Re: calcru negative time error
At 11:58 PM -0500 6/3/03, Shane Kinney wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Jimi Thompson wrote: http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#CALCRU-NEGATIV That web page said to enter this command (which I do not have a good understanding of but did anyway) # sysctl -w kern.timecounter.method=1 which I did, but apparently my 5.0 doesn't like that because it promptly spit back: sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.timecounter.method' I looked at that FAQ page, and right underneath where it lists that command it says the following: Note: The -w option of sysctl(8) is deprecated and silently ignored in FreeBSD 4.4-RELEASE and all newer versions. You can safely ommit it when setting options with sysctl as shown above. I'd give it a try with out the '-w' flag. Although I don't know if it'll fix your issues. Just maybe a step in the right direction. It still generates the exact same error message Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson, CISSP, Rev. ~Shane Kinney Web: http://www.freebsdhackers.net IRC: irc.freebsdhackers.net #freebsd PGP: http://www.freebsdhackers.net/pgp -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE+3XyIgsso3QO013ERAqQ5AKCOOAzKidPBCGCJ2W/Jb23nXdCRwACeIzOO T7nUctlbH/J02Ewo7JO/fX0= =bkPR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson, CISSP, Rev. Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. --Plato ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
calcru negative time error
Please cc me on all replies as I am not subscribed to the list. The machine in question is running FreeBSD 5.0 Stable. Before anyone tells me to RTFM, I did read the FAQ which pointed me to this item on the freebsd site: http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/troubleshoot.html#CALCRU-NEGATIV That web page said to enter this command (which I do not have a good understanding of but did anyway) # sysctl -w kern.timecounter.method=1 which I did, but apparently my 5.0 doesn't like that because it promptly spit back: sysctl: unknown oid 'kern.timecounter.method' 1) Is there another similar command that will do the same thing? 2) Will this stop the error messages? 3) Will this break anything else? Since the command given doesn't work, I'm not really sure what do next. The web page says that if this command doesn't solve the problem that you should set the NTIMECOUNTER option in your kernel to increasingly large values but offers absolutely no information on how to proceed to do this. 1) Will this make the errors stop? 2) Will this break anything else? 3) Where are the directions on setting the NTIMECOUNTER option? In all honesty, I have have never tinkered with my kernel. It works and it is stable so I leave it alone. I know that the calcru error messages are pesky, but the machine doesn't seem to be having any problems. It's logs are normal, I ran top and that looks good, it's been up for months with out any apparent issues. I'm rather tempted just to leave it and ignore the errors. I keep hearing my Dad's voice If it ain't broke. Any help appreciated. -- Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson, CISSP, Rev. Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. --Plato ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fwd: Cvsup Handbook Example
Since the major portion of the world's misery, both past and present, can be directly attributed to organized religion, I find this incessant prattling about the demon (INTENTIONAL misspelling) logo and some of the other things like this thing below to be totally offensive. The Middle East is in a shambles and those people have been squabbling for 5000 years over who's ideas about God are right. Europe has fared no better and neither has the New World - just ask the Native Indian population. Millions of people have died over religion. It doesn't really matter which one. Pick one - they are ALL equally guilty. The short-sighted narrow-minded viewpoint expressed below is PRECISELY the mind-set that encourages and promotes things like the Inquisition. Since it does nothing but add to the sum total of human misery, I find postings like this to be highly offensive. If you think that you might be going to hell over reading something that says cvsup666, then you are probably already in one and too brainwashed to get out. At http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html, cvsup666 is used as an example. Out of all the possible three number combos, why was 666 used? As a Christian, this does bother me and I would like to know why exactly it was used. I do not think this is being extreme or unreasonable. Please note that I do not want to start a confrontation or cause problems etc... with this question. Simply the answer. If you would prefer, please feel free to email me directly if you feel this may cause problems on this list. I help admin a few freebsd servers and so this of extra interest to me. notvalid To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message -- Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson, CISSP, Rev. Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. --Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Laptops w/ FreeBSD pre-loaded (somewhat OT)
