Alejandro Imass writes:
Hi,
> IMO it's stupid as well and I second Dick's opinion.
You're at least two, great.
> The module doesn't hurt anyone, and reduces confusion. I think that
> PHP is still more heavily deployed on mod_php than on anything else.
> The Apache module should be built by def
;>
>>> *You* think it's stupid.
>>
>> Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
>> But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's
>> better to *have* the pache module and disable it than to *have to* use
>> ports
>> jus
stupid.
>
> Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo"
> But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's
> better to *have* the pache module and disable it than to *have to* use ports
> just to get it.
>
IMO it's stupid as well and I second Dick'
etter to *have* the pache module and disable it than to *have to* use
ports just to get it.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
y servers, you can build custom packages with options
you need and then deploy.
If you tinker with your home server, using the ports isn't that a
problem...
Éric Masson
--
je comprend pas ce a quoi sert ce site ou cette boite a lettre.J'y voit
plein de messages et autres anneries al
d packaging
> system. Given it is such a major infrastructure change the switch over
> will have to be carefully managed and I'd expect there to be a lot of
> activity over on freebsd-ports@ while it is all in beta.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew
>
Thanks for the
Op 9-1-2012 23:00, alexus schreef:
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have
anaged and I'd expect there to be a lot of
activity over on freebsd-ports@ while it is all in beta.
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracanin
On 10-01-2012, Tue [08:51:33], n j wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske
> > wrote:
> >> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
> >> Desktop and casual usa
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
>> Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve you better if you like to stay
>> up-to-
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:00 PM, alexus wrote:
> Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
>
> One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
> somewhat limited vs ports...
>
> For example:
>
> I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to w
Thank you so much for this wonderful feedback!
One of the things I'm seeing is that unfortunately packages are
somewhat limited vs ports...
For example:
I'm trying to get Apache httpd + PHP to work, after pkg_add -r php5,
php5 doesn't have libphp5.so that links Apache and PHP
> -Original Message-
> From: aim...@yabarana.com [mailto:aim...@yabarana.com] On Behalf Of
> Alejandro Imass
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 11:37 AM
> To: Devin Teske
> Cc: alexus; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports vs packages
>
> On Mon, Ja
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
[...]
> Of course, this is explicit to rather serious production environments.
> Desktop and casual usage ... ports may serve
On 1/9/12 6:48 PM, claudiu vasadi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, alexus wrote:
>
>> Ports vs Packages?
>>
>> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>>
>> pros/cons
>>
>> --
>> http://alexus.org/
>> _
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:17:37 -0500, alexus wrote:
Ports vs Packages?
/usr/ports vs pkg_*
pros/cons
In short:
ports:
pro:
most current, if properly updated
build from source (security!)
apply
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:17 PM, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
>
> --
> http://alexus.org/
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of alexus
> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 9:18 AM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: ports vs packages
>
> Ports vs Packages?
On Mon, January 9, 2012 12:17 pm, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
Ports:
Compiled to *your* specs, for *your* machine.
Faster/smaller downloads.
More options available for customization.
Can apply your own patches.
Packages:
Faster
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:06:27 -0500, Alejandro Imass wrote:
> Use pre-built binary packages to install very large
> stuff like Gnome, Open Office, etc.
Not an option if your required language settings or
the inclusion or exclusion of desktop bindings (KDE,
Gnome, CUPS) don't match the default option
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012 12:17:37 -0500, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
In short:
ports:
pro:
most current, if properly updated
build from source (security!)
apply opti
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:17 PM, alexus wrote:
> Ports vs Packages?
>
> /usr/ports vs pkg_*
>
> pros/cons
The beauty of FBSD: they ultimately update the same DB, heck even Perl
modules installed via the FBSD CPAN shell get updated to that same db.
My rule of thumb: use ports
Ports vs Packages?
/usr/ports vs pkg_*
pros/cons
--
http://alexus.org/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-uns
o check portaudit for vulnerabilities.
>
> For such tasks, csup provides a good basis for explicitely
> specifying a RELEASE or security patch level. This can be
> applied to both the sources and the ports tree (of the
> corresponding date).
You would use the tag that was used for the tree
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:14:35PM +, RW wrote:
> If it's for a production server, you might consider building your own
> packages on a separate machine.
My principal interest is server side.
The true is, a year ago, I gave a try to a server (a web server)
in a VPS and the only two things
s like individual-separated statements, that's why you
> > did not fully understand my question (my horrible English helps
> > too :-)).
