Re: text editor

2012-08-29 Thread Thomas Mueller
On getting vim text editor (vi improved) for FreeBSD, you can either pkg_add 
or use the ports system, where you build from source code with a convenient 
setup.  You can check http://www.freebsd.org/ and check the documentation, 
including the handbook and ports system.

I've heard of Cygwin but never run it because I don't have MS-Windows 
installed.  From what I read, it creates a Unix-like environment under 
MS-Windows.

I hear that MS is getting rid of 16-bit DOS compatibility, so you might not be 
able to run DOS software under Win 7.  But you can go to

http://www.dosbox.com/

DOSBox can run under current Unix-like OSes and also MS-Windows.  You may be 
able to download a win32 installer, I just found it there, would that run on 
64-bit Windows?

I have run (Borland) Quattro Pro 5 for DOS under Linux, NetBSD and FreeBSD with 
DOSBox.

Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-29 Thread Theodor-Iulian Ciobanu
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +
Robin, Michael ro...@chapman.edu wrote:

 What is VIM?  Where could it be downloaded?
 What is CLI?  I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for
 Windows 7/8. The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting
 option even though it have a lot of hot keys.

You might want to check out SciTE as well (GUI editor). It's available
from ports in editors/scite and the Windows version can be downloaded
from:
http://www.scintilla.org/SciTEDownload.html

 My top priority is setting start/end block option which was available
 for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based
 text editor for this option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will not
 run on 64-bit operating system. Please advise. Thank you.

None of the current 64bit versions of Windows include NTVDM (the DOS
emulator).

 Michael
 Programmer Analyst
 
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
 dte...@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM
 To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: RE: text editor
 
  -Original Message-
  From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- 
  questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
  To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
  Subject: text editor
  
  Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system
 
 On FreeBSD?
 In the GUI? or on the CLI?
 
 
  with following
  features:
  * Support 100 percent of hot keys
 
 How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that
 suffice?
 
 
  * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied,
  moved or
 deleted
  without requiring any mouse lock.
  It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined 
  with
 navigating
  key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.
 
 A challenge, no-doubt.
 
 
  * Support special ASCII characters
  
 
 Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII
 characters (the ones that don't are in the minority, imho).
 
 ...
 
 I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).
 
 NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-29 Thread Jamie Paul Griffin
[ dte...@freebsd.org wrote on Tue 28.Aug'12 at 16:42:06 -0700 ]

  -Original Message-
  From: Robin, Michael [mailto:ro...@chapman.edu]
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:42 PM
  To: 'dte...@freebsd.org'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
  Subject: RE: text editor
  
  What is VIM?
 
 A _much_ improved version of vi (vi is the ubiquitous UNIX text editor 
 written
 by Bill Joy in 1976), vim itself being born in 1991 by a man named Bram
 Moolenaar.
 
 
  Where could it be downloaded?
 
 As Polytropon mentioned, FreeBSD has a built-in software acquisition system.
 
 Executing:
 
   pkg_add -r vim
 
 will install the VIM text editor (immediately after-which you can type 
 rehash
 -- if using [t]csh -- and then vim FILE to start editing files).
 
 However, I recognize the need to sometimes know where your food comes from, 
 so
 below are some links.
 
 NOTE: You need to know what version of FreeBSD you're using...
 
 For recent versions of FreeBSD:
 ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
 
 For older versions of FreeBSD:
 ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/
 
 Then under there, you'll have to select i386 for 32-bit builds, or amd64 
 for
 64-bit builds (etc.).
 
 Then under there, you'll have to select your appropriate version (e.g.,
 8.1-RELEASE).
 
 Then under there, you'll navigate to packages then either All or a 
 specific
 sub-category.
 
 In there, you'll find vim-VERSION (ending in either .tgz, .tbz, or 
 .txz,
 depending on your version of FreeBSD; mind you the suffix matters not to your
 ability to install the software).
 
 You'll also find gvim-VERSION there too.
 
 Please keep in-mind that this is _NOT_ the recommended way of electively
 installing software on FreeBSD. I'm merely explaining this so that you know
 where software for FreeBSD comes from (loosely; I'm leaving out a lot and
 choosing to focus on the consumer-side of things for the benefit of clarity).
 
 
 
  What is CLI?
 
 Before Windows and Apple, computers were told what to do without a mouse. This
 interface was called the command line. It has a very rich history and is 
 still
 common-place in server environments.
 
 
   I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8.
 
 I'd recommend getting to know something called Cygwin. It will allow you to
 run software such as VIM on Windows.
 
 The main website for Cygwin is:
 http://cygwin.com/
 
 You can even run gVIM (the graphical version of VIM designed to run in the 
 GUI)
 on Windows.
 
 Surely, you can run special versions of VIM on Windows _without_ Cygwin (link
 below), but I recommend Cygwin if you're going to program on UNIX at all
 (conflating your Windows environment with a UNIX-compatible environment is a
 convenience that many find helpful in making work more efficient).
 
 [g]VIM for MS-DOS and/or MS-Windows:
 http://www.vim.org/download.php#pc
 
 NOTE: There are downloads for self-installing executables for added 
 convenience.
 
 
  The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though it
  have a lot of hot keys.  My top priority is setting start/end block option
 which was
  available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any 
  window-based
  text editor for this option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on
 64-bit
  operating system.
 
 Have you tried compatibility mode? Win7 has a compatibility mode that it can 
 run
 executables in. I think it has a compat mode that will run 16-bit DOS 
 programs,
 but I must admit that I've not tried.
 -- 
 Devin
 
 
  Please advise.
  Thank you.
  
  Michael
  Programmer Analyst
  
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
  dte...@freebsd.org
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM
  To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
  Subject: RE: text editor
  
   -Original Message-
   From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
   questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
   Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
   To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
   Subject: text editor
  
   Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system
  
  On FreeBSD?
  In the GUI? or on the CLI?
  
  
   with following
   features:
   * Support 100 percent of hot keys
  
  How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that 
  suffice?
  
  
   * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved
   or
  deleted
   without requiring any mouse lock.
   It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined
   with
  navigating
   key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.
  
  A challenge, no-doubt.
  
  
   * Support special ASCII characters
  
  
  Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters 
  (the
  ones that don't are in the minority, imho).
  
  ...
  
  I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).
  
  NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
  --
  Devin

RE: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread dteske
 -Original Message-
 From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
 questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
 Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
 To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
 Subject: text editor
 
 Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system

On FreeBSD?
In the GUI? or on the CLI?


 with following
 features:
 * Support 100 percent of hot keys

How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice?


 * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved or
deleted
 without requiring any mouse lock.
 It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined with
navigating
 key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.

A challenge, no-doubt.


 * Support special ASCII characters
 

Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the
ones that don't are in the minority, imho).

...

I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).

NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
-- 
Devin

_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread Robin, Michael
What is VIM?  Where could it be downloaded?
What is CLI?  I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8.
The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though it 
have a lot of hot keys.  My top priority is setting start/end block option 
which was available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any 
window-based text editor for this option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will 
not run on 64-bit operating system.
Please advise.
Thank you.

Michael
Programmer Analyst

 

-Original Message-
From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of 
dte...@freebsd.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM
To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: text editor

 -Original Message-
 From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- 
 questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
 Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
 To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
 Subject: text editor
 
 Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system

On FreeBSD?
In the GUI? or on the CLI?


 with following
 features:
 * Support 100 percent of hot keys

How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice?


 * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved 
 or
deleted
 without requiring any mouse lock.
 It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined 
 with
navigating
 key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.

A challenge, no-doubt.


 * Support special ASCII characters
 

Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the 
ones that don't are in the minority, imho).

...

I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).

NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
--
Devin

_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all 
copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner; and 
(iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware that any 
message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons 
other than the intended recipient. Thank you.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:09:39 +, Robin, Michael wrote:
 Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system with
 following features:
 * Support 100 percent of hot keys

Depends also on the terminal emulator used and if it's
configured properly. Editors like the one belonging to
the Midnight Commander (mcedit) can learn keys.



 * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied,
 moved or deleted without requiring any mouse lock.

That applies to most editors, like Joe's Own Editor (joe),
mcedit (already mentioned) or vi / vim.



 It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined
 with navigating key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.

I know that both mcedit and joe support this, i. e. editing
inside an already selected region; joe also is able to handle
the begin and the end of the selection independently (^KB and
^KK).



 * Support special ASCII characters

Also depends on terminal emulator and certain system settings,
as well as your preferred input method. I've been succhessfully
using chinese characters in mcedit running in xterm with the
LC_* language setting to en_US.UTF-8. Use with non-UTF local
characters is easlily possible even in text mode consoles,
using e. g. ISO8859-1 on cons25l1 emulation. I'm quite sure
that even the basic editors can support that.



As a programmer, you should have no problems evaluating the
family of editor you will use, and find the one that fits
your needs best. Try for example vim and gvim, also give
mcedit and joe a try. Make sure your system is properly
configured (terminal emulation and language settings, keyboard
settings) so you can benefit from what those editors can do.




-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread Polytropon
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +, Robin, Michael wrote:
 What is VIM? 

VI = VI Improved, based on vi-like editor behaviour, which
is often considered one of the MAIN editor environments
among programmers.



 Where could it be downloaded?

You don't manually download things on FreeBSD. You install
software by a system means.

I suggest you make yourself familiar with the OS and how to
install programs using The FreeBSD handbook and the FAQ,
accessible from the project's main web page.

In short,

# pkg_add -r vim

or

# pkg_add -r gvim

should install vim or gvim (the Gtk-enhanced vim editor) for
you easily.



 What is CLI? 

Command line interface, a common name for text mode applications
(even when they run in a terminal emulator under X), so the
term doesn't fit 100 percent here.

A command line editor could be sed (the stream editor), which is
a a non-interactive editor, programmed by its programming language
and via command line arguments. But also text mode editors like
joe or vim allow many command line arguments (see the respective
manpages to learn more).

To a Programmer Analyst that should be known, but don't bother. :-)



 I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8.

You should then consult a mailing list (or probably a web-based
discussion forum) related to Windows topics. In worst case,
install a FreeBSD image for a virtualisation environment (e. g.
VirtualBSD) and use that for edititing. :-)



 My top priority is setting start/end block option which was available
 for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based
 text editor for this option. 

I'm sure there are ports of normal text editors also for Windows.
But this list -- FreeBSD questions -- is not the best place to
ask for what they are or where to download them.



 16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit operating system.

That lack of compatibility is a significant problem on Windows,
don't you think? :-)



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... 
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread Erich Dollansky
Hi,

On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 22:41:52 +
Robin, Michael ro...@chapman.edu wrote:

 What is VIM?  Where could it be downloaded?
 What is CLI?  I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for
 Windows 7/8. The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting
 option even though it have a lot of hot keys.  My top priority is
 setting start/end block option which was available for old DOS-based
 text editor, but I have not seen any window-based text editor for
 this option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit
 operating system. Please advise. Thank you.
 
 Michael
 Programmer Analyst
 
Analyst?

And you did not notice that you are on a FreeBSD mailing list?

Erich
  
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
 dte...@freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM
 To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: RE: text editor
 
  -Original Message-
  From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- 
  questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
  To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
  Subject: text editor
  
  Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system
 
 On FreeBSD?
 In the GUI? or on the CLI?
 
 
  with following
  features:
  * Support 100 percent of hot keys
 
 How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that
 suffice?
 
 
  * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied,
  moved or
 deleted
  without requiring any mouse lock.
  It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined 
  with
 navigating
  key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.
 
 A challenge, no-doubt.
 
 
  * Support special ASCII characters
  
 
 Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII
 characters (the ones that don't are in the minority, imho).
 
 ...
 
 I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).
 
 NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
 --
 Devin
 
 _
 The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or
 confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i)
 delete the message and all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute
 or use the message in any manner; and (iii) notify the sender
 immediately. In addition, please be aware that any message addressed
 to our domain is subject to archiving and review by persons other
 than the intended recipient. Thank you.
 ___
 freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
 http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To
 unsubscribe, send any mail to
 freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
 

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread Jerry Dunham
On 28 Aug 2012 at 22:41, Robin, Michael wrote:

 What is VIM?  Where could it be downloaded?
 What is CLI?  I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8.
 The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even
 though it have a lot of hot keys.  My top priority is setting
 start/end block option which was available for old DOS-based text
 editor, but I have not seen any window-based text editor for this
 option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on 64-bit
 operating system. 

CLI is command line interface, what you're calling a command prompt.

I came late to Windows, having run FreeBSD exclusively for quite a few years 
before trying 
out the Dark Side.  As a result, my text editor of choice on Windows is gvim.  
I'm currently 
running 7.2, and it integrates with the right-click context menu.  I believe it 
has all the 
functions you need.  If you've never used anything in the vi family there's a 
steep initial 
learning curve, but once you get past that it should do the job well enough to 
satisfy all but 
the most dedicated emacs users.

