Re: IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD

2008-10-13 Thread Zane C.B.
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 12:28:15 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone know something good. good=simply, works well, preferably no or minimal GUI. The most reliable is 'net/ekiga'. I've run into problems with 'net/kiax' and crossing NAT. That was nearly two years

Re: IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD

2008-10-13 Thread Wojciech Puchar
anyone know something good. good=simply, works well, preferably no or minimal GUI. The most reliable is 'net/ekiga'. I've run into problems with 'net/kiax' and crossing NAT. That was nearly two years ago so it may for now kiax works for me (but no NAT), just they automatic gain control and

Re: IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD

2008-10-13 Thread Wojciech Puchar
Jagermiester so this may not make to sense. The problem I originally ran into is that behind goat fraging NAT I would run into issues receiving calls. The problem I ran into is that this is not kiax problem. this may be your NAT problem. what is doing NAT? IAX has configurable ping time,

IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD

2008-10-12 Thread Wojciech Puchar
anyone know something good. good=simply, works well, preferably no or minimal GUI. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: IAX2 (or SIP) softphone for FreeBSD

2008-10-12 Thread Zane C.B.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:23:54 +0200 (CEST) Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone know something good. good=simply, works well, preferably no or minimal GUI. The most reliable is 'net/ekiga'. I've run into problems with 'net/kiax' and crossing NAT. That was nearly two years ago so it