> >
> > Let's see if I can explain myself.
> >
> > I know that FreeBSD base system and 3rd party are "managed&q
lly understand my question (my horrible English helps
> too :-)).
>
> Let's see if I can explain myself.
>
> I know that FreeBSD base system and 3rd party are "managed"
> separately. For RELEASE I meant the ports included in a fresh
> RELEASE install. The sc
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:03:01PM -0600, Adam Vande More wrote:
> That is the price you pay for updated software on FreeBSD.
>
OK, Adam. That's almost as expected.
> --
> Adam Vande More
Thanks to all.
Walter
___
freebsd-quest
, this will likely result in a significant amount of compiling depending
time from RELEASE and your chosen packages and whatever PACKAGESITE is set
to eg stable. That is the price you pay for updated software on FreeBSD.
Also be sure to read /usr/ports/UPDATING
There are man pages and a handbook
an explain myself.
I know that FreeBSD base system and 3rd party are "managed"
separately. For RELEASE I meant the ports included in a fresh
RELEASE install. The scenario is: what to do after a fresh
RELEASE install. Once you updated the ports with 'portsnap fech
extract update'
On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Walter Alejandro Iglesias wrote:
> I am giving my firsts steps with FreeBSD.
Greetings and welcome...
> In a RELEASE fresh install, after updating the ports using i.e.
> portsnap, the packages downloaded with pkp_add -r are older
> versions respec
nstall, after updating the ports using i.e.
> portsnap, the packages downloaded with pkp_add -r are older
> versions respect their port counterparts, leading to
> dependencies issues. So, once the ports tree is updated:
>
> 1) Am I forced to compile all?
No, you aren't forced
gle, mailing list, forums, freebsd
> handbook and I am still not clear about the following.
>
> In a RELEASE fresh install, after updating the ports using i.e.
> portsnap, the packages downloaded with pkp_add -r are older
> versions respect their port counterparts, leading to
> depen
Hello,
I am giving my firsts steps with FreeBSD.
I've searched a lot in google, mailing list, forums, freebsd
handbook and I am still not clear about the following.
In a RELEASE fresh install, after updating the ports using i.e.
portsnap, the packages downloaded with pkp_add -r are
ot clear what the URL is, of the flash to
> > > > > save to file }
> > > >
> > > > In reply to knowing the flash's URL, I think the download helper
> > > > plugin for FF could be of use to you.
> > >
> > > Does plug
flash's URL, I think the download helper
> > > plugin for FF could be of use to you.
> >
> > Does plugin = remote compiled binary ?
> > If so I'd rather not thanks (security).
> >
> > With
> > /usr/ports/graphics/gnash
> > I can now
o from CLI,
> > > But I'm not clear what the URL is, of the flash to save
> > > to file }
> >
> > In reply to knowing the flash's URL, I think the download helper
> > plugin for FF could be of use to you.
>
> Does plugin = remote comp
}
>
> In reply to knowing the flash's URL, I think the download helper plugin
> for FF could be of use to you.
Does plugin = remote compiled binary ?
If so I'd rather not thanks (security).
With
/usr/ports/graphics/gnash
I can now run eg
gnash /xp/WINDOWS
On 12/27/11 4:45 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Hi questions@
[snip]
> Externaly
> {
> man gnash says what to do from CLI,
> But I'm not clear what the URL is, of the flash to save to file
> }
In reply to knowing the flash's URL, I think the download helper plugin
for FF
Hi questions@
cc Dmitry Marakasov ( of graphics/gnash/Makefile )
On 8.2-RELEASE amd64 I ran make install on both
/usr/ports/www/firefox
/usr/ports/graphics/gnash
But I see no hint what to read, hot to get firefox to call gnash.
I would like to view a flash eg from
http
k disabled, database not found
> ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user
> ===> Found saved configuration for stellarium-0.11.1
> ===> Extracting for stellarium-0.11.1
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for stellarium-0.11.1.tar.gz.
> ===> Patching for stellarium-0.11.1
> sed:
und saved configuration for stellarium-0.11.1
===> Extracting for stellarium-0.11.1
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for stellarium-0.11.1.tar.gz.
===> Patching for stellarium-0.11.1
sed:
/usr/ports/astro/stellarium/work/stellarium-0.11.1/src/core/external/fixx11h.h
/usr/ports/astro/stellarium/work/ste
t;
>>>> Hi,
>
[...]
> Today I noticed something interesting...
