Re: struggling with hylafax installation

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Gardner


Alex Teslik wrote:
-- Original Message ---
From: Jeff Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alex Teslik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: list-freebsd-questions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 01:00:37 -0500
Subject: Re: struggling with hylafax installation

Alex Teslik wrote:

Oy, the second post to questions in the same day :(

So, I bought new modem and got it working, but only kind of - the modem is
not echoing commands back to the 'cu' or 'ppp' terminals. It is a USRobotics
5610B 56K Pro Modem. It is not winmodem and the system put it on sio2.
Is this an internal or external modem?


Internal

dmesg | grep 'sio[0-9]':
sio0: configured irq 2 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0x20
sio0: 3COM PCI FaxModem port 0xe000-0xe007 irq 2 at device 10.0 on pci0
sio0: moving to sio2
sio2: type 16550A
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
sio1: type 16550A



I made all the devices in /dev eventhough they already existed.

I added a direct line to the modem in /etc/remote like:
cuaa2:dv=/dev/cuaa2:br#57600:pa=none
I can connect to the modem like:
cu -l /dev/cuaa2
or
tip cuaa2
or
ppp (then 'term')
I can type commands and see them. I type ATDT1234567 and the modem picks up
and dials. So I know it hears and understands me. But it never echoes back
result information. I never see an OK or anything from the modem in the
terminal.
So you get nothing when you type 'AT' followed by enter with nothing else?


Correct.



The problem is that HylaFAX relies on these echo results to control its
communication with the modem. It is looking for those OKs. Does anyone have
any ideas on how to get the OKs working? I have gone through all of the AT
commands USR documents and I can't get anything. Is this a problem with 'cu'
or 'ppp' or 'tip'? The results are obviously going somewhere, but I don't know
where.
And this makes me ask my first question.  Is this internal or external?


The AT command set for this modem is documented (USR issues the same document
for all their modems - this is an online version from another model instead of
a PDF version that is posted with my specific model, but they are the
same) here:

http://www.usr.com/support/839/83909-ug/six.html

This should turn on all echos (but does not):
ATQ0 E1 F0
These should at least get the result codes you need.  Maybe try an atf1
which is Load Factory 1, HW FC and see if that gets the OK working.  The 
only thing I could do to mine to turn of the OK is Q1.


Nothing with atf1 or any of the factory settings. Do you have this modem? Are
you willing to share the steps you took to get it working properly?
uname -a:
FreeBSD xxx.xxx.xxx 4.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #6: Sat Feb  7 16:57:02
PST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DUALP3-4_8_0-RELEASE  i386
Thanks,
Alex
I have:

sio0: configured irq 17 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0: port may not be enabled
sio0: 3COM PCI FaxModem port 0xb400-0xb407 irq 17 at device 2.0 on pci2
sio0: moving to sio4
sio4: type 16550A
running:

FreeBSD genesis.at.home 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #15: Wed Feb  4 
23:09:22 EST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM  i386

All I did is plug mine into a PCI slot and used the cu command you 
mentioned above and it simply worked.  Before that I used it with ppp 
for dialup before I got my ISDN line. Maybe your modem is bad?

Jeff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Mozilla:No window found

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Gardner


Ruslan N. Gogunsci wrote:
Hello All,

I use  FreeBSD5.2
I have one problem with mozilla,when i try in run it says: No window found
I try Mozilla1.5 and 1.6 from ports:with xft and without it, with gtk2 and
without it, frome packages,but always have this problems
Interesting, that in another box with FreeBSD5.2 it'a work fine
Another box and my use same ports tree. All soft installed via ports.
I read google,and find that I must reistall xft but it doesn't help  
Well, the 'no window found' comes from the startup script
/usr/X11R6/bin/mozilla when it calls the mozilla binary to check to see
if mozilla is already running.  If it is not, then that message gets
generated by mozilla.  If there is a running mozilla, you will not get
that message.
Jeff

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3Com USRobotics 5699B 56k fax modem install

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Gardner


Christopher Nehren wrote:
If you can, take your 5699B back and get a 5610B. It's a great
non-winmodem made by USR, and it gave me many successful and
uninterrupted dial-up hours.
OK, mine is the 5610B as well.  I was not sure if the 5699B was a 
winmodem or not.  I misread the thread thinking that he replaced a 
winmodem with a non-winmodem.So, I concur get the 5610B and your 
problems will be gone.

