Re: can burn cd's, can't read once burnt
Garrett Cooper wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Timothy Smith wrote: Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Thursday, October 19, 2006 00:17:33 +1000 Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i have an odd issue with 6.0 that i've been trying to solve for ages and nobody seems to know how to answer. 1. i can mount any cd's or dvd's THAT I DIDN'T BURN. makes no difference what media is used. 2. i burn a dvd like so growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0=bailes.iso Are you sure this shouldn't be growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/acd0=bailes.iso ? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ not unless the freebsd handbook is wrong. it burns the dvd, i just can't mount it on this computer. i can mount under windows. Not sure, but it's either UDF or ISO9660 format, and if you don't have the correct support built into your kernel or if you don't have the right fs mentioned in fstab, the kernel/mount will refuse to mount the DVD since it doesn't know how to interpret the contents. Try either mounting with -t udf or -t auto and see if you can mount the disk. Also, if the DVD is an audio DVD, you can't mount it; just use a program like xMMs to play it directly by setting up the CDROM plugin properly.. You need to be a part of the operator group, or set the permissions for the drive properly in order to mount it. - -Garrett -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFNt2K6CkrZkzMC68RAo81AKCH5B/4DDoETPxG9IIYpRYHyd/22ACfeShd 5Q1ndeKDiLmEqr8Ip7KgxPc= =XTP4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" none of the above apply, since i can mount the original dvd just fine, but i can't mount the burnt image. :/ i'm at a loss with what to do ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can burn cd's, can't read once burnt
Paul Schmehl wrote: --On Thursday, October 19, 2006 00:17:33 +1000 Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i have an odd issue with 6.0 that i've been trying to solve for ages and nobody seems to know how to answer. 1. i can mount any cd's or dvd's THAT I DIDN'T BURN. makes no difference what media is used. 2. i burn a dvd like so growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0=bailes.iso Are you sure this shouldn't be growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/acd0=bailes.iso ? Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ not unless the freebsd handbook is wrong. it burns the dvd, i just can't mount it on this computer. i can mount under windows. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
can burn cd's, can't read once burnt
i have an odd issue with 6.0 that i've been trying to solve for ages and nobody seems to know how to answer. 1. i can mount any cd's or dvd's THAT I DIDN'T BURN. makes no difference what media is used. 2. i burn a dvd like so growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0=bailes.iso outputs some info like this... 1608941568/1616412672 (99.5%) @3.9x, remaining 0:03 RBU 22.3% builtin_dd: 789264*2KB out @ average 1.4x1385KBps /dev/pass0: flushing cache :-[ SYNCHRONOUS FLUSH CACHE failed with SK=3h/ASC=A0h/ACQ=80h]: Input/output error and i find i have a dvd i can't mount on my machine, but under say windows i CAN mount it. the same thing applies to cdr's, although i don't get any error messages. so i know my drive works, but it appears freebsd does not. as you can see by my dmesg below i have cam loaded and working, i've also tried turning off dma in loader.conf with no success. acd0: DVDR at ata1-master PIO4 ad10: 190782MB at ata5-master PIO4 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad10s1a cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: moused problem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2/23/06, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi there when i disconnect my mouse from the ps2 port, when i go to reconnect it i find my mouse has stopped working. when i restart moused it works again, but i find that my scroll wheel no longer works in X. any ideas how i can prevent this from happening all together? I do think that ps2 mouses aren't always hot-pluggable, but I'm uncertain. xorg 6.9 and moused -z 4 don't seem to play nicely, I had to take the -z 4 flag out for scroll wheel to work again. I also discovered that some cheap KVMs (belkin omni cube) throw up a lot of random noise when you switch ports, and mouses can do odd and not fun things when you reconnect (up to and inclusing freezing X and panicking the system). If yours isn't related to that maybe it's just your momma board not likin' the hot swappin' and is tryin' to tell you to quit it. -- -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" if i used a usb mouse would i see this problem, if this is the case? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
moused problem
hi there when i disconnect my mouse from the ps2 port, when i go to reconnect it i find my mouse has stopped working. when i restart moused it works again, but i find that my scroll wheel no longer works in X. any ideas how i can prevent this from happening all together? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
problems burning multi session dvd-rw
i'm having some troubles burning a multi session dvd-rw. i blanked te dvd to make sure it was in sequential mode %dvd+rw-format /dev/cd0a -blank * DVD\uRW format utility by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 4.9. * 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected. * blanking 100.0| i then burnt some files to it with %growisofs -Z /dev/cd0a -r -J -speed=4 /home/timothy/burning/* this burns the files sucessfully to the dvd. now according to the docs i should be able to append another session to the dvd with the -M option. this is what i get %growisofs -M /dev/cd0a -r -J -speed=4 /home/timothy/burning/* :-( unable to pread64(2) primary volume descriptor: Invalid argument you most likely want to use -Z option. i'm using 4.10 and an LG multiformat dvd burner. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: divx encoding vob files