>
[...]
OK, so it happened to me again on a new server and here is the cause:
When you initialize ezjail if you forget the -p to include ports you
can actually fix this by re-initializing with ezjail-admin update
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:28:18 +0100
Polytropon wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:08:42 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> > My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
> > had with ports came from trying to follow the recommended approach
> >
On Tue, 01 Nov 2011 06:08:42 -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
> had with ports came from trying to follow the recommended approach
> of updating the tree after installing, before trying to build
> any
Michael Powell wrote:
> I have always suspected that unknowingly utilizing the already
> out-of-date tree from the initial install is probably what causes
> most newcomers' problems with ports.
My experience is exactly the opposite. The biggest problem I've
had with ports
Polytropon wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:45:44 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
>> then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was
>> was perfect. I have a laptop with intel core i5.
>
> The ports should work without any further configuration
> change, no matter
On Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:45:44 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
> then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was
> was perfect. I have a laptop with intel core i5.
The ports should work without any further configuration
change, no matter if you've installed via Internet or
from an i
then, as the system must be configured?, I thought as I was was perfect. I have
a laptop with intel core i5.
PS: I think that occupying FreeBSD or OpenBSD, and you should consider ;)
Zantgo
El 31-10-2011, a las 6:12, Joe Gain escribió:
> I agree, the ports are *amazing*. Even w
I agree, the ports are *amazing*. Even when installing a major component
like kde4. If you have your base system set up correctly this very complex
task will generally complete flawlessly. For a first-time install you can
accept most of the default options when configuring, but it's probably
s just work.
> For things you want to tailor and optimize to your needs then use the
> ports system. FBSD is so cool that it doesn't matter if you install
> one way or the other and you can use almost all methods
> interchangeably.
A managament tool (such as portmaster or portupgrade)
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Zantgo wrote:
> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
> one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
> KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, fo
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:19:16 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports,
> but almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install
> firefox, I tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have
> been many errors, commonly solocionabl
;> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost
>>> no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also
>>> install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly
>>> solocionables, for example I had to modif
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block escribi?:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no one serves me, I've only been able
to install firefox, I tried also install KDE, GNOM
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block escribió:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
>
>> What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
>> one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
>> KDE, GNOME a
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but
almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I
tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors,
commonly solocionables, for example I had to m
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no one
serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install KDE,
GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, for
example I had to modify "REFRESH" to "true&q
Sounds like a well-thought out backup strategy. I've started to use your
methods here, and I'm building ports I need at the same time, but the
wireless here is not password protected so is incredibly slow as there are
lots of leaches on the system. But while I'm plodding along, I
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Peter Kryszkiewicz
wrote:
> I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
> laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
> on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the lapt
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Peter Kryszkiewicz
wrote:
> I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
> laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
> on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the lapt
I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the laptop as I need
them (all machines have the same FreeBSD 8.2 installed).
The pro
On 10/24/2011 01:57, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> So would portmaster give me a similar log file without conio and stdio going
> to war with each other?
To the extent that I understand your question, I think portmaster can
help. Why don't you install it, read the man page, and give it a try.
Doug
gt; showing the user the config dialogs. The configuration option to save
> those logs is in the portmaster man page.
> > NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
> > OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
> > to say NetBSD p
ion option to save
those logs is in the portmaster man page.
> NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
> OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
> to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that
> they have
On 23/10/2011 10:48, Thomas Mueller wrote:
> NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
> OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
> to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that
> they have a good idea in this a
NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that they
have a good idea in this aspect.
Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Galati, Michael wrote:
Unfortunately, there's no good way of upgrading packages on FreeBSD
(that I'm aware of, at least). My solution (crude as it may be) has
been to remove all the packages and reinstall.
There's pkg_upgrade from sysutils/bsdadminscripts.
___
Not exactly an answer to your question, but I use the batch flag to bypass
configuration menus. If you have one or two ports you do not install with
default settings, you can go back and install manually.
On Oct 20, 2011 9:54 PM, "Paul Macdonald" wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell w
> >Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
> during update, i have some auto update scripts
> > Stop doing this.
> >
> > Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
> > Your update scripts do not read package changel
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Can i programmatically tell if user input is required?
It might require reinventing the logic used by the ports system
Makefiles. Or maybe there's a way to run make config-recursive but get
dialog to immediately cancel any config screens
On 2011/10/21 11:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
> during update, i have some auto update scripts
>> Stop doing this.