Check out:

http://www.vim.org/

I hope this helps.


--
Jerry Dunham
Moderator, Texas Great Dane Rescue
jdun...@texas.net

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: text editor

2012-08-28 Thread dteske
 -Original Message-
 From: Robin, Michael [mailto:ro...@chapman.edu]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:42 PM
 To: 'dte...@freebsd.org'; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: RE: text editor
 
 What is VIM?

A _much_ improved version of vi (vi is the ubiquitous UNIX text editor written
by Bill Joy in 1976), vim itself being born in 1991 by a man named Bram
Moolenaar.


 Where could it be downloaded?

As Polytropon mentioned, FreeBSD has a built-in software acquisition system.

Executing:

pkg_add -r vim

will install the VIM text editor (immediately after-which you can type rehash
-- if using [t]csh -- and then vim FILE to start editing files).

However, I recognize the need to sometimes know where your food comes from, so
below are some links.

NOTE: You need to know what version of FreeBSD you're using...

For recent versions of FreeBSD:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/

For older versions of FreeBSD:
ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/

Then under there, you'll have to select i386 for 32-bit builds, or amd64 for
64-bit builds (etc.).

Then under there, you'll have to select your appropriate version (e.g.,
8.1-RELEASE).

Then under there, you'll navigate to packages then either All or a specific
sub-category.

In there, you'll find vim-VERSION (ending in either .tgz, .tbz, or .txz,
depending on your version of FreeBSD; mind you the suffix matters not to your
ability to install the software).

You'll also find gvim-VERSION there too.

Please keep in-mind that this is _NOT_ the recommended way of electively
installing software on FreeBSD. I'm merely explaining this so that you know
where software for FreeBSD comes from (loosely; I'm leaving out a lot and
choosing to focus on the consumer-side of things for the benefit of clarity).



 What is CLI?

Before Windows and Apple, computers were told what to do without a mouse. This
interface was called the command line. It has a very rich history and is still
common-place in server environments.


  I am looking for GUI/command prompt text editor for Windows 7/8.

I'd recommend getting to know something called Cygwin. It will allow you to
run software such as VIM on Windows.

The main website for Cygwin is:
http://cygwin.com/

You can even run gVIM (the graphical version of VIM designed to run in the GUI)
on Windows.

Surely, you can run special versions of VIM on Windows _without_ Cygwin (link
below), but I recommend Cygwin if you're going to program on UNIX at all
(conflating your Windows environment with a UNIX-compatible environment is a
convenience that many find helpful in making work more efficient).

[g]VIM for MS-DOS and/or MS-Windows:
http://www.vim.org/download.php#pc

NOTE: There are downloads for self-installing executables for added convenience.


 The notepad plus program lacks start/end block setting option even though it
 have a lot of hot keys.  My top priority is setting start/end block option
which was
 available for old DOS-based text editor, but I have not seen any window-based
 text editor for this option.  16-bit DOS text editor program will not run on
64-bit
 operating system.

Have you tried compatibility mode? Win7 has a compatibility mode that it can run
executables in. I think it has a compat mode that will run 16-bit DOS programs,
but I must admit that I've not tried.
-- 
Devin


 Please advise.
 Thank you.
 
 Michael
 Programmer Analyst
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Devin Teske [mailto:devin.te...@fisglobal.com] On Behalf Of
 dte...@freebsd.org
 Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:25 PM
 To: Robin, Michael; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: RE: text editor
 
  -Original Message-
  From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
  questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Robin, Michael
  Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 3:10 PM
  To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'
  Subject: text editor
 
  Which text editor program will run 64-bit operating system
 
 On FreeBSD?
 In the GUI? or on the CLI?
 
 
  with following
  features:
  * Support 100 percent of hot keys
 
 How many is that? If a program has programmable hot keys, would that suffice?
 
 
  * Hot keys available for setting start/end block to be copied, moved
  or
 deleted
  without requiring any mouse lock.
  It is not possible to use mouse lock or to hold shift key combined
  with
 navigating
  key at the same time without accidently dese4lcing.
 
 A challenge, no-doubt.
 
 
  * Support special ASCII characters
 
 
 Less of a challenge. Most editors are good about special ASCII characters (the
 ones that don't are in the minority, imho).
 
 ...
 
 I'd honestly recommend vim (CLI) or gvim (GUI).
 
 NOTE: Assuming FreeBSD here.
 --
 Devin
 
 _
 The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential.
If
 you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message and all
copies;
 (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any manner

Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread perryh
mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:

 Robert Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin
 I wrote a screen-based editor in it, having heard of Emacs,
 wanting to do the same thing.

Didn't Emacs start out as a reimplementation of TECO in Lisp?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 12:04:06AM -0700, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
 mer...@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) wrote:
 
  Robert Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin
  I wrote a screen-based editor in it, having heard of Emacs,
  wanting to do the same thing.
 
 Didn't Emacs start out as a reimplementation of TECO in Lisp?

As I recall, it started out as a collection of TECO macros.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpHauwcSPxVu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Strying off topic, but Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread ill...@gmail.com
On 31 May 2010 17:38, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 I meant to reply to the list, as a response to this, but accidentally
 replied directly to Giorgos Keramidas.

 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:45:07PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:00 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
  Does Vim install more than the binary?  I've got this:
 
       ls -l /usr/local/bin/vim
      -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1650340 Apr 18 12:20 /usr/local/bin/vim

 Yes, it does: help files; syntax highlighting rules; manpages; around 14
 binaries in /usr/local/bin; including more than a thousand files in
 /usr/local/share.

 After some off-list discussion, it has come to my attention that of the
 14 binaries that are installed, one of them is the vim binary itself,
 two of them are vimtutor binaries, one is a hex dumper, and the other ten
 are links (hard or soft) to the vim binary itself (and thus not actually
 separate binaries).  It seems kind of silly to include a tutor and a
 hexdumper in the size of the editor just because the port for that
 editor installs them, too.  Furthermore, documentation like manpages and
 help files should not count against an application's size in my opinion,
 since more documentation is a *good* thing, and counting it toward the
 size of the application is marking it in the *bad* column.

 The grand total size of that hex dumper and two tutor binaries is about
 15KB, by the way -- so even if you include them with the editor for
 determining its size, they're still pretty negligible.

 Considering I could just delete all the syntax highlighting files and it
 wouldn't even affect the way I use Vim (I tend to prefer monochrome, even
 when editing code), I don't realy think I'd count those against the size
 of Vim either.

