
And I bet some historical vi could be
smaller still.
...but I have nothing against ed, I
simply never memorized how to
use it properly.
--
View this message in context:
That's substantial if, no?
But in this case, yes, I should
have mounted fs maybe.
But really didn't know what to
expect.
Thanks for help again.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727720.html
Sent from the
Good catch, totally missed it.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Nasty-reference-loop-in-login-conf-tp5727668p5727755.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
-offtopic-
(...)
like he works at a small Polish SMB, more
commonly referred to as a SOHO in more
developed countries.
Not really sure what you wanted to imply,
as SMB looks like americanism to me.
--
View this message in context:
This topic went totally off, but anyway there are interesting bits,
do you say that e.g. Gutmann method is totally unneeded?
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/fsck-on-FAT32-filesystem-tp5727015p5728126.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive
Follow up is even more interesting than epilogue,
especially:
Another problem with the article is the fact that
a magnetic force microscope, which is a scanning
probe microscope, is nothing like an electron
microscope, and yet the article repeatedly refers to
using an electron microscope to
Hi,
I was fortunate enough to buy USB 3.0 pendrive,
which actually works with FreeBSD just ripped from
package! (normal _empty_ FAT filesystem, no
garbageware added, no need to format).
It actually bounces from 40MB/s limit when reading
from it.
Writing is about 18MB/s.
Device is supposed
This could be deducted, but I will add for clarity, that I
bought USB 3.0 pendrive to use in 2.0 port, to take
advantage of 2.0 to the fullest (as 2.0 pendrives have
slow flashes inside).
--
View this message in context:
18MB/s write is figure from few
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=1 to 15M
runs, 13-14MB/s from actual files copied
in mc to flash and 36-39MB/s file copied
from flash to hdd in mc.
dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/zero bs=15m
gives 33MB/s read.
Speaking of advertisements, yes I know
but USB 3.0 drives
Speaking of misunderstanding, that's certainly
possible.
How much overhead is normal and alternatively,
why in FreeBSD USB 2.0 reports as 40MB/s and
not other arbitrary number.
I hope I didn't sound like PLEASE HELP I WANT
USB 3.0 SPEEDS ON USB 2.0...
--
View this message in context:
Apparently my speeds are pretty decent,
as this this advertised speed relates to
read speed, and write one is pretty weak.
People are reporting
62-70MB/s read and
17-31MB/s write.
Are you saying that disk clearly bumping
from 40MB/s read barrier (as I saw in midnight
commander is my
i have never seen USB 2.0 exceeding 35MB/s write and 40MB/s read.
That means I essentially got what I wanted- as
high read output as possible on USB 2.0. Thanks.
Indeed 35MB/s-40MB/s is common reported maximum
throughput.
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=64k count=1
newfs_msdosfs /dev/da0
However, after formatting it in Windows why duplicate it again in
FreeBSD?
Just to check if it works as should, also trim sectors and whatever.
Format without partition table?
But in this case, no 1 reason was probably most important.
--
View this message in context:
The same as in 9-STABLE?
$ cc -v
FreeBSD clang version 3.1 (branches/release_31 156863) 20120523
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.0
Thread model: posix
--
View this message in context:
8.3 or 9.1.
Using 9.0 when 9.1 is behind the corner
is going backwards IMHO.
or 9-STABLE if you want your system
evolving up to release, which is nice
because you can catch and solve all
possible problems one at the time,
and not be overwhelmed upgrading
only to RELEASE.
--
View this
Same problem here, policykit-gnome also.
Alain G. Fabry wrote:
Hi,
Hope I didn't do something stupid here
Tried to 'portupgrade -R policykit' but it came back with an error. So I
deinstalled it and now I'm trying to reinstall it, but it fails with the
following error.
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing gcc43 as
base.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18736784.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by
the GPLv3.
Kris
___
freebsd-questions
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by
the GPLv3.
Thanks for fast answer
instructions support.