Sergey Zaharchenko wrote: Hello Timothy! Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 07:52:16PM +1000 you wrote: i've been looking how to encode vob files into divx avi files, and without fail following any of the howto's i google resulted in failure. i have mencoder installed, vobcopy. i have the vob files and they play perfectly. what do i need to execute to convert them into mpeg4 avi files? So you need to fit a DVD onto a CD;) Here's what I did. For each .vob file mencoder -oac lavc -ovc lavc -lavcopts \ acodec=mp3:abitrate=192:vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=800 -vf scale=512:384 \ -o your.avi your.vob \ then concatenate the avi's cat your1.avi your2.avi ... yourn.avi > all.avi and then fix the resulting avi with mencoder -idx all.avi -ovc copy -oac copy -o result.avi HTH, it doesn't have to fit on a cd, just a single layer dvd. so only a small reduction in size is needed. initally when i tried your command it errored whinging about not having a subfont.tff, so i just pointed it to a generic ttf i had, it then bombed out with this mencoder -oac lavc -ovc lavc -lavcopts \ acodec=mp3:abitrate=192:vcodec=mpeg4:vbitrate=800 -font /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf \ -o 1.avi the_video_you_wanted1-1.vob \ Opening video decoder: [mpegpes] MPEG 1/2 Video passthrough VDec: vo config request - 720 x 576 (preferred csp: Mpeg PES) Could not find matching colorspace - retrying with -vf scale... Opening video filter: [scale] The selected video_out device is incompatible with this codec. VDecoder init failed :( Opening video decoder: [libmpeg2] MPEG 1/2 Video decoder libmpeg2-v0.4.0b Selected video codec: [mpeg12] vfm:libmpeg2 (MPEG-1 or 2 (libmpeg2)) == Building audio filter chain for 48000Hz/2ch/s16le -> 48000Hz/2ch/s16le... Writing AVI header... ODML: Aspect information not (yet?) available or unspecified, not writing vprp header. VDec: vo config request - 720 x 576 (preferred csp: Planar YV12) VDec: using Planar YV12 as output csp (no 0) Movie-Aspect is 1.78:1 - prescaling to correct movie aspect. videocodec: libavcodec (720x576 fourcc=34504d46 [FMP4]) Illegal instruction (core dumped)Trem: 0min 0mb A-V:0.004 [0:0] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
divx encoding vob files
i've been looking how to encode vob files into divx avi files, and without fail following any of the howto's i google resulted in failure. i have mencoder installed, vobcopy. i have the vob files and they play perfectly. what do i need to execute to convert them into mpeg4 avi files? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
avr-gcc
avr-gcc-3.4.3_1 is marked as broken: System's Pod::Man too old to generate the documentation.. anyone here used this or know how to get it working? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.3 doesn't detect wireless card dwl g520
Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 08:51 am, Timothy Smith wrote: Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 06:59 am, Timothy Smith wrote: Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:50 am, Timothy Smith wrote: is there something extra i can do to force it to load this card? What do you mean by "extra"? What have you done so far? Have you recompiled the kernel with device lines for ath and ath_hal? Andrew Gould ___ i tried compiling it with ath and ath_hal, but it totally freaks out on make. error on apci (i thought that stuff was disabled in generic?) What version of FreeBSD are you using? Note that the atheros chipset is only supported by FreeBSD 5*. If apci is incompatible with your hardware, you may have to disable it and revert back to apm (or neither). Andrew Gould it's 5.3 release, apci and apm are disabled in generic (which i copied). i added the lines device ath and device ath_hal i get the error "internal compiler error: segmentation fault" stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ctau sorry i can't provide any kind of dump. wifi is this machines only option for networking :/ should i just give up or is there a glimmer of hope i might get this to work? Since I had a version B of the same wireless PCI card working in 5.3, I wouldn't give up. I would, however, update the system using cvsup in case something is missing/corrupted in the source code. (Also check the version of the PCI card. Is it version B?) Best of luck, Andrew Gould yeah thats the bugger of a thing, it has no network access to update via cvsup, i have to d/l latest i think and try again. can i load kernel modules any other way besides compiling them in? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.3 doesn't detect wireless card dwl g520
Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 06:59 am, Timothy Smith wrote: Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:50 am, Timothy Smith wrote: is there something extra i can do to force it to load this card? What do you mean by "extra"? What have you done so far? Have you recompiled the kernel with device lines for ath and ath_hal? Andrew Gould ___ i tried compiling it with ath and ath_hal, but it totally freaks out on make. error on apci (i thought that stuff was disabled in generic?) What version of FreeBSD are you using? Note that the atheros chipset is only supported by FreeBSD 5*. If apci is incompatible with your hardware, you may have to disable it and revert back to apm (or neither). Andrew Gould it's 5.3 release, apci and apm are disabled in generic (which i copied). i added the lines device ath and device ath_hal i get the error "internal compiler error: segmentation fault" stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ctau sorry i can't provide any kind of dump. wifi is this machines only option for networking :/ should i just give up or is there a glimmer of hope i might get this to work? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: 5.3 doesn't detect wireless card dwl g520
Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tuesday 24 May 2005 02:50 am, Timothy Smith wrote: is there something extra i can do to force it to load this card? What do you mean by "extra"? What have you done so far? Have you recompiled the kernel with device lines for ath and ath_hal? Andrew Gould ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i tried compiling it with ath and ath_hal, but it totally freaks out on make. error on apci (i thought that stuff was disabled in generic?) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: AppendRows() broken?
