On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:55:05 +1100
Terry Sposato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:43:20 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll find that bursts are best counteracted like this:
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Cowart
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available to some
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christopher Cowart
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available to some connections
The vast majority of people out there have asymmetrical bandwidth
limiting needs - that is, they have a pipe to the Internet and
have a lot more data coming from the Internet to them, than data
going from them to the Internet. Their desire is to somehow make
it so that certain kinds of incoming
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:27 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
I gave port 80 as an example but I need this configuration
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:55:58AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
It is that it's impossible to limit INCOMING bandwidth from the
Internet.
The fact is you can limit incoming TCP with little to no packet
loss and almost any other traffic stream (including P2P) with
1-10% loss.
In short, the
loss and almost any other traffic stream (including P2P) with
1-10% loss.
In short, the bandwidth limiting code really has little
practical value when implemented in FreeBSD that is why few do
it.
:)
i do on my 300 users network. works VERY well. i use queues to equally
divide available
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 10:55:58 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
The vast majority of people out there have asymmetrical bandwidth
limiting needs - that is, they have a pipe to the Internet and
have a lot more data coming from the Internet to them, than data
going from them to the Internet. Their
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 09:27:21 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I gave port 80 as an example but I need this configuration for
limiting other services as well.
If you have a 100mbps connection and only one client, you want him to
only use 50kbps, not the full pipe. If you have 200 clients, they
I think you guys went a bit on a tangent here. What I am trying to do
is limit the outbound bandwidth of my services and this should be
perfectly possible as I control the output.
Also, the reason for this need is that some services use
burst-bandwidth and I have many peaks and lows
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christopher Cowart
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 14:21:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, the reason for this need is that some services use
burst-bandwidth and I have many peaks and lows throughout the day.
This means that my carrier who bills me by the 95th percentile is
having a field day.
He bills by the
As far as I know, every carrier bills by 95th percentile.
This particular server is colocated and the bandwidth average is
2.35mbps while the 95th is 3.7mbps.
I don't want my clients to have to compete for bandwidth - if 1000
users share a 3mbps fixed pipe, they will each get 3k/sec -.
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:30:44 +0200 (CEST), Wojciech Puchar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The vast majority of people out there have asymmetrical bandwidth
limiting needs - that is, they have a pipe to the Internet and have a
lot more data coming from the Internet to them, than data going from
them
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:22 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
I think you guys went a bit on a tangent here. What I am trying
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:38 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
I can now confirm that these two commands do exactly what I
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 4:51 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
As far as I know, every carrier bills by 95th percentile.
You
-Original Message-
From: Giorgos Keramidas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:45 AM
To: Wojciech Puchar
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 11:30:44 +0200 (CEST
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:43:20 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll find that bursts are best counteracted like this:
http://www.probsd.net/pf/index.php/Hednod%27s_HFSC_explained#Tips.2FIdeas
Mel, can you please confirm this link / FQDN ? no NS defined for the domain...
TIA,
B
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Wed, 2 Apr 2008 14:43:20 +0200
Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you'll find that bursts are best counteracted like this:
http://www.probsd.net/pf/index.php/Hednod%27s_HFSC_explained#Tips.2FIdeas
Mel, can you please confirm this link / FQDN ? no NS defined for
On Tue, 1 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available to some connections and I'm not
sure FreeBSD can handle this. Maybe some of you can help. Here's what I need
to have exactly.
No matter what the number of connections, each connection should have at
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 00:18:36 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've tried dummynet but it doesn't do what I need because if I define
a pipe with 1mbps and if I have 1000 connections, each connection will
have less than 50kbps.
Any way to do this in FreeBSD ?
No, unfortunately your ISP gives
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available to some connections and I'm
not sure FreeBSD can handle this. Maybe some of you can help. Here's what I
need to have exactly.
No matter what the number of connections, each connection should have at
most/least 50kbps
]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to limit the bandwidth available to some connections and
I'm not sure FreeBSD can handle this. Maybe some of you can help.
Here's what I need to have exactly.
No matter what
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
6Mbps/608kbps soon. The issue I'm having is that whenever I upload, it
fills the upstream to
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
6Mbps/608kbps soon. The issue I'm having is that whenever
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Vincent Poy wrote:
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
6Mbps/608kbps
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at 1.5Mbps/384kbps now and will be upgrading to
6Mbps/608kbps
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After reading ipfw(8), I hope I have it correct that it's
like this:
ipfw add queue 1 ip from any to any out xmit xl0
Shouldn't ipfw add queue 1 be enough?
ipfw pipe 1 config bw 384Kbit/s
ipfw queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask all
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Greetings all:
I have a ADSL connection where the upstream pipe is smaller than
the downstream with it at
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After reading ipfw(8), I hope I have it correct that it's
like this:
ipfw add queue 1 ip from any to any out xmit xl0
Shouldn't ipfw add queue 1 be enough?
Don't know, that was what I was told to do
Vincent Poy writes:
That's the part where it becomes difficult since even though I
have 8 IP's, it's still on a /24 mask so only the 8 IP's in that /24 are
actually local.
Use a /27 mask.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote:
Vincent Poy writes:
That's the part where it becomes difficult since even though I
have 8 IP's, it's still on a /24 mask so only the 8 IP's in that /24 are
actually local.
Use a /27 mask.
a /27 would work except it'll be 32 IP's
33 matches
Mail list logo
