On Monday 07 August 2006 02:57, Jonathan Horne wrote:
i just decided to take a box, and installworld, without going to single
user mode. from what i can see, the update was completely successful. of
course, other then myself (su'd to root), there were no other users logged
in).
i wonder
--- RW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 August 2006 02:57, Jonathan Horne
wrote:
i just decided to take a box, and installworld,
without going to single
user mode. from what i can see, the update was
completely successful. of
course, other then myself (su'd to root), there
i just decided to take a box, and installworld, without going to single user
mode. from what i can see, the update was completely successful. of course,
other then myself (su'd to root), there were no other users logged in).
i wonder how many people are brave enough, and do actually
On 8/7/06, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i wonder how many people are brave enough, and do actually installworld
without changing to single user mode? i wonder what is truly at risk from
not going to single mode?
I've done this plenty of times, and the only time I find I have
On Sunday 06 August 2006 21:57, Jonathan Horne wrote:
i just decided to take a box, and installworld, without going to single
user mode. from what i can see, the update was completely successful. of
course, other then myself (su'd to root), there were no other users logged
in).
i wonder
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006, Jonathan Horne wrote:
i just decided to take a box, and installworld, without going to single user
mode. from what i can see, the update was completely successful. of course,
other then myself (su'd to root), there were no other users logged in).
i wonder how many people
