Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to determine for what version of
FreeBSD a binary was compiled, purely by examining the binary?
Any and all help and suggestions are greatly appreciated,
Thanks,
john Smith
___
freebsd-questions
kind of hint ?
Regards,
John Smith
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ier on: I
also have a file called 'kernel'. Could that somehow give somewhat
more detailed information about exactly which 4.x kernel it is, and if
so, how would I go about doing that ?
Regards,
John Smith
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org m
Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
nanobsd, picobsd and tinybsd.
They all seem to be doing the same (creating a minimal FreeBSD image
that can be used in embedded systems), or is this not right?
I've searched the internet but can't really find a page that clearly
ex
onable question and
expect a reasonable reply...?
On Nov 10, 2007 9:40 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-11-09 17:01, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can anybody please explain to my what the differences are between
> > nanobsd, picobs
be part of the BSD world ;-)
On Nov 10, 2007 5:10 PM, Jerry McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:05:35PM -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:45:30PM -0600, John Smith wrote:
> >
> > > I'd expected a
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 11:58:14 -0800
andi payn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Supra-Debians"
> ---
> There are a number of Debian-based distros that will install a complete
> system ready to go as a workstation, server, etc., but that can be
> administered from there just like any other
As advised, I omitted the "at nexus? flags 0x20" part from the line:
device apm0at nexus? flags 0x20# Advanced Power
Management
and that's how I got auto power off to work. I think LINT has more
info.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] m
Check chapter 5.7.3.1 of the FreeBSD Handbook. kdm is relatively easy
to setup. GDM's setup is more work or at least the method I found on
the net was. Maybe there's an easier way. I actually find GDM to be
more aesthetically appealing than kdm, even though I don't really like
Gnome's aesthetic
Hello,
I have Dual xeon EMT64 2.8 GHz with 2 gig of ram.
Is it better to install i386 on it or go for AMD64?
I'll use it mainly for MySQL with 400 queries per second in the peak time.
Thank you,
-John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 11/9/06, Niek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to install phpmyadmin 2.9.0.3 from ports. Although
php5-5.1.6 + extensions is installed, the script tries to install
php5-5.2.0. How can one avoid this? I don't see an option in the Makefile.
thanks i.a. for any comment,
niek
Why PHP 5.1.
On 11/9/06, Daniel Gerzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Gerard,
Thursday, November 9, 2006, 7:45:53 PM, you wrote:
> On Thursday November 09, 2006 at 12:12:42 (PM) John Smith wrote:
>> Why PHP 5.1.6 is removed in the first place?
See the PHP 5.2.0 announcement:
"The
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote:
> Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to
> ensure full update-ness?
Shouldn't really matter, the relevant changes were in the kernel.
Kris
When was t
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1?
As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into
6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x. Since then it's been a
process of polishing and improving, inste
On 11/16/06, g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Folks,
Well I stayed off the beer and other sinful delights for a while (month
or so P:) and have raked together enough cash to buy a new laptop. For
those of you out there with experience what would you advise. The plan
would be for ..unfortunately W
On 11/25/06, probsd org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm a long time proponent of FreeBSD as a server. For a long time I've really
wanted a FreeBSD system as a desktop. So, I decided to install the FreeBSD 6.2
and compile xorg, gnome, mozilla, etc... to give it a whirl.
For anyone reading this
On 11/15/06, probsd org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to get a WPC54G (linksys) wireless PCMIA card working in 6.1. I
made the kernel module using ndisgen and loaded it with kldload. kldstat
confirms the module and ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko is loaded along with the WPC54G
driver made fro
Hello,
What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
I would like to hear from somone who tested both on FreeBSD 6.2 B to RC1
Thank you,
-J
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questio
On 11/26/06, Andrew Pantyukhin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/26/06, John Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> What shall I use as a scheduler on it? 4BSD or ULE?
The general consensus is you should not touch ULE unless
you're a developer willing to fix s
i want to get winxp running using vmware inside fbsd
4.8. i have read some posts that have said that win2k
is the newest version that's supported, not winxp?
there must be a way to install winxp in vmware from
within fbsd? let me know if any of you have done this.
please be specific if you know how
20 matches
Mail list logo