 Vim looks pretty small to me, compared with other editors of similar
 power (emacs, GUI IDEs, et cetera).


I don't know much, but the source tarball is slightly
over 7m.

In any case, the executable size is only loosely
related to the actual running size.

-- 
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 03 2010 11:11, Murray Taylor wrote:
 Hmm i remember a 'game' where you opened a file
 then predicted what would happen if you just typed
 your name at the command prompt... then of course you had to do it
 to see if your guess was right...
 
 ie in vi
 
 dwight would delete a word then insert ght 
  
 destroyed the odd file or two i remember with the addition
 of 'random' control key additions
 
It would be unfortunate if your parents named you :!rm -r *, even
though they affectionately called you little Remy Star and you made
good friends with Bobby Tables (http://xkcd.com/327/).

-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Richard T C Farnes
To Matthias Apitz
I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor 
usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly 
happy with vi.
BUT I noticed  your political comment at the end of your contribution. I find 
this out of place as this questions site is for  FreeBSD problems and  not 
political ones. Could you please take your political comments and  place them 
on appropriate sites where such comments belong. I keep with president Barack 
Obama, who has a law degree from Harvard and sees the necessity to set up a 
commission to analyse the matter before taking  part in the 
international howling choir against Israel.
Yours sincerely
Richard Farnes

On Wednesday 02 June 2010 13:33:44 Matthias Apitz wrote:
 El día Wednesday, June 02, 2010 a las 01:26:44PM +0200, Ruben de Groot 
escribió:
   The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary
   for some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more
   of causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.
 
  Most usefull traditional Unix tools can cause pain or foot-shooting.
  That's what makes them usefull.

 The ed(1) is *extremely* useful when it comes to editing text files on
 the fly in shell scripts (i.e. without user interaction).

   matthias

Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel?   Not in my  name!
¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread Fbsd1

Walt Pawley wrote:

On Sun, 30 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:


Been using ee and been happy.

Now I have need for an editor with block commands.


I'd suggest looking into aee.



That has what I am looking and so simple.

Thanks for your info.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
 To Matthias Apitz
 I read with interest your contribution and those of others in text editor 
 usage. In this I do not have much to contribute as I am so far perfectly 
 happy with vi.
 BUT I noticed  your political comment at the end of your contribution. I find 
 this out of place as this questions site is for  FreeBSD problems and  not 
 political ones. Could you please take your political comments and  place them 
 on appropriate sites where such comments belong. I keep with president Barack 
 Obama, who has a law degree from Harvard and sees the necessity to set up a 
 commission to analyse the matter before taking  part in the 
 international howling choir against Israel.
 Yours sincerely
 Richard Farnes

I don't recall any netiquette rules about making your signature block
on-topic.  Aren't you getting a bit uptight?

If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpFgHoUVbcNq.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Strying off topic, but Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:14:19AM -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I don't know much, but the source tarball is slightly
 over 7m.

I suspect a lot of that is documentation.  One thing Vim definitely has
going for it is the breadth and depth of user documentation that comes
with it.


 
 In any case, the executable size is only loosely
 related to the actual running size.

True.  On the other hand, to offer a comparison that actually came up in
real life, a co-worker once needed to edit a file.  She tried using
emacs to do so, but emacs couldn't open the file because it was so
friggin' large that trying to open it with emacs exhausted system
resources.  She asked me how to achieve the same thing in Vim that she
had intended to do with emacs because she discovered that it opened just
fine in Vim.

Obviously, this was very much an edge-case.  The file was *huge*,
measured in the gigabytes.  It's not a problem you're likely to encounter
in general usage.  It does give me a little faith in the ability of Vim
to avoid abusing system resources (and of vi in general).

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgp0Xct42bOnj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:49:04PM +0200, Richard T C Farnes wrote:
 To Matthias Apitz

[ ...snip ...]

 Yours sincerely
 Richard Farnes
 
 I don't recall any netiquette rules about making your signature block
 on-topic.  Aren't you getting a bit uptight?
 
 If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
 pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.

Nicely put Chad.

sigs can be easily ignored, or filtered.

Politics and religion are not allowed on this list, unless they relate
to ``technical'' politics/religion.

...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.

Steve ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Chad Perrin
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
 On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
  
  If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
  pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.
 
 Nicely put Chad.

Thanks!


 
 ...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.

I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so.  For one thing,
it has a friendlier license (since we're getting political) than Vim,
and for another it has better undo support than I realized.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpmPYsBpPisA.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.06.03 20:40, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:

 ...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.
 
 I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so.  For one thing,
 it has a friendlier license (since we're getting political) than Vim,
 and for another it has better undo support than I realized.

Can I use my .vimrc?

Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor and your postscript

2010-06-03 Thread Gary Kline
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 06:40:14PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 08:25:54PM -0400, Steve Bertrand wrote:
  On 2010.06.03 19:46, Chad Perrin wrote:
   
   If anything, it's *you* who took things into the realm of politics by
   pulling it out of the signature block where it belonged.
  
  Nicely put Chad.
 
 Thanks!
 
 
  
  ...here's an example... use vi(m). It solves ALL of the world's problems.
 
 I'm beginning to think nvi, in particular, might do so.  For one thing,
 it has a friendlier license (since we're getting political) than Vim,
 and for another it has better undo support than I realized.
 
 -- 
 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


my 27 cents' worth [[[inflation]]]: YES on the vim undo.
i've lost scores of lines and messed up other files than
code.'

gary




-- 
 Gary Kline  kl...@thought.org  http://www.thought.org  Public Service Unix
The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php
   http://journey.thought.org  99 44/100% Guaranteed Novel

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-03 Thread Steve Bertrand
On 2010.06.03 18:35, Fbsd1 wrote:
 Walt Pawley wrote:
 On Sun, 30 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:

 Been using ee and been happy.

 Now I have need for an editor with block commands.

 I'd suggest looking into aee.
 
 
 That has what I am looking and so simple.

Simple is in the eye of the beholder.

Also, simple isn't always the best solution.

afair, you (FBSD1) (it'd be nice if you'd use your real name), are
wanting to move from `ee' to a new editor.

I'm almost certain that this was a question that I've asked here before.
Moving from ee to a real editor. Search my name in the archives.

Personally, I chose vim. I found that the 'vimtutor' was phenomenal, and
I only had to spend one work day making notes for myself on paper to
mentally remember the important commands.