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 07:20:48PM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: http://www.open-networks.net/Main_example.py the above example code uses AppendRows() to add a row. AppendRows() exists, but appears to have no effect? This doesn't appear to be a FreeBSD question. Look for a more relevant support list. Kris heh, sorry i realised that right after i clicked send. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
AppendRows() broken?
http://www.open-networks.net/Main_example.py the above example code uses AppendRows() to add a row. AppendRows() exists, but appears to have no effect? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
5.3 doesn't detect wireless card dwl g520
is there something extra i can do to force it to load this card? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
gnome-update.sh
how likely is the gnome upgrade script to work on a 4.10 system? i have a few manully updated ports related to wxpython and wxGTK. basicly what i'm intrested in, is can the gnome upgrade script totally blow apart my gnome installation/system, or is it intellegent enough to only replace things once they have built correctly? i'd like to update from 2.6 to 2.10, but i'm a bit nervous about what it'll do :/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 08:36:58AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: yes sorry i jumped in without reading the man page for it's useage. however some digging and a few other helpful emails and TA DA!!! it works!!! i portupgraded freetype2, and then firefox built successfully. i was under the impression that portupgrade looked after dependencies like this on it's own however? If you tell it to..again, please see the manpage :) Kris Specifically: -R --upward-recursive Act on all those packages required by the given packages as well. (When specified with -F, fetch recursively, including the brand new, uninstalled ports that an upgraded port requires) The man page is your friend. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" don't i need to be wary of -R ?? wholesale upgrading of library's might break other apps that use them ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:51:48AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: nsFontMetricsPS.cpp:1633: `struct FTC_ImageTypeRec_' has no member named `face_id' Make sure your freetype port is up-to-date and that you don't have stale freetype files installed from a previous non-ports install or from a previous version of the port that you did not upgrade correctly. Use pkg_which from the portupgrade package to do this (see the manpage). Kris ok maybe we have found the problem here pkg_which freetype2-2.1.7_3 freetype2-2.1.7_3: not found yet pkg_info see's it That's not how you use pkg_which (please read the manpage!), but you've also inadvertently shown that you need to take the first part of my advice. Kris yes sorry i jumped in without reading the man page for it's useage. however some digging and a few other helpful emails and TA DA!!! it works!!! i portupgraded freetype2, and then firefox built successfully. i was under the impression that portupgrade looked after dependencies like this on it's own however? is it possible in my fiddling around i screwed up something which prevented portupgrade upgrading freetype2? fyi i upgraded gaim and some other stuff successfully, so everything seems OK thanks for everyones help and patience, it's what makes freebsd superior. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Kris Kennaway wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 07:33:43AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: it didn't like it too much. i did pkg_delete on the old version then i ran portinstall www/firefox which compiled for a bit then gave the following error gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 This isn't the error though. This is gmake stopping because of something previous going wrong. Are you doing this as root? What's the actual error? I've compiled the latest just fine on 4.11. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" yes i'm doing all this as root i let it do a make install (instead of using portinstall, portinstall seems more verbose) and i got this nsFontMetricsPS.cpp:1633: `struct FTC_ImageTypeRec_' has no member named `face_id' Make sure your freetype port is up-to-date and that you don't have stale freetype files installed from a previous non-ports install or from a previous version of the port that you did not upgrade correctly. Use pkg_which from the portupgrade package to do this (see the manpage). Kris ok maybe we have found the problem here pkg_which freetype2-2.1.7_3 freetype2-2.1.7_3: not found yet pkg_info see's it ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: it didn't like it too much. i did pkg_delete on the old version then i ran portinstall www/firefox which compiled for a bit then gave the following error gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 This isn't the error though. This is gmake stopping because of something previous going wrong. Are you doing this as root? What's the actual error? I've compiled the latest just fine on 4.11. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" yes i'm doing all this as root i let it do a make install (instead of using portinstall, portinstall seems more verbose) and i got this nsFontMetricsPS.cpp:1633: `struct FTC_ImageTypeRec_' has no member named `face_id' gmake[4]: *** [nsFontMetricsPS.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/gfx/src/ps' gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/gfx/src' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/gfx' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
