Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-30 Thread Kurt Buff
On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Nikola Lecic wrote:

  C) port it!
 
  is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
  Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
  for others.

 It's already been done.  I don't know why the port is called
 p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though.  Possibly it pre-dates
 the current naming conventions.

 Cheers,

 Matthew

Ah, thanks so very much. It's option D) - the comfy chair! :)

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Kurt Buff
I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant

I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.

Can I:

A) leave the script as-is, and simply install one or the other of
these ports, and have it work? If so, which one?

Or, must I

B) commit minor surgery on the script wherever I see references to
those packages, and if so, what might that look like?

The script in question is found here:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~malth/gaptuning/postfix/

for getting SMTP addresses from my Exchange server.

TIA,

Kurt
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Nikola Lecic
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:22:39 -0700
Kurt Buff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
 Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
 
 I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
 p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.
 
 Can I:
 
 A) leave the script as-is, and simply install one or the other of
 these ports, and have it work? If so, which one?
 
 Or, must I
 
 B) commit minor surgery on the script wherever I see references to
 those packages, and if so, what might that look like?
 
 The script in question is found here:
 
 http://www-personal.umich.edu/~malth/gaptuning/postfix/
 
 for getting SMTP addresses from my Exchange server.

Kurt,

Maybe this is not a direct answer, but it seems that

C) port it!

is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
for others.

Just look at Makefile of net/p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP. Make
the port for you own use, test it, then share.

Nikola Lečić
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Kurt Buff wrote:
 I'm trying to implement a script that I found, and it's referencing
 Net::LDAP, Net::LDAP::Control::Paged and Net::LDAP::Constant
 
 I'm not finding p5-net-ldap in ports, though I do see
 p5-ResourcePool-Resource-Net-LDAP and p5-perl-ldap.

p5-perl-ldap is what you want for the Net::LDAP modules.

Cheers,

Matthew

- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1lmr8Mjk52CukIwRCNGMAJ9y02XHc+pWRtBQaksTu0MY9Z4w1gCcDh7t
uOoJ5S7QcBlFRnojR1DqEN8=
=Oqte
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Quick perl ports question

2007-08-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

Nikola Lecic wrote:

 C) port it!
 
 is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for
 Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and
 for others.

It's already been done.  I don't know why the port is called
p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though.  Possibly it pre-dates
the current naming conventions.

Cheers,

Matthew

- --
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
  Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1lql8Mjk52CukIwRCLLLAJwOlyMUZzEJJdDgme1tG0Y/fr1wRwCeOZ+5
I1+nojgdW6Yc5cs9y6pQWNY=
=lHyb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]