The mailing list is *very* good and *very* active, but again, the
tutorial is excellent. Not only that, the :help system in vim contains
ALL of the documentation for itself.

All in all, I tried emacs, and I'm a bit used to it, but vim stuck. I am
so used to the key commands now that I oftentimes use them in editors
that I shouldn't ;)

I won't go on about how flexible the config is, because I'm certain all
of the other editors can do all sorts of special tricks (particularly
when coding) too.

iTry vim.
ii:wq

Steve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 05:23:55PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
 On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:08:42 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:
  On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:21:20PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
   On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:32:04 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:
   
Unfortunately, the killer feature that keeps me with Vim instead of 
nvi
is its support for multiple levels of undo.
   
   Have you ever tried u (undo command) followed by . (repeat
   last command)? ;-)
 
  . . . but how do you redo what you've undone?
 
 If I understand the question correctly then: it's just one more u
 (undo command) followed by . (repeat last command)...

That's rather odd.  Okay, thanks.  That works beautifully.  I *really*
wish the help stuff for nvi was more helpful so I wouldn't have to learn
this stuff on the mailing list.  All this time, I thought all I could do
with u is one level each of undo and redo.

I suspect I've been mistrained by Vim's subtle incompatibilities with
traditional vi.  Thanks for setting me straight.  I'll give nvi a try as
my primary editor for a while, and see if I run into any other
show-stopping problems.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpe5otJ9Lg4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
 I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.

I remember when . . .

I got nuthin'.  I think my first text editor was edlin, and it *sucked*.

. . . not counting this nifty editor I called pencil.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpLDf833Iisr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Adam Vande More
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:

 On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
  I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.

 I remember when . . .

 I got nuthin'.  I think my first text editor was edlin, and it *sucked*.

 . . . not counting this nifty editor I called pencil.


The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary for
some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more of
causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.

-- 
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread perryh
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:

 Young whippersnappers.  *Eight* was the good old days,
 back before the web was invented.

Dept of (in)famous last words:

  There is no reason for anyone to have a computer in their home.
  -- Gordon Bell, founder of DEC

  No one will ever need more than 640K.
  -- Bill Gates, perpetrator of Microsoft
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Ruben de Groot
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:20:07AM -0500, Adam Vande More typed:
 On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 
  On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
   I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.
 
  I remember when . . .
 
  I got nuthin'.  I think my first text editor was edlin, and it *sucked*.
 
  . . . not counting this nifty editor I called pencil.
 
 
 The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary for
 some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more of
 causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.

Most usefull traditional Unix tools can cause pain or foot-shooting. That's
what makes them usefull.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Wednesday, June 02, 2010 a las 01:26:44PM +0200, Ruben de Groot escribió:

  The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary for
  some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more of
  causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.
 
 Most usefull traditional Unix tools can cause pain or foot-shooting. That's
 what makes them usefull.

The ed(1) is *extremely* useful when it comes to editing text files on
the fly in shell scripts (i.e. without user interaction).

matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e g...@unixarea.de - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Solidarity with the zionistic pirates of Israel?   Not in my  name!
¿Solidaridad con los piratas sionistas de Israel? ¡No en mi nombre!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:33:44PM +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote:
 
 The ed(1) is *extremely* useful when it comes to editing text files on
 the fly in shell scripts (i.e. without user interaction).

This is why I don't consider ed the kind of abomination that edlin was;
it exists within a stronger command toolset so that it can actually be
put to good use.  Plus, y'know, there are also other editors available in
Unix systems these days, so I have something other than just ed available
for interactive editing.  When edlin was all I had available, and it was
stuck in the DOS world where there was nothing like a Unix shell to make
reasonable use of it, it was nothing but frustration.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgp42MGZiW2Ee.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Wed Jun  2 01:20:03 2010
 Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 01:20:07 -0500
 From: Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: text editor

 On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:

  On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
   I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.
 
  I remember when . . .
 
  I got nuthin'.  I think my first text editor was edlin, and it *sucked*.
 
  . . . not counting this nifty editor I called pencil.
 
 
 The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary for
 some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more of
 causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.

Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin

It could do a _LOT_ of things, but a complex command string was nearly 
indistinguishable from line noise.  :)

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Wed Jun  2 02:11:23 2010
 Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:06:31 -0700
 From: per...@pluto.rain.com
 To: m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk
 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Subject: Re: text editor

 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:

  Young whippersnappers.  *Eight* was the good old days,
  back before the web was invented.

 Dept of (in)famous last words:

   There is no reason for anyone to have a computer in their home.
   -- Gordon Bell, founder of DEC

   No one will ever need more than 640K.
   -- Bill Gates, perpetrator of Microsoft

Worldwide, there might be a demand for five to eight computers
-- T. Watson, head of IBM

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Chip Camden
On Jun 02 2010 11:45, Robert Bonomi wrote:
   On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 09:10:22AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.
  
   I remember when . . .
  
   I got nuthin'.  I think my first text editor was edlin, and it *sucked*.
  
   . . . not counting this nifty editor I called pencil.
  
  
  The phrase son of an edlin has happily been retired in my vocabulary for
  some time.  If you're not aware of it, ed(1) is as capable or more of
  causing pain as edlin was and it's still in the FreeBSD base.
 
 Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin
 
 It could do a _LOT_ of things, but a complex command string was nearly 
 indistinguishable from line noise.  :)
 
ED is the standard text editor!

http://www.gnu.org/fun/jokes/ed.msg.html

Yes, I remember TECO -- I've used it to trash many a file.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread John Levine
Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin

Oh, you mean that editor I used on a PDP-6?  Sigh.  Yes.

R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Murray Taylor
Hmm i remember a 'game' where you opened a file
then predicted what would happen if you just typed
your name at the command prompt... then of course you had to do it
to see if your guess was right...

ie in vi

dwight would delete a word then insert ght 
 
destroyed the odd file or two i remember with the addition
of 'random' control key additions


Murray Taylor
Bytecraft Systems
Special Projects Engineer

P: +61 3 8710 0600
D: +61 3 9238 4275
F: +61 3 9238 4140

--
 |_|0|_|Absence of evidence
 |_|_|0|is not evidence of absence
 |0|0|0|Carl Sagan

-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of John Levine
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:31 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com
Subject: Re: text editor

Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin

Oh, you mean that editor I used on a PDP-6?  Sigh.  Yes.

R's,
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
---
The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive
use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action
in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please inform the sender and/or
addressee immediately and delete the material. 