On Sunday, December 29, 2002, at 04:00 PM, Scott Robbins wrote: On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 09:28:31PM -0500, John Bleichert wrote: Last year (when I wasn't in the market for a laptop) I found a site/manufacturer which sold Athlon- and Pentium-based laptops with Free/OpenBSD and/or Linux pre-installed. Now that I'm in the market I can't find the site to save my life. Has anybody seen such a site anywhere? I thought I found the site linked from freebsd.org but no luck. I know Walmart sells some laptops (or is it only desktops--don't have time to check at this instant) with some version of Linux installed. If you do find out, please post the site. Thanks -- Scott Robbins Scott, You would be referring to the bastardized linux thing called Lindows. We were interested in at work for a test and horked up the $99.00. What a waste! Mandrake 9.0 is a better desktop distro. It biggest selling point is that it's running Transmeta's CPU's and it's only $350.00 for their high end device. You'd be as well of with one of the mail stations since you'd at least get some support if something breaks. I know that the Sun reps at work all carry HP laptops loaded with Intel/Solaris. They have told me that they normally load with disks burned from the ISO's on their own web site (freely downloadable) with out any problems. This leads me to think that your odds of having unix drivers for the device available would be rather high. HTH, Jimi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: Mozilla Crashing
On Monday, December 30, 2002, at 10:47 AM, Ian Watkinson wrote: Has anyone else any experiance of Mozilla crashing with shockwave pages? I can repeat is quite easily by visiting of all places, freebsddiary... Pops up about shockwave, cancel, select search, pop up about shockwave, click cancel, boom Mozilla dies. Nothing in /var/adm/messages, does Mozz have it's own log file? TIA Ian Ian, I've seen it to, but then again, I'm running the beta. Perhaps reverting to the earlier stable release will solve your problem? I know I did not have it in earlier versions, although loading the plug in manually was slightly painful. Thanks, Jimi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: DOS ATTACK. Any Suggestions?
Track'em and prosecute them. On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Anti wrote: more an issue with apache than freebsd i think... perhaps mod_dosevasive (http://www.networkdweebs.com/stuff/security.html) could be of use? `Anti` On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:53:23 -0500 (EST) Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sigh. I have had my website for well over a few years now. I am very upset with the internet and where it is going due to the fact that their is so many children on it whose parents dont know how to do their jobs and they allow their children to perform dos attacks and god only knows what else on daddys fast connection. The internet falls the perfect place for every child/grownup who was/is pushed around in school, the unpopular kids no one likes, the fat kid in class and the guys that cant even get laid to go online and be the man behind the monitor. It is the only place they can go and be something in power As lame as that is this must be how they look at it in their sick mind. I have been dossed many times. Heres the latest. I go to http://www.unixhideout.com/server-status which you can also look at if it actually loads for you.. and i see around 80-100 of these 24/7 1-0 50860 1/4/4 K 0.40 10 1134 0.0 0.00 0.00 24.67.253.203 www.unixhideout.com GET / HTTP/1.1 all from different (at least 100 ips) over and over again bringing my server to its knees. As i said previously i have been dossed by the nobodys many times and it usually just goes away. This has been going on since january first. I am running IPFW with very strict rules, on FreeBSD 4.7 IPFW does me no good because i am allowing the port they are abusing (80) due to the last DOS attack and my few hours research i have the following options already in my rc.conf tcp_extensions=NO tcp_keepalive=YES tcp_restrict_rst=YES icmp_bmcastecho=NO icmp_drop_redirect=YES firewall_enable=YES firewall_script=/etc/rc.firewall firewall_type=custom firewall_quiet=NO firewall_logging_enable=YES log_in_vain=YES Im sure you can notice some mistakes. I try to keep the research on this lame shit to a minumum as it does not interest me to learn how to hurt other people. Please help me get the best out of this immature child and continue my website which is a complete gift to FreeBSD and its community, not that you owe me a god damn thing but you understand what i mean.. I have dealt with this many times. As soon as my site gets big and i have a lot of users in irc, some little jealous network comes along and destroys what i worked on. The last time this happened my ISP shut ME off because it took out one of their facilities. -- Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] The unixhideout network, http://www.unixhideout.com need to get ahold of me? finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Free, secure and stable email from UnixHideout The UnixHideout network http://www.unixhideout.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Re: DOS ATTACK. Any Suggestions?