albi wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 19:54:07 +1000 Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: a very wild guess, perhaps you made your /tmp nosuid and noexec, and now compilation fails because of that ? (for me firefox compiled fine from ports some days ago, firefox-1.0.4,1) drwxrwxrwt 9 root wheel 1536 May 19 19:36 tmp nope. keep in mind everyone that this is 4.10 there's nothing in /tmp that could be causing this i'm sure. is there anything i can do to make sure my ports and src tree's are clean besides make clean? well, if your /tmp was mounted nosuid and noexec then a make world would also fail i have only 5.4-p1 systems in use (and not really time right now to install 4.10 to try to reproduce this) did you do a : portsclean -C portsclean -D portupgrade -arvy isnt' there some upgrade guide i should be reading before doing -ar ? this system is very important, and while it doesn't matter if firefox is broken for the moment, breaking something like gnome would be a total disaster ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
albi wrote: On Thu, 19 May 2005 19:36:10 +1000 Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall92181.0 make reinstall a very wild guess, perhaps you made your /tmp nosuid and noexec, and now compilation fails because of that ? (for me firefox compiled fine from ports some days ago, firefox-1.0.4,1) drwxrwxrwt 9 root wheel 1536 May 19 19:36 tmp nope. keep in mind everyone that this is 4.10 there's nothing in /tmp that could be causing this i'm sure. is there anything i can do to make sure my ports and src tree's are clean besides make clean? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Josh Ockert wrote: a tmp file? thats odd... looks like you have some cruft hanging about i would try booting to single-user, rm -Rf ing /tmp, rebooting, and then: cd /usr/ports make update (assuming you have set up your cvsup stuff to work nicely with this) cd /usr/ports/www/firefox make clean make install if you havent followed the handbook to set up the cvsup flags right to handle 'make update' then follow whatever procedure you use to update your ports. nope it tried it again. any more ideas? i don't need to update, i only just cvsup'd my ports tree 5 minutes ago. i did a make clean and still the error gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall92181.0 make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! www/firefox (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Timothy Smith wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Why aren't you compiling this from the port? With a port someone has already gone to the trouble of making FreeBSD specific patches to fix things like configuration issues. Is there a reason for trying to re-invent all those wheels? well whats the lastest port, how quickly are ports brought up todate with the current version? i'd like to be able to compile it myself and not have to rely on someone else. In the case of firefox, the answer seems to be "pretty damn quickly". The same is true of most popular ports. I can only think of one port which I have which doesn't seem to have kept up with the original (fcron). With a port you *do* compile it yourself (it's packages which are pre-compiled and I rarely touch those). What you get are checksums, patches, dependencies calculated automatically. If you are desperate for a version of something which is newer than the port (or, older), you can still recompile it yourself, though if it's as complicated as firefox you are likely to run in to trouble. You also get a good record of what exactly is installed on your system (pkg_info) and semi-automatic info about what needs upgrading (cvsup and portupgrade, which I highky recommend; or the newer portmanager, but that dumps core for me). In the time you've been having all this trouble, I compiled and installed one version of firefox (1.03). Then came various potential security holes, and version 1.04 came out, which I then upgraded to. The only hassle was waiting for it to compile! With portupgrade it even remebered which configuration options I had picked the first time, and re-used them the second time. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ok sounds fair enough. i'm following the handbooks chapter on cvsup, i've alreayd upgraded my ports, i'm now portinstall'ing firefox (1.0.4) we will see how it holds up there seems to be no chatper on portupgrade, is this because there's already plenty of info out there about it? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" it didn't like it too much. i did pkg_delete on the old version then i ran portinstall www/firefox which compiled for a bit then gave the following error gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall25370.0 make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! www/firefox (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Why aren't you compiling this from the port? With a port someone has already gone to the trouble of making FreeBSD specific patches to fix things like configuration issues. Is there a reason for trying to re-invent all those wheels? well whats the lastest port, how quickly are ports brought up todate with the current version? i'd like to be able to compile it myself and not have to rely on someone else. In the case of firefox, the answer seems to be "pretty damn quickly". The same is true of most popular ports. I can only think of one port which I have which doesn't seem to have kept up with the original (fcron). With a port you *do* compile it yourself (it's packages which are pre-compiled and I rarely touch those). What you get are checksums, patches, dependencies calculated automatically. If you are desperate for a version of something which is newer than the port (or, older), you can still recompile it yourself, though if it's as complicated as firefox you are likely to run in to trouble. You also get a good record of what exactly is installed on your system (pkg_info) and semi-automatic info about what needs upgrading (cvsup and portupgrade, which I highky recommend; or the newer portmanager, but that dumps core for me). In the time you've been having all this trouble, I compiled and installed one version of firefox (1.03). Then came various potential security holes, and version 1.04 came out, which I then upgraded to. The only hassle was waiting for it to compile! With portupgrade it even remebered which configuration options I had picked the first time, and re-used them the second time. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ok sounds fair enough. i'm following the handbooks chapter on cvsup, i've alreayd upgraded my ports, i'm now portinstall'ing firefox (1.0.4) we will see how it holds up there seems to be no chatper on portupgrade, is this because there's already plenty of info out there about it? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: i've gotten futher, i've found you can't compile it with make, you need to use gmake. sunbird compiled fine, however firefox errors with +++ making chrome /usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk/resources => ../../dist/bin/chrome/en-US.jar error: file '../../toolkit/locales/en-US/chrome/necko/contents.rdf' doesn't exist at ../../config/make-jars.pl line 418, chunk 9. gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk/resources' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 Why aren't you compiling this from the port? With a port someone has already gone to the trouble of making FreeBSD specific patches to fix things like configuration issues. Is there a reason for trying to re-invent all those wheels? --Alex well whats the lastest port, how quickly are ports brought up todate with the current version? i'd like to be able to compile it myself and not have to rely on someone else. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
apache2 headers cache
hi there i have a situation where my isp's tranparent proxy is caching an old file from my webserver (it's a zip file) and they have suggested turning off caching HTTP headers on my webserver, i can't find any docs on this has any one had experience with this? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Timothy Smith wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: ./configure gets *** The libIDL-config script installed by libIDL could not be found *** If libIDL was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in *** your path, or set the LIBIDL_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to libIDL-config. checking for orbit-config... no configure: error: libIDL not found. libIDL 0.6.3 or higher is required. [and ...] %locate libIDL-config-2 /usr/local/bin/libIDL-config-2 %which make /usr/bin/make %ls -lsa `which make` 224 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 206736 May 26 2004 /usr/bin/make That looks right. (Btw "/usr/local/bin/libIDL-config was installed by package ORBit-0.5.17_2" and that doesn't appear to be a dependency of firefox's. I think the message from firefox install is just confusing the issue and it is libIDL-config-2 that's required). More obvious questions. You are doing the firefox install as root and root does have /usr/local/bin/ in it's path and libIDL-config-2 is executable? As root check with: "which libIDL-config-2". Just to confirm it working, I tried just configuring firefox and got: checking for libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.0... yes checking LIBIDL_CFLAGS... -I/usr/local/include/libIDL-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include checking LIBIDL_LIBS... -L/usr/local/lib -lIDL-2 I'm not sure what else to suggest. make clean in firefox and try making again. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i wasn't doing ./configure as root, doing it as root and it's found libIDL-config without a problem, however i've runinto something else now make halts at "Makefile", line 386: Missing dependency operator Error expanding embedded variable. note there's a few other missing dependency operator msg's above that a quick look in the make file see's this at line 386 # Hack to generate xpidl Makefile ifneq ($(BUILD_MODULES),all) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i've gotten futher, i've found you can't compile it with make, you need to use gmake. sunbird compiled fine, however firefox errors with +++ making chrome /usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk/resources => ../../dist/bin/chrome/en-US.jar error: file '../../toolkit/locales/en-US/chrome/necko/contents.rdf' doesn't exist at ../../config/make-jars.pl line 418, chunk 9. gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk/resources' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla/netwerk' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/home/timothy/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re:
kylie pye wrote: i need help with my laptop its a toshiba te2100 and the screens black even when i turn it on and have the battery cord being charged what has made this happen? is there anything i can do to fix it? _ REALESTATE: biggest buy/rent/share listings http://ninemsn.realestate.com.au ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" what makes you think this is a freebsd problem? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: ./configure gets *** The libIDL-config script installed by libIDL could not be found *** If libIDL was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in *** your path, or set the LIBIDL_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to libIDL-config. checking for orbit-config... no configure: error: libIDL not found. libIDL 0.6.3 or higher is required. [and ...] %locate libIDL-config-2 /usr/local/bin/libIDL-config-2 %which make /usr/bin/make %ls -lsa `which make` 224 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 206736 May 26 2004 /usr/bin/make That looks right. (Btw "/usr/local/bin/libIDL-config was installed by package ORBit-0.5.17_2" and that doesn't appear to be a dependency of firefox's. I think the message from firefox install is just confusing the issue and it is libIDL-config-2 that's required). More obvious questions. You are doing the firefox install as root and root does have /usr/local/bin/ in it's path and libIDL-config-2 is