E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and
may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this
e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are
given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage
caused by such matters.
---

### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ###
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Robert == Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com writes:

Robert Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin

I wrote a screen-based editor in it, having heard of Emacs, wanting to
do the same thing.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Chad Perrin
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:41:37PM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
  Robert == Robert Bonomi bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com writes:
 
 Robert Anybody else familiar with TECO?  *EVIL* grin
 
 I wrote a screen-based editor in it, having heard of Emacs, wanting to
 do the same thing.

How did that work out -- and what happened to it?

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpxsR7qQz9tn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-02 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
 Chad == Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com writes:

 I wrote a screen-based editor in it, having heard of Emacs, wanting to
 do the same thing.

Chad How did that work out -- and what happened to it?

It was used by my group at Tektronix from 1981 to 1983... not sure what
happened to it after that.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
mer...@stonehenge.com URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 31/05/2010 21:31:15, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:48:22PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:36:53 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi 
 bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
 Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 
 vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

 Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for Eighty
 Megabytes And Constantly Swapping!  *GRIN*

 That's an old joke, but it's not particularly good anymore.
 
 . . . probably because it's increasingly inaccurate.  Eighty was the
 good ol' days.
 

Young whippersnappers.  *Eight* was the good old days, back before the
web was invented.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwErZQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIycDACdF6huoSCi8fLetC9yZPLKhkDF
WlcAnRk9Q8Ro9wzs3NwsKnimmgenbbAc
=sJKj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:32:04 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:

 Unfortunately, the killer feature that keeps me with Vim instead of nvi
 is its support for multiple levels of undo.

Have you ever tried u (undo command) followed by . (repeat
last command)? ;-)

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:21:20PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
 On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:32:04 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:
 
  Unfortunately, the killer feature that keeps me with Vim instead of nvi
  is its support for multiple levels of undo.
 
 Have you ever tried u (undo command) followed by . (repeat
 last command)? ;-)

. . . but how do you redo what you've undone?  I've scanned through nvi's
awful viusage list of commands (awful mostly because it's a pain in the
ass to use it as a help system for vi) and haven't found an answer to
that question.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpiVasLVPJ6J.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Chad Perrin
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:49:56AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 
 Young whippersnappers.  *Eight* was the good old days, back before the
 web was invented.

No -- those are the even better old days.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpsisp2Mnyyg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Boris Samorodov
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:08:42 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:21:20PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
  On Mon, 31 May 2010 14:32:04 -0600 Chad Perrin wrote:
  
   Unfortunately, the killer feature that keeps me with Vim instead of nvi
   is its support for multiple levels of undo.
  
  Have you ever tried u (undo command) followed by . (repeat
  last command)? ;-)

 . . . but how do you redo what you've undone?

If I understand the question correctly then: it's just one more u
(undo command) followed by . (repeat last command)...

-- 
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone  Internet SP
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Chip Camden
I remember writing our own text editor, and it had to fit in 64K.

On Jun 01 2010 07:09, Chad Perrin wrote:
 On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 07:49:56AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
  
  Young whippersnappers.  *Eight* was the good old days, back before the
  web was invented.
 
 No -- those are the even better old days.
 
 -- 
 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]



-- 
Sterling (Chip) Camden | camdensoftware.com | chipstips.com | chipsquips.com
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-06-01 Thread Walt Pawley
On Sun, 30 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:

 Been using ee and been happy.

 Now I have need for an editor with block commands.

I'd suggest looking into aee.
-- 

Walter M. Pawley w...@wump.org
Wump Research  Company
676 River Bend Road, Roseburg, OR 97471
 541-672-8975
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:10:03AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:28:27 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:31:59PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
  If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and
  GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks.
 
  I'm not sure why you mentioned the size of Vim here as if it's a
  remarkably large piece of software.  It *barely* doesn't fit on a 3.5
  floppy when you use a full install of the console-based Vim editor.
  I'm pretty sure it's under 2 MB.
 
 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:
 
   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 Απρ 17:11 vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

Does Vim install more than the binary?  I've got this:

 ls -l /usr/local/bin/vim
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1650340 Apr 18 12:20 /usr/local/bin/vim

I don't think the size of the installation tarball is necessarily
representative of the final size.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpe18YHJc0LU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Robert Bonomi
 From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org  Mon May 31 00:10:28 2010
 From: Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr
 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
 Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 08:10:03 +0300
 Subject: Re: text editor

 On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:28:27 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:31:59PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
  If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and
  GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks.
 
  I'm not sure why you mentioned the size of Vim here as if it's a
  remarkably large piece of software.  It *barely* doesn't fit on a 3.5
  floppy when you use a full install of the console-based Vim editor.
  I'm pretty sure it's under 2 MB.

 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 vim-lite=
 -7.2.344.tbz

Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for Eighty Megabytes And 
Constantly Swapping!*GRIN*

I can't get at my FBSD box right now to check vim itself, but on another box,
'nvi' (which is described as a bug-for-bug compatible replacement for the 
original Fourth Berkeley Software Distribution (4BSD) vi, has an executable
that is under 256k in size.



___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:00 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 Απρ 17:11 vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

 Does Vim install more than the binary?  I've got this:

  ls -l /usr/local/bin/vim
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1650340 Apr 18 12:20 /usr/local/bin/vim

Yes, it does: help files; syntax highlighting rules; manpages; around 14
binaries in /usr/local/bin; including more than a thousand files in
/usr/local/share.

 I don't think the size of the installation tarball is necessarily
 representative of the final size.

For modern editors like Vim and Emacs the binary is pretty much a basic
'scripting engine' that loads plugins, scripts and other data files to
present an editing user interface to the user.  The last Emacs binary I
compiled is 13 MB:

  keram...@kobe:/opt/emacs/bin$ ls -ld emacs-*
  -rwxr-xr-t  2 root  wheel  - 13395130 31 Μαϊ 20:13 emacs-24.0.50

The full Emacs installation in /opt/emacs is more than 110 MB:

  keram...@kobe:/opt/emacs$ du -sk .
  113298  .

The binary itself is a small part of the installation; almost 1/10 of
the full size of GNU Emacs.



pgpQO2501u1dl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:36:53 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi 
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 
 vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

 Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for Eighty
 Megabytes And Constantly Swapping!  *GRIN*

That's an old joke, but it's not particularly good anymore.

The smallest laptop-size 2.5 SATA disk I have at home can hold
more than 80 GB of data.  The size of a program is now a limiting
factor only if you are working with embedded applications.

