Marc G. Fournier wrote:
I've increased the size of the IDTOKEN to 32 from 16, since I've been
noticing alot of duplicates when two hosts submit at close to the same
time ...
Ummm... that's actually really bad. That means that the RNG used by OpenSSL
(hence SSH and others) is not actually
On 9/29/06, Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As painful as it was to do, I backed up the old data tonight and wiped out
the stats ... for one major reason: the stats lost their accuracy.
As I said, you just need to download the new version and run it, you don't
have to wait for the
On 29/09/2006 1:11 AM, Joao Barros wrote:
On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases
stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on
that?
Yep, each individual *BSD is getting its own detailed stats summary
section... they're not finished yet, so
On 9/29/06, Antony Mawer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/09/2006 1:11 AM, Joao Barros wrote:
On another subject, with the addition of the other BSDs the releases
stats for example are pretty much nonsense. Do you plan to work on
that?
Yep, each individual *BSD is getting its own detailed
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On the other hand, the duplicates could be the result of people deliberately
trying to frig the statistics or just innocently running the 300.statistics
script manually several times. In either case, entries with duplicate tokens
should be discarded -- I guess you'ld
On 29/09/2006 2:01 AM, Erik Norgaard wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
On the other hand, the duplicates could be the result of people
deliberately
trying to frig the statistics or just innocently running the
300.statistics
script manually several times. In either case, entries with duplicate
Antony is working on operating system sub-pages that will be linked from the
operating system summary page ... check out what he has so far by going to:
http://www.bsdstats.org/freebsd
--On Friday, September 29, 2006 12:11:51 +0100 Joao Barros
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On
As painful as it was to do, I backed up the old data tonight and wiped out
the stats ... for one major reason: the stats lost their accuracy.
As several have noticed, the OpenBSD numbers have been increasing quite
steadily, but looking at the RAW urls coming in, 99% of those #s were from
a
