Re: New work on installer?

2004-05-17 Thread slave-mike
If one were to *not* use the installer to setup a FreeBSD system, (aka, 
like *old* dos, each step done manually), what are the manual steps 
involved?

Matthew Seaman wrote:
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 01:00:37AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has there been any new work on the installer or planned? If not, I would like to help... What about graphical?

There's been plenty of planning and various projects to produce
something better, but to the best of my knowledge all such efforts
have basically ground to a halt.  Probably the one that got closest to
actually getting into production was the libh project --
http://www.freebsd.org/projects/libh.html
but that seems to have imploded under a too ambitious development
plan, and apparently nothing new has been produced by it since 2002.
Note that the system installer tends to be quite a sore point around
the various FreeBSD lists, with all sorts of claims about the current
sysinstall(8) ranging from loud praises to downright hostility, often
by people who haven't got the foggiest idea of how to improve things.
It's also a topic that regularly gets bikeshedded to death.
Cheers,
Matthew
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: poptop / pppd

2003-10-19 Thread slave-mike
Please use the port mpd instead.

Chris Knipe wrote:
Lo all,

Very arb and weird problem... I've followed all the docs that google could
return (they all mostly the same in any case), and yeah...
My PPTP server *does* work.. As long as I don't terminate more than one
connection at a time to the server *shock horror*.  For some reason (and I
suspect I know why), ppp insist on only using one device for all the
incoming PPTP connections from poptop.  Obviously not right, and err, ja.. I
need to get this fixed... Very urgently as well.
My streamlined ppp.conf:
pptp:
  accept dns
  allow mode direct
  disable chap
  disable mschap
  disable mschapv2
  enable lqr
  enable pap
  set device localhost:pptp
  set dial
  set dns 192.168.1.1
  set ifaddr 192.168.1.1 10.255.255.1-10.255.255.254 255.255.255.255
  set log Connect
  set login
  set radius /etc/ppp/ppp.radius
  set server /tmp/loop  0177
  set timeout 0
Now, I suspect that it is only using one device (regardless of the number of
connections), due to the device (socket) specification.  But frankly, if I
don't specify it what device to use, it won't even be able to operate a
single pptp connection.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.  I need to get this resolved asap.  I
didn't send any logs from ppp PPP and the PPTP connections works 100% -
even with Radius.  The problem is purely that PPP always uses the same
device, regardless of the amount of connections (ala tun0).  My kernel does
have allot of tunX devices, and ifconfig -a lists at least two available.
Still, ppp only uses the one.
I'm sad to say, but if I can't get this to work, I'm going to have to be
forced to scrap my BSD box for a W2K Adv server... *sigh*, at least their
RAS server works okish...
Thanks,
me
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Problems with latest update and network

2003-10-19 Thread slave-mike
Please spit out and attach as plain text tht outputs of

ifconfig

netstat -rn

ps ax | grep dh



Richard Morse wrote:
Hi!  I just CVSup'd (last Thursday) and upgraded my system to RELENG_4. 
 I now cannot connect (seemingly) to the network.  Whenever I try to 
ping and outside system, I get ping: sendto: no route to host.  I 
can't ping my router, or even hosts with known IP addresses.  I don't 
see anything odd in `netstat -a` or `ifconfig`, but I'm not the worlds 
greatest networker, so I'm not sure that I would know what is odd.  
uname reports the system as 4.9_PRERELEASE.  The ethernet card is (I 
think) and Intel card -- the device is 'ep'.

Any suggestions on what I can look at to figure out what is going wrong?

Thanks,
Ricky Morse
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re:

2003-10-19 Thread slave-mike
AMD Duron, Athlon, et al, are all i386 compatible processors

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FreeBSD-
Do AMD Duron processors fall under the AMD64 release category, because on
your website it only says that AMD Opteron and Athlon prcoessors are the
AMD64 architecture.
Thanks
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: screen font size

2003-10-19 Thread slave-mike
YOu X-Windowing installation is *not* right.

Update your XFree86 to the latest available (via packages), not
you might need to download and upgrade your FreeBSD 4.5 to 4.8-RELEASE
or 4.9-PRERELEASE, this should give much up to date video card drivers,
then you run XFree86 -configure and follow instructions (hopefully in 
your book) from there.