Normal, every-day computers have enough disk space to hold tens
of thousands of full Emacs installations even without any sort of
compression :-)


pgpDAH7yDZmZs.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:48:22PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:36:53 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi 
 bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
 Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
  Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:
 
keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11 
  vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz
 
  Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for Eighty
  Megabytes And Constantly Swapping!  *GRIN*
 
 That's an old joke, but it's not particularly good anymore.

. . . probably because it's increasingly inaccurate.  Eighty was the
good ol' days.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpZIP1xtwvq1.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Chad Perrin
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:36:53AM -0500, Robert Bonomi wrote:
 
 I can't get at my FBSD box right now to check vim itself, but on another box,
 'nvi' (which is described as a bug-for-bug compatible replacement for the 
 original Fourth Berkeley Software Distribution (4BSD) vi, has an executable
 that is under 256k in size.

Unfortunately, the killer feature that keeps me with Vim instead of nvi
is its support for multiple levels of undo.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgp9ujiQxFcjv.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Chad Perrin
I meant to reply to the list, as a response to this, but accidentally
replied directly to Giorgos Keramidas.

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:45:07PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 On Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:00 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
  Does Vim install more than the binary?  I've got this:
 
   ls -l /usr/local/bin/vim
  -rwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  1650340 Apr 18 12:20 /usr/local/bin/vim
 
 Yes, it does: help files; syntax highlighting rules; manpages; around 14
 binaries in /usr/local/bin; including more than a thousand files in
 /usr/local/share.

After some off-list discussion, it has come to my attention that of the
14 binaries that are installed, one of them is the vim binary itself,
two of them are vimtutor binaries, one is a hex dumper, and the other ten
are links (hard or soft) to the vim binary itself (and thus not actually
separate binaries).  It seems kind of silly to include a tutor and a
hexdumper in the size of the editor just because the port for that
editor installs them, too.  Furthermore, documentation like manpages and
help files should not count against an application's size in my opinion,
since more documentation is a *good* thing, and counting it toward the
size of the application is marking it in the *bad* column.

The grand total size of that hex dumper and two tutor binaries is about
15KB, by the way -- so even if you include them with the editor for
determining its size, they're still pretty negligible.

Considering I could just delete all the syntax highlighting files and it
wouldn't even affect the way I use Vim (I tend to prefer monochrome, even
when editing code), I don't realy think I'd count those against the size
of Vim either.

Vim looks pretty small to me, compared with other editors of similar
power (emacs, GUI IDEs, et cetera).


 
  I don't think the size of the installation tarball is necessarily
  representative of the final size.
 
 For modern editors like Vim and Emacs the binary is pretty much a basic
 'scripting engine' that loads plugins, scripts and other data files to
 present an editing user interface to the user.  The last Emacs binary I
 compiled is 13 MB:

That's not what I see from the list of binaries in /usr/local/bin.  Those
appear to basically just be links to Vim, for the most part, rather than
separate programs with the vim binary acting as glue code.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpJaUi531kuy.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Fbsd1


SNIP alot of text not related to original posted question.

Can we get back on subject.

I have worked many years with ispf so decided to check out THE
I installed pkg_add -r the
entering the on the command line produces something that is far 
removed from ispf/pdf. manpage and website documentation for the 
really sucks. Think I need to create a default profile that activates 
ispf but have found no instructions on how to do it. Can not find the 
profile file on my system.


more help please.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread doug

On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:



SNIP alot of text not related to original posted question.

Can we get back on subject.

I have worked many years with ispf so decided to check out THE
I installed pkg_add -r the
entering the on the command line produces something that is far removed 
from ispf/pdf. manpage and website documentation for the really sucks. 
Think I need to create a default profile that activates ispf but have found 
no instructions on how to do it. Can not find the profile file on my 
system.


more help please.


I would infer from the responses to your original question that you probably got 
what the list has to offer on THE. It does not seem to be a very active project. 
If you can not find a mailing list or an IRC channel, you may well be stuck with 
figuring it out. I worked on SPF and wrote a monitoring tool for it back in the 
day. Kate (KDE) and TextPad (Winders) have most if not all the features I can 
remember as being things other editors do not generally have, e.g., block 
editing and collapsing code blocks.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: text editor

2010-05-31 Thread Murray Taylor
Hmmm I have successfully run vi from a partition on 
a 32M flash card in 32M of RAM

The RAM also had memory disks for /var and /tmp.

The entire system was dynamically linked so a lot of 
space was saved by that build technique

The box was an embedded system running SNMP, gsmsmd and a few
oter thing as a real time network monitor for the Melbourne 2006
Commonwealth Games and the Asian Games a year or so later in Doha, Qatar


the box (still) runs on FreeBSD 4  and was built this way
  https://neon1.net/misc/minibsd.html 

the author did also make similar builds available for FreeBSD 5 and 6


NOTE all these have been replaced by nanobsd, but the techniques are
still useful, especially if you are pushed for space.


Murray Taylor
Bytecraft Systems
Special Projects Engineer

P: +61 3 8710 0600
D: +61 3 9238 4275
F: +61 3 9238 4140

--
 |_|0|_|Absence of evidence
 |_|_|0|is not evidence of absence
 |0|0|0|Carl Sagan

-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Giorgos
Keramidas
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 3:48 AM
To: Robert Bonomi
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: text editor

On Mon, 31 May 2010 11:36:53 -0500 (CDT), Robert Bonomi
bon...@mail.r-bonomi.com wrote:
Giorgos Keramidas keram...@ceid.upatras.gr wrote:
 Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

   keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
   -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 =CE=91=CF=80=CF=81 17:11
vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

 Yeah, but EMACS is (currently) reputed to stand for Eighty
 Megabytes And Constantly Swapping!  *GRIN*

That's an old joke, but it's not particularly good anymore.

The smallest laptop-size 2.5 SATA disk I have at home can hold
more than 80 GB of data.  The size of a program is now a limiting
factor only if you are working with embedded applications.

Normal, every-day computers have enough disk space to hold tens
of thousands of full Emacs installations even without any sort of
compression :-)
---
The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive
use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action
in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please inform the sender and/or
addressee immediately and delete the material. 

E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and
may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this
e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are
given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage
caused by such matters.
---

### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ###
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread perryh
Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
 Been using ee and been happy.
 Now I have need for an editor with block commands.
...
 Is there any editors with a function like this?

Either vi or emacs can do this general sort of thing.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Polytropon
On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:36:31 +0800, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
 Been using ee and been happy.
 
