RE: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-13 Thread Bob McConnell
On Behalf Of RW

 I don't normally do this as Watson is usually less impressed when
 Holmes reveals his working, but the clues were there. He wrote: 
 
install software with ports (i.e, the 
/usr/ports collection.)
 
 and 
 
FTP to grab source files from mirrors
 
 If you combine that with crediting the poster with enough common sense
 to mention he was using a version before 6.2, then it seemed unlikely
 to be a problem with active FTP. 
 
 BTW neither of us actually answered the question. I know I forgot as I
 was in a hurry. I'm pretty sure you didn't either, but I don't have
the
 time to read all of your reply in detail.
 
 The answer is: enable outgoing tcp connections to port 21 and to all
 ports above 1023.

Is there a way to set up any firewall so that while there is an active
outgoing connection on port 21, allow any incoming connections from the
same IP address?

Bob McConnell
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
 I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration. One 
 problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e, the / 
 usr/ports collection.) I have to disable PF to do so. Obviously not a  
 great solution.

 Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files from 
 mirrors? I'm trying to figure out the smallest number of ports (the 
 TCP/IP kind) that I need to open in my firewall. I don't want to enable 
 incoming FTP requests, but do want to allow outgoing ftp requests, I 
 believe.

 Am I on the right track, here?

See the fetch(1) man page.  Try this first:

sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true

Chances are this will address the problem for you.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread RW
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
  I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration.
  One problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e,
  the / usr/ports collection.) I have to disable PF to do so.
  Obviously not a great solution.
 
  Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files
  from mirrors? I'm trying to figure out the smallest number of ports
  (the TCP/IP kind) that I need to open in my firewall. I don't want
  to enable incoming FTP requests, but do want to allow outgoing ftp
  requests, I believe.
 
  Am I on the right track, here?
 
 See the fetch(1) man page.  Try this first:
 
 sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
 csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true
 


passive ftp has been the default for long time, fetch is called
with the -p option.

If you have access to an http-proxy that supports ftp requests over
http, fetch can use that. Alternately you can probably avoid ftp
altogether by setting:
 

MASTER_SORT_REGEX?=   ^http:

in make.conf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
 On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
 Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:45:04PM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
   I just set up a new server with a very restricted PF configuration.
   One problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e,
   the / usr/ports collection.) I have to disable PF to do so.
   Obviously not a great solution.
  
   Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files
   from mirrors? I'm trying to figure out the smallest number of ports
   (the TCP/IP kind) that I need to open in my firewall. I don't want
   to enable incoming FTP requests, but do want to allow outgoing ftp
   requests, I believe.
  
   Am I on the right track, here?
  
  See the fetch(1) man page.  Try this first:
  
  sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
  csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true
 
 passive ftp has been the default for long time, fetch is called
 with the -p option.

Let's give the users some actual detail, not terse one-liners which will
induce more questions/confusion.

First off, libfetch (which is what fetch(1)) uses) itself DOES NOT
default to using FTP passive mode.  You have to either pass the -p
option to the fetch(1) binary, or you have to set the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE
environment variable (which affects anything using libfetch).

Secondly, the ports framework (not pkg_* tools!), specifically
ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, defines FETCH_ARGS with the -p argument to force
passive mode.  This will be used for things like make fetch.  It *will
not* be used for things like pkg_add -r or pkg_add ftp://...;

The addition of the -p argument to FETCH_ARGS in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk
was applied to HEAD on 2006/09/20.  HEAD at that time is what became
FreeBSD 6.2.  Of course, anyone updating their ports tree after that
date would also get the change; I'm just pointing it out so people know
what the actual date was when -p was added to the default argument list.

Now let's expand a bit on FTP_PASSIVE_MODE, because I'm absolutely sure
someone will try to argue that's also been turned on by default for a
long time; I know how people are...  :-)

FTP_PASSIVE_MODE being set by default on login shells was induced by an
addition to login.conf(5) back in late 2001 (around the time of
RELENG_6).  See revision 1.45 (not 1.44!) of src/etc/login.conf in
cvsweb.

But I'll remind people that login.conf only applies to login shells;
logging in on the console, or logging in to an account via ssh
[EMAIL PROTECTED].  Most people I know of *do not* SSH into their servers as
root; they SSH in as themselves and use sudo.  Some use su2, and some
use su.