Jakub Lach wrote:
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
Kris Kennaway-3 wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing
gcc43 as
base.
I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered
Hello.
From what I understand, gcc42 does not support core2 option. How it's
possible that
some people are using it with FreeBSD -CURRENT (and it's not used as mere
prescott alias).
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html
Is -CURRENT using newer version of gcc, despite licensing
This is the Qt/X11 Open Source Edition.
The specified system/compiler is not supported:
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/freebsd-g++
Please see the README file for a complete list.
=== Script configure failed unexpectedly.
In README there is no
g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]
FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Mon Jul 28 17:27:04 CEST 2008
--
View this message in context:
/usr/ports/devel/qt4-moc/work/qt-x11-opensource-src-4.4.1/mkspecs/ is empty
directory.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/qt4-moc-4.4.1-not-compiling-%28compiler-system-not-supported%29-tp18829459p18829813.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
# portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
# portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
- - Martin
I have already tried upgrading corelib (=== qt4-corelib-4.4.1 depends on
package:
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
# portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
# portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
Still cannot upgrade qt4-corelib without qt4-moc=4.4.1.
--
View this message in context:
Bugzilla from [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
please force update qmake4 and qt4-corelib ports:
# portmaster devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
# portupgrade -f devel/qmake4 devel/qt4-corelib
I have forced packages one by one today.
Thanks for help and updating UPDATING file.
--
View this
Hello.
I recently installed from ports (games/linux-enemyterritory).
At first it complained about missing X11 lib, and I concluded
that installing linux-xorg-libs should sort it out. I wass correct
(perhaps it should be added as dependency?).
Running et it gives:
--- sound
Shooting in the dark, try installing lzo or lzo2.
Gary Kline-5 wrote:
Hi Y'all:-)
About the only thing that fails to portupgrade is
multimedia/transcode [v 1.0.6]. I've poked around, but only
superficially. Is there a bug report on this? Should I have
Many thanks, works splendid :)
Ironically, I'm leaving at dawn for two weeks AFK.
Hugo Silva wrote:
Jakub Lach wrote:
Hello.
I recently installed from ports (games/linux-enemyterritory).
At first it complained about missing X11 lib, and I concluded
that installing linux-xorg-libs
Julien Cigar-2 wrote:
Am I the only one to have sort: write errors since a few days with
portsnap ? :
Same here.
FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0 r209773
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sort%3A-write-error-with-portsnap-tp29105763p29109444.html
Sent from
andrew clarke-3 wrote:
Same here. No idea why!
I think this issue would have got more attention on freebsd-stable.
regards,
- Jakub Lach
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/sort%3A-write-error-with-portsnap-tp29105763p29143811.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions
Just something that wouldn't pull in whole KDE/latest flavour of the month
DE.
Any recommendations?
Online video flippers have severe size limits.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/I-need-a-simple-cli-tool-to-rotate-mp4-video-tp5756670.html
Sent from the
Thanks, I'm was already playing with mencoder, but I had no luck with it;
either I was destroying/misaligning audio track or loosing video quality.
(or encoding raw with 54x size increase).
I have more success with ffmpeg, e.g.
$ ffmpeg -i A.mp4 -vf transpose=1 -r 30 -sameq -acodec copy B.mp4
Strange thing is, -sameq should give same quality as original.
Thanks for all help!
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/I-need-a-simple-cli-tool-to-rotate-mp4-video-tp5756670p5756776.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
What's state of valgrind port on pure amd64 system?
Here, it core dumps upon linking both with clang and gcc47,
with complaint that looks suspicious (expected i386 not X86_64
or something to that effect).
--
View this message in context:
If it was from me, my system is without 32bit compat
whatsoever, and this is not default setting on amd64.
Maybe on def. amd64 there are no problems, I don't
know, nobody replied to my thread.
--
View this message in context:
The problem is, it gets recreated upon updating from source.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765488.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Even that I was aware of that, I've just lost track of it. Thanks for simple
solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765489.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
67 matches
Mail list logo