 Now I have need for an editor with block commands.
 Put dd on the first line of sequence number you want to start deleting and dd 
 on the
 last line of the block and hit enter and the block of lines are deleted.
 OR
 Put cc on first line and cc on last line of black to copy and enter I on 
 line where
 you want the copied block to be inserted after.
 Also same for mm meaning move block.
 
 Is there any editors with a function like this?

Hmmm... block commands are a big strength of joe (Joe's own
editor). Start block with ^KB, end block with ^KK. Blocks
can be copied with ^KC, moved with ^KM and deleted with
^KY. ^KH and man joe for more details.

Another solution is mcedit, the editor that comes with the
Midnight Commander. Press PF3 on block start, move to block
end, press PF3, the block will be selected. Press PF8 to
delete it.

And a third suggestion: the (The Hessling Editor), a very
powerful editor, allthough a bit strange to learn. If
you already have an ISPF/PDF background, this editor will
be for you.



-- 
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Fbsd1

Polytropon wrote:

On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:36:31 +0800, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:

Been using ee and been happy.

Now I have need for an editor with block commands.
Put dd on the first line of sequence number you want to start deleting and dd 
on the
last line of the block and hit enter and the block of lines are deleted.
OR
Put cc on first line and cc on last line of black to copy and enter I on line 
where
you want the copied block to be inserted after.
Also same for mm meaning move block.

Is there any editors with a function like this?


Hmmm... block commands are a big strength of joe (Joe's own
editor). Start block with ^KB, end block with ^KK. Blocks
can be copied with ^KC, moved with ^KM and deleted with
^KY. ^KH and man joe for more details.

Another solution is mcedit, the editor that comes with the
Midnight Commander. Press PF3 on block start, move to block
end, press PF3, the block will be selected. Press PF8 to
delete it.

And a third suggestion: the (The Hessling Editor), a very
powerful editor, allthough a bit strange to learn. If
you already have an ISPF/PDF background, this editor will
be for you.




I installed pkg_add -r the
entering the on the command line produces something that is far 
removed from ispf/pdf. manpage and website documentation for the 
really sucks. Think I need to create a default profile that activates 
ispf but have found no instructions on how to do it. Can not find the 
profile on my system.


more help please.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 30 May 2010 11:36:31 +0800, Fbsd1 fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
 Been using ee and been happy.

 Now I have need for an editor with block commands.

 Put dd on the first line of sequence number you want to start deleting
 and dd on the last line of the block and hit enter and the block of
 lines are deleted.

 OR

 Put cc on first line and cc on last line of black to copy and enter
 I on line where you want the copied block to be inserted after.

 Also same for mm meaning move block.

 Is there any editors with a function like this?

If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and
GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks.

editors/vim-lite has visual block-editing and rectangle-editing modes.
It includes support for multiple open buffers, split windows, and many
more nice features.

editors/emacs has support for many selection modes, including support
for block-editing, rectangle-editing, a virtually unlimited number of
'cut buffers' (they are called 'registers' in Emacs terminology), and
a literally mind-bending number of extra features.

I use both editors on a regular basis.  Most of the ASCII art I've
posted in this mailing list and other open source mailing lists has
been created using Vim or Emacs.

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Lars Eighner

On Sun, 30 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:


Been using ee and been happy.

Now I have need for an editor with block commands.


I recommend joe which is one binary with several flavors including
pico, emacs, and wordstar work-alikes as well as its own interface.
The macro language is easy and powerful.

--
Lars Eighner
http://www.larseighner.com/index.html
8800 N IH35 APT 1191 AUSTIN TX 78753-5266

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Chad Perrin
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:31:59PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 
 If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and
 GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks.

I'm not sure why you mentioned the size of Vim here as if it's a
remarkably large piece of software.  It *barely* doesn't fit on a 3.5
floppy when you use a full install of the console-based Vim editor.  I'm
pretty sure it's under 2 MB.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]


pgpaG7UliNUHC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On Sun, 30 May 2010 17:28:27 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 09:31:59PM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 If you don't mind the size of the respective packages, both VIM and
 GNU Emacs have support for many features that ee(1) lacks.

 I'm not sure why you mentioned the size of Vim here as if it's a
 remarkably large piece of software.  It *barely* doesn't fit on a 3.5
 floppy when you use a full install of the console-based Vim editor.
 I'm pretty sure it's under 2 MB.

Vim is much smaller than Emacs but it still a few MB's here:

  keram...@kobe:/usr/ports/packages/All$ ls -ld vim*
  -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  - 5757731  1 Απρ 17:11 vim-lite-7.2.344.tbz

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


RE: text editor

2010-05-30 Thread Murray Taylor
 yep ... its called vi


place cursor at the line at hte top (or bottom) of the block

press   ma

(put marker a on the line)


move your cursor to the line at the other end (bottom ot top)
of the block

press d'a

this will delete between the marked line and the cursor

to move the block delete it as above, then put the cursor where you
want it
to go and press  p

(pastes the last deleted whatever in the new place)

to copy a block ... 

ma
(move cursor)
y'a
(move cursor)
p

y is the yank into the default storage buffer instead of deleting into
the buffer


and you can use named buffers also ...   a through z

ad'adeletes test from marker a to current into buffer a

appastes from buffer a

dd  delete current line into default buffer

bdd   delete current line into buffer b  



etc etc


 
Murray Taylor
Bytecraft Systems
Special Projects Engineer

P: +61 3 8710 0600
D: +61 3 9238 4275
F: +61 3 9238 4140

--
 |_|0|_|Absence of evidence
 |_|_|0|is not evidence of absence
 |0|0|0|Carl Sagan

-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Fbsd1
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2010 1:37 PM
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: text editor

Been using ee and been happy.

Now I have need for an editor with block commands.
Put dd on the first line of sequence number you want to start deleting
and dd on the
last line of the block and hit enter and the block of lines are deleted.
OR
Put cc on first line and cc on last line of black to copy and enter I
on line where
you want the copied block to be inserted after.
Also same for mm meaning move block.

Is there any editors with a function like this?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
---
The information transmitted in this e-mail is for the exclusive
use of the intended addressee and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any review, re-transmission,
dissemination or other use of it, or the taking of any action
in reliance upon this information by persons and/or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
received this in error, please inform the sender and/or
addressee immediately and delete the material. 

E-mails may not be secure, may contain computer viruses and
may be corrupted in transmission. Please carefully check this
e-mail (and any attachment) accordingly. No warranties are
given and no liability is accepted for any loss or damage
caused by such matters.
---

### This e-mail message has been scanned for Viruses by Bytecraft ###
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org