Let's examine the behaviours:

$ env | grep FTP
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES

As you can see here, the machine I've SSH'd into as myself does apply
login.conf's defaults.  But...

$ sudo -s
# env | grep FTP
# exit
$ sudo -i
# env | grep FTP
#

The above scenario (as root) fails, since the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE
environment variable isn't being handed down from the login shell (my
user account) to the root shell spawned by sudo[1].

su, on the other hand, does it a little differently:

$ su
Password:
# env | grep FTP
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=YES

And likewise, su -l behaves the same way.

The OP did not disclose how he was installing ports.  A lot of users
think that packages == ports, so for all we know, he could be
pkg_add'ing things while using sudo and running into this.

If make fetch in an actual port is timing out, then he's either doing
it on a machine with a ports tree prior to 2006/09/20 (see above), or
his outbound pf rules are so strict that the machine is absurdly
limited.

I've advocated in another thread my displeasure for filtering outbound
traffic *solely* because of this exact scenario.  Network admins seem
to think that oh, HTTP is always going to use port 80, and likewise,
oh, FTP is always going to use ports 20-21.  Bzzzt.  Nothing stops
a MASTER_SITE from being http://lelele.com:9382/.

[1]: The problem with sudo can be addressed; FTP_PASSIVE_MODE needs to
be added to the env_keep list in the default sudoers file.  I know the
port maintainer, so I'll take this up with him so that users (including
myself) don't keep getting bit by forgetting to set FTP_PASSIVE_MODE
after doing a sudo.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread Wojciech Puchar
problem: I can no longer install software with ports (i.e, the /usr/ports 
collection.) I have to disable PF to do so. Obviously not a great solution.


Am I correct in guessing that ports uses FTP to grab source files from


FTP or HTTP.

if you have http proxy like squid in your network do

export http_proxy=http://yourproxy:port
export ftp_proxy=http://yourproxy:port

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread RW
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:41:40 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 06:54:32PM +0100, RW wrote:
  On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:51:16 -0700
  Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  passive ftp has been the default for long time, fetch is called
  with the -p option.
 
 Let's give the users some actual detail, not terse one-liners which
 will induce more questions/confusion.


 Snip some facts used as a blunt instrument  

 The OP did not disclose how he was installing ports.  A lot of users
 think that packages == ports, 

I don't normally do this as Watson is usually less impressed when
Holmes reveals his working, but the clues were there. He wrote: 

   install software with ports (i.e, the 
   /usr/ports collection.)

and 

   FTP to grab source files from mirrors

If you combine that with crediting the poster with enough common sense
to mention he was using a version before 6.2, then it seemed unlikely
to be a problem with active FTP. 

BTW neither of us actually answered the question. I know I forgot as I
was in a hurry. I'm pretty sure you didn't either, but I don't have the
time to read all of your reply in detail.

The answer is: enable outgoing tcp connections to port 21 and to all
ports above 1023.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Firewall and FreeBSD ports

2008-10-10 Thread John Almberg


sh/bash: export FTP_PASSIVE_MODE=true
csh: setenv FTP_PASSIVE_MODE true


First off, this did solve the problem. Thank you, Jeremy.

Now, as to the why...


That's odd, because if you are running  7.x with a default settings,
FTP_PASSIVE_MODE should be irrelevant to fetching distfiles - even if
it's set to no.

Do you have any FETCH_* variables defined?


No


What happens if you cd to a
port directory and type: make -V FETCH_CMD ?


[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~] cd /usr/ports/shells/zsh
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:zsh] make -V FETCH_CMD
/usr/bin/fetch -ApRr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:zsh]


I then wanted to install NTP:

cd /usr/ports/net/ntp
make config; make install clean

This failed because the mirrors were not accessible.


I just tried this port myself and it failed on all four servers
configured in the Makefile, only succeeding on the fallback Freebsd
server, (Freebsd's own cache for package building).

Unless you turn-up something odd for FETCH_CMD, I think there's
a good chance that you never had an FTP firewall problem in the first
place, and that the file has simply been added to ftp.freebsd.org  
since

you got the original failure.


I just removed the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE variable from .bash_profile,  
logged out, and logged back in. I then tried to install another port  
and it installed without problem.


-- John

___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]