I forgot to add that hacking is now a terrorist act and can be prosecuted as such. On Sunday, January 5, 2003, at 05:28 PM, Anti wrote: more an issue with apache than freebsd i think... perhaps mod_dosevasive (http://www.networkdweebs.com/stuff/security.html) could be of use? `Anti` On Sun, 5 Jan 2003 17:53:23 -0500 (EST) Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sigh. I have had my website for well over a few years now. I am very upset with the internet and where it is going due to the fact that their is so many children on it whose parents dont know how to do their jobs and they allow their children to perform dos attacks and god only knows what else on daddys fast connection. The internet falls the perfect place for every child/grownup who was/is pushed around in school, the unpopular kids no one likes, the fat kid in class and the guys that cant even get laid to go online and be the man behind the monitor. It is the only place they can go and be something in power As lame as that is this must be how they look at it in their sick mind. I have been dossed many times. Heres the latest. I go to http://www.unixhideout.com/server-status which you can also look at if it actually loads for you.. and i see around 80-100 of these 24/7 1-0 50860 1/4/4 K 0.40 10 1134 0.0 0.00 0.00 24.67.253.203 www.unixhideout.com GET / HTTP/1.1 all from different (at least 100 ips) over and over again bringing my server to its knees. As i said previously i have been dossed by the nobodys many times and it usually just goes away. This has been going on since january first. I am running IPFW with very strict rules, on FreeBSD 4.7 IPFW does me no good because i am allowing the port they are abusing (80) due to the last DOS attack and my few hours research i have the following options already in my rc.conf tcp_extensions=NO tcp_keepalive=YES tcp_restrict_rst=YES icmp_bmcastecho=NO icmp_drop_redirect=YES firewall_enable=YES firewall_script=/etc/rc.firewall firewall_type=custom firewall_quiet=NO firewall_logging_enable=YES log_in_vain=YES Im sure you can notice some mistakes. I try to keep the research on this lame shit to a minumum as it does not interest me to learn how to hurt other people. Please help me get the best out of this immature child and continue my website which is a complete gift to FreeBSD and its community, not that you owe me a god damn thing but you understand what i mean.. I have dealt with this many times. As soon as my site gets big and i have a lot of users in irc, some little jealous network comes along and destroys what i worked on. The last time this happened my ISP shut ME off because it took out one of their facilities. -- Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] The unixhideout network, http://www.unixhideout.com need to get ahold of me? finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Free, secure and stable email from UnixHideout The UnixHideout network http://www.unixhideout.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Refusing Connections
Bernardo Et. AL, Thank you to those of you have generously offered me your assistance. I grew frustrated, gave up and formatted the drive and reinstalled with a slightly newer version of FreeBSD, which seems to have solved the problem. I was never able to determine the root cause of the issue. I suspect that it was something in the OS causing a proxy effect to port 8080. I still have no idea why this happened. The only thing that was on this box is the OS, Perl, OpenSSL, OpenSSH, and Apache. I was able to determine from port scanning the box internally that the httpd process was running, but not allowing any network connections. I know that my ISP is not the issue because I have a web interface on my mail servers which operates initially on port 80 and that was not blocked. The firewall on the box was disabled.The httpd.conf that I was using is now in use running the current build. For informational purposes, in case someone else should encounter this issue, I will repost some things. The netstat that I did looked like this: netstat -an -finet -ptcp Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) tcp4 0 0 4.60.243.40.22 4.60.243.201.1277 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 *.8021 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.8080 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.587 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.25 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 4.60.243.40.22 *.*LISTEN This was the ONLY thing in the error log. [Sat Dec 21 23:48:19 2002] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Sat Dec 21 23:48:25 2002] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `web1' does NOT match server name!? [Sat Dec 21 23:48:28 2002] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `web1' does NOT match server name!? [Sat Dec 21 23:48:28 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.43 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.43 OpenSSL/0.9.6g configured -- resuming normal operations Note that top, etc. showed the httpd process running. However, it remained idle even when I was attempting to make a connection to the box. Apparently the connection request wasn't making it through the TCP/IP stack and reaching the httpd process. Why this was happening, I have no idea. Maybe we were hacked??? Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]