>>
>> Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
>> Your update scrip
>Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What you're doing is irresponsible, and pot
On 10/21/11 9:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during
> update,
>
> i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not re
Hi,
Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update,
i have some auto update scripts which when prompted will run through
updates, but occassionally i forget which will require user input and
this leads to dialog running ( often @ 100%) until i notice.
Obviously
;
> I tried to mount the ports tree on this machine to the other machines
> (machine mfc for instance) with:
>
> #mfc> cd /usr
> #mfc> mount_nfs vbear:/usr/ports ports
>
> and then installing the needed port on mfc. What happens is that the working
> directories and th
I have several machines networked using NFS mounts or SSH and scp. Only one
machine has internet connectivity - a laptop (machine vbear) with a wireless
card (I'm in a temporary location for a few weeks and only wireless is
available here).
I tried to mount the ports tree on this machine t
On 09/26/11 06:43, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Still no joy trying to build from source via ports or installing the
binary from tenable.com on FreeBSD 9. nessusd is installed but
errors out with 'libz.so.5 not found. I have;
$ ls -l /lib
On Monday 26 September 2011, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> Still no joy trying to build from source via ports or installing the
> binary from tenable.com on FreeBSD 9. nessusd is installed but
> errors out with 'libz.so.5 not found. I have;
>
> $ ls -l /lib/libz.*
> -r
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 06:11-0500, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> On 09/25/11 10:08, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:24+0200, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> >
> > > On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> > > > Good Day
> > > >
>
On 09/25/11 10:08, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:24+0200, Andrei Brezan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:24+0200, Andrei Brezan wrote:
> On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
> > Good Day
> >
> > Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
> > updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011.
On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with
ports updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The
result from #>make;
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1
===>
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The result
from #>make;
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1
===> nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1 depends on executab
On 09/20/11 01:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
'Latest' packages are built for each updated port + OS version +
architecture combination whenever resources are available on the build
cluster. Typically that implies a delay of a few days or a week or so
after the update hits the ports CVS
On 20/09/2011 05:33, Jason C. Wells wrote:
> I noticed only recently that there are now packages on FTP in a folder
> called packages-8-stable. I am not sure how often these are built. I
> expect that the entire ports tree is built much like it is during a
> release, except at some
On 09/19/11 13:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if
things get too out of sync.
Doh, I just read the handbook.
On 09/19/11 13:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if
things get too out of sync.
I noticed only recently that ther
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if things
get too out of sync.
I'd like to say it doesn't matter, but ...
If you are using pa
Hi,
I'm running RELENG_8_2 and I've been using packages instead of ports for
most things, because they're so much quicker. But certain packages aren't
compiled the way I need them to be-- postfix had no TLS or SASL support,
for example, so I built it from the port
Is there any way to get portmaster to reinstall every port in the *EXACT*
same order they where installed in, preferably with out any knowledge of
what ports where installed after the current one was the reason for
asking is many times it seems that subtle incompatibilities solely due to
On 04/09/2011 12:09, Richard Collyer wrote:
> Just incase anyone else reads this for a solution I think the cd
> /usr/ports/packages line near the bottom was a typo and should have been
> /var/db/pkg
Yes. Dammit. One of these days I'll perfect the art of writing down
exactly what
fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't
need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
back and find out what packa
(mostly X11 related) that I don't
> need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
>
> Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
> or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
> back and find out what packa
this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
back and find out what packages I need to nerf.
I've run cutleaves and portmaster to show port
kage 'rxvt-unicode-9.11' is corrupt
This prevents 'portmaster -a' from working at all, and 'portupgrade -a'
will not detect changes to those ports whose info is corrupt. Neither
does portversion report on those ports (it acts like they aren't
installed).
I've
I noticed something interesting...
If you SSH to the jail you get this when you try to make fetchindex:
fetch: /var/ports/INDEX-8.bz2: open(): No such file or directory
But is you jexec to the jail as root from the host then it fetches the
index without any problems.
It may be related to EzJa
"Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote:
> Having been away from FreeBSD for a while, I'm still catching up with
> all the changes that took place while I was on hiatus, so bear with me
> here. :-)
>
> Trying to construct the ports' README.html files with:
>
> cd
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jason Helfman wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:05:14AM -0400, Alejandro Imass thus spake:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Alejandro Imass wrote:
>>>
[...]
>> Never mind. It's a specific couple of jails that doesn't work and I
>> never tried to fetchind
501 - 600 of 6569 matches
Mail list logo