C. W. Talbot wrote:


Greetings
I recently installed FreeBSD 4.5 with desk top KDE using a CD that came 
with the book, FreeBSD Unleashed, by Michael Urban and Brian Tiemann.  
Everything seemed to go fine until I executed startx.  The desktop 
environment on my screen seems to be at least four times as big as it 
should be, displaying only the top left portion of the desktop.

The strange part of this problem is that during the install process, 
program option screens are the correct size and font.

Any advice to get me going will be appreciated.

C. W. Talbot
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Frustrated with dial-up? Get high-speed for as low as $29.95/month 
(depending on the local service providers in your area).  
https://broadband.msn.com

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Best place to start a misc program at bootup

2003-10-19 Thread slave-mike
a shell script ending with .sh with chmod +x in dir /usr/local/etc/rc.d

man heir

jason dictos wrote:
Hello again,

   So there's /etc/rc, and etc/rc.local, and then there's the fancy rc.conf 
scripts which stat programs. /etc/rc and /etc/rc.local don't appear to be 
designated places for starting up misc. programs, so where do we put these 
misc programs which we want to run at startup?

Thanks,
-Jason
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Silent boot?

2003-10-31 Thread slave-mike
If all you are wanting to do is hide the boot messages at boot time,
the splash boot screen would be an option.
look in /boot/defaults
Yong Yi wrote:
Anyone know whether it'd be possible to cleanly disable
printing the kernel boot messages (the bold white text)?
Meaning, short of commenting out the code that prints this,
is there any way?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Extracting individual Files via tar

2003-11-06 Thread slave-mike
you must use the f flag when manipulation files.
no f flag equals attempt to access tape drive.
Martin McCormick wrote:
	The command

tar ztf  /usr/local/src/ports.tar.gz

produces a table of contents just like the man page says it should.
The man page also says that individual files can be recovered or
listed but I haven't gotten that to work at all. if I try:
$ tar zt ports/print/pstotext/ /usr/local/src/ports.tar.gz

tar (child): /dev/sa0: Cannot open: Permission denied
tar (child): Error is not recoverable: exiting now
gzip: stdin: unexpected end of file
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: ports/print/pstotext: Not found in archive
tar: /usr/local/src/ports.tar.gz: Not found in archive
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors
In the successful test, tar obviously knew which specification
was the archive and was able to uncompress it with the z flag.  The
file specification I am attempting to recover from the archive throws
tar completely off.  I looked in the handbook and all the examples I
found were the more usual procedure of unpacking whole file systems
as in
tar zxf somedir/archive.tar.gz

	I'm not having trouble with that use of tar.

Thank you.

Martin McCormick WB5AGZ  Stillwater, OK 
OSU Information Technology Division Network Operations Group
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Anymore help out there? Re: mail never gets sent

2003-11-06 Thread slave-mike
You need to configure sendmail to route via your ISP's SMTP gateway.
Many IP's are listed in a 'dial up user blacklist', and yahoo, aol, etc
will reject your mail otherwise.
REF: SmartHost in you sendmail config. webmin is your friend.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/06/2003 01:23:22 PM:


What does 'mailq' tell you?
___


Here is the results of mailq -

simradusa# mailq | less
/var/spool/mqueue (8 requests)
-Q-ID- --Size-- -Q-Time- 
Sender/Recipient---
hA6KKrBZ0040865 Thu Nov  6 12:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx4.mail.yahoo.com.)
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx4.mail.yahoo.com.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA6K6bBZ0040575 Thu Nov  6 12:06 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mail.pioneernet.net.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA6IAdBZ003813   38 Thu Nov  6 10:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Warning: could not send message for past 4 hours)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA6HF9BZ0036805 Thu Nov  6 09:15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx3.eunet.no.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA4Gc7wG000649   30 Tue Nov  4 08:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx4.mail.yahoo.com.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA4GXHwG000641   15 Tue Nov  4 08:33 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx3.eunet.no.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA4FCFdC099301   21 Tue Nov  4 07:12 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx4.mail.yahoo.com.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hA4F8udC099278   13 Tue Nov  4 07:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (Deferred: Operation timed out with mx3.eunet.no.)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Total requests: 8
(END)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Anymore help out there

2003-11-06 Thread slave-mike
Set your SmartHost in your sendmail config to relay through your ISP's 
SMTP relay will fix the problem.