This approach has several advantages, not the least of which is finding out who has sold your email account down the river. I have a domain that I purchased and the MX records on my DNS are configured to send *@mydomain.com into my personal email. My general practice is to use the name of the merchant like [EMAIL PROTECTED] (I used Best Buy for good reason) when I have to give an email address to make an online purchase. That way when I start getting Viagra or penis enlargment offers (and God knows I need 'em ;)) addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED], I can voice a loud and provable complaint.I encourage anyone with a spare domain to do the same. I also encourge you to report your findings to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for posting. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andrew Brampton Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 12:02 PM To: Kurt Bigler; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] I think the orginal poster didn't mean to say set up a different subdomain for each account just a different address, for example [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I have a catch all email address so [EMAIL PROTECTED] goes to me without having to set it up in advance, all goes to one mail box. I actually don't use this method, I should really, but I found out about it too late :( Andrew - Original Message - From: Kurt Bigler [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Rob O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 7:07 PM Subject: Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack] on 12/24/02 3:53 AM, Rob O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote: on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums, just attracks crackers. I currently create a new email address for every category of mailing list that I join. For web use, I use a throw-away free-ISP account (which lets me pop mail from anywhere!) which hands out email addresses in the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] - whenever a web sites asks me for an email address, I use their domain name in front of the @ - nothing to set up my end, and I know immediately whenever I get spam through that isp which web site gave it out. (Thank you, Paltalk..) Well that's an interesting idea. Throw-away subdomains (excuse my terminology - maybe I'm supposed to call them host names?) imply a whole host of email addresses without wasting a domain name. I have never implemented email at a subdomain. Can most virtual domain mail servers handle [EMAIL PROTECTED] just as easily as [EMAIL PROTECTED]? If so, I might start providing myself (and others too) such options. Will qmail+vpopmail do this transparently? Is it just a matter of the domain name containing another . as far as qmail+vpopmail is concerned? Or should I avoid giving further exposure to the domain name by creating subdomains under it? In that case I can register one more domain name just for this purpose. Presumably it is not a problem that it is hosted on the same server.? Only problem I see is I use webmail.domain.com for webmail access at domain. I guess I will have to find out whether zoneedit.com will let me set up DNS such that webmail.foo.domain.com can work. (Getting really OT now - I'll ask zoneedit about this.) Thanks, Kurt Bigler I sort of forgot for this mailing list Rob I know others use special accounts for mailing lists which refuse to receive any mail that doesn't come from one of the lists that they associate with the account (or else they accomplish the filtering in their email client). A word of warning: When I first joined freebsd-questions, I joined with my main preferred only-for-friends spam-safe email address by mistake. Being lazy, I waited a few hours to correct that, unjoining, and rejoining with the desired address. But ever since then I get matching paired spams on the two addresses: the one I used by mistake for a few hours, and the one that I use at the moment ONLY for freebsd-questions. Fortunately I get only 1 or 2 spams a day like this, but I'm afraid it will grow and I will have to give up my main email address, or get deeply into spam filtering, which so far I have avoided. Regards, Kurt Bigler To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send
RE: L0phtcrack
Especially coming from a hotmail email address.. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stacey Roberts Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:30 PM To: Kenzo Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: L0phtcrack On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 22:24, Kenzo wrote: Anyone here use the l0phtcrack version that comes with FBSD 4.7? Is it capable of cracking SAM files from XP computers? I installed it, but I can't seem to find how to use it. I tried John and that didn't get me anywhere. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message I could swear I saw a thread with this subject on FreeBSD forums recently.., I could well imagine that if this is indeed the same source, that more than a few people would have looked at the content and thought twice about responding:-) Why would you want to do this? Personally, I figure its prudent to ask. Regards, Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: L0phtcrack
Not thatasking how to crack Windows passwords from a hotmail email box is just highly suspicious. Acting angry when you get questioned about it is even more so. I also point out that I'm not the one needing an answer. There is an answer to your question, we just want more information about who you are and why you want to know. If you want to continue in this vein, I'll be happy to accomodate you. Flame mail doesn't really bother me. If you want to offer a decent and reasonable explanation, I'll be happy to help you. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: Kenzo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:56 PM To: Jimi Thompson Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: L0phtcrack Well sorry for being cheap and not buying my own domain, or maybe I don't want to use my real E-mail for forums because they can get pretty big, and I don't want the world to know my real E-mail. And I assum myrealbox is a better one? doesn't seem much better to me. - Original Message - From: Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Kenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: FreeBSD Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 6:39 PM Subject: RE: L0phtcrack Especially coming from a hotmail email address.. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stacey Roberts Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 2:30 PM To: Kenzo Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: L0phtcrack On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 22:24, Kenzo wrote: Anyone here use the l0phtcrack version that comes with FBSD 4.7? Is it capable of cracking SAM files from XP computers? I installed it, but I can't seem to find how to use it. I tried John and that didn't get me anywhere. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message I could swear I saw a thread with this subject on FreeBSD forums recently.., I could well imagine that if this is indeed the same source, that more than a few people would have looked at the content and thought twice about responding:-) Why would you want to do this? Personally, I figure its prudent to ask. Regards, Stacey -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Disk Problems
Dmitry, If you have the smart start CD that came with the server, it will have those utiliies on it. If you do not, I suggest that you visit Compaq/HP's web site, download the CD, burn it and use that. It contains a utility to create a system partition on one of the drives. I HIGHLY recommend doing this on ANY Compaq server that you have. It gives you access to all sorts of diagnostic and repair tools that are designed to talk to things like your BIOS, the firmware on your System Board, RAID controller, RIBLOE, and even your hard drives. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dmitry Ternovoy Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 9:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: it is IDE. As it all the same to make? (Disk low level format or other format) To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Refusing Connections
Oddly enough, yes. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Emmerton Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jimi Thompson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Refusing Connections Does 'sockstat' show that httpd is listening on port 80? Matt - Original Message - From: Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 12:53 AM Subject: Refusing Connections OS - 5.0 RC2 Apache - 2.0.43 OpenSSL - 0.9.6g I'm having a rather odd problem and I can't quite put my finger on it. I can verify that the apache httpd is running but I am unable to connect to the box on port 80. I verified that httpd.conf specifies port 80. I've verified that the firewall is disabled. I can connect on other ports so I know that the network settings are working properly.If someone could point out what I'm missing, I'd really appreciate it. I have a feeling that it's going to be a DOH! momemt. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
RE: Refusing Connections
This is a strange one. Here's the deal. The traffic doesn't even appear to be making it as far as the Apache process. That's why I was looking for something in the OS that would be blocking it (like the firewall). # # Listen: Allows you to bind Apache to specific IP addresses and/or # ports, in addition to the default. See also the VirtualHost # directive. # # Change this to Listen on specific IP addresses as shown below to # prevent Apache from glomming onto all bound IP addresses (0.0.0.0) # #Listen 12.34.56.78:80 Listen 80 Yep and I'm not getting a thing in the error logs either. My access log is totally empty. My error log shows this when I stop and restart it by hand - [Sat Dec 21 23:48:19 2002] [notice] caught SIGTERM, shutting down [Sat Dec 21 23:48:25 2002] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `web1' does NOT match server name!? [Sat Dec 21 23:48:28 2002] [warn] RSA server certificate CommonName (CN) `web1' does NOT match server name!? [Sat Dec 21 23:48:28 2002] [notice] Apache/2.0.43 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.43 OpenSSL/0.9.6g configured -- resuming normal operations Netstat, however, has other ideas - netstat -an -finet -ptcp Active Internet connections (including servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address(state) tcp4 0 0 4.60.243.40.22 4.60.243.201.1277 ESTABLISHED tcp4 0 0 *.8021 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.8080 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.587 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 *.25 *.*LISTEN tcp4 0 0 4.60.243.40.22 *.*LISTEN Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Matthew Emmerton Sent: Saturday, December 21, 2002 8:36 PM To: Jimi Thompson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Refusing Connections Does 'sockstat' show that httpd is listening on port 80? Matt - Original Message - From: Jimi Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 12:53 AM Subject: Refusing Connections OS - 5.0 RC2 Apache - 2.0.43 OpenSSL - 0.9.6g I'm having a rather odd problem and I can't quite put my finger on it. I can verify that the apache httpd is running but I am unable to connect to the box on port 80. I verified that httpd.conf specifies port 80. I've verified that the firewall is disabled. I can connect on other ports so I know that the network settings are working properly.If someone could point out what I'm missing, I'd really appreciate it. I have a feeling that it's going to be a DOH! momemt. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Refusing Connections
OS - 5.0 RC2 Apache - 2.0.43 OpenSSL - 0.9.6g I'm having a rather odd problem and I can't quite put my finger on it. I can verify that the apache httpd is running but I am unable to connect to the box on port 80. I verified that httpd.conf specifies port 80. I've verified that the firewall is disabled. I can connect on other ports so I know that the network settings are working properly.If someone could point out what I'm missing, I'd really appreciate it. I have a feeling that it's going to be a DOH! momemt. Thanks, Ms. Jimi Thompson Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber. - Plato To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