executable? As root check with: "which libIDL-config-2". Just to confirm it working, I tried just configuring firefox and got: checking for libIDL-2.0 >= 0.8.0... yes checking LIBIDL_CFLAGS... -I/usr/local/include/libIDL-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include checking LIBIDL_LIBS... -L/usr/local/lib -lIDL-2 I'm not sure what else to suggest. make clean in firefox and try making again. --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i wasn't doing ./configure as root, doing it as root and it's found libIDL-config without a problem, however i've runinto something else now make halts at "Makefile", line 386: Missing dependency operator Error expanding embedded variable. note there's a few other missing dependency operator msg's above that a quick look in the make file see's this at line 386 # Hack to generate xpidl Makefile ifneq ($(BUILD_MODULES),all) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: Or try: setenv LIBIDL_CONFIG `which libIDL-config-2` or it {ba,z}sh equivalent. --Alex ok i just did the following ( i must have mis typed the first tiem or something ) and the ./configure finished, but it get "Makefile", line 406: Missing dependency operator Error expanding embedded variable." when i do "make" this is all screwed up :/ This thing is that I don't believe any of this should be necessary. Firefox should find ibIDL-config-2. Can you tell us where on your filesystem ibIDL-config-2 is located? Also, check which make you are running. which make and ls -lsa `which make` --Alex ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" %locate libIDL-config-2 /usr/local/bin/libIDL-config-2 %which make /usr/bin/make %ls -lsa `which make` 224 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 206736 May 26 2004 /usr/bin/make ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Alex Zbyslaw wrote: Timothy Smith wrote: set the LIBIDL_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to libIDL-config. Or try: setenv LIBIDL_CONFIG `which libIDL-config-2` or it {ba,z}sh equivalent. --Alex ok i just did the following ( i must have mis typed the first tiem or something ) and the ./configure finished, but it get "Makefile", line 406: Missing dependency operator Error expanding embedded variable." when i do "make" this is all screwed up :/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: lnc0: Missed packet -- no receive buffer
Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: Hey! I get this message all the time. What does it mean? Can it be prevented, or in worst cases ignored? Thanks. -- Fafa Hafiz Krantz Research Designer @ http://www.home.no/barbershop Enlightened @ http://www.home.no/barbershop/smart/sharon.pdf it's people invading your privacy - why do you keep posting to this list? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
can't build firefox 1.0.4 on 4.10
./configure gets *** The libIDL-config script installed by libIDL could not be found *** If libIDL was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in *** your path, or set the LIBIDL_CONFIG environment variable to the *** full path to libIDL-config. checking for orbit-config... no configure: error: libIDL not found. libIDL 0.6.3 or higher is required. pkg_info shows libIDL-0.8.3_2 A library for creating trees of CORBA Interface Definition so obviously it's not looking into the right place, only there doesn't seem to be a libIDL-config, there is how ever a libIDL-config-2 ? i tried setting libidl_config to that but it's no go. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Mailinglist privacy: MY NAME ALL OVER GOOGLE!
Anthony Atkielski wrote: Marc Fonvieille writes: All, and I said "All", mailing list subscribing forms mention their archives ("To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the freebsd-blahblah Archives."). It is impossible to miss it. Then why do so many forms require that you tick a checkbox to assert that you've read and accepted the terms on the page? In any case, nothing like that exists for FreeBSD lists. but you DO have to consent to the terms and conditions in to confirmation email that is sent to you, you have to repsond to this email. the actual mode of agreement is irrelivant You can't claim your not bound by a contract just because you didn't read it ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
grappling with users
whats the correct method of creating a deamon user account, which you can use to start a deamon process but can't be logged into. so far i have not seen a single good explaination or example of this below is my svn user, who has /sbin/nologin, but can't be used because it runs the no login shell. whats the correct way to do this? %su svn -c "svnadmin create /usr/local/svn/PubWare" This account is currently not available. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cvs lock files
is there an elegant solution to this problem titan# cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/PubWare checkout python/PubWare.py cvs server: failed to create lock directory for `/PubWare/python' (/PubWare/python/#cvs.lock): Permission denied cvs server: failed to obtain dir lock in repository `/PubWare/python' cvs [server aborted]: read lock failed - giving up i did some googling and it turns ou the problem is in the cvsroot anonymous doesn't have access, chmoding everything stikes me as a bit problematic. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
installing 4.10 AND 5.3 on one system
is it possible to install 4.10 and 5.3 on a single system? i'm need them for testing a various times but i've only got the one system for them both. i tried myself, but i ended up with getting "not ufs" error msg after the boot prompt, it did show 2 freebsd options however. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
no patch whats going on
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/12825/info/ openbsd and netbsd have taken action on this, but i see no movment in the freebsd camp ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD?
