RE: Help to start BIND on boot

2004-06-02 Thread Nuno César Pires
r Pires Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Help to start BIND on boot The problem is that this behaviour occurs also in a fresh installation (4.9/8.3.6) in a different box (following the same installation checklist). At this moment I'm considering to install and setup BIND 8.3.7 in the

RE: Help to start BIND on boot

2004-05-25 Thread Nuno César Pires
hanks Matthew, I will give you the feedback of this. Nuno -Original Message- From: Matthew Seaman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: segunda-feira, 24 de Maio de 2004 14:09 To: Nuno César Pires Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Help to start BIND on boot On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 1

Re: Help to start BIND on boot

2004-05-24 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:29:55PM +0100, Nuno César Pires wrote: > My question is: what solve the problem, the new FreeBSD 5.2.1 or the BIND > 8.3.7? Good question. It's unlikely to be the simple replacement of one OS version or one BIND version for another -- we would know about it if there wa

RE: Help to start BIND on boot

2004-05-24 Thread Nuno César Pires
other and defined to start BIND on boot. The result was that the boot process was ok (it took the normal time) and the output of "ndc status" was: "The server is up and running" ;- instead of the boring message "server is initializing itself". My question is: what

Re: Help to start BIND on boot

2004-05-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Fri, May 21, 2004 at 12:07:25PM +0100, Nuno César Pires wrote: > I'm setting up a BIND/DNS server (recursive) and I'm facing a problem when I > try to start the "named" automatically on boot (named_enable="YES" in > rc.conf): > > First I noticed that the boot process takes a very long time in

Help to start BIND on boot

2004-05-21 Thread Nuno César Pires
Hello list, I'm setting up a BIND/DNS server (recursive) and I'm facing a problem when I try to start the "named" automatically on boot (named_enable="YES" in rc.conf): First I noticed that the boot process takes a very long time in the "Starting Standard Daemons" phase. After boot I have loo

RE: Start BIND on boot

2004-05-19 Thread Nuno César Pires
uggestions to debug and solve this problem? Thanks Nuno -Original Message- From: Charles Swiger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: terça-feira, 11 de Maio de 2004 20:32 To: Nuno César Pires Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Start BIND on boot On May 11, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Nuno C

Re: Start BIND on boot

2004-05-11 Thread Charles Swiger
On May 11, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Nuno César Pires wrote: [ ... ] The result is that the boot process takes a very long time in the "Starting Standard Daemons" [ph]ase. After boot the result of "ndc status" is: (server is initialising itself) and then nothing happen. Starting de named manually works

Start BIND on boot

2004-05-11 Thread Nuno César Pires
Hello list, I'm setting up a BIND/DNS server (recursive) and I'm facing a problem when I try to start the "named" automatically on boot (named_enable="YES" in rc.conf): The result is that the boot process takes a very long time in the "Starting Standard Daemons" fase. After boot the result of

Start BIND on boot

2004-05-10 Thread Nuno César Pires
Hello list, I'm setting up a BIND/DNS server (recursive) and I'm facing a problem when I try to start the named automatically on boot (named_enable="YES" in rc.conf): The result is that the boot process takes a very long time in the "Starting Standard Daemons" fase. After boot the result of nd