Robert Huff wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 The timeouts look suspicious. Is your upstream blocking outgoing SMTP
 connections (perhaps in an attempt to stop spam)? A quick way to check
 would be to:
 
 telnet mx4.mail.yahoo.com smtp
 
 No response would mean that someone is blocking you out (either
 upstream or the receivers).

Tried that, it just sits on 

simradusa# telnet mx4.mail.yahoo.com smtp
Trying 216.136.129.5...
and never connects.


Bingo.  Same response here, and I know I'm being blocked.
Time to talk to the ISP 
			Robert Huff





___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: the -L in dump

2003-11-07 Thread slave-mike
It should.
To test it after running the dump do a
restore -i -f /mnt/backup_drive/ad0backup/main_backup11_03
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was working my way through dump and was going over what the
-L switch is used for.  I guess one would use this when you
are dumping a mounted file system correct?
Here's what I've been trying to do, dump all of / without
dumping /tmp, /proc, /mnt, and /entropy.  I've already
learned to use the nodump flag with some help from a list
member and now I want my dump to run correctly.
My commandline is as follows:

dump -0 -a -f /mnt/backup_drive/ad0backup/main_backup11_03
-h 0 -L -u /
Will a command like this dump the entire file system  for
me for later restore should a complete meltdown happen?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Running RawIO

2003-11-07 Thread slave-mike
If your hard drive is IDE, then /dev/da0 is definately wrong. :)

Try /dev/ad0.

This is presuming of course that rawio doesn't do anything *bad* to your 
data.

Rishi Chopra wrote:
I am newbie who just installed RawIO ('cd /usr/ports/benchmarks/rawio',
'make install') but am having trouble running the benchmark.
I run 'pkg_info -L rawio-1.2' to see that the program is installed in
/usr/local/bin/rawio.  To run the program, I used:
'/usr/local/bin/rawio -a /dev/da0'

but the only ouput is a list of command-line switches and their definitions.
Am I doing something wrong?  My system only has 1 hard drive, and I've tried
using /dev/rasr0 with the same result.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Using the ATAPI/CAM Driver

2004-01-30 Thread slave-mike
Jeff Elkins wrote:

No responses on this yet, but I can hope :)

Another issue:  After changing the permissions on the /dev/pass* devices, 
following a reboot, they all reverted, rendering k3b useless.

I'd appreciate some help...



I've enabled the ATAPI/CAM driver in my kernel under freebsd 5.2 - this has 
given me two devices: /dev/cd0 and /dev/cd1. Thus far, I'm able to burn 
CDs/DVDs but I am having trouble mounting them (as root).

If I issue the command: mount /cdrom or mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /cdrom I get 
the message:  cd9660: /dev/cd0: Device not configured

However, if I comment out the /dev/cd devices in fstab and enable the acd 
devices:

/dev/acd0   /cdrom cd9660   ro,noauto   0   0
/dev/acd1   /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noauto0   0
#/dev/cd0   /cdrom cd9660   ro,noauto   0   0
#/dev/cd1   /cdrom1 cd9660 ro,noauto0   0
I'm able to mount w/o problems.

Do I have something misconfigured?

Thanks,

Jeff Elkins

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

look in /etc/devfs.conf

try adding something like: ...

# Commonly used by many ports

permacd00660
linkacd0cdrom
linkacd0rcdrom
linkacd0racd0
permacd10660
linkacd1dvd
linkacd1rdvd
permast00660
linkast0sa0
permnast0   0660
linknast0   nsa0
permpass0   0660
permpass1   0660
permpass2   0660
permpass3   0660
permscanner00660
permugen0   0660
permugen0.0 0660
permugen0.1 0660
permugen0.2 0660
permugen0.3 0660
# Allow a user in the wheel group to query the smb0 device
permsmb00660
# Allow members of group operator to cat things to the speaker
own speaker root:operator
permspeaker 0660


___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]