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jon Drews writes: If you think the FreeBSD community is a "nightmare" then why are you sticking around except to stir up strife ? It's the closest thing to support available for FreeBSD. There's nothing else. I do note, however, that only about 10% of my questions to the list actually generate useful answers. The other questions either get no replies at all, or vague replies that really aren't useful, or pure guesses. One gets the impression that nobody really knows anything about FreeBSD, or, if anybody does, he never replies to this list. That is bullshit. Take your recent request regarding firefox. I told you exactly how to do it - install ports, run portupgrade, then make install in the firefox directory. I did exactly that Monday evening on a system I was setting up and it worked perfectly. I also told you not to screw with the precompiled firefox package, and you did it anyway, and you had problems. Indeed, the only messages that generate replies are those that suggest that FreeBSD is anything other than sweetness and light. Serious questions about how to use the software are met by a deafening silence in too many cases. That's why I say what I do on my Web site. Anyone thinking of running FreeBSD in a production environment needs on-site experts to deal with it, because they'll never get any help from anywhere else. Untrue. There's many of the core team that make a living consulting with FreeBSD and that has been going on for years. What you really mean to say is that they will never get any CHEAP help from anywhere else, whereas with Windows since it's common as dogshit, there's enough activity in the huge number of Windows forums that your bound to run across the answer to your question, for free, if you fish around for it long enough. Ted ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i've had everything i've ever asked about answered by multiple people, quickly and they have all be very insightful answers. what the parent poster needs to look at it not the quality of the answers, but the quality of his questions. no one is going to waste time deciphering some vague question like " freebsd doesn't work help me" ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
compiling xorg 6.8.2
has anyone been successful with this? mine errors on make install ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh key authentication
markzero wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 11:27:03AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: i've followed the howto exactly and it still doesn't work. i don't know wtf i'm doing wrong. here is the output i get in verbose mode the files i have in the remote host ls -l total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 241 Feb 18 22:44 authorised_keys -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 621 Feb 19 11:12 authorised_keys2 You're going to kick yourself. It should be authorized keys, with a 'z'. Mark nope still no good. doesn't work. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: ssh key authentication
markzero wrote: On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 11:27:03AM +1000, Timothy Smith wrote: i've followed the howto exactly and it still doesn't work. i don't know wtf i'm doing wrong. here is the output i get in verbose mode the files i have in the remote host ls -l total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 241 Feb 18 22:44 authorised_keys -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 621 Feb 19 11:12 authorised_keys2 You're going to kick yourself. It should be authorized keys, with a 'z'. Mark yes, yes i did kick myself ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ssh key authentication
i've followed the howto exactly and it still doesn't work. i don't know wtf i'm doing wrong. here is the output i get in verbose mode OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030924, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090704f debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Rhosts Authentication disabled, originating port will not be trusted. debug1: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to foo.com [#] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /home/timothy/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /home/timothy/.ssh/id_dsa type 2 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 FreeBSD-20040419 debug1: match: OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 FreeBSD-20040419 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.5p1 FreeBSD-20030924 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: dh_gen_key: priv key bits set: 120/256 debug1: bits set: 1027/2048 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY The authenticity of host 'foo.com (#)' can't be established. DSA key fingerprint is #. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added 'foo.com' (DSA) to the list of known hosts. debug1: bits set: 1018/2048 debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: kex_derive_keys debug1: newkeys: mode 1 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: waiting for SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: newkeys: mode 0 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: done: ssh_kex2. debug1: send SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST debug1: service_accept: ssh-userauth debug1: got SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT debug1: authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: next auth method to try is publickey debug1: try privkey: /home/timothy/.ssh/id_rsa debug1: try pubkey: /home/timothy/.ssh/id_dsa debug1: authentications that can continue: publickey,keyboard-interactive debug1: next auth method to try is keyboard-interactive Password: the files i have in the local host ls -l /home/timothy/.ssh/ total 6 -rw--- 1 timothy wheel 672 Feb 19 11:06 id_dsa -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 621 Feb 19 11:06 id_dsa.pub -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 614 Feb 19 11:21 known_hosts the files i have in the remote host ls -l total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 241 Feb 18 22:44 authorised_keys -rw-r--r-- 1 timothy wheel 621 Feb 19 11:12 authorised_keys2 ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: Anthony
Stijn Hoop wrote: On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:34:24AM +0100, Anthony Atkielski wrote: MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than almost any other browser. Firefox does pretty well, tough; Opera much less so. Thank you for giving me another reason to killfile you again, after you resurfaced without your vanity domain. You clearly don't know jack about the things you write. Maybe you could write some code instead of exploding the lists with drivel. *plonk* --Stijn hah well said sir ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
pls ignore
___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
install cd crazyness
i must be doing somethign wrong with burncd, becuase when i burn the RELEASE iso's, the system boots from the cd, gets all the way through the sysinstall menu's and when it comes to copying files it says it either can't read the cd or that it looks like an audio cd. here is how i burnt them burncd -e -f /dev/acd0c data /home/timothy/5.3-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cronjob doesn't run???