Jeff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: 3Com USRobotics 5699B 56k fax modem install

2004-02-08 Thread Jeff Gardner
You stumped me... All I know is I have this modem and it works with any 
FreeBSD I threw at it:

sio0: 3COM PCI FaxModem port 0xb400-0xb407 irq 17 at device 2.0 on pci2

and ati* commands respond:
ati9
(1.0USR1008\\Modem\PNP00A2\U.S. Robotics 56K FAX INT)FF
OK
ati7
Configuration Profile...
Product type   US/Canada Internal
Product ID:00561000
OptionsV32bis,V.80,V.34+,x2,V.90
Fax OptionsClass 1/Class 2.0
Line Options   Caller ID, Distinctive Ring
Clock Freq 92.0Mhz
EPROM  256k
RAM32k
FLASH date 10/1/99
FLASH rev  5.20.3
DSP date   10/1/99
DSP rev5.20.3
OK
ati3
U.S. Robotics 56K FAX INT V5.20.3
OK



Alex Teslik wrote:
Hey Jeff,

   No, you are correct. I had a 5699B and I have now replaced it with a 5610B.
Both modems do not work with 4.8_RELEASE. I started another thread called
struggling with hylafax install which you have already responded to that
details the problems with the 5610B modem.
   From your uname output I have decided to upgrade to 4.9 RELEASE in the
hopes that that supports it. I can't do a 5 branch upgrade right now.
fingers crossed and thanks,
Alex
P.S.- I'll update after the results of my upgrade.

-- Original Message ---
From: Jeff Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christopher Nehren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alex Teslik [EMAIL PROTECTED], FreeBSD Questions List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 20:52:51 -0500
Subject: Re: 3Com USRobotics 5699B 56k fax modem install

Christopher Nehren wrote:

If you can, take your 5699B back and get a 5610B. It's a great
non-winmodem made by USR, and it gave me many successful and
uninterrupted dial-up hours.
OK, mine is the 5610B as well.  I was not sure if the 5699B was a 
winmodem or not.  I misread the thread thinking that he replaced a 
winmodem with a non-winmodem.So, I concur get the 5610B and your 
problems will be gone.

Jeff
--- End of Original Message ---

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: struggling with hylafax installation

2004-02-07 Thread Jeff Gardner


Alex Teslik wrote:
Oy, the second post to questions in the same day :(

So, I bought new modem and got it working, but only kind of - the modem is
not echoing commands back to the 'cu' or 'ppp' terminals. It is a USRobotics
5610B 56K Pro Modem. It is not winmodem and the system put it on sio2.
Is this an internal or external modem?

I made all the devices in /dev eventhough they already existed.

I added a direct line to the modem in /etc/remote like:
cuaa2:dv=/dev/cuaa2:br#57600:pa=none
I can connect to the modem like:
cu -l /dev/cuaa2
or
tip cuaa2
or
ppp (then 'term')
I can type commands and see them. I type ATDT1234567 and the modem picks up
and dials. So I know it hears and understands me. But it never echoes back
result information. I never see an OK or anything from the modem in the
terminal.
So you get nothing when you type 'AT' followed by enter with nothing else?

The problem is that HylaFAX relies on these echo results to control its
communication with the modem. It is looking for those OKs. Does anyone have
any ideas on how to get the OKs working? I have gone through all of the AT
commands USR documents and I can't get anything. Is this a problem with 'cu'
or 'ppp' or 'tip'? The results are obviously going somewhere, but I don't know
where.
And this makes me ask my first question.  Is this internal or external?

The AT command set for this modem is documented (USR issues the same document
for all their modems - this is an online version from another model instead of
a PDF version that is posted with my specific model, but they are the same) here:
http://www.usr.com/support/839/83909-ug/six.html
This should turn on all echos (but does not):
ATQ0 E1 F0
These should at least get the result codes you need.  Maybe try an atf1
which is Load Factory 1, HW FC and see if that gets the OK working.  The 
only thing I could do to mine to turn of the OK is Q1.

Jeff

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mailing list archives

2004-02-03 Thread Jeff Gardner
I am not subscribed to any lists but I do read the archives regularly 
via the freebsd website.  However, I have noticed that there are not 
messages posted after Jan 26 2004.  Is there an issue regarding the 
archives?

Jeff
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: True IMAP Trash Folder

2004-02-03 Thread Jeff Gardner
Mozilla mail client does this.  It uses a Trash folder on the IMAP 
server.  However, there is no setting that I found which specifies where 
the Trash folder should be or what it is called.  It simply just works 
as expected.  I am using courier-imap for my imap and that is what I get 
here.

Jeff

Matt Juszczak wrote:
Gary wrote:

Gary,

Hi Matt,

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 10:20:09 -0500 UTC (2/2/2004, 9:20 AM -0600 UTC my
time), Matt Juszczak wrote:
M Does anyone know of a mail client that supports a true IMAP trash
M folder?  Evolution doesn't, and so I use evolution on three different
M machines and if I have deleted messages I have to check all three
M machines sometimes to find it.
There is no trash folder in the IMAP protocol itself.. Removing mail is a
two step process, first of deleting it, and second of purging the deleted
mail.
 

I understand now.  Thanks.  So do you know of a mail client that 
supports Deleting Items to a folder called Trash on the IMAP 
server?  Right now I have evolution and if I delete mail it puts it into 
a local trash folder, but I dont see an option to Copy deleted mail to 
folder blah on mail server or something like that.

Thanks!


--
Gary
TEAMWORK...means never having to take all the blame yourself.

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 



___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]