i have an odd problem with this cronjob, #!/bin/sh cd /home/timothy burncd -f /dev/acd0c blank tar -zcvf ./burning/thunderbird.tar.gz ./.thunderbird/* tar -zcvf ./burning/Projects.tar.gz ./Projects/* tar -zcvf ./burning/cvsd.tar.gz /usr/local/cvsd/* mkisofs -L -l -relaxed-filenames -o tmp.iso burning burncd -e -f /dev/acd0c data tmp.iso rm tmp.iso rm burning/* n# ls -l /etc/periodic/daily/Backup -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 323 Dec 27 22:42 /etc/periodic/daily/Backup as you can see it's not a permissions issue. the job must do something, because i end up with a cdrw i can't mount :\ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
dvd burning was can't mount cdrom
ok i disabled hw.ata.atapi_dma="1" in loader.conf and this sovled the problem. how ever, i still can't burn a dvd with growisofs. i run titan# dvd+rw-format -blank=full /dev/cd0a * DVDïRW format utility by <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, version 4.9. * 4.7GB DVD-RW media in Sequential mode detected. * blanking / that finishes without error titan# growisofs -use-the-force-luke=dao -Z /dev/cd0a=PubWare.exe Executing 'builtin_dd if=PubWare.exe of=/dev/pass1 obs=32k seek=0' /dev/pass1: engaging DVD-RW DAO upon user request... /dev/pass1: reserving 2160 block, warning for short DAO recording /dev/pass1: "Current Write Speed" is 4.1x1385KBps. 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? 0/4415108 ( 0.0%) @0x, remaining ??:?? :-[ [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with SK=3h/ASC=73h/ACQ=04h]: Input/output error :-( attempt to re-run with -dvd-compat -dvd-compat to engage DAO or apply full blanking procedure :-( write failed: Input/output error could it be the blanking procedure is the problem? theres a lot of doc's saying upgrade to 5.20 for dvd+rw-tools my question, is why ship such an old crap version. i mean 4.10 isn't THAT old, these docs are bloody old old. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
ok i deleted the devices and ran sh MAKEDEV acd0 and still no joy i'll pre-empt the "it must be hardware" by assuming you it's not, it's does it on 2 different drives which work in other machines just fine. one is an lg dvdrw the other a cdrw my only possible thought now is it's something to do with dma Timothy Smith wrote: Peter Harmsen wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-12-15 09:43, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0a: Invalid argument Try without *any* partition name: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mount Since /mount is a non-standard name, you _did_ check that /mount exists as a directory right? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Have you checked the acl rights of /dev/acd0 ? On my PC i just installed FreeBSD 5.3 Issuing chgrp "/dev/acd0" + chmod 770 "/dev/acd0" solved the problem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i'm su'd to root.. it's not a permission problem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
Peter Harmsen wrote: Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-12-15 09:43, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0a: Invalid argument Try without *any* partition name: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mount Since /mount is a non-standard name, you _did_ check that /mount exists as a directory right? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" Have you checked the acl rights of /dev/acd0 ? On my PC i just installed FreeBSD 5.3 Issuing chgrp "/dev/acd0" + chmod 770 "/dev/acd0" solved the problem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" i'm su'd to root.. it's not a permission problem. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
Subhro wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy Smith Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:14 To: James; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0a: Invalid argument the exact same issue. reinstalling etc is not an option since this is a development machine and i need to work on it all the time, can't afford for it to be down. fyi i am using freebsd 4.10 release is there a way i can delete /dev/acd0* and remake the device, could this be a fix? As far as remaking the devices are concerned, you can use the MAKEDEV script for remaking all devices. Are you sure that you drive is jumpered properly and the data cables connected to the drives are in good condition? Regards S. Indian Institute of Information Technology Subhro Sankha Kar Block AQ-13/1, Sector V Salt Lake City PIN 700091 India yes, the hardware is perfect. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
what your suggesting is for 5.x mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0: No such file or directory and yes /mount does exist and yes i do have permission to use it. note how earlier i posted the problem with /cdrom Giorgos Keramidas wrote: On 2004-12-15 09:43, Timothy Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0a: Invalid argument Try without *any* partition name: titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mount Since /mount is a non-standard name, you _did_ check that /mount exists as a directory right? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Re: cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0a /mount cd9660: /dev/cd0a: Invalid argument the exact same issue. reinstalling etc is not an option since this is a development machine and i need to work on it all the time, can't afford for it to be down. fyi i am using freebsd 4.10 release is there a way i can delete /dev/acd0* and remake the device, could this be a fix? James wrote: Hi, Have you tried: # mount -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mntpnt Seeing as how you said its a cdrw, I remember reading somewhere to use /dev/cd0 and not /dev/acd0 On Tuesday 14 December 2004 07:16 am, Timothy Smith wrote: i have a genuine problem here. i noticed my backup cdrw's had stopped working at some point. upon furthur investigation i find i cannot mount cd's full stop. titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mount cd9660: /dev/acd0c: Invalid argument the above command makes the drive light flicker for 3 seconds then the error. this is NOT a hardware problem. i get the exact same issue with my brand new dvd drive. here is what dmesg gas to say: acd0: DVD-R at ata1-slave WDMA2 da0 at hpt3740 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 190782MB (390721957 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 24321C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [1 x 2048 byte records] note this was working perfectly. i suspect that some how my ata device has gone "bad" some how. let me get the obvious replys out of the way: yes i have googled nothing i can find has even touched on a fix. yes there is a disc in the drive no it is not an audio disk. there is nothing else connected to the ide ports. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
cannot mount cdrom - not a newbie problem
i have a genuine problem here. i noticed my backup cdrw's had stopped working at some point. upon furthur investigation i find i cannot mount cd's full stop. titan# mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mount cd9660: /dev/acd0c: Invalid argument the above command makes the drive light flicker for 3 seconds then the error. this is NOT a hardware problem. i get the exact same issue with my brand new dvd drive. here is what dmesg gas to say: acd0: DVD-R at ata1-slave WDMA2 da0 at hpt3740 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 190782MB (390721957 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 24321C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [1 x 2048 byte records] note this was working perfectly. i suspect that some how my ata device has gone "bad" some how. let me get the obvious replys out of the way: yes i have googled nothing i can find has even touched on a fix. yes there is a disc in the drive no it is not an audio disk. there is nothing else connected to the ide ports. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"